Search News


Browse Archives

News

A Tangled Tale in Tbilisi

August 29, 2006

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

When the e-mails began flying last week, they laid out what seemed like a very provocative and sexy tale: An accrediting agency recognized by the U.S. Education Department had given its approval last year to a campus in the Republic of Georgia tied to an unaccredited Hawaiian university that had been run out of business by state regulators there.

As several educators and government officials who monitor the behavior of unaccredited institutions shared information among themselves and with reporters, they threw around loaded phrases like "diploma mill" to describe the now-defunct American University of Hawaii. They also suggested that the accreditor, the American Academy for Liberal Education, had failed in its mission of ensuring quality control by accrediting the Georgian institution.

Peeling back the layers, however, suggests that the situation is not nearly as clearcut as it initially may have seemed. First, despite questions raised by some of the critics about the legitimacy and quality of the American University for Humanities Tbilisi College Campus, it appears to be a real place. It is operating with the full authority of Georgian authorities, and the review by the American Academy for Liberal Education -- which included three site visits, including an independent assessment by two strongly credentialed faculty members at American universities -- found an imperfect institution, but a serious one.

"Our report hardly offered an A+," Stephen C. Zelnick, associate professor of English and former vice provost for undergraduate education at Temple University and one of the independent reviewers, said in an interview Monday. "There were a lot of failures in management and resources, but everything that was related to hardcore education -- preparation of the faculty, seriousness of what happens in the classroom, writing assignments and how they're treated, the curriculum itself -- all looked pretty good, once you made the correction for the limited resources in the post-Soviet world."

Some of the critics say that even if the Tbilisi institution is legitimate, Hawaii's prosecution of the American University of Hawaii and its owner, Hassan H. Safavi, who founded and partially owns the Tbilisi campus, should have raised enough red flags to deter the American Academy for Liberal Education from accrediting the Georgian institution.

"Given the interaction of Safavi with the State of Hawaii, [AALE] should have been extremely cautious about looking at its programs," said George D. Gollin, a professor of physics at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign who closely tracks unaccredited degree-granting institutions. "If issues are raised about the apparent integrity of a school's administration, an accreditor has an obligation to think about whether the administration will run that campus in the same fashion."

Officials at AALE bristle at the suggestions both that they accredited a seriously flawed institution -- "this would be pretty far down the line of a duping process, and a lot of good people would have to have been bamboozled," said Jeffrey Martineau, AALE's director of higher education, who visited the Tbilisi campus three times -- and that they failed to sufficiently take the legal situation involving the Hawaii institution and Safavi into account. They note that while a Hawaii court found Safavi to have violated state law by awarding degrees without accreditation and fined him $500,000, state officials never accused Safavi of running a diploma mill.

"We have monitored the situation all along," said Jeffrey D. Wallin, AALE's president. "It is important to us that when we saw what Safavi was being accused of, there was no hint that something shady was going on with regard to the quality of education. Had it been there, we might have made a different decision."

A Circuitous Path

Depending on who you ask, Hassan Safavi, who also goes by Henry, is either a convicted criminal or a patriot. Most agree that he is smart and somewhat arrogant, traits that emerge as you talk to him. A British-born Iranian, he describes himself as having been educated (through to a postdoc) at the University of Manchester and other universities in Britain and Geneva, of having played a hand in the early years of the Open University, and of making it a personal mission throughout more than 35 years as an educator of trying to provide "American-style liberal education in countries that had a grave need," like those in the former Soviet Union and Pakistan, said Safavi. "My hope is that if we had enough of these small colleges, perhaps they could fight off enough of those small madrassas that the enemy is using so well."

As he tells it, Safavi has followed a circuitous and at times mine-laden path in pursuit of his fond hope. He created what he calls a "consultancy" in Delaware years ago to provide curriculums and course materials for foreign institutions that sought to establish liberal arts programs. In 1994, he was asked, he says, to help found the American Universiti of Tbilisi in the newly independent Republic of Georgia, an institution he also owned in part when it opened in 1995. Around that time, he said, he worked as a consultant for the Southern California University for Professional Studies, a for-profit institution in California, and through that arrangement he inherited a share, in 1996, of the American University of Hawaii.

Between then and 2003, Safavi said, the university, which offered no classes itself, helped to establish liberal arts programs at institutions in numerous foreign countries -- 32 in all, he said -- "providing syllabi, making announced visitations to the campuses, providing quality control," in his words. (One of the partner campuses was the institution he partly owned in Tbilisi, which became known as American University of Hawaii, Tbilisi Campus.) The Hawaii institution was highly successful and popular with politicians in the state, Safavi said.

But in 2003, he said, several years after a change in Hawaii's law governing unaccredited institutions, state regulators prosecuted him, accusing him of misleading consumers by implying that the degrees his institution offered had the approval of accreditors and the state.

As the litigation unfolded, Safavi agreed to stop using the name American University of Hawaii, and he changed the name of the Delaware consulting operation he'd long had to American University for Humanities. Most of the programs that the Hawaii institution had operated in other countries had been shuttered by 2005, as Hawaii officials aggressively informed the foreign institutions about his legal troubles, but his newly renamed entity, American University for Humanities, took over the relationship with the institution in Tbilisi.

Throughout this period, Safavi sought accreditation for the Tbilisi campus from various entities, he said, including the Western Association of Schools and Colleges and the American Academy for Liberal Education. He first approached AALE in 1999, but was told that it would not consider accrediting the campus until it had been operating for 10 years.

In 2004, as the 10-year anniversary of the Tbilisi campus's founding neared, Safavi applied for AALE approval, and the accrediting agency, which is known as a maverick with an ideological (read: traditional) bent, began its process for "programmatic" accreditation of campuses, which includes a self-study, a mountain of paperwork and multiple visits. Unlike institutional accreditation, which allows an institution's students to qualify for financial aid from the United States government, programmatic accreditation does not offer the keys to that particular lucrative kingdom.

The visit in mid-May 2005 by Temple's Zelnick and Margaret Downes, a professor of literature and language at the University of North Carolina at Asheville, notes that the campus was a "campus of the American University of Hawaii," though the institution's name changed to American University for Humanities just as the accreditation process was unfolding.

The reviewers, who spent three days in the ramshackle office building in downtown Tbilisi that houses the institution, its 125 students and 30 mostly part-time faculty members, found a place that "has made remarkable progress in its ten years of existence in a troubled political and social setting," their report said. "The commitment to liberal education shines through in many ways, most particularly the variety of disciplines students are exposed to and a commitment to free discussion and inquiry." They said they were particularly impressed by the commitment and passion of the institution's poorly paid faculty, which is led by its rector, Alexander T. Rondeli, president of the Georgian Foundation for Strategic and International Studies.

It also found, however, that "there are essential AALE standards that the AUH-T seems not yet to have met satisfactorily," the review team continued. "The rigorous reasoning standards AALE recommends are uneven through the curriculum. Samples of student work we reviewed do not seem, in a few cases, to have received thorough attention from instructors.... The natural sciences and biological sciences, though represented adequately by general courses, lack a laboratory opportunity for students or even laboratory demonstration, because there is yet no facility to make that possible."

Wallin said that AALE officials monitored the situation in Hawaii throughout this time but determined that because the litigation was not final, he "did not think it would have been fair to the institution or to faculty or students" to delay a decision pending the final outcome.

In June 2005, based on the largely upbeat report of the reviewers and the fact that the Tbilisi campus has the appropriate authority from the Georgian government to operate, Wallin and Martineau said, the AALE's Board of Trustees approved the accreditation of American University for Humanities Tbilisi College Campus.

An E-Mail Chain

That decision went largely ignored until last week, when a series of e-mails involving the Hawaii official who had prosecuted Safavi, Jeffrey Brunton, circulated in the closeknit world of accrediting experts and those who track potentially fraudulent institutions.

They traded e-mails tracing the transformation of American University of Hawaii into American University for Humanities and speculated that AALE had failed to rigorously review the Tbilisi institution even though its relationship to the shuttered institution and Safavi should have raised enough red flags to warrant significantly greater scrutiny. Their casual use of the phrase "diploma mill" to describe American University of Hawaii -- even though even Brunton, the Hawaii official, acknowledges that state officials "do not allege it" because "we have no idea ... about the quality of education they're providing" -- has Safavi threatening legal action against any who have used the term to describe his current or former institutions.

Wallin provided a reporter with a copy of a letter he sent Safavi on June 14, after the publication of a "final judgment" from the Hawaii court, which he said "raises serious questions that need to be resolved at the earliest opportunity."

He asked Safavi to explain in writing his relationships with and among two American University institutions and the Tbilisi campus, and to say "why the Hawaii court's judgment should not reflect negatively on the overall integrity of the institutions and its management as well as the quality and integrity of the educational objectives of these and any other institutions of higher learning with which you are connected and that are either currently accredited by, or are under consideration for, AALE accreditation or membership." At least two other foreign institutions affiliated with American University for Humanities, in Lebanon and Singapore, are now seeking AALE approval, and Wallin said those institutions' applications are on hold for now.

The AALE president said he thought it unlikely that the Tbilisi campus's accreditation could be threatened, because "we are accrediting the college, not accrediting the person." He added: "If we’re going to take this place’s accreditation away, we have to find a link" -- a way in which Safavi's legal troubles in Hawaii is "making the Tbilisi campus less of a good campus. We'd have to look through everything again, and ask: Is there any failing, anything wrong that’s attributable in part to the ownership?"

Safavi, who wrote two replies to the AALE's June letter, said he was hopeful that the agency's officials, if they reconsidered the Tbilisi campus's accreditation, would put more stock in the judgment of the outside reviewers and others who've attested to the quality of the campus than in the legal action against him in Hawaii, which he calls ill-founded. He said he was confident that the accreditor would find no evidence that the quality of the education has been subpar or seriously deficient in Tbilisi.

Have any of your institutions granted degrees without requiring work or engaged in the other sorts of activities that critics suggest, he was asked? "Over my dead body," Safavi said. "I am an obsessive educator. If one slimy fish has gone through my net, I will hang myself."

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on A Tangled Tale in Tbilisi

  • Accreditation and Diversity
  • Posted by Glen McGhee at Florida Higher Education Accountability Project on August 29, 2006 at 9:20am EDT
  • Thanks to Doug for navigating the twists and turns of this labyrinthine tale. US accrediting bodies and their dark lords seem to have an inbreed phobia of diversity and have completely lost sight of the high ideals of liberal education. What the Republic of Georgia needs and what the acreditors want are worlds apart. Unfortunately, these accreditors do not have 'hearts of gold' like those recently portrayed in the college spoof film, "Accepted." So much the worse for them!
    Historically, accreditors have always have a strong bureaucratic resistance to diversity, whether it is the advent of junior colleges in the 1920s, or vo-tech schools, or, gasp, black colleges. And the record clearly shows they haven't yet succeeded with the latter. So, why do we expect them to be able to deal with higher education in the Republic of Georgia?

  • Posted by Dennis Ruhl on August 29, 2006 at 9:45am EDT
  • The AALE was on the ground in Tiblisi 3 times and studied the school at length and considered all the factors involved. They came to the conclusion that the school is legit. No-one else has done such a study or even examined the school at all but, as usual, they line up, in gross, to comment.

    There is a cottage industry of hobbyists in the education field who apply gut-feeling, innuendo, and occasionally misinformation in evaluating schools. Far be it for them to examine coursework, the success of graduates, or any meaningful evaluation of a school.

  • Diploma Mills and Investigations
  • Posted by Vicky Phillips , Founder at GetEducated.com - Diploma Mill Police on August 29, 2006 at 10:50am EDT
  • This is an unusually good article on accreditation in general and one particular institution's mission in particular. Would like to see more on this topic and college accreditation so faculty as well as students can better grasp what accreditation is and how to judge and sidestep the more than 200 online degree mills that operate out of the USA alone. -- Vicky Phillips, GetEducated.com - Diploma Mill Police

  • The Tale of Tbilisi
  • Posted by Alan Contreras at Oregon Degree Authorization on August 29, 2006 at 1:10pm EDT
  • As one of the people involved in the exchange of e-mails on this case last week, I feel obligated to out myself in order to encourage this discussion to continue along policy-improvement lines.

    It is important to remember that the validity of colleges and degrees in the U.S. is determined by states, in Canada by provinces and in most of the world by national governments. Accreditors do not have this role; indeed, some states such as Texas do not accept AALE accreditation. Outside the U.S., where they operate without oversight from the Department of Education, American accreditors are simply clubs that charge a fee.

    In my role as the person responsible for degree quality in Oregon, I enforce a state law that defines the validity of U.S. and foreign degrees. To be valid, a degree must not only have genuine content, it must be issued by an entity that has legal authority to do so. Oregon law, and the laws of every state I know of with the possible exception of Mississippi, does not recognize a right to issue degrees absent government approval.

    So what is the American University of Humanities? We asked the AACRAO international evaluation office whether it was listed as a Georgian university by the Georgian ministry of education, and they said no. We therefore wrote to the U.S. Department of Education and said, in more colorful words, what on earth does AALE think it is doing?

    It is clear that the Georgian institution is in significant part simply another branch of the American U. of Hawaii, though it may have a different balance of ownership interests. AALE quite reasonably says that it accredits schools, not individuals, but when I look at the school in Tbilisi, I see simply a rebranded American U of Hawaii. Furthermore, I see nothing in the Hawaii court opinion that says "Mr. Safavi may own *part* of a college, that's ok."

    Oregon law requires that foreign degrees, to be valid here, meet these standards:

    (a) The supplier is operating legally as a degree-granting institution in its host country.

    (b) The host country has a postsecondary approval system equivalent to U.S. accreditation in that it applies qualitative measures by a neutral external party recognized in that role by the government.

    (c) The supplier has been approved through the demonstrable application of appropriate standards by the host country's accreditor equivalent.

    (d) All degrees issued by the supplier are legally valid for use and professional licensure within the host country.

    These standards are becoming more common in the U.S. and are essentially the same as standards proposed in HR 6008, a bill before Congress that may be discussed in 2007.

    Although this case is a fine example of why those who lieth with dogs waketh with fleas (why on earth did AALE even *want* to accredit this thing?), it is also a useful lesson in the difficulty of international portability of educational norms and credentials. The fact that a college in a foreign country can issue degrees that achieve U.S. accreditation (albeit unsupervised by the Department of Education) while being illegal for use in some states argues for a national standard of the kind proposed in HR 6008.

  • Posted by Dennis Ruhl on August 29, 2006 at 2:20pm EDT
  • Why is a 100 student residential school in the Republic of Georgia under the microscope? Seems odd.

    I wonder if Alan has stopped exhibiting bias as determined by the judge in the Bob Jones U. case or has taken his remedial course in libel as ordered by the judge in the Kennedy-Western U. case?

    While regionally accredited schools are still graduating some illiterate students and there are dozens of degreemills functioning in the US why is there a particular problem with this school? Again, the only people to actually study the school think it's OK. But the critics obviously believe that they are much smarter, at a distance, than the fools at AALE are in person.

  • Posted by Jeffrey Wallin , President at AALE on August 29, 2006 at 4:50pm EDT
  • I had thought the article spoke for itself. But since Mr. Contreras has weighed in I expect that I, as president of AALE, the accrediting agency concerned, ought to as well. Of course, it is mainly for the sake of other readers that I respond, as I suspect Mr. Contreras’ bullet proof arrogance will prove as resistant to fact now as it has thus far.

    Let’s take a look at a couple of things Contreras could have known had he only been more professional, something that would have led him to check his facts before going public with mere hearsay.

    1.The American University, Tbilisi , is indeed licensed in the Republic of Georgia. It received its first license when it opened in 1995. Recently, under a new procedure it received its license in January of this year. If AACRAO is behind the ball on this, it is hardly the fault of anyone but AACRCO. In any event, it is clear that the institution meets point (a) of this criticism. It is operating legally as a degree granting institution in its host country.
    2.We are told that the host country must have “a postsecondary approval system equivalent to U.S. accreditation in that it applies qualitative measures by a neutral external party recognized in that role by the government.” If it is true that Georgia lacks this (something I do not know), then it is a problem Mr. Contreras should take up with the officials in Georgia, not AALE. I add here only that I expect he knows quite well how very few countries have anything like the “equivalent to U.S. accreditation.” Indeed, when I participated in the UNESCO talks on cross-border higher education and the portability of degrees and credentials in Paris recently it became clear that this is one of the most serious problems that need to be addressed.
    3.And just what are these “appropriate” standards of the host country referred to in ©? Are they universally recognized or are they merely parochial, that is to say peculiar, to Oregon?
    4.And (d); All degrees issued by the supplier must be legally valid for use and professional licensure within the host country. AUH-Tbilisi meets this hands down.
    So, what are we left with? Not much, which is why, I suppose, that Mr. Contreras is reduced to asking “why on earth did AALE even “want” to accredit this thing?”

    Well, we are proud to be helping this small institution in its noble efforts to be part of the new breath of freedom in this part of the world. We could, of course, just write them off with that old American standby, a high-handed air of superiority to the “developing” or “backward” peoples of the earth. But I would prefer for AALE to stay on the high road, supporting freedom and intellectual excellence wherever it may be found.

    (One last point. The reason Texas does not recognize AALE has nothing to do with our standards and practices. It’s simply that they require an accreditor not only to be recognized by the Secretary of Education, but also by CHEA. CHEA is a fine organization, and AALE expects to join it when the press of business allows for a little breathing space. Perhaps Texas – and even Oregon?- should consider following the lead of the American Bar Association, which at one time recognized only regional accreditation. When apprised of AALE’s education standards, which are far higher than can be found elsewhere, did they retreat into smug denial? No, they simply changed their policy to include AALE.)

  • Posted by Paul perkins on August 30, 2006 at 5:50am EDT
  • I am utterly appalled at several issues.

    Firstly, that none of those avidly and understandably against the proliferate practice of 'degree milling', including the State of Oregon, have spent any time SUPPORTING innovation and integrity in the form of new schools with specific focus who are not, or perhaps 'not yet' accredited. The passion seems to be for separating US accredited institutions from degree mills. Where is the passion for separating integrity from scams and shams?

    Secondly, the term "equivalent to U.S. accreditation" is a shameful racism that, like so much that is North American, assumes itself to be de facto, standard and right.

    I wonder if a serious international empirical investigation would actually reveal that the US accreditation system is any more effective in assuring the standard of student competence than other systems. Certainly, in Europe there is an increasing belief amongst many educationalists that the US is blindly concerned with accrediting the institution and less concerned on the more honourable practice of measuring student outcomes without regard for how or where verified competence was achieved.

    The baby is getting thrown out with the bath water through conflation, all in the name of US supremacy that, at least now to everyone's knowledge, hides a multitude of sins.

  • Posted by Floyd Schneider , i on August 30, 2006 at 6:00am EDT
  • Domain registration information for "American University for Humanities Tbilisi College Campus"

    internet domain auhtc.edu:
    Domain Name: AUHTC.NET
    Registrant Contact:
    American University of Hawaii
    Henry Safavi safavi@auh.edu)
    (310) 234-9211
    1722 Westwood Blvd., #201
    Los Angeles, CA 90024-5610
    Administrative Contact:
    American University of Hawaii
    Henry Safavi safavi@auh.edu)
    (310) 234-9211
    1722 Westwood Blvd., #201
    Los Angeles, CA 90024-5610
    Technical Contact:
    American University of Hawaii
    Henry Safavi safavi@auh.edu)
    (310) 234-9211
    1722 Westwood Blvd., #201
    Los Angeles, CA 90024-5610
    Name Servers:
    ns1.1mediawebsolutions.com
    ns2.1mediawebsolutions.com
    Creation date: 04 Jan 2005 21:14:47
    Expiration date: 04 Jan 2011 21:14:47

    In the news
    American University of Hawaii: Trial of the state's claims against Hassan Safavi personally and the state's motion to have him held in contempt have been completed and a decision has been entered in favor of the state on both., Hawaii Department of Commerce and Consumer Affairs (Honolulu, Hawaii), June 13, 2006.

    From Permanent Injunction and Final Judgment Against Defendant Hassan H. Safavi:

    IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that:

    1. Defendant Hassan H. Safavi and his agents, servants, employees, attorneys and those persons in active concert or participation with him, directly or indirectly, individually or in concert with others, or through any corporate or other device who receive actual notice of this order be and hereby are permanently enjoined from any of the following:

    a. Providing any post-secondary instructional programs or courses leading to a degree;

    b. Acting as or holding himself out as a "college, academy, institute, institution, university" or anything similar thereto;

    c. Failing to comply with Hawaii Rev. Stat. Chap. 446E (2005) or § 480-2(a) (2005)in any particulars; and

    d. Owning or operating any business in the State of Hawaii, claiming to operate under the laws of the State of Hawaii, having a presence in Hawaii or maintaining a website using the name American University of Hawaii until all restitution and civil penalties entered herein are fully satisfied.

    2. Defendant Hassan H. Safavi be and is hereby liable, jointly and severally with Defendant American University Hawaii, Inc., for restitution to consumers as set forth herein. To the extent not already done, upon entry of this judgment, Defendant Hassan H. Safavi be and hereby is ordered to notify all American University of Hawaii degree holders and degree applicants who enrolled or received their degrees subsequent to July 1, 1999 in writing that they are entitled to full restitution (conditioned only on the return of any diploma awarded). Said notice shall be in a form agreeable by Plaintiff and shall also notify the recipients of their rights under Hawaii Rev. Stat. §480-13. Defendant Hassan H. Safavi or Defendant American University Hawaii, Inc. shall provide a full refund to any recipient requesting one by certified check within fourteen days of receipt of the request for such and the return of the diploma, if applicable.

    3. Defendant Hassan H. Safavi be and is hereby liable to Plaintiff for civil penalties pursuant to Hawaii Rev. Stat. § 480-3.1 in the amount of Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($500,000.00).

    4. Defendant Hassan H. Safavi be incarcerated until such time as he terminates the website using the name American University of Hawaii, agrees to and notifies each student as required by this Court's prior orders, in a form agreed to by the State of Hawaii, of his or her right to restitution, provides the State of Hawaii with a list of the names and addresses of all of its students who enrolled since Hawaii Rev. Stat. Chapter 446E (2005) became law, and changes the name of the Mississippi Corporation to something other than the American University of Hawaii.

  • AUHTC Spring, 2005
  • Posted by George Gollin , Professor of Physics at University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign on August 30, 2006 at 6:00am EDT
  • When I do a Google search for

    "student information handbook" tbilisi

    (with quotes as indicated) I find a single hit to the file www.auhtc.net/tblisi-pdf/tblisi-liberal-arts.pdf. This file is no longer available on the web, but Google's html cache of it is. Clicking on the "view as html" link yields a multiple-page document titled
    AMERICAN UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII
    TBILISI COLLEGE CAMPUS
    TBILISI, REPUBLIC OF GEORGIA
    STUDENT INFORMATION HANDBOOK
    COURSE SYLLABI AND OUTLINES
    SPRING SEMESTER 2005.

    This appears to be a partial listing of AUHTC courses; it ends abruptly at a course titled "Democracy and Its Limits: The Modern Experience."

    It is interesting to compare the course descriptions with those in online
    course catalogs from the regionally accredited University of Arizona and
    U.C. Irvine. Here are specific examples.

    **********************
    AUH:
    LS 100: On Becoming a Life-Long Educant
    This course introduces students to the mechanics of their education at AUH.
    It will cover such items as interdisciplinary thinking, skills and
    competencies emphasized by the colleges of the University, the learning
    contract, the personal projects, and the philosophical rational and
    operational basis of the University. It investigates the issue of what it
    means to be educant in a global environment and for life. (Non-Credit)

    Arizona http://catalog.arizona.edu/courses/994/AIID.html:
    AIID 100. On Becoming a Fully Educated Person (1) I II
    This course introduces students to the mechanics of their education at
    Arizona International College. It will cover such items as interdisciplinary
    thinking, skills and competencies emphasized by the college, the learning
    contract, the capstone project, the academic house system, and the
    philosophical rational and operational basis for the college. It
    investigates the issue of what it means to be educated in a global
    environment.

    Note the AUH mistaken use of "educant" in "... what it means to be
    educant..." This is suggestive of a careless edit of material taken by AUH
    from Arizona in which all instances of the word "educated" were replaced
    with the word "educant" in order to modify the course title.

    **********************
    AUH:
    LS 101: Computer Literacy & Concepts
    An introductory course of basic concepts, fundamental laws and principles of
    software and hardware organization, program construction, applications,
    policy and social issues. Develops initial programming skills. Introduces
    useful computer-based tools for analysis, expression and discovery.

    Irvine http://www.editor.uci.edu/02-03/ics/ics.3.htm:
    H21: Honors Introduction to Computer Science
    First of a three-quarter introductory sequence. Introduces basic concepts,
    fundamental laws and principles of software and hardware organization,
    program construction, applications, and policy and social issues. Develops
    initial programming skills using a high-level programming language
    (primarily C/C++/Java). Introduces useful computer-based tools for analyses,
    expression, and discovery. Prerequisite...: enrollment open to ICS majors in
    the Campuswide Honors Program or by consent of the Department of Information
    and Computer Science. ICS H21 and ICS 21 may not both be taken for credit.

    **********************
    AUH:
    LS 104: Basic Statistics
    Organizing data: displaying distributions, measures of center, measures of
    spread, scatterplots, correlation,
    regression, and their interpretation. Design of experiments: simple random
    samples and their sampling distribution, models from probability, normal
    distributions, and normal approximations.

    Arizona http://catalog.arizona.edu/2000-01/courses/004/MATH.html:
    MATH 160 Basic Statistics
    Organizing data: displaying distributions, measures of center, measures of
    spread, scatterplots, correlation, regression, and their interpretation.
    Design of experiments: simple random samples and their sampling
    distribution, models from probability, normal distributions, and normal
    approximations. Statistical inference: confidence intervals and hypothesis
    testing, t procedures and chi-square tests. Not intended for those who plan
    further studies in statistics. Registration in math courses numbered 125 or
    below, 160, and 263, requires all students, including transfer students with
    or without college level math credit, to take the UA Mathematics Readiness
    Test. P, MATH 121 or an acceptable score on the UA Mathematics Readiness
    Test. Credit allowed for only one of the following: MATH 160 or MATH 263.

    **********************
    AUH:
    LS 107 Basic Algebra
    This course for non-mathematics majors and minors covers the basic concepts
    of algebra, including linear
    equations and inequalities, relations and functions, quadratic equations,
    and systems of equations.

    Arizona http://catalog.arizona.edu/2000-01/courses/004/AISM.html:
    AISM 120 College Algebra
    This course for non-mathematics majors and minors covers the basic concepts
    of algebra, including linear equations and inequalities, relations and
    functions, quadratic equations, and systems of equations. P, two entrance
    units in algebra or an acceptable score on the math readiness test. Consent
    of instructor for non-AIC students.

    **********************
    AUH:
    SS 101 Social History ( National, Regional )
    Formation of the society; organization of families and clans; social
    stratification, mobility, conflict, and control in
    the traditional community of the learner; and transformation from
    traditional to modern society

    Arizona http://catalog.arizona.edu/courses/974/CHNx.html:
    CHN 482 Social History of China
    Formation of ancient Chinese society; organization of families and clans;
    social stratification, mobility, conflict, and control in traditional China;
    and transformation from traditional to modern society.

    **********************
    AUH:
    MUS 100 The Nature of Music
    This course surveys the history of music in a way that underscores the power
    of music as a means of communication. In addition to studying the various
    sound characteristics and styles associated with music-making, it will look
    at the specific ways in the development of basic operations of music in
    general: the role music plays in shaping social (including economic)
    interaction, and the relationship between musical production and worldview.

    Arizona http://www.catalog.arizona.edu/2002-03/courses/024/GRCENWC.html:
    MUS 109 -- Rock and American Popular Music
    This course surveys the history of rock music in a way that underscores the
    power of music as a means of communication. In addition to studying the
    various sound characteristics and styles associated with rock, we will look
    at the specific ways that the development of rock music illustrates basic
    operations of music in general: the role music plays in shaping social
    (including economic) interaction, and the relationship between musical
    production and worldview.

    **********************
    AUH:
    SS 104 Introduction to Psychology
    Survey of psychology including history, systems, and methods; structure and
    functions of the nervous and endocrine systems; learning; motivation and
    emotion; perception; memory; thought and language; personality; development;
    social cognition and behavior; psychopathology and psychotherapy. Same as
    PSY 100. Required for admission to all other psychology courses.

    Arizona http://www.catalog.arizona.edu/2002-03/courses/031/PSYC.html:
    PSYC 101 -- Introduction to Psychology
    Only for students who have not taken the psychology section of INDV 101. In
    the absence of INDV 101, this course is required for admission to all other
    psychology courses. See University General Education, Tier One.
    Survey of psychology including history, systems, and methods; structure and
    functions of the nervous and endocrine systems; learning; motivation and
    emotion; perception; memory; thought and language; personality; development;
    social cognition and behavior; psychopathology and psychotherapy.

    **********************
    AUH:
    SS 106 Fundamentals of Social Psychology
    Introduction to the major theories and research findings of social
    psychology. Specific topics covered in the course include the self, social
    cognition, attitudes, interpersonal relations, group processes, prejudice,
    and aggression. Prerequisite; SS 104 (PSY 100)

    Arizona http://www.catalog.arizona.edu/2002-03/courses/031/PSYC.html:
    PSYC 360 -- Social Psychology
    Introduction to the major theories and research findings of social
    psychology. Specific topics covered in the class include the self, social
    cognition, attitudes, interpersonal relations, group processes, prejudice,
    and aggression.
    Prerequisite(s): PSYC 101 or INDV 101 or 8 units of biology lab science.

    **********************
    AUH:
    SS 109 Roots of Civilization
    Ancient Times to Renaissance
    Chronological survey of human civilizations from pre-history to the
    renaissance. Students will be introduced to the critical analysis of the
    literacy and artistic expressions that constitute the ideas and values of
    our collective heritage. Emphasis will be placed on the interrelation of
    Western and non-Western cultures and on the inter-perspectives including
    science, gender and psychology, politics, social conditions, religion and
    philosophy.

    Arizona http://catalog.arizona.edu/2002-03/courses/024/tier1.html:
    TRAD 102-- Western Cultures and Civilizations: Classical to Renaissance (the
    course appears to consist of separately-titled modules)
    Humanities: Ancient Times to Renaissance
    Chronological survey of human civilizations from pre-history to the
    renaissance. Students will be introduced to the critical analysis of the
    literacy and artistic expressions that constitute the ideas and values of
    our collective heritage. Emphasis will be placed on the interrelation of
    Western and non-Western cultures and on the inter-perspectives including
    science, gender and psychology, politics, social conditions, religion and
    philosophy.

    **********************
    AUH:
    SS 109B Civilization of Middle and Near East
    The "western" tradition(s) are often traced to the Classical Greeks.
    However, by the time that work on the Parthenon had begun, the peoples of
    the Middle and Near East and Northeastern Africa had already witnessed the
    rise and fall of a series of great civilizations for over ten thousand
    years. In fact, many of the elements of "classical" civilization can be
    traced to experiments made in this distant past.

    Arizona http://catalog.arizona.edu/2002-03/courses/024/tier1.html:
    TRAD 102-- Western Cultures and Civilizations: Classical to Renaissance (the
    course appears to consist of separately-titled modules)
    In the Beginning: Roots of Western Culture
    The roots of "western" tradition(s) are often traced to the Classical
    Greeks. However, by the time that work on the Parthenon had begun, the
    peoples of the Near East and Northeastern Africa had already witnessed the
    rise and fall of a series of great civilizations for over ten thousand
    years. In fact, many of the elements of "classical" civilization can be
    traced to experiments made in this distant past.

    **********************
    AUH:
    PHI 212 Acquisition of Language
    Introduction to linguistic, psychological, philosophical and social aspects;
    meaning structures; meaning in the mind/brain; acquisition of word meaning;
    the differences between literal/figurative meaning; metaphors; meaning in
    social contexts, models of representation. (Same as PSY 212)

    Arizona http://cogsci.web.arizona.edu/courses/index.php?record=47:
    LING 211 Meaning in Language and Society
    Introduction to linguistic, psychological, philosophical and social aspects;
    meaning structures; meaning in the mind/brain; acquisition of word meaning;
    the differences between literal/figurative meaning; metaphors; meaning in
    social contexts, models of representation.

    **********************

    I am not being selective: with few exceptions, all the AUH course
    descriptions I've looked at are also to be found on the web site of a single
    regionally accredited university. None of the Google searches for text
    fragments in AUH course descriptions have produced hits to more than one RA
    school: the course descriptions are not so "obvious" as to be duplicated
    from school to school.

    In my experience, this is a bad sign. The generation of material of dubious nature should enter into consideration of the integrity of a candidate for accreditation.

    George Gollin
    Professor of Physics
    University of Illinois at Urbana-champaign

  • Give me shashlik, or give me McDonald's
  • Posted by Rev. John Weaver-Hudson on August 30, 2006 at 7:05am EDT
  • There are, of course, legitimate tertiary institutions of long standing in the Republic of Georgia. None of them has sought accreditation from a United States accreditor, nor has needed or wished to do so.

    The cultural imperialism which assumed--note the condescension in the earlier remark about the former Soviet Union--that a politically tilted US accreditor could play a saviour's role in "Christianising and civilising" the benighted Caucasus, as the late William McKinley once inflicted upon the Philippines, shows an ignorance of Georgian history, a willingness to associate with picaresque individuals (as demonstrated by Mr Brunton, Mr Contreras, and Dr Gollin), and an unpleasant messianism of the "ugly American" type.

    One hopes that legitimate Georgian tertiary institutions will not be associated in the public mind with this needlessly imported farrago of ideological posturing and accreditorial adventurism. But then, one man's Mede is another man's Persian, and nobody's Georgian.

  • Posted by Dennis Ruhl on August 30, 2006 at 12:25pm EDT
  • Nice to see some of Contreras's friends show up.

    George, are you speaking as a representative of CHEA? Should you be commenting in this situation, in effect prejudging an issue that relates to a future decision you may be required to make? I am not sure that copying the course description should create any concern other than flattery.

    John, I'm sure the integrity of the Georgian education system will survive.

    Just a note on Hawaii. Hawaii doesn't evaluate the quality of programs, at all. Hawaii has a very open system of licensing. Jeff Brunton administers the dotting of "I"s and the crossing of "T"s with alarming efficiency. To be worked over by Brunton is no indication of program quality and if asked, he would say as much.

    People, it's a 100 student residential school in the Republic of Georgia.

  • AALE recognition
  • Posted by George Gollin , Professor of Physics at University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign on August 30, 2006 at 4:25pm EDT
  • AALE is recognized by the U.S. Dept. of Education. It is not recognized by CHEA.

    GG

  • Posted by Dennis Ruhl on August 30, 2006 at 6:05pm EDT
  • George,

    But Mr. Wallin indicated that AALE would probably be applying to CHEA.

    Perhaps you need to define your roll, whether as an inquisitor or as a decision maker at CHEA without preconceived notions. In the English/American tradition, judges and prosecutors are separate people.

    There are altogether too many members of boards or civil servants whose position would normally preclude their maintaining a public opinion on education matters that regularly make comments. There are 2 here today, and more elsewhere.

    Sorry for the multiple posts.

  • Tbilisi Redux
  • Posted by Jeffrey Wallin , President at AALE on August 30, 2006 at 7:25pm EDT
  • I expect many have seen the list of courses posted here by George Gollin. It is intended to prove that the curriculum of AUH-Tbilisi has been lifted wholesale from other institutions, though primarily from one in Arizona.

    There is a reason why the site he quotes has been archived. It no longer exists. One might even say that it is out of date.

    Still, out of date or not, I doubt it differs very much from the current one. That website – like the curriculum itself – was put together before Safavi took over the operation (in spite of the misleading date on it, the result of automatic re-dating, much like the automatic re-dating of a letter’s original date when opened in MS Word). He, of course, had no reason to suspect that the original courses and course descriptions had been lifted from other colleges. Hence, there was no reason to cull them, although new ones were added.

    I haven't had the time to check out all of the AUH courses. The list we have here in the office is a long one. It is so, I expect, because it comprises the entire handed down course catalog from 1996, plus new courses that have been added since then. None of the newer courses I Googled brought back any hits indicating that either the courses or course descriptions at Tbilisi exist elsewhere.

    I suppose AUH-Tbilisi could be faulted for not keeping its catalog up to date, but it’s only been quite recently that universities in this country have started clearing out the untaught deadwood carried on their books for years.

    In any event, regardless of course descriptions, faculty in Tbilisi teach from their own syllabi, just as faculty do here. Years ago, when I myself was a tenured professor, I rarely asked for a handbook change. As long as the course description was reasonably accurate (i.e. graduate or undergraduate, general subject covered, etc.) I taught it according to my own lights. Similarly, a colleague here in the office who is teaching a course in constitutional law at AU this semester designed his own course description, the way the course would be taught, the textbooks and requirements and so on, none of which are specified in the catalog listing.

    All this seems very confusing, I know. But one thing is clear. This controversy is not about academic quality. Even Brunton, the compliance scourge of Hawaii, has publicly stated that quality was not at issue in the lawsuit. It was compliance and compliance only. Now complying with state regulations and rules is surely important, but it has very little, if anything, to do with educational quality.

    And we should all remember that quality is what this entire slanderous affair has been all about. What else can it mean to call a school a diploma mill than to say that it offers no education, let alone a good one?

    There seems to be a lot of running for cover here to explain why something that never should have happened can be justified by whatever imperfections can be found in this gutsy little school.

    But what in the world does any of this really have to do with whether the place is a diploma mill?

    Cheers,
    Jeff Wallin

  • question for jeffrey wallin
  • Posted by Kim on August 31, 2006 at 2:40pm EDT
  • This is an honest question.

    Are you aware of the totality of Safavi’s baggage?

    Leave the American University of Hawaii out of it for a moment.

    Did you know that he has (or once had) an Iranian "university" that was shut down by Iranian officials for providing degrees to Iranian students at inflated prices in exchange for no academic work? Iranians officials shutting down an educational institution?

    THAT is nothing to just brush off and pretend never happened, in my opinion.

    The website is dead now but here is the archived version of AUH Iran site:
    http://web.archive.org/web/20050308225822/http://www.auhiran.com/

    Which article would you like to read about Safavi?

    This one?

    Excerpt:
    “The institution reportedly issued some 8,000 degrees in exchange for tuition that ranged from 50 million to 120 million rials (about
    $6,300-$15,000), but no actual academic activities took place.”

    http://www.rferl.org/features/features_Article.aspx?m=09&y=2004&id=D526607D-299E-40CD-A6DF-6324A396767A

    or this one?

    http://www.rferl.org/featuresarticle/2005/09/f5469e14-b744-4e7f-8f75-24fc2a2f8563.html

    Bottom line, the guy is questionable. And this is just a portion of it. If you need more info for verification...and other things, feel free to respond with another post. I’ll be happy to accommodate you.
    Spare yourself further embarrassment by associating your organization with Safavi. I’m just bringing what appears to be very credible news articles to your attention.
    I would think that the very least you could do is confront him on this issue, (if you did not already know about it.) Keep us posted and good luck.

  • Posted by Dennis Ruhl on August 31, 2006 at 5:15pm EDT
  • I love the threat. Why no name?

    [QUOTE]Bottom line, the guy is questionable. And this is just a portion of it. If you need more info for verification...and other things, feel free to respond with another post. I’ll be happy to accommodate you. Spare yourself further embarrassment by associating your organization with Safavi.[UNQUOTE]

  • Posted by Kim on August 31, 2006 at 8:45pm EDT
  • Dennis, How is providing [heretofore] little known credible information and offering my opinion about Safavi..a threat? I think it is clear that one could easily form the opinion that from time to time, he's done some questionable things in the field of education as it pertains to money for diplomas where there's not much actual education going on. So that jives with your original thinking about Safavi and we're both entitled to our opinions.

    - Kim (Sorry, I forgot. Kim Preston)

  • A Serious Question for Kiim
  • Posted by Jeffrey Wallin , Presidenet at AALE on August 31, 2006 at 10:00pm EDT
  • AALE accredited AUH-Tbilsi on the basis of three visits, one of which was an in-depth review that included sitting in on several classes and speaking with faculty members, administrators and students, both current and former. Meetings were also held with the Ministry of Education, which is the body that confers degree granting status in Georgia. This site visit was conducted by non-AALE affiliated academics of solid reputation, whose veracity and judgment have not, at least to my knowledge, been questioned.

    The standards and procedures applied by the visiting team and, later, by the AALE board, are available on our website. They have been approved by the U.S. Secretary of Education (although the Department does not recognize foreign accreditation by U.S. agencies) and are the same standards we apply to institutions in this country. These standards, like our on site reviewers, have not been questioned.

    So, unless you think that over the course of three visits, both AALE and two independent academics with considerable experience in international education had the wool pulled over their eyes, I would expect you to grant that AUH-Tbilisi is a perfectly legitimate entity. It has real faculty and real students, and real courses are taught there.

    So let me ask you a question: Should an institution of known legitimacy and demonstrated quality be denied accreditation simply because an individual who holds 20% of it had once been associated with another institution that was closed, not for being a “diploma mill” or a “shady operation” but because the institution, which previously had met the state standards, no longer was able to do so after the law was changed?

    AUH-Hawaii was an administrative headquarters for several institutions outside the U.S; it was not a place where courses were taught anymore than some administration buildings on US campuses are. The new law stipulated that a minimum of 25 students must reside in Hawaii. This meant that AUH-Hawaii would have to turn itself into an active college campus or close. The Hawaii case was about compliance, not academic quality. Even the agency that brought the suit against AUH-Hawaii and Safavi did not allege that the charges had anything to do with the institution being a diploma mill.

    But, you say, look at all the other baggage carried by Safavi. Look, for example, at the state issued charges by, of all places, Iran!

    Henry Safavi is Persian or, as usage now has it, Iranian. He left the country during the revolution of the Mullahs and is now considered to be an enemy of the state. He may not enter the country without courting immediate arrest. Frankly, taking the claims of this hyper-religious tyranny of a country at face value, especially when they are made against its enemies, requires a high degree of gullibility, something along the lines of the credulity once exhibited by those Soviet supporters always so ready to accept as truth the Soviet Union’s official account of its magnificent crops, industry and economy, and, of course, its peaceful intentions.
    Again, the real issue is simply this: is AUH-Tblisi a fraud or not? If it is not, then all these other allegations become much less credible and certainly much less relevant.

    This is beginning to resemble an old fashion blood dispute, where the sins of the father must be paid for by the sons.

  • See No Evil, Hear No Evil (and become an accreditor)
  • Posted by Ivan Chonkin on September 1, 2006 at 12:25pm EDT
  • This exchange has revealed more about AALE than about AUH Tbilisi. Jeffrey Wallin has been given an opportunity here to demonstrate the substantive virtues that are the essential ends of liberal education. It is disappointing to see that, instead of maintaining the open mind and the vigilant attitude that are the hallmarks of the liberal tradition and good accreditation, he has decided to serve as a dogmatic (and gullible) apologist for entities and individuals that he really does not know very well.

    First, he apparently did not know that the American University of Hawaii was embroiled in a major scandal involving the sale of academic credentials in “of all place, Iran!” His reaction upon hearing the news is not to ask questions, nor does he display the slightest interest in understanding what the issues might be. Instead, he goes on a tirade against the mullahs and informs us that Mr. Safavi left Iran after the revolution and is an enemy of the state. A more curious mind would look at the press reports of the scandal, and would quickly learn that, in stark contrast to the faux opposition heroics that Mr. Wallin so readily embraces as facts, high officials of the Iranian regime were implicated in the scandal. Indeed, the American University of Hawaii was alleged to have ingratiated itself with powerful regime officials by granting free credentials to them before it embarked on the sale of academic diplomas, which, by the way, included medical degrees.

    Second, he seems curiously unaware, and, even more curiously, unconcerned, that the American University of Hawaii keeps popping up in various foreign venues—Iran, India, Vietnam, Cambodia—almost invariably with the same pattern of allegations. While a dismissive and lackadaisical attitude towards these reports would be a perfectly normal American reaction, AALE has taken it upon itself to trot the globe as an international accreditor. It should at least be aware of these reports, foreign though they are.

    Finally, to go—of all places—to Tbilisi, what conceivable theory does AALE have with regard to the motivations behind a bankrupt American investor’s ownership interest in a “gutsy little school” in a cash-strapped former Soviet republic? How is this school an investment for a former operator of an unlicensed university with branch campuses in various third-world countries? Is the Tbilisi institution being primed for bigger and better things? Curious minds want to know. Too bad that none of them seems to work at AALE.

  • Comments to Jeffrey
  • Posted by Kim on September 1, 2006 at 4:15pm EDT
  • < >I believe you. And I do not doubt that Tbilisi is a legitimate institution. The past and current status of Tbilisi is not the issue here. <Now your dancing the Lambada, Jeffrey. Did you ever wonder WHY they changed the law? It was BECAUSE the existing laws were making Hawaii a haven for Diploma Mills and unaccredited distance learning institutions. You know very well that Hawaiin authorities were not just picking on Safavi. AUH was NOT the only case. Let me ask you this. Do you feel that the American University of Hawaii granted Ph.D. and other post secondary diplomas that were comparable to the level of work and effort required to earn one from an accredited school?"The state has taken legal action against nearly 60 of the so-called "diploma mills" and received court judgments against many of the schools, said Stephen Levins, executive director of the Office of Consumer Protection."http://the.honoluluadvertiser.com/article/2006/Jul/19/ln/FP607190348.html<>I'll take your word on that. If that's true Jeffrey, maybe compliance was the path of least resistance for the Hawaiian legal system to take in order to clamp down on those types of educational institutions and other diploma mill problems. But I am compelled to ask you this question again. Do you feel that the American University of Hawaii granted Ph.D. and other post secondary diplomas that were comparable to the level of work and effort required to earn one from an accredited school? <>I'm not a big fan of Iran myself. We do agree on that. It could be that the whole story came straight from the Iranian propaganda machine. I retract the credibility of the AUH-Iran news article. It's probably a big misunderstanding. You're right. I guess I was gullible.Just to remind you that YOU are banking on those articles to be fabrications so as to not have to comment on that alleged debacle.

  • Posted by Kim on September 1, 2006 at 8:50pm EDT
  • First, I am not attacking AALE. What did I ever say that would lead you to believe I criticized them? I pointed out something I thought they should at least be aware of.

    Next, I am not Ivan Chonkin. If you think I write like him, so be it.

    And finally, I belong to no organization and have no agenda. I researched this topic for reasons that were strictly personal. That's how I discovered among other things, the Iranian news story. I passed along some new information to this discussion board and if you and others think it is not credible then you are entitled to believe that. I happen to think it is worth examining.

  • 2nd Reply to Kim
  • Posted by Jeffrey Wallin , President at AALE on September 2, 2006 at 9:25pm EDT
  • You say that “the past and current status of Tbilisi is not the issue here.” But it is the only issue. Have you read the two articles in the Chronicle and the one here?

    The sequence of charges that led to this thread is the following: AUH-Tbilisi is a diploma mill. It is accredited. It is a mistake to accredit a diploma mill. Therefore, its accrediting agency (AALE) must be guilty of either (1) having been duped, (2) not having exercised due diligence, or (3) having lax standards and procedures.

    We are agreed that the premise of the charge is false. Tbilisi is a legitimate institution. That being so, it follows, as night does the day, that neither 1, nor 2, nor 3 should have been raised in the first place. If the legitimacy of the result is not in question, why should the legitimacy of the means be in question?

    This is like the old saying “where there is smoke there is sure to be fire.” But we are agreed that there is no smoke here. So why are you still looking for flames?

    As to your questions:
    1. The Hawaii charge. You say that AUH-Hawaii was sued and closed because it was a diploma mill, just the sort of fish that the new regulations were intended to catch. Yet Mr. Brunton, the Consumer agency lead in prosecuting the case against AUH-Hawaii and Dr. Safavi, has explicitly stated that this is not so. Do you have grounds for disagreeing with him? (BTW, I was not able to get the link to the Hawaii newspaper to work.)

    You appear to be arguing that AUH-Hawaii was caught up in this diploma-mill catching net in spite of Brunton’s denial, the court record, and the actual published facts of the case. And then for evidence, you cite the very agency that disagrees with you! The only conclusion I can draw is that, regardless of the known facts, you just feel in your bones that the place must have been a diploma mill. Maybe so, but I would hope that you are willing to admit that your feelings, however strong they may be, do not provide sufficient grounds for more objective observers to agree with you.

    2. Safavi. Yes, charges against board members and investors can, under some circumstances, be of concern to an accrediting agency. Ah, ha, critics charge, then isn’t Safavi’s connection a “red flag” of sorts that should have alerted us to the possibility that something shady is going on here? Why, yes indeed. And so it did. This is why Tbilisi received so many visits and also why we opened an official investigation. In fact, the investigation is still active, as is Safavi’s appeal. In other words, we have, and will continue, to follow our procedures. At this point, nothing has come to light to suggest that the Tbilisi campus is illegitimate, and therefore should not have been accredited.

    Accreditation can only be granted or withheld on the basis of meeting or not meeting specific criteria. Our criteria, approved of by the U.S. Department of Education, are online and can be viewed by anyone. Are you suggesting that either our visiting team or our board of trustees failed to apply our standards in this case? If not, are you arguing that they should have ignored them and made the decision on some other basis?

    3. Iran. You agree that the word of the present Iranian regime is worthless, but nevertheless say that if I assume its charges are false, it is no different than you assuming they are true. I’m sorry, but I just don’t see the logic in this.

    4. Lastly, you ask "Do you feel that the American University of Hawaii granted Ph.D. and other post secondary diplomas that were comparable to the level of work and effort required to earn one from an accredited school?"

    I haven’t the faintest idea how to answer this. I know almost nothing about AUH-Hawaii. I never visited it when it existed and, now that it no longer exists, cannot do so if I wished to. The quality of the degree may have been equivalent to accredited institutions or it may not have been. I simply don't know. Certainly, the lack of accreditation is no proof that the quality of an institution’s degrees is substandard (much as we accreditors wish it were otherwise). One of the finest universities in Central Europe is not accredited and, as far as I know, has no interest in becoming accredited.

    But again, I remind you that all this is at best tangential to whether Tbilisi is or is not legitimate. As all the spokes of a wheel radiate from its hub, so does everything important in this matter radiate from the answer to this central question. And this question has been answered in the affirmative.

  • a few details
  • Posted by George Gollin , Professor of Physics at University of Illinois at Urbana-champaign on September 3, 2006 at 5:10am EDT
  • I have comments on two issues.

    Dr. Wallin wrote "You [Kim] say that AUH-Hawaii was sued and closed because it was a diploma mill... Yet Mr. Brunton, the Consumer agency lead in prosecuting the case against AUH-Hawaii and Dr. Safavi, has explicitly stated that this is not so."

    As I understand it, the Hawaii statutes are silent on the issue of the quality of instruction of a degree-granting entity. Mr. Safavi and AUH were challenged by Hawaii for operating a degree-granting organization illegally. I believe there is nothing in Hawaii's legal code that defines for the state the meaning of the term "diploma mill." As such, the state cannot declare ANY degree-granting entity to be a diploma mill, no matter what is learned of its practices during Hawaii's investigation.

    Again, as I understand it, the Oregon statutes are different: a degree granting entity operating in violation of the laws of the state in which it is headquartered is, by Oregon's definition, a diploma mill, without regard to the quality of the entity's academic program. (A degree-grantor's other practices may also obligate Oregon to classify an entity as a diploma mill.) But once it was established (as was done by the State of Hawaii) that AUH was operating illegally, Oregon's laws required the state to classify AUH as a diploma mill and to act, based on that classification.

    Dr. Wallin wrote "Accreditation can only be granted or withheld on the basis of meeting or not meeting specific criteria. Our criteria, approved of by the U.S. Department of Education, are online and can be viewed by anyone."

    AALE's recognition by the Department of Education is described on the AALE web page http://www.aale.org/aale/about.htm this way: "AALE is listed by the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Education as a recognized national accrediting agency for the accreditation and preaccreditation of institutions of higher education and programs within institutions of higher education that offer liberal arts degrees at the baccalaureate level." A similar description on the page http://www.aale.org/highered/ is as follows: "The Academy is listed by the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Education as a recognized agency for the national accreditation and preaccreditation of institutions of higher education and programs within institutions of higher education that offer liberal arts degrees."

    The Department of Education web page http://www.ed.gov/admins/finaid/accred/accreditation_pg8.html#libed describes the scope of Education's recognition of AALE: "Scope of recognition: the accreditation and preaccreditation ("Candidacy for Accreditation") of institutions of higher education and programs within institutions of higher education throughout the United States that offer liberal arts degree(s) at the baccalaureate level or a documented equivalency."

    Note the inclusion of the phrase "throughout the United States" in Education's recognition of AALE. With this definition of the scope of AALE's recognition, activities AALE may choose to undertake concerning foreign schools are outside the scope of its Education recognition and beyond the Department of Education's regulatory capacity. The Department of Education does not recognize AALE as an accreditor of foreign universities. It appears that the Department of Education is not allowed to consider AALE's interactions with foreign degree-granting entities when evaluating AALE for the sake of renewing its recognition, or otherwise judging its merits. The Department of Education cannot speak to the nature of AALE's practices when AALE issues accreditation to foreign programs since (as I understand things) federal statutes require Education to remain mute on the subject. Accreditation issued to a foreign school by AALE is not implicitly approved by the Department of Education through its recognition of AALE because Education is not permitted to include AALE's foreign practices in its decision to continue to recognize AALE.

    AALE describes its "Program Accreditation" for foreign schools on its web page http://www.aale.org/highered/ this way: "For college or universities that require a liberal arts core leading to a baccalaureate degree that meets AALE’s standards at the same level as programs within the US and wish to have third-party review of their institution and the highest stamp of quality that the Academy may offer a school outside the US."

    However, the Department of Education is not empowered to provide an independent check of the equivalence of AALE's standards as they are applied to domestic and foreign schools. It is not the case that recognition of AALE by the Department of Education implies that AALE's practices in credentialing foreign schools have been found acceptable (or unacceptable, for that matter) by the Department of Education.

  • Posted by Dennis Ruhl on September 3, 2006 at 9:50am EDT
  • George;

    And this differs from the regional accreditors and DETC in which ways? They all do the overseas thing. You're splitting some fine hairs while you're picking nits.

    Is this an argument you really want to be making? You take pride in your anti-degreemill work. You haven't got them all yet. Perhaps you are barking up the wrong tree.

  • Reply to Dr. Gollin
  • Posted by Jeffrey Wallin , President at AALE on September 3, 2006 at 12:25pm EDT
  • Let me begin by thanking Dr. Gollin for the clarification regarding the relevant statute in Hawaii. According to his explanation, the lack of a legal definition of diploma mill means that the State cannot directly charge an institution with being one and therefore it must use the compliance issue to do so indirectly. That may be so, but it leaves us with the following problem: it doesn’t tell us anything about the quality or lack of it of any institution so charged, including whether it was a diploma mill. Many colleges in the US have experienced compliance problems without their academic quality being called into question. Are we nevertheless to assume that every infraction of a state regulation is proof that an institution is a diploma mill?

    Recently, we received an application from an institution claiming the right to issue degrees, and providing us with a state document from several decades ago. Before allowing the process to go further, we inquired of the state whether this document was still in effect. The answer was no, it was not. Consequently, the school was required to seek and then have the state forward to us a current document granting it degree issuing authority. Subsequently, it sought this authority and was granted it, the proof of which was sent to us. My point is that the education at the institution had not changed one iota throughout all this. Its academic program was of exactly the same quality during the period it mistakenly issued degrees it did not possess the authority to grant as it was after the authority was granted.

    As to Oregon, here are the two issues we have trouble with:

    1. Tbilisi IS licensed to operate in its home country. By this definition then, it meets Oregon’s definition of legitimacy. (Note: AALE standards are the same as Oregon’s in this respect, we could not have accredited the school without such a license.)
    2. The fact that Oregon didn’t do its homework is not the fault of Tbilisi. Nothing required Mr. Contreras to go public before checking his facts. Yet he jumped at the chance to slander AALE to other accrediting agencies and to the US Department of Education without even the courtesy of asking why or on what grounds we granted accreditation. Maybe the Oregon budget can’t be stretched far enough to pay for a long-distance telephone call?

    Righteousness is seldom the father to prudence, and it certainly wasn’t here. Contreras knew that the institution had been approved by a U.S. accrediting agency, which one would think would have alerted him to the fact that there might be more here than meets the eye. Yet, instead of checking his facts, he chose to slander both the school and its accreditor with the most deadly charge that can be laid against either.

    AALE Standards and Scope of Accreditation

    I already addressed this issue earlier in this thread, but I will do so again for those who have not read the entire series of comments.
    You state that the Department of Education “is not empowered to check on the equivalence of AALE’s standards to standards as they are applied to domestic and foreign schools. It is not the case that recognition of AALE by the Department of Education implies that AALE’s practices in credentialing foreign schools have been found acceptable (or unacceptable, for that matter) by the Department of Education.”

    As Winston Churchill one remarked in the House of Commons, “The statement is accurate without beginning to be comprehensive.” As I myself have posted before this, AALE’s recognition by the Department of Education does not extend to foreign schools, just as it does not in the case of the regional agencies. I have never said or implied that our foreign accreditation carries with it approval by the Department of Education. Indeed, this is why we do not offer institutional accreditation to foreign schools. (Yes, there is some confusion both here and abroad about the term “institutional,” which the Department uses to qualify a school for eligibility to apply for Title IV funds. Unfortunately, the plain meaning of the distinction between institutional and programmatic seems to imply something else, namely, the distinction between part and whole. Thus “institutional accreditation” often appears to those not thoroughly acquainted with the U.S. system to simply mean that the entire school, rather than only a program within it, has been accredited.) What I have said, and what the standards on our web site accurately reflect, is that AALE uses the same standards in accrediting foreign schools as it does in accrediting domestic schools and that these same standards for domestic schools have been approved by the Secretary. I should have thought the difference between same and other was self-evident.

    What, precisely, is the point of arguing that the Secretary has not approved either our standards, or the standards of any other agency, for use in examining foreign schools? The foreign schools that U.S. agencies accredit are not looking for Secretarial approval. They seek U.S. accreditation because they want to demonstrate to a skeptical world that they have been reviewed on the basis of highly regarded standards. Being able to claim they have passed the same exacting criteria that U.S. domestic institutions are required to pass is quite good enough for their purposes. Why else would foreign schools seek accreditation by a U.S. agency, whether national or a regional, knowing it confers absolutely no standing with the U.S. Department of Education?

    All this aside, the only truly relevant question here is the following: Tbilisi was charged with being a diploma mill. Is this true or is this not true?

    Why spend all this time and energy attempting to prove that those who falsely accused a school of illigitimacy must be right about something? Is error not possible in the wonderfully grand and beautiful state of Oregon? Or is it just too humiliating to admit error?

  • domestic vs. foreign
  • Posted by George Gollin , Professor of Physics at University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign on September 3, 2006 at 1:50pm EDT
  • The matter of U.S. accreditation issued to foreign institutions is an interesting one. A factor that is relevant is whether an accreditor is recognized only by the Department of Education, or also by the Council for Higher Education Accreditation. CHEA is not barred from consideration of questions regarding accreditation of foreign universities. For example, CHEA publishes a document whose "principles are to advise Council for Higher Education Accreditation (CHEA) accrediting organizations and to provide a framework for U.S. accreditors undertaking reviews of non-United States (U.S.) institutions and programs operating in countries outside the U.S." The regional accreditors and many national accreditors (including DETC) are recognized by CHEA, as well as the Department of Education. At the present time AALE is recognized by Education but not by CHEA.

  • Domestic vs International Accreditation
  • Posted by Jeffrey Wallin , President at AALE on September 3, 2006 at 6:40pm EDT
  • Well, now that the legitimacy of Tbilisi seems to be settled, and nnow that we all have a clear understanding that the U.S. Department of Education does not concern itself with international accreditation - all of which has had to be pointed out again and again here - one might think that this controversy had reached its natural conclusion. After all, what can be left when the two charges made so recklessly and irresponsibly have been demonstrated to be false and without any foundation?

    But now we are to believe that AALE international accreditation is somehow weaker than that of other agencies because we are not a member of CHEA. CHEA, unlike the Department of Education, does concern itself with international accreditation and publishes guidelines governing it. The fact that we are not a member is evidently supposed to demonstrate that we are not up to CHEA's international guidelines and standards.

    I do not wish to see this discussion turned into an AALE vs. CHEA argument. We at AALE have a very high regard for CHEA and for its fine staff. In fact, we indicated to the staff some time ago that we intend to apply for membership, although we are too busy to do so at the moment. Of course, in light of Dr. Gollin's demonstrated hostility to AALE, our board will have to reconsider whether AALE is likely to be treated in a fair and unprejudiced manner by the CHEA board.

    As to the matter of our international accreditation procedures, it turns out that, just as the charge againt Tbilisi would have been easy to check out, so too would this have been. A glance at the documents pertaining to international accreditation on our website would have assured Dr. Gollin that AALE standards in this matter are perfectly consistent with CHEA's.

    I invite readers of this discussion to make their own judgements about this. Go to CHEA's website and read what it says about international accreditation. Then compare it with our own practices. To make this as easy as possible, I am posting an AALE document that must be signed by all international applicants. There is much more on our website, of course, but this short document should make it easy to examine our practices without spending a great deal of time on the matter. The document follows:

    Addendum to International Applications

    Note: ALL institutions applying for membership with the American Academy for Liberal Education MUST attach this addendum to their completed application with the appropriate officer signing this Addendum.

    The acceptance of an application for membership in the Academy IS NOT AN EXPRESS OR IMPLIED CONTRACT. Membership in the Academy is ENTIRELY VOLUNTARY, whether an institution does or does not meet the requirements for any particular form of membership is entirely up to AALE.

    Scope of Accreditation for Non-US Institutions

    Accreditation for institutions outside the United States does not confer eligibility for US Financial Aid funds. Nor does accreditation guarantee that transfer units or degrees will be accepted by universities or other institutions. Acceptance of transfer units and degrees is decided by the accepting institution.

    International Agreements on Higher Education

    The Academy attempts at all times to adhere to international treaties regarding cross-border education, accreditation and quality assurance. Nothing in AALE materials should be construed to be in conflict with any international agreements to which the US government is a signatory.

    The Academy’s International Priorities

    In the belief that liberal learning transcends geographical and national borders, the Academy applies the same standards internationally as it does within the United States. This does not prevent the Academy from recognizing that different peoples and countries may interpret these requirements, and indeed, some aspects of liberal education itself, differently. The Academy makes every effort to employ the flexibility of judgment necessary to encompass such differences while also adhering to its own traditional standards.

    Domestic Quality Assurance

    All international applicants for accreditation must be recognized and authorized by their domestic governing agency. Additionally, each applicant must supply to the Academy the names of all quality assurance agencies within the home country of the applying institution. The Academy will be in communication with these agencies prior to conducting any third-party evaluations. All Academy visitors will be informed of the particulars of higher education of the country that they are visiting.

    Language

    All documents and communications with the Academy are to be submitted and conducted in English. The Academy will make every attempt to have at least one evaluator that is versed in the language in which courses are conducted at the applying institution.

    Costs

    All costs associated with accreditation activities undertaken by the Academy are to be payable in US funds only and are to be paid prior to rendered services.

    Decorum

    During site visits the Academy requires that Chancellors, Presidents, Vice-Presidents, rectors, deans and any other appropriate institutional officers be available for interview by Academy staff and/or third-party evaluators.
    I, _____________________________, have read and understood this document.
    (PRINTED NAME)
    ______________________________
    Signature of Executive Officer
    ______________________________
    Institution Name
    __________________
    Date

  • How I found THIS story & the Iranian News Story
  • Posted by Kim Preston on September 3, 2006 at 8:15pm EDT
  • "Kim Preston is also a researcher of private means that has archived everything from the Internet on an obscure Civil Case in Hawaii over the past 4 years knowing that Doug Lederman will write such an article in August 2006, but otherwise has been quiet up to now."

    I guess I can't avoid a little cynical commentary here, Therese. You and everyone else can debate the legitmacy of Tbilisi and the AALE. I have no problem with either institution. There is a healthy discussion going on and they both have an active voice making their cases here. I've been told more than once that I'm criticizing Tbilisi and the AALE's credibility and I am NOT. I'm not commenting here to judge either of them.

    The AUH court case didn't make the six o'clock news and rarely does any diploma mill related news story. I guess that would make it obscure, wouldn't it?

    Therese, here is exactly how I discovered THIS article. It's so simple. I have Google News e-mail me ANYTIME it has an article with the words "diploma mill". Try it sometime with your favorite topic. It works really well. Diploma mills continue to be an interest of mine but my world doesn't revolve around it. AUH is not the only similarly situated institution that I have looked into. There are others such as the American University of Asturias, http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22American+University+of+Asturias%22 and InterAmerican University. They mention each other's universities on their sites (or have in the past).

    As for Jeffrey...your comment to the article, “We have monitored the situation all along. It is important to us that when we saw what Safavi was being accused of, there was no hint that something shady was going on with regard to the quality of education. Had it been there, we might have made a different decision.”, and then your comment to me, "I know almost nothing about AUH-Hawaii." seem to conflict. How can you know with certainty that "nothing shady was going on regarding the quality of education" if you "know almost nothing about AUH-Hawaii", but yet you have "monitored the situation all along"? Did you know about the Iranian school story? If not, did Safavi happen mention it to you? Have you ask him about it since you found out about it? But then again, you believe the Iranian school news story may be completely fabricated.

    Not according to the author. Bill Samii promptly responded to my e-mail asking him about the source of the article. He said, "I stand by what I wrote based on the information available at the time. Moreover, Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, Inc., is funded by the U.S. Congress and has nothing to do with the Iranian state." Regards, Bill Samii.

    Funded by Congress? Hmmm. Could it be the propaganda machine is actually coming from Congress instead of Iran? (Gulp).

    And I must strictly go by YOUR word that you know enough about Safavi to know that he's not welcome back in his homeland. This cut both ways, Jeffrey.

  • Reply to Kim
  • Posted by Jeffrey Wallin , President at AALE on September 3, 2006 at 10:00pm EDT
  • Kim,

    I'm not at all trying to have it both ways. Read what I said again. Clearly, my remark about "nothing shady" going on was a direct reference to the court case. It is this that we began monitoring as soon as we were informed of it by the state of Hawaii. And that case appears not to be about whether the institution was a diploma mill.

    Besides, how did you think we could have been monitoring AUH-Hawaii? The place no longer exists. There is nothing to monitor. I repeat , I know no more about AUH-Hawaii than what the general public knows.

    I guess we have different definitions of what a "source" is. When you inquired about the sources of the story you were told that the author stands by it. But where did he get it from? Did he mention any non-Iranian sources? I doubt it.

    I'm quite well aware that Radio Liberty and Radio Free Europe are funded by Congress. But surely you are not suggesting that the source of their stories is the U.S. Congress?

    Iran, as I'm sure you are aware, is not the most transparent of states, especially to foreign journalists. So yes, I continue to treat their claims as being far more likely to stem from political/religious vindictiveness than from any desire for truth, especially when it comes to education. Maybe Safavi could have stayed and run a madrassa. By and large, that's what their view of "education" is these days.

    In any event, this is really between you and Safavi and has little to do with AALE. Unless, that is, you can give a good reason why the story, even if true, should change the opinions of the visiting team we sent to Tbilisi. They judged by what they saw and heard. We wanted to know if it was a good school. It is.

    JDW

  • Good Point, However
  • Posted by Kim Preston on September 4, 2006 at 5:10am EDT
  • Understood and accepted, Jeffrey. However, I am amazed that you say the problem is between me and Safavi. How do I fit into this in any way other than that I brought a few things about him to your attention? Safavi is not my problem. Safavi is part owner of Tbilisi. I wasn't involved with accrediting the school he's part owner of. That would be your institution. Wouldn't it be prudent to have a talk with Safavi? Safavi is a player more so for you than he is for me. You've never answered any question I've asked you as it pertains to whether you've ever had a conversation with him...about anything, nevermind the Iranian thing.

    I'm just someone who happened across some potentially salient information about him. Criticize me. Reject the information. Fine. But I would think that the AALE would (or could) do a little homework in that department. I'll admit I'm not well versed in the personalities of accrediting institutions. That's why I have refrained from being critical of Tbilisi and the AALE, because my gut tells me that both are just fine. But honestly, What would other accrediting institutions do if they were faced with this...truly nothing...as that seems to be the direction you prefer to take???

  • Accreditation?
  • Posted by Anne N on September 20, 2006 at 3:10pm EDT
  • Dear Sir/Madam,

    I am a student of the American University for the Humanities - Tbilisi Campus. Unfortunately, I just read this article today and am very concerned about the information it provided. I have researched the subject and I gather that the Tbilisi Campus was recently granted programmatic accreditation, through June 2015 by the American Academy for Liberal Education. I would like to inquire whether the actual University for the Humanities in the US has received acceditaion, and whether the diplomas issued by the institution will be recognized and valid in the United States and elsewhere.
    Thank you in advance for your assistance!

  • AUFH in the United States?
  • Posted by George Gollin , Professor of Physics at University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign on September 24, 2006 at 7:25pm EDT
  • "I am a student of the American University for the Humanities — Tbilisi Campus. Unfortunately, I just read this article today and am very concerned about the information it provided. I have researched the subject and I gather that the Tbilisi Campus was recently granted programmatic accreditation, through June 2015 by the American Academy for Liberal Education. I would like to inquire whether the actual University for the Humanities in the US has received acceditation, and whether the diplomas issued by the institution will be recognized and valid in the United States and elsewhere. Thank you in advance for your assistance!"

    The web site for the "American University for Humanities" group is http://www.aufh.net. That would be one place to check for information about the organization. It does not appear to be the case that any AUFH sites are located inside the United States, although "Mashdots College, California" is listed as an "affiliate" of AUFH.

    AALE is not recognized by the U.S. Department of Education as an accreditor of institutions outside the United States. This is not to be taken as an implied comment on AALE's practices regarding foreign institutions from the Dept. of Education: DoE is not allowed to take note of an accreditor's interaction with foreign degree providers. As I understand it, DoE is required to remain silent, neither endorsing nor criticizing an accreditor's activities in the domain of foreign higher education. As such, there can been no federal recognition of the AUFH accreditation by AALE as coming from an accreditor acting within the scope of its DoE recognition.

    AALE describes its practices towards foreign institutions as being equivalent to its practices regarding domestic schools. However, AALE's activities in the US higher education sphere are subject to DoE oversight, while its foreign activities are not. Consequently, there is no independent U.S. federal verification of the nature of AALE's practices towards foreign evaluations: there is only information coming directly from AALE.

    You may be concerned about acceptance in the United States of AUFH degrees. That will vary from employer to employer, and university to university. It is an arcane point, but the AUFH accreditation by AALE does NOT come from an accreditor holding federally-recognized authority to accredit foreign schools. AALE certainly is recognized to accredit U.S. schools, but not foreign schools. AUH-TC is a foreign school.

  • AUFH
  • Posted by Michael M. Harari , V.P, European Refion at AUFH on September 26, 2006 at 3:50pm EDT
  • Since the name of Professor Henry H. Safavi, an earlier president of this University, has been linked to a Civil Case in the State of Hawaii, and with the said Civil Case in Hawaii still continuing, we have been advised that it would be unethical to make any announcement outside what is available as public information. The ensuing reluctance by us to make any statements on the accusations, gossip, false libelous assertions, and falsifications that have appeared in the comments following the publication of the article entitled “A Tangled Tale of Tbilisi” in Inside Higher Ed {Published August 29, 2006) has resulted in a number of direct enquiries from our students as well as peers and members of the public, to which I venture to respond in the briefest possible manner:
    1- The implication that the Tbilisi Campus College of this University was a “Diploma Mill” has to be established in a court of law, where the person who started that piece of libelous misinformation will be held responsible for providing proof for the allegation. Legal proceeding against the person or persons who circulated the false assertion has already commenced.
    2- The obscure case of course outlines having been copied from some other institutions at the now defunct American University of Hawaii have no relevance to this University, which has insisted that all course curriculum and syllabi should be developed by the local members of faculty in charge of the course, geared to the local socio-cultural requirements.
    3- The reason for the presence of the said document on course outlines, which was displayed on the AUH Website since 1996 and which was developed and “sold” to AUH in 1994 by its sole owner of the time, Dr. Donald Hecht, should be addressed to him, who could perhaps explains how and by whom these outlines were produced. It does not concern this University, but I suggest that perhaps Professor Safavi should be faulted for having trusted what he inherited in 2004 from Dr. Hecht, an academic who has been president of 4 institutions of higher education in USA, and should have carried out the same sort of search that Professor Gollin has recently embarked upon.
    4- Professor Gollin in his response to our student, Ms. Anne Nemsitsveridze states that AALE is not recognized by the U.S. Department of Education as an accreditor of institutions outside the United States. I personally feel that the statement is somehow unkindly put. In fact what is stated in the rest of the paragraph, if it had been said more clearly, could have made what is said more factual. The U.S. Department of Education (DOE) has no policy regarding accreditation of overseas institutions by ANY of the accrediting agencies recognized by DOE. On the same token the accrediting agencies that have already extended accreditation to the American University of Cairo, American University of Beirut, American University of Paris, American University of Sharjah (and the list can go on to embrace more than 26 institutions overseas) have done so not because they had recognition from the U.S. Department of Education as accreditors of institutions outside the United States, but because accreditation in the United States is a private, voluntary, and non-federal process. It is no more than obtaining recognition from your peers in the United States.
    5- Having personally been involved in the accreditation process of a college in the United States by a regional accreditor, and 5 of the overseas branches of the American University for Humanities by AALE, I can assure Professor Gollin that the process followed by AALE proved to be much more stringent and thorough, particularly since they put a lot of emphasis on the quality and outcome, which I found lacking when dealing with the regional accreditor.
    6- As to acceptance of our degrees in the United States, what Professor Gollin has indicated is true, that because of the independent nature of higher education in the United States, it would be up to each University to accept or refuse to accept credits earned in another institution, depending on whether the courses passed correspond with what is offered at the host institution, be it from AUFH or the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Fortunately the degrees issued by AUFH have been accepted by some of the most prestigious universities in the world including London Imperial College, Edinburgh University, and University of Leeds in the United Kingdom, University of Paris and Robert Schumann University in France, University of Lund and University of Uppsala in Sweden, Central European University, Budapest University of Economic Sciences, Technical University of Budapest, and Janus Pannonius University in Hungary, University of Vienna and University of Gratz in Austria, University of New South Wales, University of Queensland and Monash University in Australia, and so on. In fact we are very proud of the fact that almost all scholarship awarded by overseas countries to the developing countries where we have a branch are grabbed by our graduates. The situation with USA is again different in the fact that tuition charged by US-based institutions are well beyond the reach of our graduates, and there is a distinct lack of scholarships and grants for developing countries, a point that I will take up later.
    7- As to employment of our graduates, Professor Gollin should rest assured that we show 100% employment for all our graduates, some of them now high echelon technocrats, captains of industry and commerce, and major role players in the public sector in their own communities, each of them an outstanding ambassador of what liberal education can produce.
    8- We are at the age of Knowledge Technology Revolution and Globalization; the concept of a university is no longer marble halls, parklands, and ivory towers of tenured professors, a relic from 19th Century. The other side of the coin to globalization process that conveys exploitation and greed in the material world of “capitalist superpowers” is to offer education, health and welfare at the least cost or practically no cost to the next generation of world elite. We are at war with ignorance, bigotry and prejudice, and the last thing we need to see is for the individuals with personal vested interests to join ranks with the oppressive fundamentalist forces who are determined to devaluate our way of thinking and living. I wish some of the commentators to this column could feel at first hand what it would mean in this day and age to stand for the name “American” in Beirut, Dubai, or even London. In order to put an end to this discourse I am extending hereby an invitation to Professor George Gollin to visit our campuses in the Middle East, all expenses paid. He will have a free hand to examine whatever he deems fit, and then come back and submit a report to this page. He will see for himself, in every instant, that all our campuses; are officially registered with the local responsible authority, normally Ministry of Science and Higher Education with their own complicated and rigorous rules and regulation; have their own Boards, Rectors, and Administrators reporting directly to a Regional Vice President; with their own faculty, students that attend full-time, curriculum that has no ‘soft-options”, and with an institutional discipline that would be envy of any college in USA. He will also note that the offices in the United States are the headquarters responsible for quality control, general coordination and procurement of educational resources, a practice now very much in evidence with all global operations.
    9- My hope is that Professor Gollin will accept the invitation, and on his return he will spend part of his incessant energy that he is devoting to matters relating to higher education in promoting the cause of the students from the developing countries, whose main aspiration is to spend at least one semester in a US-based institution and can not afford it. Perhaps Professor Gollin can become the champion of securing a few scholarships and grants from the billion-dollar endowment funds to show these future leaders of the developing world that what we preach in the way of democratic and liberal values we also selflessly practice.

  • Posted by George Gollin , Professor of Physics at University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign on September 27, 2006 at 4:35am EDT
  • "...said Civil Case in Hawaii still continuing..."

    If I recall the details correctly, except for the matter of lifting the order of incarceration, all appeal periods that followed all the court's judgments have expired. As a result, the "civil case" has been concluded.

    "Professor Gollin... states that AALE is not recognized by the U.S. Department of Education as an accreditor of institutions outside the United States. I personally feel that the statement is somehow unkindly put."

    The intent of the sentence which followed the one cited by Mr. Harari: "This is not to be taken as an implied comment on AALE’s practices regarding foreign institutions from the Dept. of Education: DoE is not allowed to take note of an accreditor’s interaction with foreign degree providers." was to counter an unkind reading of the previous sentence.

    "In fact what is stated in the rest of the paragraph, if it had been said more clearly..."

    The third sentence in the paragraph under discussion was "As I understand it, DoE is required to remain silent, neither endorsing nor criticizing an accreditor’s activities in the domain of foreign higher education." That is a clear statement, reinforcing the previous sentence which points out that DoE is blind to accreditors' foreign-school activities.

    "On the same token the accrediting agencies that have already extended accreditation to the American University of Cairo, American University of Beirut, American University of Paris, American University of Sharjah (and the list can go on to embrace more than 26 institutions overseas) have done so not because they had recognition from the U.S. Department of Education as accreditors of institutions outside the United States, but because accreditation in the United States is a private, voluntary, and non-federal process."

    The American University of Cairo, and a number of other non-US schools, are accredited by CHEA-recognized accreditors. The scope of CHEA recognition of US-based accreditors includes the possibility that the accreditor will grant accreditation to foreign schools. It is not because accreditation "is a private, voluntary, and non-federal process" but rather because CHEA includes the matter of accreditation granted to foreign schools in the set of practices that it will evaluate and monitor when granting/renewing recognition to an accreditor.

    "In order to put an end to this discourse I am extending hereby an invitation to Professor George Gollin to visit our campuses in the Middle East, all expenses paid."

    Your invitation is most kind. I would be particularly interested in receiving detailed information about instruction, faculty, and facilities at the Iran campus of the American University of Hawaii, and the nature of the interaction between AUH-Iran and the Iranian authorities during the last several years. This can be done with documents sent through the mail.

    "..He will also note that the offices in the United States are the headquarters responsible for quality control, general coordination and procurement of educational resources..."

    You are referring to the Delaware and Mississippi offices? Could you describe the number of staff members, and the qualifications they hold that permit them to perform these functions effectively?

  • AUFH
  • Posted by Michael M. Harari , VP, European Region at AUfH on September 29, 2006 at 12:40pm EDT
  • 1- Since we have no connection with the American University of Hawaii, and our interest in the case simply concerns the association of the name of one of our colleagues (now on sabbatical leave) with the defunct Hawaii institution, I can only quote from what we have received from the attorneys involved with the case. As to whether the case is continuing or not, I suggest Professor Gollin, who appears to know much more about the case than we do, should contact the lawyers of the party involved in that civil case.
    2- Regarding the position of the US Department of Education vis-à-vis accreditation of overseas institutions, all I am saying is that rather than going via the intricate manner by which Professor Gollin starts his comments, giving the wrong impression about American Academy of Liberal Education, namely that “AALE is not recognized by the U.S. Department of Education as an accreditor of institutions outside the United States”, he could have simply said that the US Department of Education (DoE) has no role or input in the matter. With all due respect, I find Professor Gollin’s attitude toward both the US Department of Education and AALE rather malevolent; I personally would not have used words such as “As I understand it, DoE is required to remain silent” or “DoE is blind” when referring to a part of the US Administration, particularly since we are now aware that the audience of this column presently comes partly from the overseas. Who has required DoE to remain silent, and in what way it is blind to what is going on? Perhaps Professor Gollin can enlighten us, since it is he who “understands it”. As to his qualm with AALE, I have nothing to add to what Dr. Wallin, President of AALE has so capably stated on behalf of his organization in this site.
    3- It also would have been appropriate for Professor Gollin to point out that CHEA is no more than a private organization, and its mandate does not supersede that of the US Department of Education.
    4- “Your invitation is most kind”, Professor Gollin says, but does not indicate if he has accepted it or not? He then goes on to show an interest in Iran !!! I am not certain why Professor Gollin is asking us about the operations of the American University of Hawaii (now-defunct) “particularly” in Iran? All I can say is that the American University for Humanities has never had any dealings with Iran since its inception. I sincerely do hope that some kind of response on this matter of interest to Professor Gollin can come from the people in the know, since I personally have neither any interest in nor any knowledge about the subject.
    5- I am a little amused by the manner which Professor Gollin tries to evade addressing topics of concern by posing confusing questions on unrelated matters, example given above. The American University for Humanities has never had any offices in Mississippi !!!? . As to who works with us and why and how they are working with us, a whole package is being prepared to be sent to him at the University of Illinois, since the material would be too lengthy to be posted on this column. Upon examination of the material he can then kindly clarify for our behalf what he has found and what he wanted to prove.
    6- I am truly sorry that Professor Gollin in his indirect manner apparently has turned down my invitation to visit our campuses, yet I understand it. As I have said before, it is dangerous for any one to venture to the places where we fly the flag and fight the rogue ideologies by working 12-14 hours a day, 7 days a week. I therefore do not blame any one for preferring the safety and comfort of their own cozy offices, with plenty of leisurely time on their hands to pursue their own personal interests, for not wanting to share the alarming experience with us.

  • AUH & Iran
  • Posted by Jamshid Joe Matini on September 29, 2006 at 9:30pm EDT
  • I am an investigative reporter for a pro-Democracy Iranian media in Diaspora. What I started as an article on the American University of Hawaii and its Iran connection is now turning into an e-book with the tentative title of “Who Killed AUH?” which I plan to publish on the Internet. I did send a lengthy e-mail to Inside Higher Ed a few days ago, which was not published. Now that Mr. George Gollin whishes to know something about AUH in Iran, perhaps the following could be displayed for his benefit and that of all the others who might want to know this part of the story:

    1- AUHIran was established through a loophole in the Iranian rules and regulations that allow foreign investors establish a presence in its Free Zones in the Persian Gulf. It established offices in the Kish Island and Qeshm Island Free Zones, along with a number of other US-based enterprises including Halliburton, Pfizer, etc. in 2001. A case against its presence in Iran, in which the plaintiff was the Iranian Ministry of Higher Education, Research and Technology, was thrown out by the Iranian Superior Court in 2002, distinctly signifying that AUHIran was legally established.
    2- The allegations against AUH in Hawaii were first made public in a pretrial hearing in the Second Circuit Court of Maui more than a year after this, and in the same pretrial hearing, the Office of Consumer Affairs of the State of Hawaii, represented by Jeffrey E. Brunton Esq. was able to obtain a Summary Judgment against AUH through presentation of a long list of allegations of infringements of Hawaii Revised Status, almost all of which were either dropped or never proved by the Plaintiff (Court Transcripts of the Case).
    3- Jeffery E. Brunton Esq., representing the Office of Consumer Affairs of the State of Hawaii in the Civil Case against AUH, circulated copies of the Summary Judgment thus obtained to all the various potential authorities of the 31 countries in which AUH was operating at the time as “ The Final Judgment”, and in circulating this document, also sent copies of the document together with a cover letter to the authorities of the Islamic Republic of Iran. This was done on the official letterhead of State of Hawaii, as evidenced in the clippings from Tehran daily paper “Keyhan”, the semi-official mouthpiece of the radical fundamentalists in Iran. Under the terms of Iran Sanction Bill, 1997, which restricts correspondence with Tehran Regime for any U.S. Federal or State employee, contingent on the direct consent from the US Department of Justice, Mr. Brunton must have had that consent.
    4- After Mr. Brunton’s communication with Iranians, a new complaint was lodged against AUH Iran, this time by the Iranian Ministry of Health and Welfare, using as evidence the Summary Judgment sent to them by Mr. Brunton, which alleged that AUH had issued medical degrees. After it was established in front of the Court in Maui that AUH never had any medical degree programs, and never enrolled even one student in anything resembling a medical degree program of any nature, the Judge ordered Mr. Brunton to sign a stipulation to this effect (Court Transcripts of the Case). Mr. Brunton refused the Court’s order and was never questioned by the Court for his refusal. The document, if signed, could have saved the AUH operation in Iran, and its lack resulted in the Primary Court (their system is different from that of US) ordering the offices of AUH in Iran to be put under lock and seal, and its director to be arrested and imprisoned for 3 years on the bogus charge of “selling medical degrees”.
    5- At this juncture Radio Farda/the Persian division of Radio Liberty, which is an official US governmental establishment, started 2 rancorous broadcasts against AUH, based on a telephonic interview with a certain Mr. Nasserzadeh in Iran. I can not establish if Radio Farda/Radio Liberty directorships and the individuals conducting the interviews knew that they were talking to Brigadier-General Houshang Nasserzadeh, Head of Counter-Intelligence of Tehran Law Enforcement Forces, a part of the Islamic Revolutionary Guards (recently retired) or not? My inquiries to Radio Farda/Radio Liberty directorships on this issue have gone unanswered.
    6- Also at this juncture a number of articles and even full-page advertisements started to appear in the newspapers of Pakistan, Oman, United Arab Emirates, Kuwait, Armenia, and India, all neighboring countries of Iran and/or destinations for Iranian students who are looking for reasonable venues of higher education, calling AUH a “diploma mil” that was closed by the State of Hawaii. The texts are all the same, whether in the format of a reportage or an advertisement, and for all of us in the media, this is a distinct sign that the reportage is no more than a paid advert.
    7- When the Primary Court in Iran found the director of AUH Iran guilty of selling medical degrees, a completely unfounded allegation as testified in the Maui Court Records, they set a bail of 10 Billion Rials (equivalent to US$1.2 Million) for him. This is in a country where the bail amount recommended to the judges for second-degree murder is 250 Million Rials (US$26,000). This was followed by a letter to every student, faculty member and administrative staff of AUH Iran issued by the security authorities of the Regime in Tehran, stating that unless they immediately and publicly and in written form did not dissociate themselves from AUH, they will lose any governmental jobs that they may hold, and could even be put on trail for “treason”. This was mostly addressed to more than 650 adjunct faculties, almost 400 of them US-trained academics, and to the postgraduate students, all in high governmental positions, one of them the then Minister of Education, and a member of the “opposition” Reformist group. Following this letter and the protests that it caused, Ayatollah Shahroudi, the head of Iranian Judiciary Power, in a number of public interviews reaffirmed that “Their (AUH) case is not that of selling degrees or that of the quality of their education, but of operating in Iran as a university without the appropriate authorization”, yet the ruling of the Primary Court was not overturned by him and still stands.
    8- Immediately after the ultimatum the schools belonging to the Sufi sect, of which Dr. Safavi is a grand master, were put to torch in Iran, and all the followers of Sufism sacked from their jobs particularly in the fields of military and education including just over 100 AUHIran adjunct faculty, as reflected in the reports by Amnesty International and US Congress.
    9- All the above can be verified by a search under “Hawaii” at: www.baztab.com,
    a website run by General Mohsen Rezaei, ex-Commander-in-Chief of the Revolutionary Guards, who was an alternate candidate with Ahmadinejad, both nominated by the fundamentalists, in the recent presidential “elections” in Iran.

    Hope the above information has been of some use.

  • Posted by George gollin , Professor of Physics at University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign on September 30, 2006 at 1:50pm EDT
  • Michael M. Harari wrote: "Who has required DoE to remain silent, and in what way it is blind to what is going on?"

    It is the Dept. of Education's interpretation of the U.S. federal regulations that define its scope of activity and authority that DoE must remain mute on all matters relating to accreditation of foreign universities.

    Michael M. Harari wrote: "The American University for Humanities has never had any offices in Mississippi !!!?."

    According to the State of Hawaii, "Safavi actually established his Mississippi corporation named American University of Hawaii, Inc. prior to the January 31, 2005 entry of the permanent injunction and final judgment against the Hawaii corporation. There was an out-of-court mediation in June 2004. At the mediation, Safavi indicated he "knew how to play the game" and would just move to another state if forced to do so. He quietly set up the MS corp without advising us or the court. Safavi set up the DE corp of the same name on Feb 23, 2005. He changed its name to American University for Humanities on March 10, 2005."

    It is difficult to believe that "American University of Hawaii," "American University For Humanities," and "American University of Human Sciences" are independent organizations. Note the mix of California, Mississippi, and Delaware addresses, as well as various shared phone numbers in the following:
    ************************
    American University of Hawaii
    auh.edu domain registration information on August 25, 2006
    Administrative Contact:
    Hassan Safavi
    AUH
    981 Highway 80 East
    Clinton, MS 39056
    (310) 234-9211
    safavi@yahoo.com
    Technical Contact:
    Raymond Shenassa
    AUH
    1722 Westwood Boulevard
    Los Angeles, CA 90024
    (310) 234-9211
    info@auh.edu
    ************************
    American University For Humanities
    http://www.aufh.net/index.php?option=com_contact&Itemid=3
    Contact Us
    Registrar Contact Address:
    501 Silverside Road
    Wilmington, DE
    USA
    19809
    info@auh.edu
    Telephone: 1 (302) 230-2717
    Fax: 1 (302) 230-2716

    aufh.net domain registration information
    Administrative Contact:
    Safavi, Professor Henry safavi@auh.net
    American University for Humanities
    AUH International
    1722 Westwood Boulevard, #201
    Los Angeles, California 90024
    United States
    (310) 234-9211 Fax -- (310) 234-9231
    ************************
    American University of Human Sciences
    http://www.auhs.us/contact_us.html
    General Administration:
    961 HWY 80 EAST
    Clinton, MS 39056
    Telephone : (1) 601-923-0954
    Fax: (1) 601-923-0955
    E-mail info@auhs.us
    Academic Programs and all international communications:
    961 HWY 80 EAST
    Clinton, MS 39056
    Telephone : (1) 601-923-0954
    Fax: (1) 601-923-0955
    E-mail: admissions@auhs.us
    Worldwide Web and Related Links:
    AUH Main Website:http://www.auhs.us

    auhs.us domain registration information
    Registrant Name:
    Henry Safavi
    Registrant Address:
    1722 Westwood Boulevard
    Suite 201 - 202
    Los Angeles, CA 90024
    +1 (310) 234-9211
    ************************

    We see:

    AUH: Clinton, MS and Los Angeles, CA
    AUfH: Wilmington, DE and Los Angeles, CA
    AUHS: Clinton, MS and Los Angeles, CA.

    Michael M. Harari wrote: "As to who works with us and why and how they are working with us, a whole package is being prepared to be sent to him at the University of Illinois, since the material would be too lengthy to be posted on this column."

    Thank you.

  • AUH College of Medical Education web page
  • Posted by George Gollin , Professor of Physics at Univesity of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign on September 30, 2006 at 4:55pm EDT
  • Jamshid Joe Matini wrote: "...using as evidence the Summary Judgment sent to them by Mr. Brunton, which alleged that AUH had issued medical degrees. After it was established in front of the Court in Maui that AUH never had any medical degree programs, and never enrolled even one student in anything resembling a medical degree program of any nature..."

    This is from an October 1, 2000 archive of the AUH web page http://auh.edu/Colleges/college_of_medical_education.htm:

    "OFFICE OF THE DEAN FOR MEDICAL EDUCATION
    33 NORTH MARKET STREET, WAILUKU, MAUI, HI 96793, USA.
    TELEPHONE : 808 534 0816. FACSIMILE : 808 534 0917

    The American University of Hawaii is proud to announce that through an Agreement of Articulation with the Yerevan State Medical University it will be offering a number of degree programs in Medical Sciences, including Doctorate of Medicine.

    The programs offered will be based on the curriculum offered by the best medical schools in the United States of America, and will run in parallel with the programs offered by YSMU, a very reputable institution at world level.

    All degrees issued will be that of AUH, and will be ratified by the Ministry of Education and Science, and Ministry of Health of the Republic of Armenia.

    Both universities are presently developing modes of implementing the programs from Academic Year 1999.

    For further details kindly contact the office of the Dean for Medical Education, AUH, address as above, or your local AUH representation."

  • PLEASE!!!
  • Posted by Jamshid Joe Matini on October 1, 2006 at 4:50pm EDT
  • Come on Mr. Gollin, read the whole thing posted by me once more. A letter of intent with a world renowned Medical School under the supervision of the Armenian Ministry of Science and Higher Education that came to no fruition is not “selling medical degrees” that the man with the Office of Consumer Protection of Hawaii indicated to the Iranians. You must obviously have the transcript of the Court’s proceedings as I do. The QUESTION is why the person representing the State of Hawaii, who was in correspondence with the Iranian Regime, did not sign the Court’s order for stipulation that AUH never had any medical degree programs and never enrolled any medical students? You wanted to know about AUH and Iran, and you now have all the answers. Since you appear to be privy to insider information on the Civil Case that is not in the domain of public information, why don’t you address the real issues raised in my communication?

  • staffing?
  • Posted by George Gollin , Professor of Physics at University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign on October 2, 2006 at 8:50am EDT
  • Michael M. Harari wrote: "..He will also note that the offices in the United States are the headquarters responsible for quality control, general coordination and procurement of educational resources..."

    I had asked if you were referring to the Delaware and Mississippi offices and asked about the number of staff members, and the qualifications they hold that permit them to perform these functions effectively. I am still interested in this information. You asserted that U.S. offices are providing significant oversight to multiple foreign academic providers. This requires a substantial investment in staff and resources in the United States. Could you describe the offices that perform this function please?

    For several years the AUH web site showed a "College of Medical Education" web page. This was the web page that explained that AUH "will be offering a number of degree programs in Medical Sciences, including Doctorate of Medicine" and that "The programs offered will be based on the curriculum offered by the best medical schools in the United States of America, and will run in parallel with the programs offered by YSMU..."

    The phrase "run in parallel" indicates that the AUH "College of Medical Education" would be an active participant in curriculum delivery at an independant site. This would not possible unless the AUH College of Medical Education had employed its own instructional staff, many of whom held M.D. degrees. Who comprised the College of Medical Education's instructional staff and from where had they obtained their terminal degrees?

  • Important
  • Posted by Jamshid Joe Matini on October 7, 2006 at 7:10pm EDT
  • George Gollin on September 30 wrote” There was an out-of-court mediation in June 2004. At the mediation, Safavi indicated he “knew how to play the game” and would just move to another state if forced to do so. He quietly set up the MS corp without advising us or the court. Safavi set up the DE corp of the same name on Feb 23, 2005. He changed its name to American University for Humanities on March 10, 2005.”

    For the past 7 days I have tapped every possible source and I have not been able to find any records or recollection of the above. Could Mr. Gollin tell us where or from whom did he get this story? It is very important to know the exact source, please.

  • Posted by Dennis Ruhl on October 23, 2006 at 11:05am EDT
  • George apparently has established good connections in administration of education in many states and with enforcement up to and including the FBI and the US Secret Service. George seems to know a lot of things.

    I have followed George's degreemill buster career over the last several years and have agreed with him on some of his early concerns with the Washington State/Liberian group.

    I simply cannot fathom the criticism of what appears to be a very successful and small Georgian school providing education to Georgians. While one can still purchase a degree on the internet with a resume and cash, what is the point of attacking schools that actually do provide a reasonable education? George's work is not done. It is simply misdirected.

    And what is the criticism of the AALE all about?

  • AUHIran
  • Posted by Morteza Beheshti , CEO at Beheshti & Associates, Law Offices on October 23, 2006 at 4:55pm EDT
  • PRESS RELEASE

    The Law Offices of Dr. Morteza Beheshti, attorneys to Dr. Ardeshir Ghasemlou, Director of Central Information Organization of the American University of Hawaii in Iran wishes to inform all concerned that Branch 12 of the Appellate Court of the County of Tehran, after seven months of comprehensive and thorough investigation and deliberation, and in accordance with the Clause 37 of the Constitutional Law of the Islamic Republic of Iran, has found Dr. Ghasemlou not guilty of any fraudulent operation.
    The Law Offices of Dr. Beheshti, with extending its appreciation of the legal decision of the honorable judges of the said Appellate Court, sincerely hopes that we could be witness to legal perspicacity in all cases, the emergence of the truth and candor, and dependability of all judgments.

    Tehran, October 23, 2006
    Ref.: 110/7976

  • Posted by Jeffrey E. Brunton , Staff Attorney at Office of Consumer Protection on December 11, 2006 at 7:45pm EST
  • Mr. Matini appears to have a few of his facts in error, perhaps due to a misunderstanding of the legal system in Hawaii. I would be curious as to how Mr. Matini has obtained court transcripts of various matters, as none were prepared to my knowledge by the various court reporters and none are available online.

    “2- The allegations against AUH in Hawaii were first made public in a pretrial hearing in the Second Circuit Court of Maui more than a year after this, and in the same pretrial hearing, the Office of Consumer Affairs of the State of Hawaii, represented by Jeffrey E. Brunton Esq. was able to obtain a Summary Judgment against AUH through presentation of a long list of allegations of infringements of Hawaii Revised Status, almost all of which were either dropped or never proved by the Plaintiff (Court Transcripts of the Case).”

    Response: In fact, the allegations against AUH were first made a matter of public record on August 21, 2003 when the Complaint instituting the lawsuit was filed in the First Circuit Court in Honolulu. On February 26, 2004 the State filed a motion for partial summary judgment. In this motion, the State asked the court to rule that AUH’s conduct had violated Hawaii’s law as alleged in the Complaint and further asked the court to permanently (or at least preliminarily) enjoin it from continuing to violate the law. The evidence that AUH had indeed violated the law as alleged in the Complaint was presented in the motion and the court found the evidence sufficient to grant partial summary judgment as requested. The allegations were not dropped or never proven as you say. To the contrary they were, in fact and law, proven in the motion. The resulting court order was called the Order Granting Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and Permanent Injunction Against Defendant American University Hawaii, Inc. or, in the Alternative, for a Preliminary Injunction. This was only a partial ruling, however, as a number of issues remained to be decided. Those issues were subsequently decided in the State’s favor and a Permanent Injunction and Final Judgment Against Defendant American University Hawaii, Inc. was entered on January 31, 2005.

    “3- Jeffery E. Brunton Esq., representing the Office of Consumer Affairs of the State of Hawaii in the Civil Case against AUH, circulated copies of the Summary Judgment thus obtained to all the various potential authorities of the 31 countries in which AUH was operating at the time as “ The Final Judgment”, and in circulating this document, also sent copies of the document together with a cover letter to the authorities of the Islamic Republic of Iran. This was done on the official letterhead of State of Hawaii, as evidenced in the clippings from Tehran daily paper “Keyhan”, the semi-official mouthpiece of the radical fundamentalists in Iran. Under the terms of Iran Sanction Bill, 1997, which restricts correspondence with Tehran Regime for any U.S. Federal or State employee, contingent on the direct consent from the US Department of Justice, Mr. Brunton must have had that consent.”

    Response: Because a preliminary injunction is effective only when it is served upon parties, the State mailed a copy of the Order Granting Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and Permanent Injunction Against Defendant American University Hawaii, Inc. or, in the Alternative, for a Preliminary Injunction to each of AUH’s affiliates. It was not sent to any governmental authorities anywhere in the world by my office.

    Similarly the Permanent Injunction and Final Judgment Against Defendant American University Hawaii, Inc. entered on January 31, 2005 was mailed to AUH’s affiliates. It is, in fact, the final judgment against AUH. In addition, this document was mailed to the United States Embassies in the various countries in which AUH had affiliates. Since there is no US Embassy in Iran, the documents were mailed to the US Interests section of the Swiss Embassy in Teheran. Neither I nor my office has had any contact, written or otherwise, with any Iranian officials.
    “4- . . .After it was established in front of the Court in Maui that AUH never had any medical degree programs, and never enrolled even one student in anything resembling a medical degree program of any nature, the Judge ordered Mr. Brunton to sign a stipulation to this effect (Court Transcripts of the Case). Mr. Brunton refused the Court’s order and was never questioned by the Court for his refusal. The document, if signed, could have saved the AUH operation in Iran, and its lack resulted in the Primary Court (their system is different from that of US) ordering the offices of AUH in Iran to be put under lock and seal, and its director to be arrested and imprisoned for 3 years on the bogus charge of “selling medical degrees”.”

    Response: This was never established-- although Dr. Safavi claimed it to be the case. There was no order requiring me so sign any stipulation. The Complaint, however, was subsequently amended to allege that either AUH was offering medical degrees in violation of Hawaii law or, alternatively, that it was falsely representing itself as doing such.

  • AUH
  • Posted by mar on June 20, 2007 at 12:45pm EDT
  • I know all messages are moderated before appearing on this site . It seems you only add comments which are on your side or you have something against it to say .Be so happy because AUH of Iran was completely closed and our education came also to an end .Do know that your enemity toward this man Safavi just will ruin somebody's education.