Advertisement

Advertisement

News, Views and Careers for All of Higher Education

Quick Takes: History vs. ABC, Randolph-Macon to Admit Men, Senators and Spellings, Plagiarism Double Standard?, Rutgers Patent, Tenn. Desegregation, Contract at Emerson, Dean Quits After Attack on Spouse, ID Theft, More Saudis in U.S., Earmark Answers

  • A group of leading historians has published an open letter calling on ABC to cancel “The Path to 9/11,” which the network calls a “dramatization” of the events leading up to the terror attacks that took place five years ago today. The historians’ letter cites “numerous flagrant falsehoods” that it says make the show inappropriate. ABC is scheduled to show the conclusion of the program tonight.
  • Randolph-Macon Woman’s College, a single-sex institution for 115 years, will allow men to enroll, beginning next fall. The 25-2 vote by the college’s board Saturday was expected. The board will vote on a new name for the college in October. “This announcement resonates with both loss and hope, tears and anticipation,” said Jolley B. Christman, the board president. While college leaders said the shrinking market for women’s colleges precipitated a change, some alumnae have blamed poor financial management for the sinking endowment. Hundreds of alumnae signed an online petition asking for trustees to turn over financial documents or delay the vote. “We’re still not convinced. We’re ready to fight this,” said Erin Briggs, press contact for the Coalition to Preserve Women’s Education. “We respect the decision, but we aren’t done having our say.”
  • Twelve of the 20 members of the U.S. Senate’s education committee have written a letter to Secretary Margaret Spellings questioning the Education Department’s plan to use an upcoming “negotiated rule making” process to consider implementing some of the recommendations of the Commission on the Future of Higher Education. The bipartisan letter, signed by Sens. Michael B. Enzi (R-Wyo.) and Edward M. Kennedy (D-Mass.), the committee’s chairman and senior Democrat, as well as 5 other lawmakers from each party, said the senators “have concerns” about including the commission’s recommendations in the regulatory process. “Although we have not yet received the final report, the draft recommendations approved by a majority of the Commission members are extremely broad and will likely require legislative action before they could be appropriately included in regulations,” the lawmakers wrote.
  • Some Stanford University students say that the institution has a double standard on plagiarism, holding students responsible while looking the other way at apparently common practices used by others, The San Jose Mercury News reported. The issue was raised after students examined a speech by George Shultz, a professor who was formerly U.S. secretary of state. Parts of the speech were prepared by a co-author who took passages from a journal article he had written, but that was not cited in the address.
  • Rutgers University is suing General Motors, charging that its OnStar service for connecting drivers with emergency help violates a university patent, the Associated Press reported. GM is not commenting on the suit, but OnStar is used by millions of drivers.
  • Tennessee higher education and government leaders are expected today to announce an agreement to end a longstanding desegregation case, under which the state has focused on goals for improving diversity of the public colleges’ student bodies, the AP reported.
  • After long and tense negotiations, Emerson College and its faculty union have reached agreement on a new contract, The Boston Globe reported. The agreement limits the power of the union in certain areas (such as tenure), but provides more assurances of faculty rights in the college’s faculty handbook.
  • Valerie Parisi has quit as dean of medicine at the University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, following a physical attack in July by unidentified men on her husband, The Galveston County Daily News reported. The attackers made statements suggesting that they were angry at Parisi over layoffs she proposed to deal with budget cuts.
  • A student at Bronx Community College, who worked in the student health center and had access to many students’ identifying information, has been indicted on charges that she stole the identities of dozens of fellow students and used credit card fraud to obtain plasma televisions and many other goods, the AP reported. The scheme allegedly involved the student’s brothers, who were also charged. Their lawyer had no comment.
  • An agreement between President Bush and King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia is resulting in thousands of additional students from Saudi Arabia enrolling at colleges in the United States, all with full scholarships paid by the Saudi government, according to the AP. The generous aid packages — for which some 15,000 students will have been enrolled by January — have led many American universities to recruit the Saudis.
  • Only 14 of the 110 colleges and universities that received information requests from a U.S. senator responded to his queries by the Sept. 1 deadline, according to the journal Science. Sen. Tom Coburn (R-Okla.) sent the colleges letters in July asking for information about their earmarks and their use of lobbyists to obtain them.

Scott Jaschik and Elia Powers

Got something to say?


Want it on paper? Print this page.
Know someone who’d be interested? Forward this story.
Want to stay informed? Sign up for free daily news e-mail.

Advertisement

Comments

“We write as professional historians, who are deeply concerned by the continuing reports about ABC’s scheduled broadcast of “The Path to 9/11.” These reports document that this drama contains numerous flagrant falsehoods about critical events in recent American history. The key participants and eyewitnesses to these events state that the script distorts and even fabricates evidence into order to mislead viewers about the responsibility of numerous American officials for allegedly ignoring the terrorist threat before 2000.”

What, specifically, was false in what was aired last night?

JBM, at 7:30 am EDT on September 11, 2006

Double-Standards

So where were all these historians to complain when Fahrenheit 9-11 was released?

Joe Smith, at 8:45 am EDT on September 11, 2006

Little shame, less integrity

Let’s compare this list of distinquished scholars with the one that called for Clinton’s impeachment for his bold-faced, and very public lies — “I did not have sexual relations with that woman, Miss Lewinsky” — calling into question his credibility as a person, and the weakening of the presidency to the point where his ability to influence the legislative agenda of the 104th — 106th sessions of Congress was seriously compromised. If liberals want to cite the results of those sessions, they need to accept the fact that their president was preoccupied with sexual activities that he mysteriously couldn’t recall, but that he seemed to find time for, in spite of the pressures of maintaining his focus on the Nation’s welfare. These folks only find moral turpitude to be an issue if the perpetrator is a Republican; and they are quite comfortable with the unadulterated bias of network shows such as West Wing and movies like “The American President.” It’s all fair play unless it’s their ox that is being gored. The fact that standards of scholarship no longer require either high intelligence or objective perspective seems to have brought about a decided lack of both in the higher education community.

Scott, at 9:45 am EDT on September 11, 2006

Apples, Oranges

I see your point, Mr. Smith, but would like to respectfully point out that there is a big difference between a clearly ideologically-driven movie, intended to make a specific case (whether you believe it has merit or not) and a “docu-drama” aired on the eve of a historical event which is marketed and presented not as entertainment but as a representation of the truth of the event and features public figures portryed by actors with fictional lines. I hated the Moore film, but let’s be honest here, there was no actor playing the President. There was footage, clipped to make a point and surrounded by voice-over assertions of opinion. A very different animal. And I remember many, many talking heads going point by point picking it apart and challenging the content. That is exactly what is happening here.

J, at 9:45 am EDT on September 11, 2006

Re; DOUBLE STANDARD

Joe Smith simplistically asked::

“So where were all these historians to complain when Fahrenheit 9-11 was released?”

Mr. Smith fails to realize that Fahrenheit 9-11 was shown in theaters and people had to PAY to see it. In contrast, ‘The Path to Lieberman” received millions in corporate sponsorship to broadcast this piece of biased fiction FREE to peoples’ homes.

Dr. RingDing, at 10:36 am EDT on September 11, 2006

Excuse me J?

The debate is not about the merits of the content, as you so righteously state, but rather the call is for the show to be pulled off the air, at which time the subject of the debate disappears. How disengenuous of you to play the game of semantic charades!

Scott, at 11:01 am EDT on September 11, 2006

Responding

Scott, I’m a little confused by your response (and why you are attacking me as righteous and disingenuous when I’m just trying to have a polite conversation). I was just pointing out that I don’t think that the movie and the docu-drama work as two sides of an equivalent comparison. I was just saying that I can see why the historians would respond to this but not the other.

J, at 2:25 pm EDT on September 11, 2006

Reply to J

My intent was not to attack you personally, but rather to point out that drawing the distinction between media is a straw man. Many in academic circles refuse to acknowledge their inconsistency when it comes to objecting to misleading, inaccurate or improper messages, choosing only to question viewpoints or images that are unflattering to their political inclinations. That is the only issue of substance in this case, all the rhetoric about funding sources (who funded Farenheit 911 — certainly not movie-goers before in advance of production) and images of the public being forced to watch the current ABC production notwithstanding. Your viewpoint is legitimate and proper, but it seems to support the specious objections of historians whose call for historical accuracy goes silent when inaccuracy serves their interests. Let me know if you dig up some evidence to the contrary, and I would challenge them to do likewise. Wanna give it a try Arthur?

Scott, at 4:05 pm EDT on September 11, 2006

Historical inaccuracy

What was false in Fahrenheit 9/11?

Nancy, at 5:50 am EDT on September 12, 2006

I’m with Nancy here. You’ve got to prove your case. If you want to say _Fahrenheit 911_ is equivalent to _The Path to 911_, we need to see some historical falsehood presented as fact (not opinion) in _Fahrenheit 911_. We know about the Sandy Berger episode in the Rush’s-buddy production.

Perhaps you’d like to forget the less-than-stellar moments of Bush that Moore put into his film, but there’s no denying that they happened. The difference between disliking what happened and was shown in _Fahrenheit 911_ and disliking what didn’t happen but was presented as having happened in _Path to 911_ is vast—not equivalent at all.

Thane Doss, at 12:45 pm EDT on September 12, 2006

http://www.davekopel.com/Terror/Fiftysix-Deceits-in-Fahrenheit-911.htm

Just for an example. I would venture to say that ANY book or documentary that tries so hard to push an agenda: whether “right” or “left” is going to be this way.

Now does Kopel list ‘distortions’ or ‘lies’? Good question. I would like too see what is considered a lie in the movie in questin and see if they are distortions or outright lies.

rayner, at 12:45 pm EDT on September 12, 2006

Advertisement

 Jobs Related to Quick Takes: History vs. ABC, Randolph-Macon to Admit Men, Senators and Spellings, Plagiarism Double Standard?, Rutgers Patent, Tenn. Desegregation, Contract at Emerson, Dean Quits After Attack on Spouse, ID Theft, More Saudis in U.S., Earmark Answers

or search for jobs directly.

Assistant to Director
University of Minnesota, Twin Cities

The University of Minnesota is a premier employer and a talent magnet attracting leading faculty and staff from around the ... see job

Assistant/Associate Director of Major Gifts
Grinnell College

Grinnell College Assistant/Associate Director of Major Gifts Office of College and Alumni Relations Responsibilities: The ... see job

Administrative Faculty Positions
University of New England

The University of New England is seeking applications and nominations for two administrative faculty positions in its College ... see job

Adjunct Assistant Professor-CNA (Revised)
Johnson County Community College

A career at Johnson County Community College is more than a job. We believe it’s important to invest in our employees and ... see job

Application Support Specialist — Search Extended
Butler County Community College

APPLICATION SUPPORT SPECIALIST SEARCH EXTENDED POSITION ANNOUNCEMENT Butler County Community College is currently accepting ... see job

Admissions Representative — Southeastern Colorado and New Mexico
Johnson and Wales University

JOHNSON & WALES UNIVERSITY is seeking an ADMISSIONS REPRESENTATIVE FOR Southeastern Colorado and New Mexico area see job

Network Manager
Kankakee Community College

Kankakee Community College is located in a growing tri-city metropolitan area surrounded by several rural communities. see job

Head of Information Technology
University of Colorado at Denver and Health Sciences Center-Downtown Denver

Posting Description: Head of Information Technology Health Sciences Library, UCD, AMC The UCD Health ... see job

Internship Manager- Career Center
Gonzaga University

Oversees, develops, manages, guides, & sets policy for the internship program. see job

Assistant/Associate Professor
East Carolina University

East Carolina University, a constituent institution of the University of North Carolina, is a doctoral institution with an ... see job