Search News


Browse Archives

News

Validation for Women's Colleges

July 14, 2006

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

Women’s colleges have some new material for their viewbooks, and it comes courtesy of Indiana University’s Center for Postsecondary Research.

A center report, the full version of which will be published in a forthcoming issue of the Journal of College Student Development, finds that students at women’s colleges report having more engaging and challenging academic experiences than do their female counterparts at traditional liberal arts colleges.

The study, "Women Students at Coeducational and Women's Colleges: How Do Their Experiences Compare?" looks at the frequency with which students said they took part in what the report calls "empirically derived good educational practices." Those include, but aren't limited to, working in peer groups, participating in class discussions and conversing outside of class with faculty members.

Data used in the study came from the annual National Survey of Student Engagement, which asks first-year students and seniors to evaluate their level of academic engagement. The center worked with a sample of 42,100 students at 290 four-year colleges. More than one-tenth of respondents were women’s college attendees. They represented 26 institutions -- although the report notes that many highly selective institutions didn't participate in the voluntary survey.

Researchers have long pointed to differences in the experiences of men and women in college, and sometimes refer to a "chilly climate" in academe for female students, particularly in math and science fields. Jillian L. Kinzie, associate director of the Center for Postsecondary Research, said the study shows that "there are certain things going on in women's colleges that seem to positively influence student participation."

Kinzie said far more students at women's colleges reported having regular interaction with faculty members than those at the other four-year institutions. The former group reported with greater frequency that their colleges helped them learn more about themselves, hone their quantitative analysis skills and develop a desire to help their communities.

More faculty mentors are available at women's colleges, and more student leadership positions seem to be available to students, according to the report.

“There’s an ethos created [at women's colleges] where women are taught, 'this is what you are supposed to do,' " Kinzie said. "You are supposed to speak up in class, supposed to do well in math, supposed to take advantage of educational opportunities.”

The study shows that students at both women's and other liberal arts colleges did not differ as far as their perceptions of the overall campus environment. Seniors at women's colleges perceived a lower level of interpersonal support than did their counterparts, although first-year students at women's colleges perceived greater support compared with their liberal arts peers.

Within women's colleges, white female students reported having significantly more interpersonal and academic support than did black students.

Contrary to the findings of Indiana University professor George D. Kuh that students who transfer into four-year colleges are less engaged than those who began at the institution, the center study found that students who transfer into women's colleges were "as engaged as those who started."

“The study validates what we have known for many years,” said Susan E. Lennon, executive director of the Women’s College Coalition. “If you believe that engagement is critical to a student’s success, this shows women’s colleges are a vital option.

“While women are a majority on campus today, it doesn’t mean they have equal experiences,” Lennon added. “College campuses remain a male-dominated culture. The import of this study is not only to validate women's colleges, but to help inform what happens in co-ed environments to keep women as engaged as possible.”

Kinzie said retention at women's colleges continues to be an issue. Financial pressures have led many women's colleges to admit men, and that has led to significant enrollment increases.

“I don’t think women’s colleges have told their story well enough," Kinzie said. "There's pretty limited research that shows what women gain."

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Validation for Women's Colleges

  • single-sex education
  • Posted by LM on July 14, 2006 at 8:45am EDT
  • And what about men's colleges for men? This is all a can of worms, but it may well be that for some a single-sex school (of whichever sex) is a good solution.
    A graduate from one of the Seven Sisters, the female Ivy League

  • Posted by Good news on July 14, 2006 at 9:05am EDT
  • This report drives a stake into the heart of the purported need to discriminate to achieve 'diversity'. Few institutions can be less diverse than those that exclude half of the population, but students seem to do well enough in this hemiculture.

  • Be wary of self-reported information
  • Posted by Mythbuster on July 14, 2006 at 9:35am EDT
  • Surveys such as NSSE can provide useful INDIRECT measures of learning but this kind of data can be easily influenced by environmental perceptions. As early as the recruitment stage these kinds of messages are hitting the students pretty hard. Small wonder they would report higher gains. I'm not dissing Women's Colleges but all sorts of folks (like the Spellings Commission) are touting NSSE as the be all and end all metric for higher education effectiveness. It's one and only one tool that should be used in combination with other direct measures.

  • Posted by fliBBity on July 14, 2006 at 10:15am EDT
  • I graduated from one of the Seven Sisters in the 90s. Even at an all women's college, the majority of my courses had men in them. Granted, I was studying Computer Science and Mathematics, but I wanted to point out that even in a single-sex institution, there can be members of the opposite sex that take the courses.

  • Reaping the Benefits
  • Posted by Joely Johnson , Media Relations Director at Russell Sage College, Troy NY on July 14, 2006 at 11:10am EDT
  • Women-only colleges began out of necessity -- (women were not permitted to attend college alongside men) -- and continue today because of the real benefits they deliver (see http://www.ed.gov/offices/OERI/PLLI/webreprt.html).

    This serendipity is something to value and spread the word about. I agree with Susan Lennon that examing the women-only college experience can and should inform, and, ideally, lead to improvements in the situations at co-ed schools. All students deserve support, frequent meaningful interactions, regular encouragement, and effective education. Let's look at what works in women-only education and spread that goodness around.

  • What is measured
  • Posted by Dr. F. Gump on July 14, 2006 at 1:15pm EDT
  • Mythbuster is right on target. Does a nice, warm-fuzzy feeling equate to a well-educated citizen? Is that the educational target?

    Should higher education provide a refuge from a nasty, competitive world to allow for leisurely reflection on the human condition?

    Much of the business world seems to prefer something akin to an arena that will train competitive gladiators for the shark-infested waters of the new world economy.

    Perhaps we need all types of higher educational institutions and the most intuitive, perceptive sttudents will choose what is best? (but best for the individual, for the community, or for the world?)

    If one chooses an institution that makes him or her the absolute best harpist in the world, is that measureable and is it good? How about the institution which makes one the best world business gladiator? Good/bad, on a scale of 1 - 9, scored pass/fail?

    Of course, the optimal wording in the above semi-farsical example, is will the chosen institution HELP one make of oneself, into the best: fill-in-the blank. Will said institution motivate and provide resources for the individual to optimize his or her original intellect, work ethic, perceptual skills and talents, critical thinking, long-range planning, concern for humanity, . . .

    Easier to measure the harpist's increase in talent pre and post college, I think.

  • Posted by Skeptical on July 15, 2006 at 11:00am EDT
  • The sample is very small and skewed, especially if, as stated, many highly selective institutions did not participate. Also questionable is whether responses from women's colleges were compared with responses from co-ed colleges of similar size.

  • Posted by Judith on July 16, 2006 at 3:30pm EDT
  • My daughter attended one of the single sex seven sisters and was told not to bother to major in math. She came home and went to community college, where she is majoring in math with great delight.

    If you get rid of the ones you don't like, you certainly skew the results!

  • For the Umpteenth Time
  • Posted by Melo H. on July 21, 2006 at 12:35pm EDT
  • My one qualm with same-sex education has always been that it just seems obsolete. The world isn't same-sex or homogenous, never has never will. Without sounding overly PC I think that college should be a time to discover a wonderful little word called "diversity". Women are going to have to get used to dealing with men and the "chilly climate", women are going to (as harsh as it sounds) have to simply overcome discrimination. I don't at all undermine the adversity that most women face, I believe that the glass ceilling is a very real and a very debilitating threat however since sexism and its "ism" brethren are still alive and walking among us, it is all the more reason for women to fight harder. They shouldn't need to run to a cozy little same-sex college. No offense.

  • Tres cool.
  • Posted by Cheese on August 1, 2006 at 9:30pm EDT
  • I go to a women's liberal arts college and think it rocks.

  • In reply to Melo H
  • Posted by Birgitta Sujdak Mackiewicz on August 27, 2006 at 6:00am EDT
  • "Women are going to have to get used to dealing with men and the “chilly climate", women are going to (as harsh as it sounds) have to simply overcome discrimination."

    Women are ALREADY quite used to dealing with men when they attend a women's college and they will have quite a bit of time to deal with them when they leave! Four years in a women's college, with numerous male professors and boyfriends, does not make them incapable of "dealing with" men.

    I've seen the differences in the women in co-ed institutions where I've attended and taught. I've watched women who one on one are confident, intelligent, well-spoken young women become silent shrinking violets in a classroom with men. (not all of them, but a majority)

    Why should women not take the opportunity to prepare for the "battle" they will have to fight for the rest of their lives with men? We send our soldiers to boot camp to equip them for battle and we don't let the "other side" into the camp just because they'll have to "deal with" them later so they might as well now.

    We do just the opposite, we train them in a setting that is tailored to them, that will prepare them to succeede, that allows them to focus before the really hard work begins.

    I would hope that one would want no less for their daughters, sisters, wives, mothers, and friends.