Search News


Browse Archives

News

Outside Help for 'Coaching' Students

September 21, 2006

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

Diane Wojdag has stopped and started a few times en route to a college degree. Since beginning school at Northeastern University 20 years ago, she has left three different universities one diploma short when life -- a daughter’s illness, her own diagnosis with multiple sclerosis and a layoff -- got in the way.

Now, Wojdag, a project director for a software corporation, is back at Northeastern, working with a personal coach that she says is helping her stay on track to complete her associate degree in management information systems by June -- and then move on to tackle her bachelor’s in leadership.

“Whenever I have an issue, or just you know, am trying to get through the bureaucracy of schools and things like that, she’s right there to help me out,” Wojdag said of her coach, Meaghan Joyce.

“I told Meaghan, ‘You know what? I think I may actually do it this time.’ ”

Wojdag’s coach is provided free of charge by Northeastern University, one of 15 colleges and universities that has contracts with InsideTrack, a San Francisco-based private company that says it bolsters retention and enrollment by offering personal coaches to students and prospective students.

Modeled after the corporate world’s executive coaches, InsideTrack coaches aim to connect students’ long-term goals with their short-term futures, said Alan Tripp, the company’s CEO and founder. Success coaches help students navigate such potential stumbling blocks as class registration and child care, focusing on seven major areas including commitment to graduation, time management, finances, academics, and health.

Most of the coaching occurs over the telephone lines, from InsideTrack’s San Francisco headquarters and Portland call center. The full-time coaches, hired primarily for their interpersonal talents, undergo a four-level certification process; 20-30 percent of the coaching staff holds an advanced degree, Tripp said.

“We are introducing more structure and positive feedback into the lives of college students, in a way that dramatically affects their behavior and outcomes. When we work with students, their probability of dropping out is reduced by about a third. Their chances of success are increased, as well as their engagement and satisfaction with the program,” said Tripp, who founded and sold SCORE! Educational Centers, a network of K-12 academic centers, before founding InsideTrack in 1999.

Colleges can use InsideTrack’s services at a rate of about $30 to $120 a month per student, depending on the intensity of services offered, and InsideTrack also offers personal coaches to students who don’t attend universities affiliated with the company. But while InsideTrack has been gaining steam -- its revenue growing, Tripp says, at a rate of 100 percent each year -- some administrators question why a college would outsource its efforts to advise and retain students.

“There is a lot of resistance or has been in some cases by the student affairs people to this work,” said Robert H. Atwell, president emeritus of the American Council on Education and a member of InsideTrack’s advisory board. “Sometimes they say, ‘Hey, I can do this.’ But if you have a very high drop-out rate, the evidence is that it’s not been done well.”

He added: “I think that’s a big hurdle for InsideTrack to overcome, the innate resistance to outsourcing. But where InsideTrack is able to land contracts, I think that resistance disappears.”

Tripp asserts that hiring InsideTrack doesn’t amount to outsourcing because the company offers a new service that’s substantially different from the typical advising colleges offer. InsideTrack’s coaches focus primarily on life effectiveness skills, rather than strictly on academics, and students are encouraged by their coaches to tap into institutional resources, in turn increasing demand for existing on-campus services, Tripp said.

“I think there was a bit of suspicion when we first started,” said Christopher Hopey, vice president and dean of Northeastern University’s School of Professional and Continuing Services, which piloted InsideTrack’s services last year.

Echoing Atwell’s sentiments, Hopey said resistance faded when the results of Northeastern’s first year of work with InsideTrack proved overwhelmingly positive -- the university saw approximately 40 percent increases in enrollment and persistence among the 600 adult students who received coaching. “The reality is, they’ve given us a great service,” said Hopey, who added that InsideTrack frees on-campus advisors to focus more intently on academics and that it would be cost-prohibitive for advisors to do the kind of time-intensive coaching InsideTrack can offer.

Andy Carrier, interim dean of students at Ottawa University, which began a one-year contract with InsideTrack in July, said the university is expanding its on-campus services and is in the midst of hiring a persistence director. “InsideTrack is just one more piece of the puzzle that may help identify problems early for students,” Carrier said.

Charlie L. Nutt, associate director for the National Academic Advising Association, said his organization would support any university’s effort to broaden its advising services, but stressed that any outside services should be viewed as supplemental to on-campus resources. “All the literature goes back to the point that one-on-one interaction with someone actually on a campus is most clearly connected with success,” Nutt said.

Carrier said Ottawa University would look closely at InsideTrack’s model to determine if the institution can one day provide similar services in-house. “But in the meantime, [the contract with InsideTrack is] helping us grow and do our own internal assessments of where our programs are and how the environment’s changing,” he said.

Ultimately, some experts on advising say it can’t hurt colleges, which are in general struggling with issues of student persistence, to have another tool in their toolbox. “In the ideal, I think that this is the kind of program that colleges and universities should be doing with their students,” said Stuart Hunter, director of the National Resource Center for the First-Year Experience and Students in Transition. “Ideally, it should be done with existing staff at colleges and universities, throughout faculty and throughout the curriculum.”

“But student success is important, and if InsideTrack is providing a service that an institution doesn’t feel it can provide itself, then that’s not a bad thing.”

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Outside Help for 'Coaching' Students

  • "inside"r knowledge
  • Posted by ll on August 24, 2007 at 4:25am EDT
  • as an insidetrack coach, I want to add that the last thing we want to do is make the student dependant upon us. We would love to "coach ourselves out of a job" and in fact, hope we do when we finish our first year with a student... we help the student learn the skills they need to navigate higher ed/bureaucracy/the real world -- and then say goodbye, as we move on to the next freshman class more ready to persist and graduate. Teach a man/woman to fish, as they say. Previous posters are right when they write that these are not skills taught in highschool, and without family members who have gone through college (and I dare say even with that) we must recognize that many people who are going to school are not simply young students who have parental support. I say the more single moms we can help get through a teaching credential/business degree/ba the better! What an amazing role model they become for their children, not to mention having the opportunity to take charge of their (and their children's) financial future. That these students might not make it through a the system "AS IS," no matter what their determination, is something that should make us question how much we really value education "for the masses." Sure, it would be great if colleges could do this themselves. But, at this time, that's not happening. One way or another, though, it has to be done! I'm thrilled to be a part of this success.

  • unnecessary, but necessary
  • Posted by PS on September 21, 2006 at 9:50am EDT
  • If only college advisors and counselors knew what they were doing, products like this would be unnecessary. Aren't these advisors, registrars, and counselors paid to deal with these issues? All you have to do is read, think, and invest a little time in your own professional development and implementation, and there is absolutely no reason any college administrator can't do this on their own. But then again, as Drucker said, "Thinking is hard..."

  • Thank you for proving your own point
  • Posted by MKG on September 21, 2006 at 4:10pm EDT
  • Yes PS, thinking is hard, thank you for proving your point. Academic counselors, often responsible for advising upwards of 100 students, are responsible for just that - academics. An individual counselor for each college student to help with "potential stumbling blocks such as class registration and child care...time management, finances, academics, and health" is not only cost prohibitive, it also makes me questions whether an individual is ready for the college degree they seek. One of the problems is normal - all six? There is a larger issue.

  • Posted by Dr. Rich Robbins , Director of Engineering Advising at Cornell University on September 21, 2006 at 4:10pm EDT
  • Academic advisors in higher education have caseloads of students ranging from dozens to thousands, and a ratio of, for example, 500 advisees to one advisor does not allow for the same degree of personalized service as InsideTrack does. On the other hand, the goals of academic advising in higher education include assisting with the development of autonomy and independence in students, and helping a student to the extent InsideTrack does may not promote these outcomes. It would be interesting to see how graduates who relied on such personalized programs function in the workplace. Further, acadmic advisors on campuses are avialble to meet with students personally, rather than by phone. I agree that in an ideal academic setting, one academic advisor would work with one individual student and have unlimited time and resources to spend with and on that one student. However, I don't think that students would be prepared to pay the tuition costs this would require. And while student retention may be increased, is the bottom line making money or helping students develop into independent adults?

  • Posted by MH on September 21, 2006 at 7:45pm EDT
  • Dr. Robbins, while I understand where your statement is coming from, there are exceptions. I definitely agree that students should be responsible for managing their own lives (helicopter parents are my worst nightmare), but I think we forget that the built in support network that traditional college students have is lacking for a lot of college students today. Students who have relatives, friends, and particularly parents who have successfully navigated higher education have people to turn to if they can't get an appointment with an advisor or need basic life advice. Someone who, for example, knows the difference between the bursar and the registrar. First generation and non-traditional students often have no family/friend resources to turn to for help and are forced to figure it all out on their own. Moreover, in some cases, students are actually pressured NOT to continue their education beyond high school, but rather to start working right away. I think services like this are a great opportunity for those students who are flying without a net to get the support that many of our more 'traditional' college students get from home.

  • Necessity of Inside Track program
  • Posted by Jeff Brody on May 10, 2007 at 12:50pm EDT
  • The point is well-taken that students should be able to navigate the unknown waters of college, but the skills necessary to do so are not provided in high school. It is all to common that a student will succeed in high school and get good grades, but they lose their support network when they enter a large 4-yr. institution. They do not have the life skills to navigate through these waters. Intelligent, well-connected and well-socialized freshman fail because there is no helping hand to guide them through this new territory. One does not instantly become an adult because they have made the transition to college. College advisors counsel students to seek them out if they are in trouble which is akin to asking someone in quicksand to reach out to those that can help them, rather than have someone offer a hand. Advisors and counselors should be pro-active and offer assistance where they see a student is failing. A student that is accepted into a 4-yr. institution with a high GPA and suddenly cannot maintain a 2.0 average clearly needs assistance...assistance that is more geared to navigating the rigors of college vs. academics. It is here that Inside Track is a valuable tool.