Search News


Browse Archives

News

The New State U.

August 31, 2006

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

The University of Illinois is in many ways a classic state university system. Urbana-Champaign is a flagship, with a history of Nobel laureates and competitive admissions. The Chicago campus has been very much on the rise in the last 10 years, expanding research and graduate programs and attracting academic stars. Springfield has more of an undergraduate and liberal arts focus.

All three campuses have some distance education programs, but the university system is now getting ready to launch a whole new campus, creating an online division that could eventually rival the individual campuses in enrollment levels, operating in a very different environment. The University of Illinois Global Campus would be operated as a separate for-profit entity, have almost entirely part-time faculty members (and none with tenure), and focus on a relatively small number of degree programs.

The idea, according to Illinois officials, is to learn from a variety of models out there that are growing rapidly (UMass Online, University of Maryland University College, and the University of Phoenix), while also learning from some of the failed attempts of  the dot-com boom, when many colleges started online, for-profit spinoffs with much hype -- only to see them go nowhere.

"This could be extremely significant in the online landscape," said Trace Urdan, who tracks education ventures for the Signal Hill Capital Group. The Illinois effort reflects a number of key trends, he said: the continued growing popularity of online education, the desire of many adults to study not only online but with an institution they know well, and the realization of many public universities that they need different types of models to compete for these students -- while not promising the moon overnight, as some institutions did 10 years ago.

"This is part of a continuing trend where the traditional schools and state institutions are becoming much more competitive in the areas that have been dominated by the for-profits," he said. "Their online programs are becoming more relevant, and even the ones that aren't spending effectively have boosted the amount of money they are spending."

Richard Vedder, an Ohio University professor who has been an outspoken critic of traditional higher education and who is a member of the U.S. education secretary's commission studying higher education, has been praising the Illinois plan as a "bold innovation" that could shake up public higher education.

But not everyone at Illinois is in love with the plan, which is expected to receive final board approval next month. Faculty leaders from the three existing campuses are working on a letter to express concerns about the idea. One faculty leader who asked not to be identified said that the plan risked the university's values. "Tenure is a very critical concern because it is a hallmark of the academic freedom that is needed for intellectual inquiry," said the professor. "If people are all part-time and non-tenure track, is that a university? Is that a faculty? It's certainly the University of Phoenix, but it's not traditionally what has been the University of Illinois."

The Illinois plan was the result of nearly a year of work by a committee that included administrators and faculty members (while some professors question the direction of the plan, even critics praise the administration for having been inclusive in planning).

Chet Gardner, who led the effort as vice president for academic affairs and is now leading the drive to create the new campus, said that the committee came to believe that distance education needed to grow, and that it couldn't do so with existing models. Currently, online enrollments are about 6,900, or 2 percent systemwide "and that just can't scale up," he said. Under the new structure, Illinois wants to have 10,000 students enrolled in 5 years and up to 50,000 in 10 years. Programs would be limited -- largely business, technology, education and similar fields in which there is strong demand by adult learners. "This will not be a traditional university where you have 100 or more academic programs," he said.

By raising money privately -- about $15-20 million for starters -- Illinois plans to create the new university without state funds (which have generally been in short supply for the last decade for higher ed in the state). As a private, for-profit institution, without tenure, the new campus will seek independent accreditation, and expects to have the freedom to create (and discard) programs quickly. Courses will be starting every few weeks, not just on a traditional semester schedule. And while most students are expected to be Illinois residents, there will be no differential between in and out of state rates.

Despite all of those very non-traditional characteristics, Gardner insisted that this "isn't about profit," but is about the university's historic mission. "What's driving this is that we are a land grant university. It's our core mission to provide access to high quality education first and foremost to the people of Illinois," he said, adding that adult students who can't enroll full time on an Illinois campus "aren't well served today."

One contention of Illinois officials is that while the online market is in some ways national or international -- since anyone online can enroll anywhere -- there is increasing evidence that online customers still want to root for the home team. UMass Online is one of the entities Illinois has studied -- and its figures suggest a strong desire to enroll at a local institution online. During the last academic year, the institution's enrollments increased by 23 percent, to 21,682 -- in a state with no shortage of colleges and where many experts have warned that students could become scarce as the U.S. population shifts out of the Northeast. Revenues from those students were up 32 percent, to nearly $23 million.

Only 28 percent of UMass Online students are from out of state.

"There is a lot of regionalism in online education," said David Gray, CEO of UMass Online. "I think Illinois will find a lot of receptivity in its own backyard."

Peter Stokes, executive vice president at Eduventures, an education research firm that has advised Illinois on its plans, agreed. "State sponsorship is very positive" as potential students are considering where to enroll -- in person or online, he said. Whatever people imagined about the worldwide market for distance education, "most enrollments are local."

Stokes said that the Illinois plans reflect a maturation of the way traditional universities are thinking about starting new online ventures, some of them with for-profit models. "Everyone knows the failures of NYU Online or Fathom," he said. "I think that going back, universities thought they could access a tremendous amount of venture capital," and then ended up "putting their own money in, without real business models in place for the time."

The survivors of that era -- he cited eCornell as an example -- are "more modest in focus."

Stokes said it was significant that Illinois was talking about raising serious amounts of money, but not outrageous sums, and that its emphasis was on serving its own state. "The motivation to go for-profit today isn't to raise capital, but to free themselves from constraints of traditional university governance. With traditional governance, it's hard to make the kinds of quick decisions you need."

Several other major public universities are currently considering an approach similar to what Illinois is planning, Stokes said, although he declined to name them. While places like UMass Online, the University of Maryland University College, and Penn State World Campus have a head start, not to mention the advantages the University of Phoenix enjoys, Stokes said that there was probably room for more players -- provided they maintain a focus on their states.

Urdan of Signal Hill agreed. "The opportunity to be as big as Phoenix is gone," he said. The opportunities that remain for state university systems are closer to home.

Not all supporters of online education, however, favor the for-profit model. UMass Online is "firmly nonprofit," Gray said, even though it is making plenty of money. It turned over $8 million in what would have been profit to the university system last year, and Gray said he expects that to rise to $10 million this year -- even with extensive growth in programming.

Gray said that UMass Online's success relates to a degree of independence it does enjoy -- while it works with individual faculty members and professors at UMass campuses, the online program can add offerings or eliminate them quickly, set up marketing efforts, and generally "operate on its own schedule," Gray said.

"I think there was a recognition here that we needed independence to pump some energy into this initiative, that something very distinctly different had to be done," he said.

So why stay nonprofit? Gray said that another key to success has been faculty support. New offerings are designed and taught by regular university faculty members. He said that any move to for-profit status would put that support at risk. "We never got into the arguments about profit-making," he said. "We needed engagement to occur for this to work, and this model isn't threatening. We got the engagement we needed because we didn't spend a lot of time on the arguments about being a commercial enterprise."

Gray said that there's no doubt that "some things can be easier by adopting a for-profit model," but he said that university leaders need to remember that "there are tradeoffs."

Pat Langley, chair of the Campus Senate at the University of Illinois at Springfield, said that her campus is providing a model of how distance education can work well -- and that she's skeptical of the new model being proposed. Springfield has received support from the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation to put traditional liberal arts courses online, and Langley said that professors have embraced the idea. "You always find computer science and business being offered online, but we're working to get philosophy and English up as well," said Langley, a professor of women's studies and legal studies.

The reason faculty members like the program -- which has resulted in Springfield having a larger share of its enrollment online than the other Illinois campuses -- is that quality is the same, Langley said. "We received a commitment that the people who would teach these courses would be the people who teach them on the ground, and as a result, the quality is indistinguishable online or in the classroom, and the professors are enjoying teaching these courses," she said.

Is a new model needed to offer more courses? "It depends what your goal is," Langley said. "In our model, students are getting a very high quality education and I'm sure that it's at least as good as if they were sitting in the bricks and mortar classroom," she said. "We don't think the model needs to be changed."

Some faculty members are supportive of the new online effort -- with a few conditions. Elliot Kaufman, chair of the University Senates Conference of the Illinois campuses, said that while "a lot of faculty are concerned, I don't share those concerns." Kaufman, a professor of biochemistry and molecular genetics at the Chicago campus, was on the committee that prepared the plan.

He noted that the university uses part-time faculty members now and that the quality of instruction by adjuncts can be very high, provided they are adequately supported. "We can't scale up what we are doing right now with the existing model, and I think we need to use adjuncts," he said.

"The trick is to make sure everyone is highly qualified and trained," Kaufman said. "I understand the concerns some people have about this model, but I don't think we should say we don't like this model. We should say we'll do this, and do it well."

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on The New State U.

  • re:
  • Posted by PS on August 31, 2006 at 10:15am EDT
  • The quoted professor who expresses concern in the article says it is not "traditionally" what the college has been. I find it interesting that tradition is the only defense the instructor has against change. The world is changing - deal with it. In regard to tenure, professors have used it as a shield from accountability and work for too long. Even though most professors work hard, their refusal to stand up against the few who abuse tenure gives higher education in general a bad name. It is too late now. In order to fulfill their mission, colleges will have to revamp the tenure system - or else state and federal governments will do it for them.

  • Adjuncts teaching on-line courses
  • Posted by Harriette Seiler at U of Louisville on August 31, 2006 at 10:15am EDT
  • Commenting on the expanded utilization of adjuncts to teach on-line courses, Elliot Kaufman, Chair of the University Senates Conference of the Illinois campuses, makes the point that "the quality of instruction by adjuncts can be very high." He goes on to say, "The trick is to make sure everyone is highly qualified and well-trained." I would add "and adequately compensated."
    Harriette Seiler
    Doctoral student in Higher Ed Admin
    Former adjunct
    Member, AAUP
    University of Louisville

  • Adjuncts for this kind of program
  • Posted by s yazge , Asst Prof on August 31, 2006 at 10:16am EDT
  • Online is definitely here to stay, and can be done well with plenty of effort. However, to build a program like this on the backs of and at the financial expense of non-tenure track adjuncts is unethical. While is certainly fits the business model of our day (outsource to the cheapest labor), it speaks poorly for the educational institution.

  • Posted by Mike on August 31, 2006 at 10:40am EDT
  • One key is that the program will "focus on a relatively small number of degree programs". I doubt that they'll be doing math or chemistry degrees online.

  • Two Problems
  • Posted by Alan Lanning on August 31, 2006 at 11:16am EDT
  • I am a retired full-time faculty member now an adjunct teaching online. Two points I wish to make. First, online faculty need to have had classroom experience and should teach in the classroom at least one section per year. Otherwise it is easy to loose touch with what works and what doesn’t with students. Second, tenure is critical to maintaining academic freedom. That is why tenure was developed. Adjuncts do not have real academic freedom. At least that is the common perception. Your employment is purely at the whim of the associate dean. Do not annoy that person or you are out of work. Without tenure, without contractual safeguards, without power of any sort, part-timers cannot risk expressing controversial ideas. The administration, not the faculty, will soon dictate the curriculum.

  • Risks Ahead?
  • Posted by Brock Holmes , President at Enrollment Management Solutions on August 31, 2006 at 11:45am EDT
  • The U. of Illinois approach seems well-balanced, but has some delicate balancing to do going forward. At UMUC OnLine, where I was SVP and co-founder, we were successful in all aspects of our enterprise – including raising $20 million in outside financing and significantly improving online marketing, recruiting and retention operations. We did not, however, work closely enough with the academic side of the house, and so ultimately did not create the institutional consensus we needed to close our deal with the university. By working with faculty, and keeping all stakeholder interests in sharp focus, Illinois seems to have built consensus around its approach. The one area that most likely will contain the greatest complexity going forward will be balancing the interests of outside investors with those of the "traditional" academic institution. Outside money needs to achieve short term financial returns, while a traditional academic institution needs to demonstrate long term “social value” returns. Both need control of the enterprise to achieve their respective goals, but only one can truly have that control.

  • What's most telling
  • Posted by Tom on August 31, 2006 at 11:45am EDT
  • about this effort is the relatively quiet reaction of tenured faculty to it. Perhaps it is only emblematic of their profound lack of concern for contingent labor or for the future of their respective professions, but one would imagine that they might be more concerned for themselves. After all, if the e-university is successful in leveraging the labor of adjuncts into a profitable enterprise, will 'tradition' be a sufficient bulkhead to protect tenure and an unorganized faculty? NYU may indeed be a watershed moment for the graduate student movement but ultimately, this one will prove much more telling for the fate of higher education in general. I feel nothing but sorrow for higher education and pity for these selfishly short-sighted and narrow-minded people.

  • Posted by hls on August 31, 2006 at 12:10pm EDT
  • The problem really does revolve around issue of adjunct, for all the professional and ethical reasons related above. There has been a canary in the tunnel situation for quite some time now, but ultimately it will backfire for lack of faculty: within a comparatively short time, no one will be able to justify the expense of even a Masters Degree if the best that can be expected is an insecure, temporary position paying in one year less than a hamburger slinger makes.

  • Jumping on the Latest Bandwagon
  • Posted by Seen Too Much on August 31, 2006 at 12:10pm EDT
  • Here are a few things these New State U's could think about before they jump on the latest educational bandwagon and glomm on to the latest quick fix. (Not that they will, of course.)

    1) Adjuncts who are poorly paid have to overteach just to make ends meet. How much time do they have to stay current in their field? I'm not talking about research; I'm talking about knowing what's happened in the last ten years in the field. I claim that college students can't be effectively taught by faculty who have no time to stay current in their field, and I'd like to see the counter-arguments to that.

    2) Sure, adjuncts can be made to jump through hoops and fired at will. As long as there's a big pool of adjuncts, deans can be as capricious as they please. Sounds great. But what happens when the big pool of curent graduate students starts to dry up? Are bright people in the future going to spend an extra five or six years in graduate school to make $20,000 a year and be treated this way? Where will the adjuncts come from then?

    3) What will colleges and universities do who don't have a big pool of adjuncts in the vicinity? Will they become mere relay points for curricula developed in a few big schools and taught by their adjuncts? A single building with banks of computers could house most colleges, on that model. How will the upper administrators justify their salaries then? And do we really want higher education to follow the business model of Big Radio?

    4) Let's say that under this model, the pool of adjunct faculty can expand nationwide, or even internationally. Schools had better have some pretty good screening procedures in place, then, before they hire their adjunct faculty. What happens when they are sued because a 16 year old dual enrollment student was sexually harassed by an online adjunct instructor no one from the college has ever met, because the instructor is physically located, say, 3600 miles away?

    That's a worst case scenario, of course. Much more common will be fraud and inflation of credentials by instructors. Still more common, even more common than it is now, will be the problem of a vastly expanded and poorly controlled adjunct faculty, having little or no contact with one another or their nominal department and teaching with little or no oversight from the department or the college. That's the problem right now, and it's led to all sorts of complaints about dismal student learning outcomes. Is more outsourcing going to improve them?

  • Same ploy, new millenium?
  • Posted by Dr. F. Gump on August 31, 2006 at 12:36pm EDT
  • Wasn't it the U. of Chicago that jumped on the Distance Education movement of 100 years ago (correspondence schools)?

    Initially the for-profits lead the way, with a few well-known universities jumping in. At least the established universities attempted to retain the students.

    What are the retention numbers for all these online schools?

    Are the exams proctored or may the remaining students (at end-of-term) keep reference and textbooks available while testing?

    Questions most pro-on-liners prefer not to discuss?

  • Posted by Stephanie on August 31, 2006 at 12:36pm EDT
  • While I appreciate the tradition of tenure in traditional organizations, I also see the negative side of tenure. If our online students complain about a class taught by a tenured faculty, absolutely nothing will change. The tenured faculty member may have a discussion with the chair, but as an administrator I see the same problems occur over and over. An adjunct faculty member has a built in incentive to doing a good job. Their continued employment depends on it. Tenure serves a noble purpose, but makes a lot of people "teflon" to genuine issues.

  • quality of teaching
  • Posted by JCO , assoc prof on August 31, 2006 at 2:46pm EDT
  • I am amazed that the focus of this discussion is mainly on the importance of tenure. For me an equally important question is - what types of skills do students taking on-line courses learn and can on-line learning really substitute for classroom contact? I agree with an earlier comment that even those teaching on-line need some (and on-going) in-class teaching experience, but what about students? Does someone trained on-line really gain the same knowledge and experience as someone who pursues a bricks and mortar education? I find it particularly problematic that business and education degrees are the bulk of degrees being offered on-line, since these are two degrees where the ability to interact in a group setting seems a crucial aspect of the education received - sure you can have on-line discussions, but there is something about face to face contact/interaction that can't be replaced... On final thought - the idea of someone who has only been educated virtually stepping into a classroom full of elementary or high school students seems particularly absurd. But perhaps these programs do build in components where the student has some non-virtual contact with other humans...

  • Posted by Michelle , Course & Faculty Development at LA College International on August 31, 2006 at 4:50pm EDT
  • I'm surprised at the comments made under the assumption that adjuncts as a population only have teaching as a source of income and lack opportunities to keep up in the field. Particularly in business programs, part-time adjuncts are active practitioners in their fields, and teach because they have rich experience and something to contribute. That makes for a huge potential pool of well-informed, current educators who aren't teaching more than one or two classes per term. The trick for the institution is to make sure they're also well-trained and have good resources at their disposal... educational theory, best practices online, elearning software.

  • "As an administrator
  • Posted by bob on August 31, 2006 at 4:55pm EDT
  • I see the same problems over and over"? What does this say about our administrators. They know about faculty who repeatedly cause the same problem and can't do anything about it? Even the most iron-clad tenure policies do not protect faculty who do not do the job and refuse to change.

  • Student Academic Dishonesty
  • Posted by Lillian on August 31, 2006 at 5:15pm EDT
  • With online courses, how do you safeguard against academic dishonesty?

    How can you be sure that the student enrolled in the course won't have someone else take their online exams? How will you know if they have the text open or closed while taking the exam? How will you know if they've turned in papers written by someone else or purchased online?

    It seems to me that seeing students in the classroom on a regular basis, listening to their discussions and reading body language can tell you things that the online experience can't.

  • The New State U - Illinois
  • Posted by Sally on September 1, 2006 at 7:35am EDT
  • Would anyone know what qualifications U of I requires to teach online. Please em me: Chicago_48 @ mytrashmail.com

  • Posted by Jan on September 3, 2006 at 5:10am EDT
  • This article just reaffirms my sense that academia has no concern for fairness, justice, or professionalism. Full time, tenure track academics and administrators are more than willing to promote a "Jim Crow" system of university instruction that depends on a huge pool of poorly paid part time adjuncts who are expected to function as an endlessly mobile and expendable workforce like migrant farm workers. I know of what I speak because I have labored in those fields for five years without being able to gain a tenure track job. Universities are wasting an entire generation of passionate scholars and teachers who sacrificed to earn their degrees. Adjuncts deserve professional respect, support, and a livable wage. Eventually adjuncts must either unionize or do what I am doing now--opting out and refusing to work under those conditions any longer. Sayonara! I am done!

  • Do governments to this?
  • Posted by Danny on September 4, 2006 at 2:40pm EDT
  • Article states: "The University of Illinois Global Campus would be operated as a separate for-profit entity, have almost entirely part-time faculty members (and none with tenure), and focus on a relatively small number of degree programs."

    So, the State of Illinois is spinning off a for profit entity that is going to compete against the many private for-profits and not-for-profits in the State of Illinois?

    First, it this legal? And, second, if it is legal, do we want our government in competition with private industry?

  • Academic Dishonesty?
  • Posted by Diane on September 5, 2006 at 1:50pm EDT
  • Just a comment on Lillian's comments on Academic Dishonesty. First, Lillian needs to be aware that one of the issue she raised (purchaing papers online or having another write papers) can happen just as easily in a face-to-face classroom setting. Secondly, having taken and taught courses online, one needs to recognize that many course management systems allow the instructor to allow only a certain time limit for students to be logged on taking a course. If the instructor puts enough time and thought into the development of an online test and allows an appropriate amount of time - while student may attempt to refer to the txtbook - in most instances, the student need to really know the material in order to complete the test in a timely manner. Looking up each question in a textbook will result in the student being unable to complete the exam. Finally, if test security is that important, I've asked students to take proctored exams (i.e. on campus, at other campuses, or at public libraries).

  • Adding on to Diane's remarks
  • Posted by Barbara on September 6, 2006 at 6:30pm EDT
  • Teaching online gets so many negatives applied to it. In reality it can be a better teaching model. I have worked for over ten years with faculty in a Big Ten university developing and implementing online courses and entire programs. It has been my experience that faculty members who teach online are more prepared, better-informed, and by and large better instructors. Instructors have to really plan for an effective online course. You become very aware of each and every student and how they are doing as far as grasping the information. It takes more work to teach online and assessments have to be well designed. More lower stakes forms of assessment make cheating really not worth it and by making the small assessments relate to each students’ individual life you get engaged learners. Online teaching and learning is not going away. Instead of knocking it why not embrace it and find new and inventive ways to use it?

  • Posted by Rich J. on September 7, 2006 at 6:30pm EDT
  • The amusing part of this article is the implicit assumption that a "UofI Online" will become a significant competitor in the online marketplace. Why? Because they run excellent programs on campus?

    If their focus is on in-state enrollment, then this might simply be a tuition grab within the UofI system -- one campus gains tuition revenues and other campuses lose tuition revenue. In business and economics, this type of scenario is referred to as "cannibalization."