Search News


Browse Archives

News

Foreign Graduate Enrollments Up

November 1, 2006

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

Following 9/11 and the tightening of visa rules, the number of foreign students coming to the United States for graduate school plunged. But a new report by the Council of Graduate Schools finds that foreign graduate student enrollment has finally started to climb. Most foreign graduate students entering this year came from China and India, which have burgeoning populations of undergraduates to feed into graduate programs.

Despite the encouraging news in today's report, experts in education say that American universities should continue to identify tactics to ensure that the best and brightest of these students continue to choose the United States for graduate school.

“We knew that these numbers would eventually turn around,” said Debra Stewart, president of the Council of Graduate Schools. Stewart said that the upswing has been driven by efforts to streamline visa policies and by university outreach to aggressively recruit foreigners. She pointed out that a prior study by her council found that 80 percent of universities created policies after 9/11 to boost their pool of international graduates.

For the study, the council surveyed 177 universities and found that total enrollment of international graduate students grew by 1 percent in 2006, a change from the 3 percent decline in the prior year. Slightly more than half of the foreign graduates came from three countries: China, India and South Korea. About 73 percent of foreign students are enrolled in programs for business, engineering, social science, physical sciences and life sciences. Engineering and business showed the largest matriculation gains this year (22 percent and 10 percent, respectively).

Trends in Foreign Graduate Enrollments

  New Enrollment, 2004 -5 New Enrollment, 2005 -6 Total Enrolled, 2004-5 Total Enrolled, 2005 -6
International total 1% 12% -3% 1%
Country of origin        
China 3% 20% -2% -2%
India 3% 32% -4% 8%
South Korea 5% 5% -4% -3%
Middle East 11% -1% 1% 1%
Discipline        
Business 7% 10% -3% 1%
Engineering 3% 22% -6% 3%
Humanities and Arts -2% -6% 1% -7%
Life Sciences -1% 2% -5% -1%

“This report pretty much speaks for us as well,” said Dick Wheeler, dean of the Graduate College at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, who said the figures mirror numbers at his university. Wheeler said that the quantities of graduate students enrolling from India and the Middle East have stayed pretty much the same as last year, but that there has been a surge in students from China who are majoring in engineering. The number of new foreign graduate students in engineering jumped from 151 last year to 207 this year, increasing the total enrollment of foreign students in engineering from 850 to 908. ( This corrects information in an earlier version of the article.)

Wheeler said that his institution did make attempts to smooth the way for foreign graduates by creating friendlier Web sites and making applications easier to fill out. But he doubts if this really had much of an effect. He suspects that the driving forces for the increases are the federal changes to ease visa problems, along with global trends, such as the large number of Chinese undergraduates.

“I was in China last November for the first time and went to a recruiting event in Beijing,” he said. “There were 12 universities there and there were long lines for each university.” Wheeler adds that the University of Illinois has always had strong representation from Chinese graduate students and that informal ties back to universities in China attracts students to the university.

“A lot of our effort is involved in protecting our base and making this a comfortable base for graduate students,” he said.

At the University of Washington, Suzanne Ortega, vice provost and graduate dean, said that her institution experienced a rebound last year. She believes that two factors caused this earlier recovery: the university is closer to Asia than states on the East coast are and began recruiting aggressively in China and Southeast Asia a few years ago. “We have a flatter picture this year,” she said of Washington's growth in foreign graduates.

Still, Ortega said that the university's foreign graduate enrollment has not rebounded completely and is down 2 percent from pre-9/11 numbers. Today, 15 percent of the graduate students at Washington are foreign born.

“The real worry for [the U.S.] is not the total number but the quality of the students,” said Philip Altbach, director of Center for International Higher Education at Boston College.

Ortega agreed with this assessment but added that it is impossible to accurately measure any change in the quality of graduate students over time. Grade point averages cannot be fairly compared and standard scores have not changed at her university, she said.

Wheeler said that the overall feeling is that the crisis has now passed, but Stewart cautioned that there are many more problems that need to be fixed.

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Foreign Graduate Enrollments Up

  • Bad news for Americans...
  • Posted by jrobbins on November 1, 2006 at 8:20pm EST
  • I don't see why this article acts as if this is good news! It's terrible news for Americans seeking entry into graduate school! Most graduate programs in America receive far more applications than they can admit, so increasing the number of foreign applicants simply means less Americans will be able to attend graduate school. Whenever a foreign student is admitted to graduate school, there is often an American who is denied admission. This is becoming so common these days. I've personally known people who have been rejected by their alma maters where they received their Bachelor's. I've also known people who are only admitted to schools in other states- meaning they face cost-prohibitive out of state tuition, or in some cases, have to travel half way across the country!

    And yet, people in America claim there is a shortage of Americans in graduate science and engineering programs! The reason I see for the shortage is that graduate programs are recruiting too many foreigners. Why can't American grad programs recruit Americans?? I find it an outrageous situation when Americans can't gain admission to programs in their own country because graduate programs are too busy filling their ranks with people who often can't speak English.

    When foreign enrollment decreased after 9/11, were there any graduate programs that lacked students? I seriously doubt it. Instead, they probably enrolled more Americans. I can't imagine why a decrease in foreign enrollment is a "crisis" - if anything, the "crisis" is for Americans seeking admission to graduate programs.

    It's truly sad that America seems more eager to educate foreigners than we are our own people. I truly believe that tax-payer funded public universities, like those mentioned, should be required to admit Americans first, and only admit foreigners when they no longer have any American applicants.

  • Bad news for Americans [reply]
  • Posted by Jun , Ph.D. student at University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign on November 2, 2006 at 5:40am EST
  • I do not completely agree with your argument. First, undergraduate and Master's international students pay ridiculous amount of money to study in the U.S. There has been a surge in the number of foreign student enrollment in undergraduate and Masters programs in the U.S. Foreigners pay about $80,000 for Masters - all out of their own pocket (as opposed to American students paying about $40,000). This brings me to my second point.

    Second, undergraduate students and Master's students (including professional degree-seekers, such as MBA, JD, MSW, etc.) do NOT receive financial aid or loans, for that matter. The amount of money they spend really is what keeps the schools running -among other things.

    Third, for Ph.D. students who typically receive full funding, international students do not qualify for federal funding, unlike domestic students. In some cases, they have to pay partially to attend, although American students do not.

    My point is that international students are the (financial) backbone of U.S. institutions - even if their primary purpose for studying is for personal gain.

    On a personal note, I am a domestic student (not an international student).

  • Reply to Jun
  • Posted by jrobbins on November 3, 2006 at 5:55am EST
  • Foreign students paying "ridiculous amounts of money" to attend graduate school in America simply is not the case in my experience. Just about all of the foreign students I know aren't paying a dime! Their tution is paid by their national governments, especially those from nationa like China and India, plus they often receive a cost of living stipend. It's true they're not eligible for federal aid, but they obviously don't need it since they receive money from their own governments.

    And where do you get the idea that Americans do NOT have to pay to attend graduate school?? Most Americans (and certainly myself!) do pay for graduate school, often going deeply into dept to finance their educations.

    Also, your figures for the cost of a Master's degree are dependent on some assumptions. $40,000 for a 2-year Master's program is what an American would likely pay for an in-state program. But, due to the overcrowding of our graduate programs, Americans are increasinly likely to have to attend an out-of-state institution, which makes the cost of the degree much more- probably around $80,000. If an American seeks a PhD, they'll easily end up in the 100-200,000 range.
    So, no Americans don't go to school for free. And foreigners often don't have to pay more than Americans.

  • Posted by Ujjaini on November 3, 2006 at 2:10pm EST
  • You should check your facts before stating that international students do not have to pay more than American students. According to the OPen Doors 2005 report international students contribute more than $13 billion to the American economy because all schools charge them more than double of what American students have to pay for tuition. Also, only a handful of international students (most of them in doctoral programs) receive funding from their schools and barely a handful of Indian and Chinese governments have drastically slashed the number of international students they sponsor- most international students, especially those who are enrolled in Masters and undergraduate programs have to pay for everything themselves. The American university system would be in serious crisis if international enrollments continued to fall.

  • Engineering Graduate Programs
  • Posted by JPK on November 13, 2006 at 5:35am EST
  • A nobel prize was won by a professor at the University of Chicago proving that gains in economic wealth as a society are directly tied to innovation. It is critical that advanced engineering educations go to individuals who will contribute in our local economy. At one time statistics showed that graduate students from abroad tended to stay in the United States, but this trend has solidly reversed. When we as a country can only provide a limited number of graduate educational opportunities in the sciences it is critical that residents of this country be given most of these positions. A trully exceptional student can still be given opportunity, but for the good of this country it is important that these research and development positions be targeted at citizens. Most professors and graduate students research is supported through research grants from the US government and to a lesser extent domestic corporations. There is a limit to the amount of funding and therefore key educational opportunities available. If you have looked at most engineering graduate populations recently there is no way any argument for diversity can be made. If anything these departments look more like a crosssection of southeast asia. Most americans: caucasion americans, hispanic americans and african americans stand out as a small minority in these departments. This is not just an interesting datapoint. We as a country are dependant for our growth on these individuals. Certainly business leaders, sales talent, marketing, legal talent, medical support all are necessary components of our society, but engineering is the core of developed counties strategic long term advantage. Old methods and technologies are supperceded by newer innovations of ever more productive and useful character. When the automobile industry decided not to innovate as quickly they gave Toyota and Honda and others an opening to remake the automobile through engineering and innovation in a way that makes competition ever more difficult. Toyota is building plants in the United States and paying its workers well while taking evermore market share away from american automakers. Certainly outsourcing is creating dislocations, but engineering outsourcing gives away our future as a leading society. All of us need to be responsible citizens and incetivize dometic enterprise through educational opportunity, and stand firm on demanding a solid future for our children and our society.