Advertisement

News, Views and Careers for All of Higher Education

Lawyers Who Can Read

“Modest” changes to the reading comprehension and writing sections of the Law School Admission Test will go into effect beginning June 2007.

The changes will pose “no noticeable benefits or challenges to test-takers,” said Wendy Margolis, spokeswoman for the Law School Admission Council, a nonprofit corporation that administers the exam. However, one of the major test preparation companies is already recommending that students consider taking the test before the changes go into effect to avoid uncertainty.

As of June, one of the four sets of questions on the LSAT’s reading comprehension section will focus on “comparative reading,” in which students read two passages and answer questions on how they relate to one another. Currently, each section includes questions on one single, longer passage.

In addition, the admission council has announced that instead of randomly assigning students to one of two types of essay prompts – decision or argument – all students will be assigned a decision prompt, in which they choose to defend one of two equally defensible alternatives, rather than champion one side of a presented dispute. As is currently the case, the writing samples will be sent to law schools, but will not be scored. More details and up-to-date test preparation materials will be available online by mid-February.

Margolis said the changes weren’t championed by any particular law school leaders – the LSAC counts more than 200 law schools as its members — but came as a result of feedback from the council’s test development and research committee. The council is introducing the comparative reading section because it closely parallels a typical law school task, she said. Meanwhile, the argument prompts are being dropped after a one-year trial period in which test designers explored whether or not they should be incorporated on the exam.

“It’s a modest change; it’s not going to undermine the broad underlying construct of the LSAT,” Margolis said. “It’s not anything where you would advise, ‘Take the test now because it’s going to be very different next year’ – that’s not the case.”

However, a director at Kaplan Test Prep and Admissions is recommending that potential law students consider taking the test before June, if possible.

“While it’s not something to panic about and it’s certainly something that they’ll be able to adequately prepare for in June, if they are taking it in the next year or so, they should, if they have time to prepare, take it in December or February. Anytime there is uncertainty in the exam, regardless of the magnitude, it should be avoided if you have the opportunity,” said Steven Marietti, director of pre-law programs at Kaplan.

Marietti said that the writing change essentially reverts the test back to its 2005 form and will likely be relatively insignificant. But he added that the comparative reading section will comprise six or seven questions on the exam – which could account for a three- to six-point difference on the test, scored on a rubric of 120 to 180.

“The difference between being comfortable and well-versed on those six or seven questions could be substantive, and is in fact substantive,” Marietti said.

Yet, Kaplan’s main competitor, The Princeton Review, isn’t recommending that students alter their test plans to avoid the comparative reading questions. “With the reading comp passages, it’s only a slightly more sophisticated way of looking at these comparative passages; however, a lot of the passages that students see already require that kind of comparative logic to be used,” said Jeff Meanza, director of graduate programs at Princeton Review. “In fact, you see this type of dual passage on the SAT currently; it’s nothing students wouldn’t have seen before.”

“I think June is a better time to take the exam, in terms of how it fits into the admissions cycle,” Meanza added. “I don’t think that it’s ultimately that big of a deal — I don’t think we need to scare students into doing something just because of two minor changes.”

The LSAT, required for admission at all American Bar Association-approved law schools, consists of five 35-minute multiple-choice sections, four of which count toward the total score, and tests students on reading comprehension, analytical reasoning and logical reasoning. A 35-minute writing sample is not scored, but law school data suggest that 67.9 percent of law schools use the writing sample to evaluate applicants on at least an occasional basis.

Elizabeth Redden

Got something to say?


Want it on paper? Print this page.
Know someone who’d be interested? Forward this story.
Want to stay informed? Sign up for free daily news e-mail.

Advertisement

Comments

Career Advice

Anyone concerned about this type of reading and writing test really must go into another line of work. Lawyers do this kind of analysis every day.

JBM, at 9:20 am EDT on October 26, 2006

Bolt from the blue

Larry – I cannot comprehend that your fellow esquires can’t read? The demagogues are used to point fingers at African Americans as under achievers in SAT and other subjects, this one it isn’t us.

Surprise – I believe those demagogues now are stumped — that lawyers can’t read, you know better Larry, please enlighten us — this is your bread and butter, and air your dirty laundry in public.

David Robertson, Professor at SUNY, at 11:50 am EDT on October 26, 2006

David,

I suggest that you proof your posts for grammatical errors before submitting them. As it is, I don’t really see a need for Larry to respond to you. You’ve done a good job of undermining yourself.

QuakerProf, at 6:20 pm EDT on October 26, 2006

Let’s take a step back.

The LSAT will always be tweaked. This is good. Let’s face it: it has a big job to do. By just looking at GPA, transcripts, and references alone, law schools have no idea whether someone is an idiot or not. “Smart” students will engineer high GPAs and cherry-picked letters of reference. There is no guarantee that a student with a 4.0 GPA will be able to reconcile, two Supreme Court cases.

So, if the braintrust at the LSAC wants to try something new, at its own behest, I say, “More power to them!”

But, there is one conundrum with the LSAT that always interested me. The LSAT is often hailed as a predictor of 1st-year law school grades. There is a slight problem with this: students with high LSAT scores will be given entry to law schools with higher grade curves, virtually assuring that indictors of performance will be better. On the other hand, students with sub-160 LSAT scores will generally be forced to attend schools with curves lower than a B, and students with scores under 155 might have to attend a school which routinely kicks out 33% of its class after the first year. While the odd student with a high LSAT score might attend a lesser school, these students are hopelessly naïve, or unwise risk takers and might not be the best advocates for their clients.

For this reason, there will never be an indication that the LSAT is providing “false positives” of intelligence, since the indicators of intelligence are generally determined on the day before admission letters are mailed.

Larry, at 4:35 pm EST on October 30, 2006

The LSAT is a sorting tool. Too many people are applying to law schools and there has to be SOME “objective” standard from which to judge people. Whether or not this sorting tool actually relates to “intelligence” or “ability", “first year grades” etc. is irrelevant but only helpful to the extent that these properties bestowed on the test justify its existence. That being said. I have to congratulate LSAC for this new feature. I have read and helped edit many law journal articles from top schools and published by people who went to top schools. Compared with others in academia, at least in terms of writing, law students are retarded and a lot of the garbage that they actually let through on top-notch journals attests to the ignorance of student editors and the poor quality and standard of writing that legal scholars are held to. So I say to you LSAC, bravo. Maybe in 10 or 15 years we’ll have some lawyers that can actually write...

Jason, On the LSAT (in general) at Harvard, at 5:55 am EDT on April 17, 2007

Advertisement

 Jobs Related to Lawyers Who Can Read

or search for jobs directly.

Senior Associate
American Federation of Teachers

The American Federation of Teachers seeks candidate experienced in working with unions or non-profit associations who would ... see job

Musicology, Post-Doctoral Resident Scholar
Indiana University

MUSICOLOGY Post-Doctoral Resident Scholar INDIANA UNIVERSITY BLOOMINGTON JACOBS SCHOOL OF MUSIC see job

Program Coordinator I
University of Georgia

Job Summary The individual in this position is responsible for the coordination of the training program for ... see job

Associate Provost — 7TWUP01
Texas Woman’s University

Texas Woman’s University — Denton Campus Department: Provost Title: Associate Provost Job Code: 7TWUP01 Date Closed: Open ... see job

Program Director/Faculty Cardiovascular
Howard Community College

The Director of the CVT program is also the program administrator. The director is responsible for providing leadership for ... see job

Bilogy Chair Tenure Track Faculty
Metropolitan State College of Denver

Urban College with 21,000 students at the base of Rocky Mountain, in Colorado. see job

Visual Resources Curator
Princeton University

Position Summary: Responsible for all daily operations of audio-visual use at the School of Architecture: ... see job

Assistant Professor, Biochemistry, IRC24124
Rochester Institute of Technology

The chemistry department at the Rochester Institute of Technology invites applications for a tenure track, junior faculty ... see job

Assistant Professor in Chemistry
University of Texas, Brownsville

Position Number: FY 09-54 Reports to: Chairperson of the Department of Chemistry and Environmental Sciences. Scope: The ... see job

Assistant Professor – Physics
Robert Morris University PA

Robert Morris University (RMU), founded in 1921, is a private university with an enrollment of approximately 5,100 students. ... see job