Advertisement

News, Views and Careers for All of Higher Education

Holding Off the Application Push

How early is too early? College and high school officials at the annual meeting of the National Association for College Admission Counseling tried to answer that question Saturday. They voted to bar member colleges from admitting students to college prior to September 15 of the students’ senior years in high school, and to bar institutions from setting application deadlines prior to October 15 of the senior year.

The association also voted — at its annual meeting, in Pittsburgh — to prohibit the use of standardized test scores as the sole criterion for awarding financial aid.

While the organization can’t order colleges to change their practices, NACAC members work at the overwhelming majority of colleges, and include admissions deans at most institutions.

The policy changes by NACAC come amid growing concern — within the profession and from students and their families — that the frenzy over the admissions process is distracting students from meaningful senior years in high school. “We’re trying to preserve the senior year,” said Pete Caruso, the outgoing chair of NACAC’s Admissions Practices Committee and associate director of undergraduate admissions at Boston College.

A survey by NACAC this year found that more than 100 colleges acknowledged offering admission to some students prior to September 1 of the students’ senior year of high school. This apparently growing trend has upset many admissions officials, who believe it is not in students’ interests to apply and be accepted so early. High school counselors say that they are unable to help students over the summer, when they need advice, and some fear that students are being pressured to commit to colleges too early, lured by promises of priority on course registration and housing.

Similar concerns prompted the idea of keeping application deadlines from creeping before October 15. Caruso said that a few colleges have been setting deadlines as early as May and June prior to the senior year and others have been pushed into September. Students need time to study their options and work with their counselors, Caruso said.

Some community colleges and open admissions institutions expressed concern at the NACAC meeting that their admissions philosophies might violate the new rules. A big part of the pitch of some community colleges to prospective students is to tell them, sometimes early in their high school careers, that if they graduate from high school they will be admitted to college.

Caruso said that the concerns of college officials about the super-early admissions offers being made by some institutions were not related to community colleges and open admissions institutions. He said that NACAC was committed to clarifying the language to reassure community colleges that this new rule is not directed against their policies — many of which are longstanding and applauded by admissions experts.

The vote on barring the use of standardized tests as the sole criterion for awarding aid makes the association’s aid rules consistent with admissions rules. NACAC has long opposed the use of test scores alone as automatic triggers to admit or reject students. Proponents of the expansion of the rule noted that the College Board, the creator and sponsor of the SAT, is on record opposing the use of the test as a sole criterion for making education decisions.

Robert Schaeffer, public education director of the National Center for Fair and Open Testing, said that there are “large numbers” of colleges that use SAT scores (or scores on selected other tests) as a sole criterion in awarding aid, although he noted that in many cases these are rules that may apply to only a few scholarships offered.

Almost all colleges abandoned the use of admissions cutoff scores, he said, but the financial aid process is “the hidden underbelly” of how test scores are used inappropriately.

Scott Jaschik

Got something to say?


Want it on paper? Print this page.
Know someone who’d be interested? Forward this story.
Want to stay informed? Sign up for free daily news e-mail.

Advertisement

Comments

Financial aid for high SAT scores

The notion that rules alone will prevent private colleges from offering merit/gift aid to the students it most wants to attract is wishful thinking. Colleges are extremely slow to change and enact policy. It will be years from now before any significant change in the admissions culture takes place. After 2009, when enrollments are to begin falling off, offering tuition discounts, especially to those who don’t need it, has been, is and will continue to be a useful recruitment tool. If someday, private institutions across the board provide true equal access, rather than the meritocracy we now have, then college cost of attendance may actually decrease and that would have a positive impact on those with fewer resources.

Stuart Siegel, College Tuition Solutions, Inc, at 8:45 am EDT on October 9, 2006

SAT scores and National Merit

The National Merit Scholarship Corp. uses PSAT scores to identify the initial selection of scholars. Will NACAC and it’s members work to reform this mis-use of test scores, at an organization whose Board has some NACAC members?

There are obvious drawbacks to the use of PSAT — based on who takes it, how they score — that also skews the final group of awardees of National Merit scholarship recipients. It is not unlike the Early Decision arguments.

Ellen, at 1:35 pm EDT on October 9, 2006

Why concentrate on merit aid?

. If someday, private institutions across the board provide true equal access, rather than the meritocracy we now have, then college cost of attendance may actually decrease and that would have a positive impact on those with fewer resources.

Private institutions are businesses and like any business need to choose how to best invest from a business perspective. Is it better for the university, as a business, to invest dollars in “needy” students or “meritorious” students. The latter are more likely to graduate and do well as alumni...

A better question might be: Why should private institutions put any more funds into need based aid than they have to to attract as many needy students as they need to meet overall enrollment goals?

There is a balance in the mix of need and merit-based aid that each institution needs to determine for their own situation.

Merit man, at 6:05 pm EDT on October 9, 2006

Advertisement

 Jobs Related to Holding Off the Application Push

or search for jobs directly.

Chair, Public Administration
Southeastern University, DC

Southeastern University PERSONAL PROFESSIONAL PRACTICAL The Department of Public Administration invites nominations and ... see job

Computer Programmer
Mississippi State University

For information about current job vacancies, visit the Human Resources Web site at:see job

Student Services Officer
Yale University

General Purpose
Reporting to the Director of Admissions, assist in recruitment, outreach, admissions and office ... see job

Pharmacy Technician Program Department Chair
Corinthian Colleges

Everest College, a respected member of the Corinthian Colleges’ network of schools, is dedicated to helping students ... see job


University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

The Carolina Women?s Center at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and RIPPLE: The North Carolina Human ... see job

Assistant Professor/Associate Professor
Western Carolina University

ASSISTANT OR ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR OF ENTREPRENEURSHIP CENTER FOR ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND INNOVATION COLLEGE OF BUSINESS WESTERN ... see job

Assistant Professor of Speech Communication
Kentucky State University

The successful candidate will teach undergraduate classroom and on-line courses in speech, interpersonal communication, ... see job

Student Services Program Coordinator II
University of South Carolina

A leader in academe, the University of South Carolina holds the Carnegie Foundation’s highest research designation and is ... see job

Meteorology Tenure Track Faculty
Metropolitan State College of Denver

Urban College with 21,000 students at the base of Rocky Mountain, in Colorado. see job

Mitchell V. Charnley Professorship in Journalism
University of Minnesota, Twin Cities

The University of Minnesota is a premier employer and a talent magnet attracting leading faculty and staff from around the ... see job