Search News


Browse Archives

News

Quick Takes: Madison Provost Warns Controversial Instructor, Gender Gap in Patents, Review Ordered of BU Lab Plans, Rejected Trustee Hopefuls Sue Governor, New Presidency for Former Baylor Chief, Do Jocks Earn More?

August 4, 2006

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement
  • Patrick Farrell, the provost of the University of Wisconsin at Madison, sent a letter last month to a controversial instructor, Kevin Barrett, criticizing him for continuing to publicize his views and telling him to keep the university's identity separate from his views. "If you continue to identify yourself with UW-Madison in your personal political messages or illustrate an inability to control your interest in publicity for your ideas, I would lose confidence that your assurances with regard to the course can be believed," Farrell wrote. The letter was released this week on a Madison Web page of documents about the controversy over Barrett, who argues that the United States government orchestrated the 9/11 attacks. When Barrett's views became public this summer, many politicians demanded that Madison fire him, but Farrell last month said that to do so would be inconsistent with academic freedom.  Barrett has said that he is just responding to press inquiries and not seeking attention, but opposition continues to grow. The Ozaukee County Board voted Wednesday to cut its support for the university's extension program by $8,427 -- the amount of Barrett's pay for a course on Islam this fall.
  • Women in the life sciences in higher education patent their work at a rate of 40 percent of their male colleagues, according to a study being published today in the journal Science. In a random sample of 4,227 life scientists over a 30-year period, the study found that 5.65 percent of the 903 women in the group (51 female patenters) produced only 92 patents. By contrast, 13 percent of the 3,324 male scientists in the sample (431 male patenters) amassed a total of 1,286 patents -- nearly 14 times as many as their female colleagues.
  • A state judge has ordered a review of a controversial bioterrorism research laboratory planned by Boston University. While the university has said that plans feature all necessary safety provisions, the judge found that the state hadn't conducted an adequate review, The Boston Globe reported.
  • Three nominees to the Murray State University Board of Trustees sued Gov. Ernie Fletcher, saying that he broke Kentucky law by not appointing one of them, since their names were put forward by a state nominating committee, The Louisville Courier-Journal reported. The governor, who has had a continuing dispute with the Murray State board, declined to comment.
  • Robert B. Sloan Jr., whose tenure at Baylor University divided the campus, has emerged as the sole candidate to become president of Houston Baptist University, The Houston Chronicle reported.
  • Do college athletes earn more in their careers than non-athletes? New research published in the Journal of Human Resources provides evidence either way. Experience as a college athlete appears to increase earnings, on average, for those in business, the military or manual labor. But there is a negative impact on those who teach in high schools.
See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Comments on Quick Takes: Madison Provost Warns Controversial Instructor, Gender Gap in Patents, Review Ordered of BU Lab Plans, Rejected Trustee Hopefuls Sue Governor, New Presidency for Former Baylor Chief, Do Jocks Earn More?

  • KEvin Barrett's warning
  • Posted by nonplussed on August 4, 2006 at 9:40am EDT
  • Ironically, the Univ. of Wisconsin may find this article violates Mr. Barrett's warning about publicity of his case.

  • How? Some inconvenient facts
  • Posted by A.D. on August 4, 2006 at 11:10am EDT
  • "Ironically, the Univ. of Wisconsin may find this article violates Mr. Barrett’s warning .."

    A reading of the provost's letter clearly states Mr. Barrett was NOT to identify himself publicly as appointed UW faculty.

    He is obviously not making himself clearly understood to the news media that he is NOT an appointed member of the UW faculty.

    Given his failure to make himself clear -- along with his obvious inability to comprehensively research issues involving civil engineering, U.S. air traffic control, security along the Pentagon traffic corridor, etc. -- brings into serious question the UW provost's decision to allow him to teach.

    Unfortuantely, sometimes a stubborn mule is just a stubborn mule, academic freedom notwithstanding.

  • Not Appointed?
  • Posted by P.D. Lesko , Executive Editor at Adjunct Advocate maganzine on August 4, 2006 at 1:40pm EDT
  • Well, well, we have finally come face-to-face with one of the most inconvenient truths related to the hiring of temporary faculty.

    For the Provost to demand that a lecturer stop telling people the lecturer teaches at an institution that has hired him to teach a course is so silly I don't even know where to start.

    Kevin Barrett (and about 1,000 other temporary faculty) teach in the UW-system. The Provost is obviously a bit confused as to what these faculty, who are appointed (hired) by UW each semester, do.

    Kevin Barrett may be the uncle whom the family finds horridly undiplomatic, and whom they WISH were not a relation. Just like that uncle, Kevin Barrett is a faculty member at UW and the Provost is, basically, asking Barrett to stop pointing that fact out to strangers who publish newspapers, magazine and websites.

    P.D. Lesko
    Executive Editor
    Adjunct Advocate magazine

  • Appointed by whom?
  • Posted by A.D. on August 4, 2006 at 3:00pm EDT
  • " .. For the Provost to demand that a lecturer .."

    Full-time Lecturer, appointed by the provost?

    Or Adjunct Assistant Professor, temporarily hired by contract under the close supervision of the department head?

    Which one?

    Academic freedom is about authentic expertise shared in classrooms.

    Mr. Barrett is not a civil engineering expert focused on high-rise buildings first-ever attacked by passenger jets, not an expert on air traffic control, not an expert on Pentagon-area building security, etc.

    Allowing the news media to think him a UW expert, then BS on topics that he is not an expert in, shows what an intellectual yahoo he is.

  • Employers have the right . . .
  • Posted by David French on August 4, 2006 at 3:25pm EDT
  • To ask that their employees not use the employer's credibility and good name when advancing their personical views. Of course, Barrett can truthfully answer questions about how he earns his living, but he doesn't have a right to proactively use his status as an adjunct at UW to enhance the credibility of his argument.

  • some facts please
  • Posted by curious on August 5, 2006 at 12:00pm EDT
  • Where was the lecturer born? Where did he go to school? What degrees does he have? What are some of his arguments? Where else has he taught? What other work has he done? How many other people around the nation and around the world share his views? I have heard about the contractual controversies but would like to understand more about how these kinds of theories and views get started and percolate.