Quick Takes: Saint Louis U. President Stuck in Beirut, Questions on Auburn Athletes' Grades, NSF Spending Increase Advances, Harvard Reportedly Losing Gifts, Settlement on Washington State Salaries, Controversial Professor Leaves Leeds
The Rev. Lawrence Biondi, president of Saint Louis University, has been trapped in Beirut by the Israeli attacks on the city, The St. Louis Post-Dispatch reported. Father Biondi had to call off plans to give the commencement speech at Lebanon's Notre Dame University, when the ceremony was postponed due to the fighting. The Post-Dispatch reported that Father Biondi had been in contact with Saint Louis University officials and said he was safe and waiting out the violence.
The New York Times is reporting today that many football players at Auburn University earned top grades and kept their averages high through "directed reading" programs that apparently required little work or class attendance.
On Thursday, the Senate Committee on Appropriations approved the spending bill a subcommittee had crafted for science, and the Departments of State, Justice, and Commerce. The bill would provide the 8 percent increase to the National Science Foundation requested by President Bush as part of his American Competitiveness Initiative. While the National Institute of Standards and Technology's total budget would be down, the research budget would rise. Legislators marked some of the money for NSF's education programs, which was not part of the president's request.
The Wall Street Journal reported Thursday that four major gifts to Harvard University, worth a total of $390 million, have fallen through because of the departure of Lawrence H. Summers as president. Supporters of Summers have been saying for months now that Harvard would lose out because of his departure. However, it is unclear whether Harvard really had all of the money coming -- regardless of who is president. One of the "lost" gifts -- $115 million from Oracle CEO Larry Ellison -- appeared to be in doubt well before the departure of Summers became clear.
Washington State will pay about $30 million to settle a lawsuit by thousands of state employees -- about half of them at public colleges and universities -- over salary inequities, The Olympian reported.
Frank Ellis has retired early as a professor of Russian and Slavonic studies at the University of Leeds, in Britain, following a furor over his public statements that black people are less intelligent than white people. The university said that it agreed to pay his salary for an extra year, and some of his legal costs, in a settlement agreement. In March, Leeds announced that it was investigating whether comments by Ellis violated university rules with his statements. Some faculty members at Leeds are upset that Ellis was allowed to leave without facing the inquiry, The Yorkshire Post reported.
Comments on
Quick Takes: Saint Louis U. President Stuck in Beirut, Questions on Auburn Athletes' Grades, NSF Spending Increase Advances, Harvard Reportedly Losing Gifts, Settlement on Washington State Salaries, Controversial Professor Leaves Leeds
Liberal Hypocrisy
Posted
by Hugh Murray
, Independent Scholar
on July 14, 2006 at 2:50pm EDT
The defenders of Ward Churchill at Colorado alleged that he was under attack for political reasons, and that the professor should not lose his job. It was a matter of academic freedom, and all should defend Churchill, and thereby defend their own rights.
Frank Ellis in Britain, also made some controversial statements. The Left demanded he be fired and silenced. How many of the American liberals will urge the U. of Leeds to retain Ellis in the name of "adademic freedom"?
And what did Ellis say? Nothing new to anyone who has read THE BELL CURVE. Might it be true? The Left has been unable to refute THE BELL CURVE. Should a professor be silenced if he states what may well be true - even if it be politically incorrect? The Left relies on academic terror, protest, firings to guarantee that no Frank Ellises remain on campus. Even Harvard's Summers was fired after he made a reasonable suggestion about genetic differences between groups.
"Academic freedom"? Or "academic tyranny," enforced by the politically correct?
And the West lectures the rest of the world about "academic freedom? ---------Hugh Murray
Equal Work?
Posted
by Dr. F. Gump
on July 14, 2006 at 2:50pm EDT
The State or Washington settlement postpones potentially tantalizing legal discussions and decisions on a national scale:
Do custodians at universities do exactly the same work as do those at state hospitals? Are the stated job descriptions and list of skills the same?
Perhaps even more importantly: Is the number of applicants (supply and demand) the same for each class of job?
One could speculate that custodians at a state university may need more diplomatic skills to dust around a tenured professor's treasured collection of whats-its or perhaps a custodian in a state hospital may need to be much more intense and relentless about sanitizing critical patient care and treatment spaces.
Exactly equal pay for exactly equal work? Are governmental entities ever accurate in measuring such subtleties?
Unable to refute The Bell Curve?
Posted
by Thane Doss
at Yomiuri Culture Centers, Tokyo
on July 15, 2006 at 11:00am EDT
I must presume you've never looked for any refutation of _The Bell Curve_, as it's widely acknowledged to be a methodological nightmare. For a simple example, one can be certain that administering English-language IQ tests to African tribespeople whose primary language is not English will probably not result in high IQ scores for them.
At any rate, one good place to start might be with _Scientific American_'s review of the book (_Scientific American_ February 1995 Volume 272 Number 2 Pages 99-103). It's easy to digest, and you can find it easily on the web and go from there. As science, _The Bell Curve_ is simply not respected, and for good reason.
horrifying intellectual suppression at Leeds!
Posted
by just Mike
on July 16, 2006 at 8:40pm EDT
Just call me Mike, I can't afford to lose my job yet. I don't have an opinion about the possibility of racial differences in intelligence, but it's not a question that can be settled by decree, it's a question of science, albeit squishy science, if it can be addressed at all.
One thing is for sure, there are group differences in current intellectual performance. The reasons could be many, I don't claim to know what they are, but the differences are there. The unwillingness to face up to this, to bring it out in the open and discuss it, is one of the biggest dishonesties in public discourse today. It's one of the biggest corruptions in the academic and intellectual world today.