Search News


Browse Archives

News

The Earliest Early Admissions

August 8, 2006

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

Ken Fox, a college and career counselor at Ladue Horton Watkins High School, in St. Louis, says that more and more seniors come up to him each year just after summer break and proudly exclaim that they’ve gotten into college. “I try to share their enthusiasm,” says the long-time counselor, ”but, on the inside, I say ‘Boy, he or she really didn’t have the chance to consider all of their options.’ ”

According to new information gathered by the National Association for College Admission Counseling, institutions are increasingly admitting students before they ever take the first class of their senior year of high school. Some juniors, in effect, are making commitments to attend an institution just as they would in traditional early decision programs.

More than 100 directors of admission have reported that they “accept regular decision applications and provide notification of admission prior to September 1 of the high school senior year.” A range of institutions -- including several smaller liberal arts private and public colleges, state universities, and even a few more selective institutions -- have provided information to the association that confirms the practice.

The NACAC survey was sent to the directors of admissions of every four-year institution in September, and the survey was completed by a combination of admission officers and institutional researchers. Six hundred and sixty institutions responded to the questionnaire, a response rate of approximately 30 percent.

The apparent growth of early admissions is a development that has left many education and counseling experts alarmed, since there’s little evidence that earlier admission is beneficial for students, and many have already been concerned about early decision programs that don't take place until the fall of the senior year.

“I think this is educationally reprehensible,” said Lloyd Thacker, founder of the Education Conservancy, an organization focused on shifting the admissions process back toward more educational goals. “Where’s the incentive to do well in your senior year? Why not just lay back and snooze?”

Thacker also said that such admissions policies may be more beneficial to wealthier students, since financial aid packages are not available so early in the admissions season. Thus, cost wouldn’t be a factor for a student who chooses to make a binding decision that may come with incentives like early choice of housing.

“We’re killing kids in this college process,” said Phyllis Steinbrecher, a long-time educational consultant based in Westport, Conn. “I think parents and colleges have lost their heads.” She suggested that such early admissions are “just another gimmick to get to students before they’ve had the opportunity to review all of their options.”

Pete Caruso, chair of NACAC’s Admission Practices Committee and associate director of undergraduate admission at Boston College, says that the super early decisions can also be unfair to students whose high school counselors don’t or can’t work in the summer to provide a student with the materials he or she would need to apply as early as their peers.

Evan Montague, director of admissions at Alma College, in Michigan, said that about 50 students apply and are accepted to the private institution before September 1 each year. Students who pay an early deposit fee are given priority in room and parking assignments.

Montague said there isn’t anything nefarious about Alma’s admissions policy. The college requires students to submit transcripts at the end of their senior year, but Montague said that “we don’t necessarily go through and study them.”  

“The only time where we would offer a student admission before the start of their senior year is through our Early Admission Option,” said Michael Hall, associate director of admission at Carnegie Mellon University. “However, we get very few students who apply to this program and even fewer who we actually end up admitting.” The option, he said, is geared toward students who will have completed their entire high school curriculum by the end of their junior year and have no additional classes available to them at their high school. Hall said that for the fall 2006 class, Carnegie Mellon received 10 applications via the early option out of about 18,400 total applications. 

Heather Eckstein, interim co-director of admission at Pittsburg State University, in Kansas, noted that, by law, any student in the state who achieves a score of 21 or higher on his or her ACT test is automatically granted admission to one of the six public institutions in the state.

“It’s not necessarily a strategy,” said Eckstein. “It’s simply our way of having a leg up in welcoming students.” She said that while the law encourages students to stay in Kansas, she believes that the early admission may result in some senior year slacking off.

“Is this beneficial to the student?” asked Eckstein. “I don’t really know.”

Caruso doesn’t think the process is beneficial to students or counselors. His NACAC committee is in charge of revising the organization’s Statement of Principles of Good Practice. The committee is currently proposing that all college and university application deadlines be no earlier than October 15 each year, and that the earlierst notification date be no earlier than September 15.

“We simply want to keep the application process to senior year,” said Caruso, who has worked in admissions for 19 years. “We need to guard against deadline creep.”

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on The Earliest Early Admissions

  • Very early admission
  • Posted by Conor King , Institutional Strategist at Victoria University (Australia) on August 8, 2006 at 6:45am EDT
  • There are certainly questions about whether such options close off sensible choices by school students of future study.

    I cannot follow the concern that students might slack off in their last year of school. Surely the early entry is a way to allow students to pursue their studies reasonably without the pressure that can make the final year appear so decisive for a person's future. Good students will certainly continue to do their best but may take a more interesting range of school subjects geared to their education rather than their scores.
    It must also be true that acceptance of an offer does not remove the capacity to apply and accept an offer elsewhere - the knowledge of a sure place may thus provide the basis for a more secure, considered approach to making the final decision.

  • Perspective of a former "early admission" student
  • Posted by HG on August 8, 2006 at 10:30am EDT
  • The article doesn't make a distinction between two types of early admission students. There are those who graduate high school at the end of their junior year and go straight into college in the fall (skipping senior year -- the implication was that this is what the early admission program is at Carnegie Mellon) and those who are just given an acceptance and stay in high school for the senior year. Those are two very different things. For what it's worth, in the 1970s, in the fall of my junior year, depressed at the prospect of two more years of high school, I went through the conventional process of visiting colleges and applying to five of them. I got the results in April before making a decision. I just felt I had exhausted what high school had to offer, and was also interested in the arts and intellectual pursuits that had always left me feeling a little out of step with my peers. I was accepted at an Ivy League university, from which I graduated with honors, and never regretted my decision. However, I agree that the process of sifting through college admissions materials, visiting them, going to interviews and so forth was well worthwhile. I clearly remember that when I visited what I had initially thought was my first choice school, it was not what I had imagined, and I didn't even apply. Also, neither the colleges nor my high school made it easy for me to take this unconventional path, which made me realize I had to be really committed and articulate why I thought this was best for me. By the way, the article also didn't look into how the students actually view those super-early acceptances. Last fall, my own son was sent a "no application fee, no essay, 21-day decision" offer by Virginia Commonwealth University. He figured why not, but when he got in, he didn't value it, and in fact it made the school seem less desirable because it came too quickly and easily!

  • A way to control the process
  • Posted by Carolyn Lawrence on August 8, 2006 at 3:10pm EDT
  • The article assumes that students who are accepted to a college before or early in their senior year will stop there and look no farther. In my experience, this is not how most students react to a very early acceptance.

    Most see an early answer as a chance to gain a bit of control over an increasingly frustrating and unpredictable process. With one college safely in hand, they can then apply to other schools without worrying as much about rejection. They already have a place to go to college. They still have the rest of the year to research other options and until May 1 to make their final choice.

    I encourage all of the students I work with to apply early in senior year to at least one rolling admissions or one early action (non-single choice) school. An early non-binding acceptance provides a solid foundation for the rest of the admissions process.

    To me, the far greater risk to student choice is the Early Decision process which truly does cut off all other options by Christmas once one is admitted. Let's focus our attention on encouraging schools to stop that process, not non-binding early admissions programs.

  • Posted by Clayton Smith , Vice-Provost, Students & Registrar at University of Windsor on August 8, 2006 at 3:25pm EDT
  • The trend toward earlier offers of admission is becoming more common in Canada too. While many universities still wait for mid-year marks to come out before making offers of admission to Grade 12 students, there are an increasing number of students being offered admission on the basis of their Grade 11 marks. We expect to see this trend grow in the coming years.

  • Only benefits the colleges
  • Posted by Ira Socol at Michigan State University on August 8, 2006 at 5:10pm EDT
  • Early admissions is only a benefit to the universities - it has no value at all to good students who would be far better off if they let diverse colleges compete for their attendance. Any "advisor" who encourages a good student to do this, rather than to apply to range of interesting post-secondary possibilities, is simply acting as a shill for the higher education industry.

    Apply to many places. Get in to good places. See what they'll do for you. In other words, be a consumer, not a fool in pursuit of status.

  • A student-centered practice
  • Posted by Jane Shropshire at Shropshire Educational Consulting, LLC on August 8, 2006 at 6:15pm EDT
  • I don't agree with the opinion voiced that students admitted so early will simply slide through the senior year. Some may, but my own experience has been that the students most likely to complete applications early are those who are motivated. Applicants less interested in their studies and the college search are often like Scarlett O'Hara, saying they'll "think about it tomorrow."

    In a process that seems to wrest control away from students in so many ways, this is a wrinkle that actually encourages students to take control. Unlike Early Decision programs, the very early submission option described in this article simply moves the timetable forward and does not restrict a student's ability to consider and apply to other schools.

    In the interest of bringing the discussion to a more scientific plane, could any of the colleges offering early submission timetables publish comparative data (perhaps high school GPA at time of admission and high school GPA upon graduation) for the early submitters vs. regular timetable submitters, so we can truly know whether the program encourages senior slackers?

    If data emerge indicating that the practice does encourage students to kiss their senior year studies goodbye, I'll revise my thinking.

  • Earl Admissions Controversy
  • Posted by Lynn Byrne , Educational Consultant at Hill Country ECS on August 10, 2006 at 10:00am EDT
  • Whether a student is admitted in the summer following his/her junior year or three weeks after the fall semester of his/her senior year is irrelevant. Most colleges, especially those with very early admissions deadlines, admit students based on their junior year transcripts. Senior year transcripts become an issue only when a student has been admitted on a conditional basis or when the student applies towards the end of his/her fall senior year term.

    The senior year for many students is the best time to "slide"--if that's how you want to look at it. Many of the students I work with have few, if any, academic credits they must complete at this point and fill their senior year with electives, internships and work cooperative hours.

    I would rather encourage early applications and assist future seniors in finding senior year opportunities that expand the depth of their knowledge and experiences than have them wait until after the start of the senior year and run amok, frantically trying to keep pace both with college application activities and school/work activities.