Search News


Browse Archives

News

Progress Over the Long Term

January 9, 2007

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

As more studies and panels of experts detail the perceived downward spiral of America’s competitiveness in science, the new edition of the biennial report, "Professional Women and Minorities," finds a slice of good news over the long term. While women and members of minority groups still lag behind white men in education and employment in science and engineering, both groups have been closing this gap over the last 40 years. However, women have made, and continue to make, substantially greater progress than minorities.

In a report released last week, the Commission on Professionals in Science and Technology takes a broad, historical look at how women and members of minority groups have fared in getting degrees in science and engineering and tracks their numbers in these fields of employment. The commission found that women have doubled their share of bachelor’s degrees in science and engineering over the last four decades. In 1966, they earned one quarter (24.8 percent) of  bachelor's degrees in those fields, while in 2004, they earned half (50.4 percent). Over the same time span, women also gained a dramatically greater percentage of master’s degrees – 13.3 percent in 1966 versus 43.6 percent in 2004. At the doctorate level, the increase was especially noteworthy – 8 percent in 1966 compared to 37.4 percent in 2004.

In many  professional fields, women have achieved parity and sometimes surpassed men. In 2003-4, women earned 46 percent of the degrees in medicine, along with 57 percent in optometry, 67 percent in pharmacy, and 74 percent in veterinary medicine.

The report also noted that women now make up 25 percent of the labor force in science, engineering and technology fields. However, that proportion varied widely, with fewer women in occupations that require a high level of skill in math, such as engineering. Nathan E. Bell, an associate director with the commission and one of the report’s authors, said that women are avoiding those fields.

“The strange thing is that at the high school level, women are prepared in math,” he said. “So it’s not that they are not prepared, but something is happening during enrollment and in college and they making different choices for some reason.”

Female Representation in Science and Engineering Occupations, 2005

Psychologists 67.3%
Biological Scientists 48.7%
Chemists & Materials Scientists 35.3%
Database Administrators 32.3%
Computer Programmers 26.0%
Computer Software Engineers 21.9%
Industrial Engineers 14.9%
Chemical Engineers 14.3%
Aerospace Engineers 13.3%
Civil Engineers 13.2%
Engineering Managers 9.5%
Mechanical Engineers 5.8%

Gains made by underrepresented minorities have not been as significant as they have been for women, the report finds. Hispanics make up about 14 percent of the population, but earned only 7.3 percent of the bachelor’s degrees, 4.3 percent of the master’s degrees, and 2.7 percent of the doctorates in science and engineering fields in 2003-4. African Americans make up 13 percent of the U.S. population and earned 8.4 percent of the bachelor’s degrees, 6.3 percent of the master’s and 2.8 percent of the doctorates. American Indians comprise less than 1 percent of the U.S. population and earned less than 1 percent of degrees in science and engineering, regardless of discipline.

Proportion of Science and Engineering Degrees for Women and Minority Group Members, 2003-4

  Women Minority Group Members
Bachelor's Degrees 50.4% 16.4%
Master's Degrees 43.6% 11.0%
Doctorates 37.4% 5.8%

In the work force, Hispanics and African Americans continue to lack substantial representation. Bell said that a much greater percentage of Hispanics than African Americans are employed as engineers, and pointed out that African Americans now make up a significant percentage of database administrators.

African American and Hispanic Representation in Science and Engineering Occupations, 2005

  African Americans Hispanic
Psychologists 2.8% 4.7%
Biological Scientists 2.9% 4.2%
Chemists & Materials Scientists 5.6% 2.7%
Database Administrators 13.1% 5.1%
Computer Programmers 4.6% 5.7%
Computer Software Engineers 5.0% 3.9%
Industrial Engineers 5.5% 3.8%
Chemical Engineers 3.1% 3.8%
Aerospace Engineers 4.3% 8.2%
Civil Engineers 6.1% 3.5%
Engineering Managers 1.7% 3.8%
Mechanical Engineers 2.5% 4.0%
See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Progress Over the Long Term

  • Distracted by the Dumbest Things
  • Posted by notdistractedbystupidity on January 9, 2007 at 12:42pm EST
  • What on earth is the point of this obsession with making science a wonderful cultural rainbow?

    The beauty of science is that it is what it is. Good science will get published, no matter the scientist's race or gender. Crappy science will (or should) not.

    Are we now to have affirmative action, or other specially reserved chairs in departments so that we can have race-based and gender-based science?

    At that point, science will have ceased even to be science. What's the difference between that and having a special chair for creationists?

  • we need women scientists
  • Posted by Doctor Richardson , Professor at University of Utah on January 9, 2007 at 2:15pm EST
  • More mechanical and civil engineers who are women would result in products designed to fit women and women's lives. I'm tired of everyday objects that I can't see over, sit comfortably in, use with my children, or even care about.

  • you read the data wrong
  • Posted by doesn'tmisstheobviouspoint on January 9, 2007 at 2:45pm EST
  • The science establishment in America is badly in need of an upgrade. We are producing scientists incapable of basic reading comprehension, as your response so clearly evinces. The data were about who gets trained and employed in science. However you seem to have inferred they were about the quality of science produced. I'm sure that if you read the article again your understanding will improve. Feel free to post again if the distinction continues to elude you.

  • Driven to Distraction By the Dumbest Reactions
  • Posted by Zuska on February 2, 2007 at 3:00pm EST
  • What on earth is the source of this vehement negative reaction everytime someone talks about the percentage of women and minorities in science? "The beauty of science is that it is what it is"...and right now what it is, is a white boy's club. Sure, lots of good science gets done. But even more good science could be done if we weren't throwing away the talent of over half our population; if the white boys weren't cut off from potential collaborations with a whole new source of bright minds. Nobody's saying that if more women and minorities go into science, then fewer white men get to go into science. Nobody's saying that science has to get dumber to allow in someone other than white males. But those two things seem to be the source of the fear: those "others" will squeeze out the white men and dumb everything down. Best to keep them out altogether! They have nothing to offer! We're fine as it is! Who do those people think they are, wanting to make science a cultural rainbow? Everybody knows white is right.

    Sheesh. Get a grip, dude. "Race-based and gender-based science"; what a moron. Do we have race-based, gender-based science now, considering that predominantly only white, predominantly only male, people are doing science? White is a race, male is a gender. If that domination of white and male doesn't bother you, then the addition of other genders and races shouldn't make you worry about bias in science. Get. A. Grip.