Search News


Browse Archives

News

Backlash Over Student Group's Demands

November 21, 2006

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

Whether it's a testament to the organizing muscle of Facebook or the intense feelings about race issues at Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, upwards of 650 people have signed an online petition reprimanding a group of black students for making what signatories say are unreasonable demands of the university's administration.

The Black Student Initiative reignited a race debate on campus earlier this month when it sent to administrators a report outlining its grievances, among them that faculty members have made disparaging comments to black students and that administrators don't communicate well with members of minority groups on the campus. The letter also accuses the university of racial discrimination in the way it allocates student activity funds.

"The campus reflects a false sense of diversity, respect and support for its black student population," the letter states. The author, an IUPUI student named Dominic Dorsey, ends by setting a deadline for a university response and threatens legal action against top administrators if the demands aren't met.

“This was destined to happen,” said Dorsey, president of the Black Student Union, a group that helped organize the campaign. "For years, we've been hearing reports of comments that make students feel uncomfortable, and we haven't received responses that make us feel like the victims are being taken care of. It's nice to convene a committee and create a diversity plan, but [the university] needs to proceed with action."

On Nov. 6, the day the Black Student Initiative set as the response deadline, IUPUI's vice chancellor of student life and diversity issued a statement saying that the university takes seriously the comments and allegations coming from the black students. 

Then last week, after holding a series of open forums with students, faculty and staff, Charles R. Bantz, chancellor of IUPUI, laid out the steps that the university plans to take to address the students' concerns. He pledged to review how student funds are allocated, open a multicultural center, hire a full-time campus diversity officer and evaluate whether to make mandatory a cultural competency program for university employees.

“We heard reports of hostile behavior and discrimination at IUPUI,” Bantz said in the statement. “We are committed to a safe, civil, hospitable environment for all students, faculty and staff.”

Roughly 15 percent of IUPUI students are members of minority groups, and about 9 percent are black. Figures from last year show that members of minority groups make up 20 percent of the faculty and 9 percent of "high level" faculty and administrative positions.  

Some of the 900-plus members of the Facebook group "IUPUI, We Want Our Money Back!!" said they are upset that the Black Student Initiative is demanding nearly $80,000 in student funding for black student organizations.

“We will not let our (or our family and friends') hard-earned tuition money and student activity fees go towards one organization. We will not promote further segregation at our school and we cannot stand by and let this happen,” wrote Areeba Farooqi, a student who started the online group.

Several students who posted on the Facebook page, including Farooqi, said they agree that a lack of cultural diversity is a problem at IUPUI. But many said they took issue with how the Black Student Initiative set a timetable for  the university, and with the manner in which administrators responded to the group's demands without seeking input from the rest of the student body.

Farooqi, president of the South Asian Student Association, said she is worried that if the university gives the Black Student Initiative what it demands, her group and others might see decreases in funding. Alex Baker, an IUPUI senior, said the black student coalition is "blatantly trying to take money from other organizations on campus that also deserve money."

A number of students said they saw the creation of a multicultural center as problematic. Because IUPUI is largely a commuter campus, they fear the building will serve only a few. "The current student union building is not 'white only,' " one petition poster noted. "I pay additional tuition because I am out of state. I do not expect my money to go towards something completely unrelated to me."

Farooqi said she supports the multicultural center and does not back some of the "inflammatory" comments that have been posted on the petition.

Baker said he is worried that the black students' actions are further polarizing the campus. Dorsey said that other campus groups have noted a funding disparity, and that the Black Student Initiative is simply fighting for fair funding -- and doing so in a public way.

Both Farooqi and Baker said tempers have calmed in recent days, since the campuswide forums have taken place. The chancellor and Black Student Initiative representatives plan to meet to discuss plans after Thanksgiving.

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Backlash Over Student Group's Demands

  • Equity over Equality
  • Posted by Ashley on October 7, 2008 at 4:55pm EDT
  • People often get upset because minority groups want "special treatment" over "equal treatment." A question though.

    One guy has $5, and another has $2. Giving both of them an extra $5 would be equal, right? But would it bring them to the same level? No.

    Equality doesn't always equal equity. I applaud this student group for bringing these issues to light. Perhaps it could've been done better, but at least it was done.

  • Where's the club advisor?
  • Posted by Lily E. Espinoza on November 21, 2006 at 12:51pm EST
  • I see here that students and administration are in a quandry about how to deal with diversity issues on campus. This issue about diversity happens on every campus in the United States. Unfortunately, students don't always have a competent filter to analyse their angst. A competent club advisor should be able to hash out the strongest feelings from the group. Before these type of issues escalate to a full-blown ultimatum, I wonder if the students were communicating with administration via an advisor? Also, it is sad to see the division among student groups. Schools located within a specific minority demographic, should be expected to focus its funds/programs/courses/resources to the improvement of access and success of its students. IUPUI should have an increase in funding for the black student organizations, but the context for the discourse is now warped because of the communication style of the document the student leader wrote. Many students have grievances that are a result of perceived disrespect. This underscores the need for intercultural communication and diversity training. There should be a student grienvance process that is well-known and diversity training for all staff and faculty on a bi-annual basis. I applaud the Black student groups, but feel the group's leadership could have opended the discussion via their advisor and with better student support.

  • advisors ?
  • Posted by Larry on November 21, 2006 at 1:50pm EST
  • Ms. Espinoza, I don’t know the details about this school, but not all schools require “club advisors.” In fact, some actively discourage it. Perhaps because faculty are lazy, or perhaps because there is a belief that administration or faculty “advise” will inhibit creativity.

    If students are mature, then there is no need to have an “advisor” to suck up to, and people can work their own problems out without going through yet another intermediary whose interests invariably differ from that of the students. Either that, or they can go to another school.

  • Advisors!
  • Posted by quiting time at work on November 21, 2006 at 6:50pm EST
  • Well, hmmmm.

    It appears that perhaps the students here are not mature. And perhaps they don't want to go to another school.

    Advisors can serve the same role professors do - provide experience and guidance and perhaps even some teaching.

  • Some thoughts on the matter
  • Posted by Ben at IUPUI on November 24, 2006 at 1:35pm EST
  • 1. Building duplicate facilities for a specific racial group is wasteful, inefficient, and generally regressive. If the concern is that integrated facilities will lack something, that can be addressed. Voluntary segregation is a step ... no, a running leap in the wrong direction.

    2. I'm not sure that racially motivated groups should be funded from the student activity fund at all. That means the Black Student Union, the Junior Skinheads, the Aztlan Volunteers - none of them. Why should funding be given to groups who emphasize racial differences when racially inclusive and racially neutral academic groups could be funded instead? If you want to emphasize why your race makes you different, special, better, or whatever else - do it on your own dime. This obsession with race (whether in minority groups or majority groups) is what drives racism in the first place.

    Whatever uncertainty I feel about awarding money to groups based on their race, I am certain that student activity funding being increased by $10,000 and then awarded in its entirety to a single racially motivated group is unfair, unjust and wrong. Talk about inequality and racial prejudice!

    3. The IUPUI Black Student Union thinks they have made a huge step forward in raising such a stink about this. They think they have brought racism out in the open so that it can be addressed. Instead, they have infuriated a huge number of people who might have otherwise been willing to support their cause. I've lost count as to the number of fellow students - of all colors! - that I've talked to at IUPUI who have felt that many of the demands were unreasonable and racist.

    The worst thing about the situation is, the Black Student Union had some valid complaints. Unfortunately they have succeeded only in piling meaningless, negative, racist demands over their good points. They have tried to hypocritically fight racism with racism.

    I hope that they fall flat on their faces, because if it becomes acceptable to be tactically racist then there is incentive for all races to do so, and that is something that won't benefit any of us.

  • Posted by Thinking... on December 7, 2006 at 12:25pm EST
  • Rhetoric is sometimes, just that: rhetoric. At the basis of this argument, proposed changes, desire on the part of students, are valid feelings. Presentation cannot mask (or supercede) intent. Regardless of how the argument was presented, there has to be some acknowledgement of the intent, WHICH, by the way, the administration did. People can argue various points until the end of time, but, unfortunately, that dilutes the very real, very strong opinions students have of the administration and the institution. The REAL question is: what now do we do to move forward? If "a threat to justice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere," then we should also stop viewing the needs of minority students as auxilliary. The needs of minority students belong to all people and maybe IUPUI is just embarking on that realization.

  • Posted by Tired of the minority battle at Indiana State on December 11, 2006 at 10:51am EST
  • The minority argument on campuses and everywhere else is getting out of control. Minority groups argue that they want to be treated like everyone else, yet want special treatment. Maybe they should do away with ALL minority programs, then everyone COULD be treated equally.