Search News


Browse Archives

News

Affirmative Action for Gay Students

October 9, 2006

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

At gatherings of admissions officials, there is much talk about students who suffer discrimination or other hardships and how colleges should help them to enroll. But as Greg McCandless noted Friday at the annual meeting of the National Association for College Admission Counseling, there is a group that "people were not talking about" -- gay applicants.

While there have always been gay college students, they were invisible in the admissions process in previous generations. College don't ask students their sexual orientations, but McCandless, associate director of admission at Harvey Mudd College, said that a small but growing number of students come out during the admissions process -- raising the question of how colleges should consider that information. Everyone who spoke at a session about gay applicants in the admissions process  agreed that the students should not be discriminated against for revealing this information. The more controversial question was whether they should receive the sort of affirmative action boost that some other groups receive at many institutions.

"I think there's a case to be made" that gay students should receive such assistance, McCandless said, although he acknowledged that the issue was a tricky one.

Middlebury College is this year for the first time giving students who identify themselves as gay in the admissions process an "attribute" -- the same flagging of an application that members of ethnic minority groups, athletes, alumni children and others receive, according to Shawn Rae Passalacqua, assistant director of admissions at Middlebury. His announcement surprised many of those who attended the session, and who said that they had never heard of a college having such a policy. (Officials of the Point Foundation, a group that provides scholarships to gay students, especially those denied financial support from their families, said that they had never heard of such a policy.)

Passalacqua said that gay students bring "a unique quality" to the college, which he said tries hard not "to be too homogeneous." Of 6,200 applications last year, 5 students noted their gay identities in their application essays and another 50-plus applicants cited their membership in gay-straight alliances. Passalacaqua said that Middlebury admissions officers were also likely to look favorably and give an admissions tip to "straight allies" of gay students -- not just out of support for that view, but because a college benefits from having people who are "bridge builders."

Several guidance counselors at the session said that they wanted to know what to tell their gay students who want to either write essays about their sexuality, or to make passing references to a love interest or crush in a way that would reveal the information. Panelists uniformly said that this information no longer hurts. And while no one matched Middlebury's policy, an official of Claremont McKenna College said that he hoped his college would follow, and an admissions officer of Loyola University New Orleans said students shouldn't feel they need to hold back their identities when applying to Jesuit colleges.

Mark Rasic, Western regional representative for Loyola, said that applicants shouldn't assume that religious colleges don't have many gay students. He said that the student newspaper at his institution recently interviewed admissions officers on whether the reason women can't find dates on the campus is that so many gay men are enrolled.

Central to the discussion at the admissions meeting was the question of how the experiences of gay and lesbian high school students are similar to -- or different from -- those of other groups that receive admissions boosts of one kind or another. McCandless reviewed statistics about the harassment that most gay students receive in high school -- and the lack of support many of them receive from family members or teachers. A series of studies have found that gay students -- and students perceived to be gay -- can experience both verbal and physical abuse, typically daily, and that this abuse can have an educational impact, as students may be more likely to miss school because of being the victim of bullying.

But citing himself as an example, McCandless said he didn't come out in high school, had a good high school experience, and didn't experience anti-gay bigotry there. "Should I have gotten special treatment?" he asked.

And then there is the practical question of how colleges would respond if word got out that being gay could help your chances of getting into a good college. "What if people just start to say, 'Hey, I'm gay.' Are we going to follow them around for a semester?" McCandless said.

High school counselors in the audience had many questions for the college officials. One said that he wasn't sure what to do with his gay students who are out, but who aren't particularly involved in gay organizations. "How gay do you have to be" to include it  on an application, and hope for help, he asked?

This counselor, who is black, also said he had some ambivalence about this latest admissions trend. Of being black, he said, "I can't hide that fact." But he said that many gay applicants can in fact apply to college and get in -- without any concerns about discrimination -- because they need not reveal their sexuality.

Another high school counselor who said that she is currently working with one transgendered student and two lesbians applying for college said that her concern is that these students have dealt with issues related to their sexuality at such early ages that "it is a non-issue for them." Should she be encouraging them to draw attention to their sexuality if they are not particularly focused on it? she asked.

Passalacqua of Middlebury said that he would never pressure any high school student to out him or herself in the process if the person didn't want to. But he said that there is a part of the admissions process that is like "a game" in which people are trying to draw attention to the special qualities they bring to a campus. If athletes and people from remote regions are getting a boost, he said, gay students should, too -- and they need to identify themselves in order to benefit.

Another high school counselor said that there was another reason to encourage gay applicants to mention their orientation. If they are denied admission for being gay, it was probably not a good college for the applicants to attend anyway, this counselor said. She said this was just a new application of an old principle of college counseling -- that students and institutions need a good fit. She said that the question gay high school students should consider about college is the same question straight students should think about: "Where are you going to be happy?"

Bruce Lindstrom, interim executive director and founder of the Point Foundation, the group that provides scholarships to gay students, said it was important for colleges to reach out to gay students, but he stopped short of saying that they should get an affirmative action push in admissions.

"The key to me is:  If a university wants to 'broaden' the understanding of students, then students must be exposed to a diversity of humanity that is meritorious to a balanced and tolerant society," he said. "Students must still qualify academically, but diversity of society is part of understanding society."

At the same time, he added: "We think our scholars can stand alone on their academic acceptance and that they are not in need of 'special consideration.' But also, it is not appropriate to be 'selected out' because of admission biases by the admission committee.  Bigotry should not be an acceptable reason for non-admission."

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Affirmative Action for Gay Students

  • I should have said I'm gay when I applied
  • Posted by Alex , Student at Columbia U on August 23, 2009 at 8:45pm EDT
  • I mean, honestly, some say they want to be eco-science majors, some (quoting the article) come out exactly when they apply with their sexuality (a coincidence?)...then why not sexuality? Who is gonna check what I do in my own room. Bisexual would be even better. The thing with race is that it's pretty visible, what you do in your own room isn't.

  • Brave New World
  • Posted by Publius on October 9, 2006 at 7:40am EDT
  • Perhaps the new book of Walter Benn Michaels should be required reading at Middlebury. Here's a relevant quote from his article in TAP:

    "In an ideal universe we wouldn’t be celebrating diversity at all -- we wouldn’t even be encouraging it -- because in an ideal universe the question of who you wanted to sleep with would be a matter of concern only to you and to your loved (or unloved) ones. As would your skin color; some people might like it, some people might not, but it would have no political significance whatsoever. Diversity of skin color is something we should happily take for granted, the way we do diversity of hair color. No issue of social justice hangs on appreciating hair color diversity; no issue of social justice hangs on appreciating racial or cultural diversity.

    If you’re worried about the growing economic inequality in American life, if you suspect that there may be something unjust as well as unpleasant in the spectacle of the rich getting richer and the poor getting poorer, no cause is less worth supporting, no battles are less worth fighting, than the ones we fight for diversity."

  • It's a marker for maturity, courage, and integrity
  • Posted by Tom Henning at NYC high school teacher on October 9, 2006 at 8:45am EDT
  • I'm stunned at the small number of Middlebury applicants who discussed their homosexuality. 5 out of 6200, or about 0.1%. Even using low estimates, out of this group more than 300 will spend their lives in same-sex relationships (that's 5%). They surely know it by age 17, even if they haven't fully dealt with it.

    These low numbers from even a liberal institution suggest that a student willing to be openly gay or lesbian on a college apllication is extraordinary indeed, in both maturity and integrity. Sounds like an easy admission decision to me.

    As for cheating, given that teachers and parents proofread these essays first, and the social cost of rumors about sexuality, I'd guess students would be more willing to lie about another unverified trait that will definitely advantage their applications: their race.

  • Posted by K.T. on October 9, 2006 at 9:15am EDT
  • I’m stunned at the small number of Middlebury applicants who discussed their homosexuality.

    You're essentially imposing the belief system that homosexuality is something one should openly discuss. Many people find sexuality, whether straight or gay, to be a private matter that has no place in the public domain. Others feel differently, but there are many perspectives to consider and openly discussing this issue on college applications, in the classroom, etc. is inappropriate to many people (though likely not enough to account for 0.1%).

  • A private matter
  • Posted by Tom Henning on October 9, 2006 at 10:25am EDT
  • To K.T.'s points:

    Certainly sexuality is a public matter- how else does one meet a mate?

    By discussing sexuality openly I'm not imposing an odd viewpoint, but rather reflecting the culture I was raised in. Every wedding, high school prom, romantic film, and gender-segregated restroom is a loud public pronouncement of heterosexuality.

    Gay high school students who find these simple examples, and a myriad of others, to be foreign to themselves must have a strength and maturity far beyond their years. Those who are open about their difference furthermore have a courage that is rare at any age.

    Applicants should be clearly and directly encouraged to discuss their sexuality in their application essays, if indeed it has been a significant stuggle in their young lives. A university non-discrimination statement in fine print on the back cover of the application won't cut it.

    Photos of same-sex couples on admissions literature, along side the mixed-sex couples already there, will go a long way to making gay students feel welcome. This may seem forced to some heterosexuals, but bear in mind that many a gay seventeen-year-old assumes that the hiding they have been doing for the past ten years will continue their entire lives.

    Colleges can change that assumption, and need to start Day One.

  • No words...
  • Posted by Amazed on October 9, 2006 at 10:30am EDT
  • "...whether they should receive the sort of affirmative action boost that some other groups receive at many institutions."

    So just about everyone except the middle income white male will receive preferential treatment. Next thing you know, the white middle income male will be the true underrepresented population!

  • Posted by K.T. on October 9, 2006 at 10:50am EDT
  • By discussing sexuality openly I’m not imposing an odd viewpoint, but rather reflecting the culture I was raised in.

    So should you not be looking at the issue from diverse perspectives and realize that not everyone was raised in your culture. I was not raised in that culture and indeed find it "odd" to discuss sexual preference/orientation (myself being gay) in such a public manner. Why impose your culture on everyone else out there, rather than acknowledging it as one of many diverse perspectives towards the issue of homosexuality. Some schools may choose one approach, some may choose another. [And, I disagree that weddings and high-school proms constitute loud pronouncements of heterosexuality. You look at them from that perpsective, but not all of us do. You are again assuming your own perspective applies to the entirety of the gay community.]

    "Photos of same-sex couples on admissions literature, along side the mixed-sex couples already there."

    Again, this assumes that mixed-sex couples in such literature are in sexual relationships. I don't really see how the composition of such individuals in promotional literature makes a difference. For some students it may, for others it may not. I personally shunned schools that tried to show a "committment" to gay issues because it detracted from the educational "nuts and bolts" I was looking for in a college and, from my perspective, was not an appropriate approach to the issue of homosexuality. Again, this may be different for others, but each school should do what it feels best... not follow some broad trend that every admissions office is pursuing through "diversity marketing." We should have diverse approaches to the issue of diversity, which may include little focus on the issue at all.

    In the end, I chose an undergraduate school that simply argued, "we are willing to discuss any issue at this institution." That pretty much covered everyone, without singling out anyone.

    Again, just a different perspective.

  • Affirmative Action for Whom?
  • Posted by Art Leonard , Professor at NY Law School on October 9, 2006 at 12:45pm EDT
  • I'm not sure how I feel about the idea of affirmative action for openly gay college applicants. I was totally closeted in my college and law school applications, and didn't really start "coming out" until during law school, but that was a different age - the 1970s. Nobody had heard of GSAs in high schools back then, and gay student groups were not even so common at colleges. Thinking back on my college experience, I avoided the gay student group at Cornell University because I was uncertain about my own sexuality at that point in my life and didn't want to make any irrevocable choices, the group had a somewhat militant reputation which did not appeal to me at that stage in my life, and I was worried whether being "out" would prejudice my ability to get into law school. (At the time, the law schools in which I was interested did not have gay student organizations, at least not to my knowledge, did not have express non-discrimination policies covering sexual orientation, and it was certainly not something mentioned in brochures and application materials.)

    I think what is most important for gay adolescents is knowing that they can be openly gay on campus when they get to college and have a university administration and faculty that supports their right to be there, and a community that is accepting and supportive of who they are. An affirmative action policy certainly sends that message, and ensures that there will be a critical mass of openly gay students to keep an organization going. That's perhaps why I would give a little plus to an applicant who, regardless of their sexual orientation, was an active member of a GSA in high school. But I remain uncertain whether a more general plus for being openly gay is needed for this purpose.

  • Posted by K.T. on October 9, 2006 at 12:45pm EDT
  • Next thing you know, the white middle income male will be the true underrepresented population!

    At my alma mater, they increasingly are... the women are taking over with 60+ percent of the undergraduate population... although, it's quite a selling point for much of the male population! [But, I agree, the trend towards preferential admissions - legacies included - especially at public institutions, for non-merit-based reasons is a disturbing trend.]

  • Celebrate the Individual, not the Group
  • Posted by kgotthardt on October 9, 2006 at 12:45pm EDT
  • "...there is a part of the admissions process that is like 'a game' in which people are trying to draw attention to the special qualities they bring to a campus."

    How about we eliminate "the game," celebrate the differences each and EVERY student can bring, and encourage EVERY applicant to openly discuss, "What makes me unique?" Then no class, gender, sexual preference, ethnic group, religion is left out. Everyone is encouraged to express what they feel is pertinent without fear of discrimination. And we are all rewarded with the benefits of true diversity and acceptance.

    We need to go back to our American roots in individualism, celebrate those qualities that make us ourselves, and learn to work in groups made up of every difference. We need to stop looking as individuals as part of a group or a class and start looking at the whole of EACH person. Yes, it takes more time and effort but what do we lose when we do NOT do this?

    Selecting only some for special treatment based on a single quality and not selecting all for such treatment based on a variety of differences might do more damage than good and actually lead to the very discrimination we seek to avoid.

  • under the label
  • Posted by karl on October 9, 2006 at 1:15pm EDT
  • I always assumed preferential treatment was given to "groups" of students as they were seen to have a deficit due to their experience as a minority. I know many gay students who have been oppressed, hence disadvantaged. I have known many black students who have not been disadvantaged (in their own lifetime) so they probably did not need preferential treatment.

    I look forward to the day that those who need help can get based on a measured deficit....and not the political flavor of the week. Shouldn't we focus on the need and not the label?

  • Posted by Paris on October 9, 2006 at 6:05pm EDT
  • "Next thing you know, the white middle income male will be the true underrepresented population!"

    Because everyone knows that white middle income men are NEVER gay. EVER.

    If a college wishes potential students to know that it is accepting of minority sexualities, the easiest and most compelling way to accomplish this is by not simply admiting students who identify as LGBT, but by admiting those that will run the GSA and generally conduct themselves as flaming queers of the most visible variety. This strikes me as no more or less remarkable than favouring athletes or others who are likely to actively participate in campus organizations.

    What would be novel, and would recognize the particular pressures experienced by many LGBT youth, is if colleges were some how able to assist in the difficult situation of a student getting disowned by his/her family for coming out and, therefore, no longer able to continue studying. I have no idea how that would work practically, but it's a little fantasy of mine every since I had a close call with that exact situation myself.

  • This is so Gay
  • Posted by Tag on October 9, 2006 at 6:20pm EDT
  • Do you know I know you're gay?

    Because you got an affirmative action admission.

  • Posted by K.T. on October 10, 2006 at 9:40am EDT
  • Amen to kgotthardt

  • Posted by Amaz-ING at Duke University on October 10, 2006 at 5:15pm EDT
  • First of all, kgottheardt, you are living in a dream world. Being an idealist myself, I agree that that would be quite nice: to banish all categories and recognize people for their entire selves and not just their labels. However, THIS is the society we are living in, and that is just not going to happen anytime soon. KT, I have to agree with Tom here. How can you say that prom, weddings, TV, etc don't shove heterosexuality down our throats?? I am sorry, but heterosexuality in academic worlds is referred to as "normative" for a reason. It does say alot about an applicant if they are willing to discuss their sexual experiences.

    As to the policy itself, I think it is a good one. If we were to get rid of affirmative action all together, thats one thing. But while it exists, it is unfair to give preferential treatment based on race and not sexuality. Minorities, despite what category they are in, are minorities. And I agree that people are not willing to risk the ostracism that comes with the label just to boost their chances of getting in to college. Sadly, it is still a pretty homophobic society.

    And to Amazed. You are clearly a white male. And you are clearly bitter. And honestly, white men have ruled this country for the entireity of its existence. Maybe its time someone else has a chance. Or should the Declaration have said "All White Men are created Equal"?

  • Question for Amaz-ING
  • Posted by Larry on October 11, 2006 at 11:45am EDT
  • Amaz-ING, I read your comments with interest, and I think I need some clarification. Having been a white male for most of my life, I am curious by what you mean by “run” and “let someone else have a chance.” Are you saying that non-white males should be put in positions of power over white males (much like myself) for no other reason, than it is their time?

    Secondly, Amaz-ING, correct me if I am wrong, but you seem to be implying that gay white men are not white men after all. This seems a little strange, as there are plenty of gay white men out there.

    Finally, I would like to say that I am somewhat disturbed by the practice of declaring oneself to be bisexual or gay, before or at the beginning of college, and turning straight later. Since it is impossible to verify whether one is bisexual, then, I think that these “bisexuals until graduation” have defrauded the institutions that they attended, who were hornswaggled into thinking that these people were mature (assuming that being gay makes you more mature.)

  • Hard to tell
  • Posted by Kevin , Undergraduate on October 12, 2006 at 4:00pm EDT
  • How will you be assured that the applicant isn't lying? Its hard enough to tell if an applicant is really African American or just a dark shade of white, but if you open this up, every applicant will pretend to be gay for a few days in order to get admitted and then drop the act. Who would that benefit?

    (I've never much liked including non-academic factors in admissions to begin with.)

  • Posted by Terri Phoenix on October 12, 2006 at 4:35pm EDT
  • Regarding the comments that "many gay applicants can in fact apply to college and get in — without any concerns about discrimination — because they need not reveal their sexuality" and that sexuality is a "private rather than public issue"...

    Think about how many times a day people talk about their weekends/vacations and mention wives/husbands or girlfriends/boyfriends. Heterosexual individuals make their sexual orientation "public" every time they do that. To ask gay or lesbian people to "keep it private" is to ask them not to discuss their partners, families, places of worship, and many significant aspects of their life.

  • Posted by Michael on October 12, 2006 at 5:25pm EDT
  • Affirmative Action is supposed to be used to combat previous discrimination.

    There are no statistics available that I'm aware of that shows that gays have been an underrepresented group in colleges and universities. In fact, most arguments are that they are enrolled in much larger numbers than people think. I'm aware of no admissions department that has ever rejected a student because he or she identified him/herself as gay.

    Taken as a group, gays are the among the best educated and highest income demographics in the USA. Affirmative Action for gays would be a true disservice to those groups who have historically faced such discrimination in college admissions and subsequently have suffered life-long economic impact as a result of it.

  • unverifiable and....
  • Posted by Professor T on October 13, 2006 at 8:50am EDT
  • Not only is sexual identity unverifiable, but those of us who teach on the college level and attend alumnae/i events realize that it's pretty unstable.

  • Posted by Robert S. Clagett , Dean of Admissions at Middlebury College on October 15, 2006 at 4:10pm EDT
  • I want to clarify Middlebury College's admissions policy as described in the article "Affirmative Action for Gay Students." While Middlebury College welcomes students from diverse backgrounds, it has no admissions policy related to sexual orientation. Middlebury accepts only those applicants who have demonstrated evidence that they will succeed at the college academically and who will make positive contributions to its undergraduate community.

    I apologize to you and your readers for any miscommunication that took place regarding Middlebury's admissions process.

  • Posted by Mike on October 15, 2006 at 5:30pm EDT
  • ...So just about everyone except the middle income white male will receive preferential treatment.

    The aforementioned criteria can still potentially apply to "middle income white male[s]."

  • Posted by CE , What About Dorms? on January 30, 2007 at 5:10pm EST
  • What happens when a student is gay? Do they put him in a dorm room with people of their sex? That could be a potential problem causer, since it's like putting a boy and girl together in a dorm. Can someone tell me what they do in that circumstance??