News, Views and Careers for All of Higher Education
Oct. 19, 2006
A Brown University report released Wednesday on the institution’s ties to the slave trade stops short of recommending an apology, and eschews the subject of personal monetary reparations. It focuses instead on memorials and social justice efforts meant to acknowledge and make amends for the past — and, perhaps more importantly, offer a paradigm for other universities with spotty paths seeking to move forward.
“Everybody is going to look to what Brown did,” said Alfred L. Brophy, professor of law at the University of Alabama and author of the just-released book, Reparations: Pro and Con (Oxford University Press).
“Virtually every school south of the Mason-Dixon Line and some of the ones up north, obviously, have connections to the institution of slavery,” Brophy said. “Brown’s study gives moral authority to conduct these studies and will likely drive more of them.”
“Slavery and Justice,” a report by the Brown University Steering Committee on Slavery and Justice, examines the complicity of Brown’s founders and backers in slavery and the slave trade, and describes the benefits the university obtained from its tainted ties. Founded in 1764 as the College of Rhode Island, Brown has what Omer Bartov, a European history professor and member of the steering committee, called “skeletons in the closet, corpses in the quad.”
The report offers an in-depth discussion of Brown’s connections to slavery, beginning with a description of the institution’s first president, the Rev. James Manning, arriving in Rhode Island with his own personal slave. University Hall, Brown’s oldest building, was built in part by slave labor. The first-ever endowment drive featured a sail down the coast to raise funds from slaveowners in South Carolina, and the institution’s wealthy benefactor and future namesake, the Brown family, participated in the slave trade, the family finally splitting over the issue in the late 18th century.
The report, completed by a commission of faculty members, students and administrators appointed by President Ruth J. Simmons in 2003, suggests a set of broad-based measures meant to redress the institution’s past. The committee does not propose reparations in the popular monetary sense of the term, but instead proposes efforts to both remember the past and make amends through various educational initiatives.
The recommendations to Simmons, who praised the committee in a letter Wednesday, include:
Commission members disagreed on the value and propriety of an institutional apology, but assert in the report that Brown’s history at least should be acknowledged.
“Of course one can’t go back in history, but in what ways can we redress some of those legacies?” Bartov asked.
“I think that generally we agreed that the way to go is not by providing checks to descendents of slaves or potential descendents of slaves. I think that simply didn’t appear to us to be a useful recommendation for the university,” said Bartov, adding that the process of identifying potential beneficiaries would be nearly impossible in itself.
“I think we’re hoping that what we’ve done will be some kind of example of at least trying to come to terms with a past that has been by and large not confronted. And because we are a university, the one thing that we know or hope we know how to do is study, research and teach.”
Observers who track rights for historical wrongs say that the proposals advanced by Brown are typical of reparations as they are commonly understood within academe. While history offers a few isolated examples of personal monetary reparations — for example, in the case of Japanese-Americans interned during World War II — the term is commonly understood by scholars to refer to a broader approach of both memorializing the past and using a prior injustice as a springboard for the creation of a more just world.
“This is potentially setting up a model for one of the ways in which specific institutions like universities can begin to let the topic resurface and do some proactive things to begin to heal the divisions in society and the inequalities in society — at least to the extent that they can do something within their arena,” said Roy Finkenbine, a professor of history and director of the Black Abolitionist Archives at the University of Detroit Mercy.
“We don’t even know the names of the slaves who labored in the West Indies to create the sugar that led to the great profits that the Bristol and Providence merchants made,” Brophy said. “We don’t know their names, but generations later, the great Brown University, built in part from the labor of these nameless people, is being used for a better purpose, for education, for the liberation of a people.”
“That’s what’s positive about this.”
In addition to the report, the steering committee is offering links to a variety of historical documents on its Web site and will hold a series of forums with those at Brown and the greater Providence area beginning November 1.
Brown’s president will respond to the report and its recommendations more fully in the coming weeks.
Want it on paper? Print this page.
Know someone who’d be interested? Forward this story.
Want to stay informed? Sign up for free daily news e-mail.
Advertisement
When I first visited the Carter’s Grove Plantation near Williamsburg, Virginia, as a teenager in the 1960s, it was touted as “the most beautiful house in America.” And indeed it appeared to be so. When I returned with my own family many years later, I was stunned and moved to see that the visitors center had reoriented the tour to acknowledge slavery’s legacy and begin with a presentation by an actor posing as a slave in the midst of reconstucted slave quarters. It was a deeply affecting presentation that I remember vividly. And of course it altered the view one took away from “the most beautiful house.” I believe that Brown’s courageous pursuit of the facts of its past will have a profound effect on the university and its reputation. I applaud President Simmons for her unswerving leadership on this quest.
Peter, at 11:30 am EDT on October 19, 2006
More teachers, more local involvement, scholarships for minorities, recruiting Africans...this sounds exactly like the 1970’s. There is no creative thought here, just a repeat of thirty years ago. If you want creative thought on the issue, ask the students of Oberlin College in Ohio, or Antioch College. But don’t expect “make some public moves it’ll go away” thinking. Here’s an opportunity to really make a statement. Is “more teachers” and “more scholarships” really the message you wish to leave for all of this?
Masso, at 1:05 pm EDT on October 19, 2006
A grandmother told me that one of my greatgrandfathers when south to free the slaves during the Civil War. As an American History teacher at the time, I doubted thata man with a wife, two small children and a successful business at the time would put his life on the line in this way, since most soldiers heading south appear to be primary modivated by a desire to save the Union. Then I read a letter written to my greatgrandmother urging her to teach the children an abolitionist song, “John Brown’s Body.” Today it would be foolish of me to expect that someone owes me something because of my grandfather’s service.
Richard J. Davis, at 1:55 pm EDT on October 19, 2006
A white oppressors response to white oppressor guilt. A memorial?? Give me a break. Sending more middleclass teachers to “help” the poor deficient Black students—-give me a break. A day of remembrance???Oppression’s form changes, but oppression remains.
Mike, at 1:55 pm EDT on October 19, 2006
The resentment that I interpret coming from the prior comments of Mr. Richard Davis is that there is some unfounded sense of entitlement here. There is also resentment about that buzzword “reparations” and the implied guilt of those who were of the oppressors’ race (i.e. White people, mainly men). Does anyone really owe anything? Well...yes...kinda.
The real problem is that from slavery and emancipation to antebellum and reconstruction to legal segregation and the Civil Rights Movement, African Americans have been systematically denied full and equal opportunities. The Affirmative Action loophole has allowed white women to reap far more benfits than those available to American Blacks, and so there remains NO closure to this country’s quite checkered past. What is owed, then, is a FULL REPORTING of one’s history. The main reason Black History Month was created was to fill in all those little blanks in American history about people of color, particularly Blacks. Had this country taken FULL OWNERSHIP of her former leaders’ past trangressions, maybe conversations like the one Brown U. is having would be passe. Unfortunately, because this nation likes to benefit from significant omissions, individuals start accounting for them by their own initiative (or they get outed).
I find it ironic that Brown University is willing to take ownership of its past transgressions — something this nation is still unable to do. An apology for slavery is at this point both moot and irrelevant. Although this country’s wealth was built on the slave economy and she continues to thrive on the exploitation of others, I cannot say that a memorial is most suitable. However, I think that in comparison to all the offenses that have been committed — even the hypocrisy of Northern abolitionists who still cashed in (although indirectly) on slave profit economy — it is good that the discussion is being had.
Does this somehow guarantee that Brown will be admitting any Black student who applies? No. Should Brown have some kind of open-door policy for minority students? Absolutely not. Perhaps Brown should rewrite her history and include all those nasty little details? Most certainly. Hopefully other institutions (including this American Government) will also air out those cobwebs and long-hidden skeletons so they can proudly proclaim their past errors and future aims to correct them.
As Americans, we are ALL owed a real accounting of the truth of this nation’s past, no matter how ugly it is. Reaping crops from tainted soil will eventually poison those who eat them. We have to start fresh. We have to detox. Brown’s trying to clean the slate and I applaud that. A new beginning? Now THAT is something to look forward to.
SAM, Grad Student, at 6:45 pm EDT on October 19, 2006
Oh my, Brown University is coming clean ... with caveats, of course. Posed in the window, in feigned supplication and a mumbled mea culpa or two is, after all, simply window dressing.
Michael, at 5:30 am EDT on October 20, 2006
Advertisement
or search for jobs directly.
Located just north of Houston, Texas, our five campuses serve 1,400 square miles. Our student enrollment is nearly 50,000 in ... see job
To provide skilled assistance in creating, modifying, and editing publications including technical manuals, procedures, ... see job
The University of Minnesota is a premier employer and a talent magnet attracting leading faculty and staff from around the ... see job
Northeastern University, founded in 1898 and located in Boston, is a private research university that is a leader in ... see job
Cradled in the foothills of the Appalachian Mountains in northeast Alabama, truly Jacksonville State University is a place ... see job
Keuka College seeks instructor(s) to teach multiple sections of a course in health and wellness for Fall 2008 and Spring 2009 ... see job
Serve as Department Chair, which includes supervision and mentoring of faculty and staff; representing and advocating for the ... see job
Job Description: This is a full-time, tenure track faculty position in the Dental Hygiene Program beginning ... see job
SOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY. Personal. Professional. Practical. see job
The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill seeks an organized, knowledgeable and enthusiastic Legacy Finding Aids ... see job
redressing the past
We live in an age of political positioning and social blindness. It’s refreshing to read about scholars and educators making an honest attempt to remember the past. Where would the country be today without the blood and sweat shed by those now silent, buried and nearly lost in time? Is it not a good and just thing to give their memories the telling they deserve? Your work honors them and deserves honoring. I am humbled by the the likes of you. Please keep doing what you’re doing.
W. Emerson, CS, at 7:15 am EDT on October 19, 2006