Search News


Browse Archives

News

Gallaudet Shuts Down

October 12, 2006

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

The protest over the selection of Jane K. Fernandes as Gallaudet's next president -- which escalated last week when students took over the main academic building -- ratcheted ever higher Wednesday when members of the university's football team manned the front gates and shut the campus down. They were later joined by hundreds of students who formed a human chain to block anyone trying to enter.

Sophomore Calvin Doudt, who plays middle linebacker, said that the players decided to bring the situation to a head because students were scared and confused. Despite the fact that hundreds of protesters had already closed the main academic building, administrators had tried to keep the campus running by scheduling classes in other buildings, including the cafeteria. Students were not sure whether classes were being held and were concerned about their grades.

Student leaders said that they had tried to negotiate an end to the building lockdown, and to move the protest to a number of “safe zones” around the campus, but were rebuffed by President I. King Jordan. At 3:30 Wednesday morning, Doudt said that the football team chose to act. “We just decided to lock the whole campus down,” Doudt said.

By early morning, students running the protest posted a news release. “This is a Coup d’Universite carried out by the students. We no longer recognize Dr. Irving King Jordan as our Gallaudet President.”

With classes effectively canceled, students at Gallaudet's high school for the deaf, which is located on the university's campus, were leaving early for the weekend and could be seen wheeling their suitcases out the front gate where parents were waiting. A press scrum formed on a sidewalk outside the main gate where Gallaudet's press officer, Mercy Coogan, unable to enter the campus, read a statement e-mailed to her by President Jordan.

“Civility, integrity, and truth are victims today, held hostage as much as our beloved campus. I have been asked why I haven’t used police to end the standoff. It is because I care about the safety of all of our students more than the protesters care about anything but getting their way. This illegal and unlawful behavior must stop. The faculty members who are instigating and manipulating the students have simply gone too far in pursuit of their own agendas.”

Coogan then took a phone call from Jordan and answered questions from television crews. Exhausted, she then walked across the street to rest in her new office, a white Toyota sedan with an advertisement from Cluck-U-Chicken stuck to the driver’s window.

Television cameras were stopped at the protest line, but a reporter from Inside Higher Ed slipped between two freshmen and met with faculty who had gathered to pow-wow.

“You’ve got 50 Ph.D.s trying to write a statement,” joked Roger Beach, a professor of counseling. Beach said that he had no idea what might happen next and was stunned that Jordan had rejected the students’ request to end the lockdown of the campus building and move the protest to the "safe zones." Still, he said that Jordan would probably not escalate the situation by calling in a police force from the District of Columbia.

“Nobody wants to arrest 300 deaf kids,” he said.

The Gallaudet situation has puzzled many people watching it from a distance: Why are students and at least some professors seemingly so unhappy with Fernandes? Beach offered some assessments that were confirmed by a few other faculty members who did not wish to be quoted. Fernandes has a top-down leadership style that has rubbed many faculty members the wrong way. And like many students interviewed, Beach added that she is also “introverted” and lacks the charisma that they view as important for a college president.

Beach also added details about why faculty and students feel that the presidential search was tainted. Beach said that a series of incidents showed that Fernandes was always the preferred choice by the current and departing president, I. King Jordan. When Jordan announced his retirement last fall, he then welcomed Fernandes to stand next to him, inadvertently signing “the next president” before correcting himself and identifying Fernandes with her proper title “provost.” Beach said that he saw the gaffe himself as did the hundreds who attended.

Beach also dismissed any allegation that Fernandes was unpopular because she had not learned sign language until later in life. “The reality is that she has the same background as many of the students here,” he said, noting that students have a range of hearing difficulty and that many students are now mainstreamed into regular classes. "This is not deafness politics. It’s about leadership.”

“The sad thing is that the [Fernandes] has not come down to meet us,” said Doudt. He said that Fernandes may have qualities that look good on paper, but that the campus community doesn’t feel that way. “None of it matters if we don’t like her.”

The student body president, Noah Beckman, also said that Fernandes is simply not seen as an effective leader. “She hasn’t even met with us,” he said. “What kind of leader is that?”

Like many students, Beckman also said that the search process that resulted in the choice of Fernandes was flawed by perceived racism. One of the candidates that did not make the final cut was Glenn Anderson , who is black. While Anderson does not have administrative experience, he chaired Gallaudet’s Board of Trustees for 11 years and is a professor at University of Arkansas at Little Rock. Meanwhile, a white candidate who runs a deaf high school did make the final cut, although he only has a master's degree and lacks experience in higher education.

Beckman added that is difficult for people who are outside the deaf community to understand the passion surrounding the choice of president for Gallaudet. “It’s hard because the deaf community is different,” he said. “The choice of president will reflect on the whole deaf community and [Fernandes] is not an effective leader.

By early evening, faculty leaders released a statement signed by 41 tenured and tenure-track faculty members (the university has about 220 instructors all together ). The statement said that the professors supported the students, and that the ongoing strife severely affected Gallaudet’s ability to maintain its status as the premier institution for the deaf. “[T]he group reached consensus in calling for Jane K. Fernandes to resign from her position for the greater good of Gallaudet University.”

 “This university has stopped functioning,” said Jeff Lewis, a professor of counseling and one of the letter's signers.

“I wish that this will end soon,” said Doudt, who noted that his team has a game in the next couple of days. “I’ve already missed classes. If it continues, we won’t have a game. And I know the players won’t want that.”

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Gallaudet Shuts Down

  • Posted by bystander on October 12, 2006 at 8:50am EDT
  • I am interested in the leadership shown by the football team. Maybe one could question its direction, but it was definitive. We who love words talk too much. Those in administration who love power want to hold on, but this presidential leader wannabe apparently does not have followers, and sounds like a nice person (not calling the police &c). I recall that Harry Truman was elected as an officer by his troops in WWI even though not a college man (that's how they did it then and maybe we still should!) because they recognized his leadership. I wonder what credentials that football coach has.

  • Trying times
  • Posted by Martin on October 12, 2006 at 10:00am EDT
  • Gallaudet has a storied history of its students making a lot of noise when it comes to making sure that their voices, however silent, are heard. Having come from a family of hearing impaired, I understand the student's reaction and while I do not support shutting down an entire university, I do hope that the issues are resolved quickly and to the satisfaction of all involved. This is a very good example of how this country became great, the voice of the people speak and demand to be heard. Too often Universities are led by politicians who are concerned only about the welfare of the "bottom line" and forget that there are flesh and blood people depending on them. Perhaps more student bodies across the country need to have as strong a voice as these deaf-mutes at Gallaudet.

  • Posted by Kathryn on October 12, 2006 at 10:45am EDT
  • Wow -- when was the last time you saw students taking an interest in their own education, in their institution's leadership, and stepping up and taking a stand like this? The only thing you could get the average undergrad class to agree on at most colleges would be that they support the football team. Way to go Gallaudet's students! This kind of active, interested, unselfish politics is exactly what America needs. I wish this were all over the news!

  • Hope...
  • Posted by d on October 12, 2006 at 11:30am EDT
  • I just hope the students have thought this out. Are they prepared for the staff (from the cafeteria, housekeeping, business office...etc) to not be paid? I am all for decisive, symbolic action- and I applaud the signal that the football team decided to send in principal.

    BUT. For a day or afternoon is one thing. To effectively shut down an entire institution has ramifications far beyond sending a signal that a future leader is milquetoast. I think they've perhaps overreached in sending their signals. And I hope the faculty will willingly take the hit to their paycheck in order to lessen the impact on hourly support staff. And if only a 1/5 of the faculty support this enough to sign that letter, than the situation is much sadder than it seems.

  • Who Needs to Take the Fault
  • Posted by Santino on October 12, 2006 at 11:30am EDT
  • First, the football team did not excercise leadership. It is obvious they reacted from their inner-most "John Wayne" attitudes. They were wrong! If the 41 tenured and tenure-track faculty members (the university has about 220 instructors all together)are asking Fernandes to leave in the spirit of saving the college, she should ask them to join her and leave as well. Never fails, the facutly is always right! They are never wrong. That's why they faculty . . .

  • JKF without Faculty Confidence
  • Posted by Carl Schroeder on October 12, 2006 at 12:05pm EDT
  • Gallaudet University has become a sad case study. JKF is without Faculty confidence. She is without student support. She is without alumni groups. She's alone now!

  • Police
  • Posted by Kevin , Undergraduate on October 12, 2006 at 1:45pm EDT
  • Why hasn't the university called the police yet? Why should part of the student body be able to hold everyone else from their jobs and their education? If they have an objection that serious, they can always go to another school where they feel their concerns are more heard... good luck.

  • re: Police
  • Posted by Supportive prof on October 12, 2006 at 4:05pm EDT
  • Calling in DC police would be very dangerous in this situation, and I applaud Jordan's restraint. Neither the vast majority of DC police nor even many of GU's own security officers are able to communicate in ASL, and the resultant miscommunications have led to injuries and deaths of student protestors in the past. In 1990 Carl Dupree, a deaf GU student died as a result of miscommunication with GU security, and the administration is painfully aware of the impact of this death on the GU and larger Deaf community. Students have also been physically assaulted by GU security over the past week as a result of inability to communicate with security officers who couldn't use ASL. Bringing in DC police would be a disaster and would create the potential for another Kent State type situation. No one wants this.

  • Posted by Jane on October 12, 2006 at 5:25pm EDT
  • I do not believe it is in the students and faculty's best interest for the students to shut down a university to make their demands known. There are peaceful ways to make their voices heard. I believe Jane and the board of trustees are not listening to the student's demands. Martin writes that he comes from a hearing impaired family yet he is in the stone age when he calls the students "deaf mutes". Doesn't he know it is an insult to use those words? Shame on Martin for using them!

  • Students that are leaders...
  • Posted by Ira Socol at Michigan State University on October 12, 2006 at 9:45pm EDT
  • Kevin and Jane:

    Please. Kevin - what other school? Gallaudet is "the one university" of this type in the US. There is no other choice. And it is shame that a "typical" undergrad cannot see that universities should have significant student involvement in their operation. The Gallaudet students are showing the rest of American college students what commitment, courage, and leadership look like.

    and Jane: These students have worked on this peacefully for over five months, and the result is that the university "leadership" has refused to seriously engage them at all. Eventually, if people are serious about demanding real institutional change, they will need to take risks and stop the status quo from maintening itself. The fact that this is so rare in America today is proof of how far our democracy has declined.

  • Posted by Thomas Nixon at Degree Press on October 13, 2006 at 4:25am EDT
  • As the father of a deaf high school student, I am concerned. Gallaudet is different and it should be treated differently. Being the president of Gallaudet is quite different than being the president of Arkansas State or Stanford. The president of GU is a (the?) de facto leader of the Deaf community in the United States. It must be a person who relates well to that community.

    I have yet to see that Jane Fernandes is capable of doing so. It is telling that she has not attempted to talk with the protesters.

  • Posted by Alison Pinsley on October 13, 2006 at 8:10am EDT
  • I am disheartened to learn of the ongoing strife at Galludet in light of what has recently happened there. I am pleased to hear that the faculty is supporting the students in their effort to reopen the search for a new president. As I understand it, I. King Jordan is still president and nobody seems to be supporting him either. What about selecting and interim president to serve while reopening the search process?

  • Who cares
  • Posted by quickrch on October 13, 2006 at 10:10am EDT
  • So we finally have a group of college students who aren't apathetic and stand up for what they believe in. I find it refreshing. Too often administrations are able to wear down these protestors by making stay in safe locations where they can be ignored because they know time is measured in classes as a student and in years as an administrator. Good for them to push the envelope and not accept what they believe to be an inappropriate decision from the university leadership. Too often students allow administrations to dismiss them politely. It’s about time students’ fight for something personal and local while showing some conviction. Whether they are right I wrong in their thinking about this president their parents should be proud that they insist in having their message out there. Other institutions should look with envy at these kids for making a difference. What other school can boast such an open and deliberate engagement of students on campus? While we administrators may cringe at the thought of this happening at our school, the long term ramifications of this for the students and for the university will be a positive one.

  • Discriminatory Protest and Hidden Agenda
  • Posted by ruby on October 14, 2006 at 6:15am EDT
  • Protesters went too far to damage the Gallaudet's mission educating the deaf students enrolling elem. school through college levels by closing down for several days now. Your actions are not acceptable!

    Morever, I felt that your actions sending mixed, unfocused messages and it added up now that reflecting you are discriminating Jane because of her background and her work focusing to build Sorenson Center on campus which many aluminis are aganist because they worked in ASL environment workplace like CSD which is a major competitor of Sorenson. This is their hidden agenda to try remove Jane so that CSD could donate money to build a center instead of Sorenson.

    I wish President I. King Jordan and DPS kicking out the aluminis because they have no business on campus this week. The protesters are responsible for the damages for no freedom of education and learning environment for others who are aganist the protest. Last word, please accept the BOT decision as they may have excellent reasons for the selection.

  • Dr. Socal
  • Posted by Kevin , Undergraduate on October 15, 2006 at 6:50am EDT
  • Dr. Socal, the actions of a disruptive minority do not necessarily represent the views of the student body as a whole. There are not only surely those not involved in this illegal action that support it and those who are involved who only support part of the platform. I don't agree with the implication that the first group to be disruptive must represent what the student body as a whole believes.

    There are better ways of demonstrating concern than ruining the educations of others. If they are so concerned that some has to lose education opportunities, I would rather it be them leaving out of protest to go to another university (there are lots of other deaf students who manage just fine elsewhere) than those who are interested in learning not disrupting others opportunities.

  • BOT
  • Posted by Whaddayathink on October 15, 2006 at 8:05am EDT
  • 1. Board of Trustee governs Gallaudet University.
    2. Jordan had 20 years,Psychology professor, time to learn and mold whos who on Board of Trustee.
    3. When Jane was hired, she was smart to ensure there is clause in contract of acceptance for compensatory of accepting resignation.
    4. Gallaudet may not have budget to compensate for Jane resignation.
    5. However unpopular, BOT insisted on Jane as next president, Student took action in the best interest of Gallaudet University.
    6. In 1988 when BOT elected Zinser, student protested and Zinser resigned gracefully and their education moved on. Now 2006 protest, Jane steadfastly refuse to resign, hence the protest.

    Case in point: University President designate should have enough intelligence that if unpopular or protest resulted in elected by Board of Trustee - (resulted in campuswide distruption) At what point should the elected president announce her resignation? What makes her think when she begins her job in Janurary, Gallaudet University operation will be hunky-dory? Students, staff, parents and faculties from Gallaudet and nationwide expressed their voice and thoughts. She havent even begun her job as president. Does one need intelligence to compute what the effects will be when she begin her job in Janurary??
    Whaddayathink??

  • A Missing Fact
  • Posted by A Gally Prof on October 15, 2006 at 3:20pm EDT
  • I am a tenure-track faculty member at Gallaudet and though I am not in the habit of commenting in a public forum, I feel the need to add one important fact that this article has (unwittingly) omitted. The meeting cited in the article, which resulted in the statement "signed by 41 tenured and tenure-track faculty members (the university has about 220 instructors all together)," was not a previously scheduled meeting. It was held at 11:00am on campus Thursday, the second day the university was closed. I received the e-mail announcing the meeting, and that protesters would allow faculty on campus to attend the meeting, at 10:10am that morning. With less than one hour notice, on a day the university was closed, absolute numbers (41 out of 220 instructors) are misleading. The results of Monday's regularly scheduled faculty meeting, which is to be open only to faculty with voting privileges, will more accurately reflect our feelings.