News, Views and Careers for All of Higher Education
Jan. 19, 2007
Under current policy, researchers in the University of California system can — and are encouraged — to seek corporate support. So it is not surprising that an attempt to block research sponsored by Big Tobacco resulted in a polarizing debate Thursday during a meeting of the Board of Regents’ finance committee. Based partly on evidence found in over 50 million archived online at the Legacy Tobacco Documents Library that show that tobacco companies sought to undermine research proving that smoking was dangerous, the regents first began discussing such a ban last September.
During the discussion on Thursday, some regents expressed strong concerns that cutting off researchers from tobacco money might lead down a slippery slip that would deny support from other corporations. Others pointed out that tobacco companies have used university research to mislead the public about health dangers and that a federal judge ruled that Big Tobacco has engaged in a decades-long conspiracy to deceive the American public.
Citing polarizing opinions and the need for further input from the UC’s Academic Senate, the committee voted to delay a vote until a meeting in May. Still, the regents confirmed that they will give a “thumbs up” or “thumbs down” vote on action item RE89 at the next meeting.
Adopting the action item would ban any funds from manufacturers, distributors, or their affiliates that would be used for studying tobacco related diseases. Text from the item states: “The collective use or sponsored research by the manufacturers and distributors of tobacco products as an industry to support a public deception about its product is unique, unprecedented and represents [a] rare and compelling circumstance.”
Since 1995, UC researchers have pulled in 108 awards totaling $37 million from tobacco companies. In comparison, the UC system received around $4 billion in total contracts and grants in fiscal year 2006. Tobacco companies currently sponsor 19 active UC grants totaling $15.8 million.
Several other institutions have enacted similar bans including Emory University School of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Ohio State University School of Public Health, and University of Arizona School of Public Health.
Want it on paper? Print this page.
Know someone who’d be interested? Forward this story.
Want to stay informed? Sign up for free daily news e-mail.
Advertisement
Did a Federal judge declare that the tobacco industry for decades has engaged in fraud by funding universities to distort the entire scientific process?
Is the real intent of the Regents to deny free speech?
Are we to think that Big Tobacco is the only source of funding for scientific research?
With compassion,
Mike Sawyer Master of Divinity Executive Director I Will Never Use Tobacco, Inc.501 © 3 Www.IWillNeverUseTobacco.com 205-515-1560 6401 Colony Park Drive Birmingham, Alabama 35243TobaccoKills2000@aol.com
Mike Sawyer, Executive Director at I Will Never Use Tobacco, Inc., at 6:31 pm EST on March 4, 2007
Advertisement
or search for jobs directly.
Cisco Networking courses offered at HCC include: * Cisco Network Technology * Cisco Internetwork Technology * Cisco LAN/WAN ... see job
HACC, a leader in education in Central PA, is a comprehensive, multi-campus community college, providing quality instruction ... see job
The Department of Asian Studies at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill invites applications for two three-year ... see job
Everest College, a respected member of the Corinthian Colleges’ network of schools, is dedicated to helping students ... see job
Roger Williams University is one of the top ranked liberal arts universities in the Northeast and is an Equal Opportunity ... see job
Angelo State University is an equal opportunity employer and seeks to build a diverse workforce community. see job
The University of Minnesota is a premier employer and a talent magnet attracting leading faculty and staff from around the ... see job
Drexel University is a nationally and internationally recognized as a pioneer in cooperative education. see job
NATIONAL ENDOWMENT FOR THE HUMANITIES HUMANITIES ADMINISTRATOR GS-1701-11/12/13 ($58,206 – $107,854 PA) see job
Cornell University, located in Ithaca, New York, is an inclusive, dynamic, and innovative Ivy League university and New ... see job
A Ban is the Wrong Solution
A ban on acceptance of grant money is a close kin to denial of free speech.
It also takes the focus off the real problem, the lack of integrity of the researcher and the administrator of the money.
A ban admits the source of the money will corrupt the project. If that is true, then all research funded by grants is suspect.
The other schools listed that have banned tobacco money have admitted their research departments have inadequate rules or people to preserve the quality of their work. They have thrown out the baby with the wash water.
My hope is that the focus turns to the quality of all work, not just the work on one particular topic funded by one particular source.
At present, higher education does a poor job on many fronts. A ban on donations is hardly the answer.
William Sumner Scott, J.D.
Judicial Equality Foundation, Inc.
wss@jefound.org
http://jefound.org
William Sumner Scott, J.D., at 9:10 am EST on January 19, 2007