Search News


Browse Archives

News

Another Scholar Turned Back at JFK

June 21, 2006

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

John Milios, associate professor of political economy and the history of economic thought at the National Technical University of Athens, was expecting to explain some of his ideas about class and politics when he flew to the “How Class Works” conference at the State University of New York at Stony Brook this month.

He just wasn’t expecting to do it in detainment at the airport.

According to e-mails Milios sent to colleagues, he was held and questioned for hours upon his arrival at John F. Kennedy International Airport in New York City on June 8.

Milios was ultimately sent back to Greece by federal authorities, because of, he wrote, alleged “visa irregularities.” Milios added that he “had travelled to the United States on exactly this visa several times in the past and had just checked with the U.S. Embassy in Athens before coming to confirm that the visa was valid even though it was in the final six months of its 10-year duration.”

Milios wrote that the questioning “focused on my political beliefs and affiliations, which I find totally repellent, an extravagant theatre of the absurd, and a clear clue of the extremist right-wing policy of the present-day U.S. administration." His story, which has not hit the mainstream media in the United States, was front page news in Greece.

Milios is a member of the the Coalition of the Radical Left (SYRIZA), a Greek opposition party. In one of his e-mails, Milios wrote that SYRIZA, as well as the Greek Socialist and Communist Parties drafted resolutions “condemning the United States for this action.”

Michael Zweig, professor of economics at Stony Brook and organizer of the conference, said in a statement that he was “embarrassed” at the “unacceptable political intrusion into the flow of ideas and intellectual work across borders.”

Milios was expected to present as part of a panel titled: “Class and the Distribution of Income in the United States.”

The U.S. Customs and Border Protection did not have an immediate response to questions about Milios.

After 9/11, many academics were dismayed at what they called overly strict visa procedures that sent the number of foreign students into a downward spiral.

Even as visa restrictions have improved, according to both colleges and the State Department, potentially embarrassing instances like Milios’ ordeal crop up from time to time.

In 2004, Tariq Ramadan, who is Swiss and is considered one of the world’s leading scholars on Islam, had his visa revoked, preventing him from assuming a position as a visiting professor at the University of Notre Dame.

Last year, the American Association of University Professors joined in a lawsuit against the federal government with the American Civil Liberties Union and the PEN American Center, in the hopes of obtaining documents about why certain scholars have been turned away. One of the examples cited in the lawsuit involved a group of Cuban scholars who were turned away from attending a conference in the U.S.

In one of the most high profile visa faux pas, Goverdhan Mehta, an Indian chemist and president of the International Council for Science, a coalition of national and international unions of scientists, said he was grilled about his research and accused of hiding information, according to news reports.

Like Milios, Mehta was not a rookie traveler. He had worked as a visiting professor at the University of Florida, the institution to which he was traveling for a conference when he was stopped. Mehta had decided not to come by the time U.S. officials offered him a visa.

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Another Scholar Turned Back at JFK

  • Posted by Michael McCanles on June 21, 2006 at 1:45pm EDT
  • In the old days when I still believed in the viability of the scholarly profession in America as above political manipulation and fellow scholars (including feminists) as above exploiting their positions and scholarly talents in the service of power brokerage, I would have been outraged by this act as well.

    Times have changed, the academy has changed, and I have changed. That the AAUP is up in arms is at present merely knee-jerk reaction--nothing surprising there. As for the professor himself, his political history likewise renders his condemnation of the Bush administration in this matter--love the egoism here: "I am nothing less than a major enemy of 'right-wing' America and this is how America treats me"--merely a matter of political self-serving.

    That said, I will add that I would see more in this action if the scholar in question were a Muslim or someone in Islamic studies. Don't tell me about "academic freedom," etc. We no longer have the leisure to separate anti-American ideology from political ideology and both from anti-American terrorism when the people involved don't make the same separation. I'd like to see a report (other than that offered by the professor himself) regarding what Homeland Security people found to be threatening about him.

  • No confidence in the status quo
  • Posted by B.J. on June 21, 2006 at 4:00pm EDT
  • In separate statements, James Carville and E.J. Dionne recently have been said to have note a lack of public confidence in either major political party. That may be part of these kerkuffles.

    When, thanks to 9/11, average, native-born Americans dressed in business suits have to take off their shoes and belts for security checks at airline gates, the terrorists have won. The U.S. now has a security level approaching Israel's.

    So, don't be surprised if the average American could care less if avowed, overseas critics of the U.S. are questioned.

    When you have to take off your shoes and belts at the airport gate, you could give a rat's behind about overseas friends of Ward Churchill and Grover Furr. You're just hoping your pants don't fall down.

  • Posted by MTS at UConn on June 21, 2006 at 4:00pm EDT
  • This article sheds no real light on whether or not ‘scholars’ are being singled out for their writings and denied or allowed entry accordingly. It is merely a listing of three incidents in which one person was denied a visa, one was turned back and one was granted a visa. In fact, no evidence is presented that, despite this article’s title, more than one scholar had ever been turned back at JFK.

    Anyone who is familiar with entry to the US since 9/11 would know that visas are looked at very closely. I would be surprised if many waivers are granted for visa technicalities. Every person I deal with professionally who has been denied a visa, found to overstay, or been refused entry believes that they have been mistreated and singled out. Is Mr. Epstein arguing that scholars have been singled out or that they deserve special consideration?

    It would add quite a bit to Mr. Epstein’s article if he could do some research and compare the rate of turn back for scholars to the rate of turn back for other occupations. Have any controversial scholars been allowed into the US? If so, how could that be explained? What were the details of Mr. Milio’s turnback – the concept of an ‘alleged’ technicality is hard to understand – was it a technicality or a fabrication? Perhaps Mr. Milios was attempting to enter with a B-1 visa when a B-2 or M, O or P was required – attempting to work on a visitor visa is a bit more than a technicality.

    I’m neither doubting nor believing Mr. Epstein’s thesis. There is simply nothing here but a couple of cases. And that is too bad because many would be interested in a rigous look at this issue.

  • Re: No Confidence...
  • Posted by Grover Furr on June 22, 2006 at 2:05pm EDT
  • "B.J" wrote:

    "...you could give a rat’s behind about overseas friends of Ward Churchill and Grover Furr."

    My thanks to B.J. for spelling my name correctly!

    Ward Churchill's politics are closer to those of "B.J." than to mine.

    As for why "B.J." dislikes me -- I wish he'd tell me, so I could do it better!

    Hey, "B.J."! If you are not on the Left, you're unpatriotic, hate America, and love terrorism! I knew you'd want to know!

    Grover Furr