Search News


Browse Archives

News

Will Photo Haunt Penn President?

November 6, 2006

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

Controversial Facebook photographs are supposed to get students -- not college presidents -- in hot water. But days after hosting her annual Halloween party at the presidential home, University of Pennsylvania President Amy Gutmann finds herself the subject of criticism after a photograph of her posing with a student dressed as a suicide bomber circulated online.

Saad Saadi, a Penn undergraduate, came to Gutmann's party wearing camouflage pants and fake dynamite strapped to his shirt. He brandished a fake gun and in some pictures appears to be reading a Koran. Photographs that were posted on his Facebook account show him staging mock executions around campus.

After the pictures began to appear on various Web sites, a number of alumni and students wrote messages to the university expressing anger that Gutmann is seen smiling next to Saadi. Some demanded an apology from the president.

On Friday, Gutmann issued a statement, saying that it is customary for students to seek photographs with her at the party, and that she at first didn't realize what Saadi's costume implied.

“This year, one student who had a toy gun in hand had his picture taken with me before it was obvious to me that he was dressed as a suicide bomber," she said in the statement. "The costume is clearly offensive and I was offended by it. As soon as I realized what his costume was, I refused to take any more pictures with him, as he requested. The student had the right to wear the costume just as I, and others, have a right to criticize his wearing of it."

Saadi has since apologized for the costume. He wrote on his Web site that he doesn't "support terrorism, violence or anything that is against society," and that the costume -- like many others on Halloween -- was simply meant to portray a scary character. 

A statement issued by the student executive committee of Penn Hillel indicates that the group found the costume offensive, not scary.

"While some may dismiss these actions as straightforward Halloween amusement, many perceive this student to have displayed a disturbing disregard for the sensitivities of others," the statement reads. “We consider this attempt at humor totally inappropriate."

Hillel student leaders said after meeting with the president's assistant and the university chaplain, they are "satisfied" that the parties understand why the photos were seen by some as being in poor taste.

Winfield Myers, director of Campus Watch, a group that critiques college Middle Eastern studies programs, said the photographs display a certain indifference toward suicide bombers and their victims. 

"It's sending a message of moral equivalency," Myers said. "I understand that everyone makes social foibles, but this goes well beyond this. Had a student walked in wearing a KKK robe or dressed as an SS officer, would [Gutmann] have taken the picture? I think not."

But Greg Lukianoff, president of the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education, said “scrutinizing parties is a silly distraction.”

FIRE's blog, The Torch, picks up on that theme, saying that “Gutmann had better prepare herself for accusations that she scoffs at suicide bombing, that she doesn’t support the troops, that she thinks 9/11 was no big deal.

"University presidents could learn a lot from Gutmann’s nonchalance about this photo," the blog entry continues. "Lest Halloween parties become the next frontier for the campus sensitivity police, people need to recognize that Halloween is a good time for satire, and that sometimes a costume is just a costume."

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Will Photo Haunt Penn President?

  • A few questions
  • Posted by math prof on November 6, 2006 at 8:06am EST
  • From an AP news story from earlier this week:

    Johns Hopkins University will provide additional diversity training to students and faculty members, one of several steps taken in response to a "Halloween in the Hood" fraternity party that focused attention on racial tensions on campus.

    The university also plans to incorporate the history of racism into the campus curriculum and workshops, and the administration will work for better communication with multicultural groups, Johns Hopkins President William Brody said in a letter to students, faculty and staff.

    Racism "is still an issue in our university community," Brody wrote.

    "We have made progress," he wrote, pointing to the formation 10 years ago of the Diversity Leadership Council. "But no one ever believed, even before last weekend's events, that we had done all we should. We all knew that we still had lots of work to do toward making Johns Hopkins the diverse, tolerant, respectful and welcoming community we want it to be."

    The Sigma Chi fraternity chapter at Hopkins was suspended after the party Saturday night. The frat house was decorated with a skeleton pirate dangling from a noose, which some students interpreted as a symbol of lynching. An invitation encouraged guests to wear "regional clothing from our locale" such as "bling bling ice ice, grills" and "hoochie hoops."

    Will dressing as a suicide bomber and staging mock executions around campus
    have any consequences for the student?
    Can he really claim that this play-acting doesn't indicate support for these activities? Would Penn's President have
    posed with a student wearing a KKK hood
    or with one dressed in blackface? Would there have been consequences for a university President who posed for a
    picture with a student so dressed? Penn's President claims she didn't realize what
    the student's costume represented. Would
    she have been equally oblivious to the
    implications of a KKK hood or blackface?

  • Amy's Picture
  • Posted by William Sumner Scott, J.D. on November 6, 2006 at 8:35am EST
  • I would want to know more about the pose and the time she had to react to the costume before the picture was taken.

    If as math prof says, she had time to look at the costume and did not understand the meaning would put move her to the brain dead class.

    And, after he was there awhile, for her to not force him to change his costume or leave was insensitive at best. The pictures posted on Campus Watch demonstrate that she did not have sufficient supervision at the party in her home. What should be the penalty for that?

    William Sumner Scott, J.D.
    Judicial Equality Foundation, Inc.
    wss@jefound.org

  • I guess there's always photoshop...
  • Posted by Thud on November 6, 2006 at 8:40am EST
  • It's too late now, but wish I'd thought of all this a week ago. I'd have loved to take a halloween party picture of my worthless university president standing next to someone costumed KKK-er, a suicide bomber, or a frat boy wearing black face.

  • Ouch!
  • Posted by kgotthardt on November 6, 2006 at 9:00am EST
  • Those are pretty indicting photos. I realize that for many, the war probably seems too "far away" to take seriously or consider the ramifications of what probably WAS meant as a joke, but this needs to be addressed. And yes, previous generations probably did dress as KKK members for parties, and that, I am sure was taken as offensive or as a joke, depending on the crowd. Costumes often reflect a country's culture. What do these costumes and the photos tell us about ourselves?

  • Posted by S.D. on November 6, 2006 at 9:20am EST
  • How about an abortion doctor or a homosexual or an American Indian? Can you dress as those? I hardly doubt the president gave it much thought as there were probably a ton of people there all milling about. She was probably uncomfortable with it, but didn't want to cause a commotion. It's not like she's shaking his hand and patting him on the back. In fact, she even looks a bit uncomfortable. Is the costume tasteless and insensitive - yes, without a doubt! But I don't think you should "hang" the president for it. Anyway, isn't that Freedom of Expression - what all the liberals rant and rave about when it suits their purpose?

  • Costume rules
  • Posted by S.D. on November 6, 2006 at 9:30am EST
  • People choose certain costumes for different reasons: fantasy (superman), as a joke, or as an opposite to their beliefs (devil). No doubt this costume is offensive. It is to me and I don't have family members in the military. I just don't think we should make it about the president. HOWEVER, in the future, invitations should clearly state that Halloween outfits cannot be offensive in nature or they will be asked to leave.

  • Random Observations
  • Posted by Jonathan Cohen on November 6, 2006 at 10:35am EST
  • The comparison with the John's Hopkins frat party of Hollywood in the Hood is revealing. The theme of that party suggested students dress up in caricatured ghetto attire. The offense was stereotyping African Americans as thugs. At Penn, by dressing up as a suicide bomber and pretending to behead infidels the person could be criticized for stereotyping Muslims as terrorists. Yet the costume has been interpreted by everyone as suggesting support for suicide bombing and the president's posing with the student as giving tacit approval.

    Did anyone find the president's outfit a little shocking? It struck me as a bit undignified for a party for students at the home of the university president. It seems that our ability to educate students is diminished when we as faculty or administrators portray ourselves as no more adult than our students.

    Finally, though the costume was probably in poor taste, it is afterall Halloween and I don't think the point of Halloween costumes is to be tasteful. We should all probably lighten up a bit. There is a place in life for poor taste and even mistakes in judgment.

    Requiring politically correct Halloween costumes is a road I don't think anyone wants to take.

  • Imagine
  • Posted by AS on November 6, 2006 at 10:50am EST
  • ha,ha, imagine if some poor ROTC kid (not that they exist at most Ivy Schools) came to the party dressed as something worse than suicide bomber--A US SOLDIER, and posed shooting some other kid dressed as Arab insurgent. The "outrage" would be world-wide, and Ms Princess President would be leading the band.

    I'd be interested to see what the "party on" posters would say to that.

  • Sophomoric Humor
  • Posted by Hubert Smith , Instructor on November 6, 2006 at 10:55am EST
  • The last thing this kid or any college student needs is more "diversity" training.

    He's simply dumb.

    Further, it's obvious the University Prez suffers from far too much diversity indoctrination--otherwise she would have kneed the little creep in the groin and called the cops.

  • Much ado about what?
  • Posted by MC on November 6, 2006 at 12:10pm EST
  • Halloween was once believed to be a night where the veil between the dead and the living is at its most thin. Now, most Americans see it as a night where the veil between what is acceptable and what is not is most thin -- a time to let off steam. For instance, many women choose to wear sexually suggestive costumes that they would NEVER wear on any other night. Halloween has become a night of feigned transgressions.

    In a similar way, comedy is about subversion and transgression. Mel Brooks takes heat for writing a song called "Springtime for Hitler." How can Nazis be funny? Because the best comedy comes from the most serious original material. Jon Stewart and the Daily Show crew have so much to work with in our world today because the stakes are so high. Comedy thrives in such an environment.

    A suicide bomber nonchalantly walking through the president's party is funny. Just a couple years ago Osama Bin Laden costumes were among the top ten most popular at Halloween. As a culture, we use Halloween and comedy to process our demons, take them down a notch, and yes, make them commonplace – that’s funny. In this way, they hold less power over us -- especially the power created by fear.

    It is unfortunate to see such educated people succumb to fear through a basic lack of understanding of things educated people should be reflective enough to understand -- rites, rituals, and comedy.

    Those who believe even feigned transgressions are immoral should not have Halloween parties nor should they plan to laugh much.

  • Bravo, MC
  • Posted by inthefire on November 6, 2006 at 1:15pm EST
  • It's about humor, free speech, the reality of the world we live in. I saw lots of people dressed as terrorists on Halloween, and while I'd never do that myself, it doesn't offend me.
    MC's point about fear is well-said. Halloween is about making light of our demons. Anything we can do to bring perspective to the culture of fear that permeates our society is not all bad.
    Halloween is not about being politically correct, and it's not about censorship either. It was in bad taste for a university president to pose smiling with this guy, but I'm glad he wasn't kicked out of the party or asked to change. That would have been an un-American response.

  • Disparity
  • Posted by math prof on November 6, 2006 at 1:16pm EST
  • There are legitimate differences of opinion about the extent of free speech, about what sort of behavior universities should allow/accept, and when and if restrictions on behavior should be loosened or tightened.

    I did not attempt to answer these questions
    in my posting, though I do have views on
    these issues. The point of my posting was
    to point out the disparity between the
    significant consequences of the action
    at Johns Hopkins and the apparent lack
    of consequences of the action at Penn
    for what is essentially the same behavior.

  • Posted by Michael on November 6, 2006 at 1:20pm EST
  • I don't doubt that Dr. Gutmann didn't "look" at the costume until it was too late. Anyone who has ever been at such an event knows that you've got a long line of folks waiting to have their photo taken with the celebrity host/ess. The host/ess just keeps smiling as the line wends its way past her. I wouldn't doubt that she did not even look at folks until her "Happy Halloween Handshake" after the photo was taken. Critics are blowing up what was probably a five second encounter in the midst of some 700 identical encounters into something it was not. I had a 3 second handshake with my dean at Penn on stage at graduation, I certainly don't hold her accountable for my beliefs based upon that 3 seconds. Dr. Gutmann should not be burdened with such an assumption either.

    As to the student in the costume, he should learn the age-old formula that COMEDY=TRAGEDY+TIME. If he really was seeking to be funny, he should know that in the case of indiscriminant murderers of the innocent that we have not had anywhere near the amount of time pass that we need for that to be seen as anything remotely funny.

  • TRANSGRESS THIS!
  • Posted by AS on November 6, 2006 at 1:25pm EST
  • "Those who believe even feigned transgressions are immoral should not have Halloween parties nor should they plan to laugh much."

    Oh, the transgression posse is ridin' free again.
    I used to think cartoons were 'transgressive' too. How about going to party as Mohammed, or even WORSE, cartoon of Mohammed. Dont plan to laugh much--without your head. Hey, here's another good party character, Danny Pearle et al, w. head in hand, if you want to get really transgressive, a laff riot. I noted the brave and ultra-transgressive Mr. Stewart did not touch the Mohammed cartoon 3rd Rail b.c. given the choice of being really, really transgressive and funny, or getting blown up, he made the laughless choice of life. I'm all for transgression, but not the PC "double standard," which is aptly in play here (suicide bomber OK, US SOLDIER shooting insurgent, not OK)which that totally bogus word always brings in its wake. Transgress That!

  • Good grief
  • Posted by Eveningsun at Small Public College on November 6, 2006 at 2:05pm EST
  • Lighten up, people. It was a frickin' Halloween party.

  • Posted by kgotthardt on November 7, 2006 at 3:45am EST
  • Ask a deployed solder's loved ones if they think the costume is funny. Yes, the student has the right to wear it. But we have the right to say it was insensitive and in poor taste. Would we be having the same reaction if a student dressed up as say, an AIDS patient? How about a victim of Hurrican Katrina? Ghosts and ghouls might be funny, but real human suffering generally is not.

  • Jewish Penn Student Comments:
  • Posted by Andrew Mener on November 7, 2006 at 3:45am EST
  • As a senior Political Science major, avid Israel advocate, and one of the leaders in the Jewish community at the University of Pennsylvania, I would like to add some context to the events that took place on Halloween. I was offended by the pictures as were many of my friends. There is no question that the student who dressed up as a suicide bomber on Halloween exercised bad judgment. Although he has issued a formal apology, it is true that we will never know for certain his intent.
    What we do know for certain, however, is that the University of Pennsylvania is a warm and welcoming place for Jewish and pro-Israel students. That environment is created largely by the policies of the University administration. Pro-Israel students over my four years at Penn have felt exceedingly comfortable expressing their Zionist beliefs. We walk through campus proudly wearing our pro-Israel T-shirts, celebrate Israel Day on College Green, and dance Torahs around campus on Simchat Torah without the slightest fear of anti-Semitism or anti-Israel rhetoric.
    Over my Penn career I have come to know President Gutmann well. We sat together on the University Council and even sung Chanukkah songs together as we lit the menorah in the Penn Hillel foyer. President Gutmann is proud of her Jewish heritage and a supporter of the pro-Israel community on campus. As she made clear in her written statements, she "abhor(s) terrorism, suicide bombers, and everything they do." President Gutmann personally called me as well as other student leaders today, and it is clear from the conversations that she firmly believes what she wrote in her statement.
    Continuing to sensationalize the Halloween events does not serve a productive purpose. I as a Jewish student and pro-Israel advocate am eager to return to pro-active Israel advocacy, leadership development, and supporting Jewish exploration. I encourage the greater community to join me in these efforts.
    Andrew Mener
    University of Pennsylvania
    Class of 2007

  • Response to Andrew
  • Posted by William Sumner Scott, J.D. on November 7, 2006 at 2:05pm EST
  • Nice work.

    Your response answers the question of what penalty for me.

    William Sumner Scott, J.D.

    Judicial Equality Foundation, Inc.
    wss@jefound.org

  • Offense
  • Posted by Scott E on November 7, 2006 at 2:05pm EST
  • What a ridiculous waste of indignation. It was a costume party meant to be fun. People shouldn't walk around in life looking for things that offend them. You can find offense in every corner. The bomber costume was a statement as much as a joke. And Guttman is getting heat over this silliness? Guttman was a gracious host, and rather than finding offense, one could see the inherent irony and humor and hope by the photograph. A successful Jewish woman dressed as a witch smiling peacefully next to an Islamic Suicide bomber? If they can smile and be peaceful and not offended next to each other, isn't that a NICE message, that PERHAPS if we stop being offended at each other we can create a lasting peace?

    The people who are offended at this and who are giving Guttman heat over this really need to check themselves and realize their reaction is in itself offensive to what humanity should be. Saad Saadi may have unwittingly done a good thing by dressing to the negative Islamic stereotype to this costume party. He may have shown us all that we can't even conceive of a world where Islamic Jihadists can peacefully coexist with the Jewish good witch.

  • This has nothing to do with the Mid East. Its simply offensive.
  • Posted by stm60 at UConn on November 9, 2006 at 7:00am EST
  • Scott, this incident is not a commentary on semitic relationships. This is simply an example, in my opinion, of poor taste, poor judgement and immaturity by the student. This student was not dressed as a simple PLO fighter but as a TNT encased terrorist. A terrorist kills people and kills people rather brutally. A terrorist costume is as appropriate for a party as an SS costume or as dressing up like Jeffery Dahmer. And sorry if I don't have a sense of humor but I really don't want to coexist with Jeffery Dahmer.

    Saaid is a student at what is supposed to be an elite university yet he doesn't have the sense to see that his little attention getting stunt is offensive to many? With this in mind I would extend what is considered appropriate beyond the examples above to specific cases like dressing as Bomber Harris at a party in Dresden. If nothing else someone of maturity tries not to offend senselessly.

    Human bombs, like Dahmer and the SS should be clearly outside of what is acceptable.