Search News


Browse Archives

News

Hate Crime at a Quaker Campus?

January 24, 2007

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

While the details are still coming together as campus officials and local police investigate, a few facts seem clear: Three members of the Guilford College football team were arrested on Monday after three Palestinian students filed assault complaints with the local police department.

The college has released a statement on the incident, which took place in the early morning hours on Saturday. An official with the campus department of public safety confirmed the accuracy of a news report that ran in the News & Record of Greensboro, and that  detailed  reports of a group assault on the Palestinian students.

“This kind of violence is rare at a Quaker college,” said Aaron Fetrow, dean of student life, in a Webcast by the newspaper. “We will not tolerate this violence or the verbal abuse.”

Court documents examined by the newspaper reported complaints that  three students were attacked at Bryan Hall, a dormitory, and that the attackers used their fists, feet, and brass knuckles, and hurled racial slurs. The attack involved “at least 15 members of the football team," according to the police report. Three members of the football team were arrested and later released on $2,000 bond. They could not be reached and there were no reports on their version of the incident.

Awartani said that he and the other two students were beaten by assailants who hurled racial epithets and called them “dirty terrorists.” Awartani is a student at North Carolina State University  and said that he and his two friends, who are students at Guilford, had attended a Quaker school in the West Bank before coming to the United States. He said that he was surprised at the attack, especially as it happened on a Quaker campus.

"We tried not to fight them, we did not insult them back, but they beat the hell out of us," he told the newspaper.

Nic Brown, assistant director college relations, told Inside Higher Ed that the conflict involved about a dozen students and was seen by several people. “There’s a lot of information collection going on.”

When asked about the oddity of such a violent act happening on a Quaker campus, he said, “No kidding. Guilford will not tolerate violence or verbal abuse. We are firmly founded on our core values with include diversity, integrity. and justice. It is a very unfortunate event.” He said that the college is conducting its own investigation into the matter, and officials have stated that punishment could result in expulsion.

In a statement, President Kent Chabotar said, "We need to get all the facts from every perspective and let the judicial process to take its course as expeditiously as possible. Guilford’s policy for handling disciplinary matters applies equally to everyone, and the college holds deep allegiance to the truth. Where violations of policy are found, there will be consequences commensurate with the offense and precedent."

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Hate Crime at a Quaker Campus?

  • cancel football
  • Posted by don , cancel football? on January 24, 2007 at 9:30am EST
  • perhaps Gilford should cancel the football program and give the money to a Course on Human understanding.

  • Posted by John O'Donnell on January 24, 2007 at 10:10am EST
  • Great idea. See also the story about football at Hibbing CC in Minnesota

  • Hate Crime at Quaker Campus
  • Posted by T. M. Neece on January 24, 2007 at 10:20am EST
  • This incident does not represent Quaker values nor does it represent the tradition of this Quaker college. I was a student at Guilford and a member of the football team during the early part of WW II. The Japanese internees from California could escape the internment if they were college students and could get accepted at an "acceptable" college well out of the western US. My memory is that we had nine Japanese internees at Guilford at the time and there were two on the football team. There was concern as to possible incidents when we played other colleges but no such ever occurred. Nor was there any incident on campus. One of the team members was a good friend and we were able to maintain contact for many years.
    Has current anti-Muslim propaganda been more effective than the "Dirty Jap" propaganda of WW II?

  • Guilford College
  • Posted by Raymond D. Cotton , Attorney on January 24, 2007 at 10:35am EST
  • As we have seen in the Duke case, it is best not to rush to judgment in instances like this. Thus, let's put the horse before the cart and determine the facts before calling for sanctions and punishments.

  • Posted by common on January 24, 2007 at 11:06am EST
  • That's interesting to bring up the Duke case. Although the incidents are very different, Duke DID immediatley cancel the lacross program for the year.

    i have had many freinds graduate from guilford, and, to be honest, i am kinda surprised that a college dedicated to Quaker values of non-violence would spend money on a football program in the first place. It is not entirely a coincident that they accused attackers were all football -players. And brass knuckles? that seems kinda pre-meditated.

    so, i agree, perhaps the football program shold take some responsibility for this.

  • Posted by Diane Robertson on January 24, 2007 at 11:25am EST
  • I recently toured Guilford with my nephew and recommended Guilford because of its core values and commitment to diversity and justice.It is not that Guilford would be immune from ignorant behavior but how Guilford responds will be its measure in the public arena. While we do not want to rush to judgement, it seems that the actions of the athletes is inconsistent with decent behavior and the community it represents.
    This is an opportunity to flex the muscles of Guilford's core values above the stupidity of this outrageous act.
    D. Robertson

  • Quaker Values
  • Posted by Gently Serious on January 24, 2007 at 11:45am EST
  • The Quaker tradition, with its commitment to peace, social justice and dialogue, needs no defending.

  • Don't Jump to Conclusions
  • Posted by Humphrey Tyler on January 24, 2007 at 12:35pm EST
  • Yes, we need to learn from the Duke case and not jump to conclusions or assign guilt until all the facts are in and this case has been fully ajudicated.

    However, both this case and the Duke case --and many, many others (both reported and unreported) -- point to a troubling and obnoxious "jock culture" that is learned by many athletes (especially those who play football, basketball, lacrosse and hockey) while in high school and is permitted to florish on most college campuses. This college sub-culture is typlified by racism, intolerance, arrogance, a sense of entitlement and a belief that as athletes -- especially elite athletes -- they are not held to the same rules as their fellow students and citizens.

    This attitude is taught to them by their coaches and parents when they are in high school, and even earlier when they participate in youth sports and compete for slots on elite "travel" teams.

    Sports in the North American society is spinning out of control, not only because of the money involved but also because of the social prestige that comes with being an athletic celebrity (even at the high school level) and because some parents place more value on althletics than on academics and ethical behavior.

    It's unfair to blame our colleges and universities for the existance of this problem.

    However, the higher education community has not even taken token steps to confront the issue. In fact, most big-time universities are ignoring the problems associated with the jock culture and are investing even more money into their athletic enterprises -- a'la $4 million coaches, enormous stadiums and special academic buildings and tutors for elite athletes.

    The NCCA's efforts to deal with this problem have been virtually non-existant, and its begrudging steps to improve the incredibly poor academic record of big-time college athletic programs have been toothless.

  • Stop the Insanity!!
  • Posted by Netexpert , Director General of Research & Information at The Ministry of Higher Education, Saudi Arabia on January 24, 2007 at 12:36pm EST
  • Having attending three different schools in the US to finish in 2003, I want to give credit to all three schools for providing the safe and comfortable environment for me. I attended games, went to the gym and did everything I wanted to do. It was great and I really enjoyed it.

    Whatever happened at Quaker Campus is an exception. Bad students do exist. I want to whisper to all international students whose countries are the hot item in the news:

    Beware of trouble spots on campus and off-campus as well.
    Beware of the idiots!

    Bars and public places are full of law offenders! Choose the time, the place, and the event carefully and you shall have a great learning experience.

  • Fighting Quakers?
  • Posted by Michelle Godard Terrell on January 24, 2007 at 2:12pm EST
  • As an alumni, former employee, and faculty brat of Guilford College, I am quite shocked that such an incident happened at this wonderful institution.

    One of the treasured traits of Guilford is that there are few cliques and people can move freely between all sorts of social groups. Tolerance of “otherness” and encouragement of open (and nonviolent) discussions of differences were reinforced throughout the school.

    Perhaps the college administration should take this opportunity to change the school’s mascot name from “The Fighting Quakers” to something much more in line with the school’s founding principles.

  • Your actions speak louder than your words...
  • Posted by Darlene Kimbrough on January 24, 2007 at 6:45pm EST
  • I am the parent of a Guilford Athlete, and I support Athletics at Guilford. I am, also, a Duke Graduate and I support Athletics at Duke....Please be mindful that YOUR actions speak LOUDER than your words! How do you support your school and its athletes? How do you support your favorite athletic programs? Be mindful, others are affected and watching...peace Darlene Kimbrough

  • Focusing on the wrong people
  • Posted by QuakerProf on January 24, 2007 at 7:16pm EST
  • I think that the important aspect of this story is not the behavior of the athletes, which could happen anywhere, but rather the response of the victims. Instead of fighting back or insulting the athletes, and thus reinforcing the violence, they exhibited the uncompromising commitment to peace that is at the heart of Quaker faith and practice.

    The victims, not the athletes, I think, are the ones sending the more powerful message to the country.

  • let Guilford's values be strengthened by this
  • Posted by Another Quaker Prof on January 24, 2007 at 8:01pm EST
  • Above all else, this shows the need for Guilford's core values, including Peace and Diversity, to become stronger, not weaker. I hope the Guilford community will use this unfortunate moment as an opportunity for growth.

    And QuakerProf is right--the Palestinian victims of this attack, all graduates of a Quaker school in Ramallah, exhibited the values of this college.

  • from a players p.o.v.
  • Posted by Student on January 25, 2007 at 4:30am EST
  • I am a football player here at Guilford. Fortunately I was in Boone, NC visiting friends when this stupid event happened. While I do not condone fighting and thoroughly believe those involved in the fight should be punished, I do not however think this is a so calld hate crime. By talking to people that were there I have found the victims instagated the problem. I know my fellow teammates would not just start picking on someone for no reason. The facts will come out: A hate crim is when a group of people acts out against a different group of people for a specific racial issue. This fight was NOT started over race. The liberals here need to grow up and stop putting unnecessary poster all over campus that serve no ultimate purpose other than keeping the controversy fueled.

  • hate crime at quaker campus
  • Posted by nina arnold on January 26, 2007 at 2:05pm EST
  • i am a parent of a guilford college student. my daughter, a soccer player, has often mentioned that she wishes they would change the name of the teams from "the fighting quakers" to "the earth quakers". i haven't had the opportunity to ask her about this in light of recent events, but i agree with a previous poster re: the inappropriateness of the name. this may have been a cute "inside joke" at one time. but alas, subtleties like this are lost
    these days.
    i hope that this horrible incident will cause guilford to reaffirm quaker values and not prevaricate. put your money where your mouth is, guilford.
    my daughter witnessed the entire altercation and is a friend to the two palestinian students. she was shocked how everyone just stood around, and she said that public safety didn't arrive until the fight was over. her words to me were that it should never have happened and that it was all wrong. we must stop condoning hate.
    guilford must take a strong, unwavering stand.

  • Hate Crime? Unfair Judgement!
  • Posted by former STUDENT athlete , #30 on January 26, 2007 at 4:16pm EST
  • I, a recent graduate and PROUD former member of the Guilford College football team, have found this entier event disturbing. The fact that five football players have been arrested and others accused is merely the tip of my disgust! Where do I start?

    The accusation of a "premeditated attack" involving brass knuckles is totally eronous! Neither are even close to the truth!!! The accusation of this being race related is equally false! Has any of those making judgements taken the time to uncover BOTH sides of the story? Whether due to their "source" or from manipulation of facts, the media has failed to portray the truth and, in most cases, given the public an extremely biases report.

    To Another Quaker Prof, I reaffirm my point in the above paragraph... I feel I am making a truthful assumption in that you have no eye witness account of the event, thus it is unfair for you to say one side exhibited Quaker values more so then the other. Adding to that, in no way should any person consider what they have read or seen through a news source a "fact," regardless of it being a direct quote. I feel it is only fair we leave the fact publishing to the authorities. The truth will come out; unfortunaly, only after the reputations of many athletes and that of our football progam is tarnished. To everyone, please keep your opinions and judgements to yourselves until ALL the facts are known.

  • Posted by Don Smith , Professor at Guilford College on January 26, 2007 at 5:55pm EST
  • I would like to point out that the school mascot is simply "The Quakers". It is *NOT* "The Fighting Quakers". Please see http://www.guilford.edu/about_guilford/services_and_administration/myths.cfm about this myth.

    We are all in a lot of pain right now. I've seen amazing efforts to try to bridge the gulfs that divide the different facets of our community, and I've seen behaviors that exacerbate the feelings of alienation and distrust. I hope that some good can come out of this horrible tragedy, and that people elsewhere will wish us well as we try to heal from this.

  • Sounds a Little Fishy to Me
  • Posted by curiouscat on January 27, 2007 at 5:32am EST
  • I haven't been in many fights, but who the heck carries brass knuckles anymore? Isn't that a 60s thing? Secondly, why weren't the football player's statements released to the press? I'm curious to see how this plays out, but I think this all sounds a little fishy to me. I'm worried they're getting framed.

  • Student athelete comments
  • Posted by Michael Harvey on January 27, 2007 at 5:36am EST
  • It's most interesting how inarticulate the student athletes are when commenting here.

    I was particularly amused by an ex-athlete, presumably a college graduate, who seemed to write at an elementary-school level.

    Hate crimes, incidentally, are not, by definition, racially motivated. They are based on hatred. This could even be within one race and one nationality, as seen in the ongoing bitterness between Irish Catholics and Protestants.

    Shalom aleichem.

  • Beyond Ugly
  • Posted by Shelby C on January 27, 2007 at 8:15am EST
  • There were some witnesses who were not involved in the fight and they seem to be supporting the palestinian boys version of events (from what ive read so far).

    These kids are second class citizens in their own country and now they come here and get beaten by racist thugs.

    If it really was unprovoked then its truly disgusting fascistic behaviour and the instigators should have no place at any college.

    "It was the ugliest thing I have ever seen," said Awartani, a freshman pursuing a double major in aerospace and mechanical engineering at NC State. "I've seen Israeli soldiers doing this to me in Palestine, but I've never seen this with citizens. It just came with punches, kicks and brass knuckles. There were witnesses that told me they were picking up rocks and bricks and hitting me."

  • Let peace & knowledge be with you
  • Posted by Alfred X on January 27, 2007 at 12:21pm EST
  • The facts of this incident are still unfounded to the public. The incident and the sensationalism that followed have sullied a fine institution in its entirety. Perspective and current students, faculty, staff, alumni and communities at large at this point have nothing more than a few scant pieces of information let by various media outlets to formulate opinions.
    Calls to cancel a Division III football program would resolve what as Division III athletics feature athletes who receive no financial aid related to their athletic skills? The athletic departments are staffed and funded like any other department in the university. Athletic departments serve as another outlet through which learning occurs. Abolishing football or vacating athletics all together diminishes the venues through which students can learn.
    The accused being football players is a non issue regarding this incident. If the incident had taken place in the context of a sporting event then perhaps the program should be examined. This incident in what ever form occurred between students and a visitor to the campus. A students’ participation in extracurricular activities is not the issue and should not be utilized as a descriptor because one could misconstrue those utterances as expressions of hatred toward a particular group of STUDENTS.
    The alleged assaults will be dealt with through both the campus and local law enforcement officials just as they have always been. Due process has its place and should be allowed to run its course without scrutiny. The assertion of this being a hate crime is extreme and has grown out of the sensationalism surrounding the incident. Has there been anything that would suggest that the alleged assault was motivated by hostility toward the alleged victim's race, religion, creed, national origin, sexual orientation, or gender? Are the alleged utterances of epithets the marker by which folks are able to come to the conclusion that this was a hate crime? If so that is more barbaric that the act of fighting.
    My time at Guilford was spent in the classroom, library, cafeteria, dormitories, on the football field and in the community forging relationships and developing the skills and abilities that enable me to function healthfully in society.
    To the knowledgeable commenter’s…thank you for your insight and perspective. To the rest…seek the knowledge you are lacking and be not guided by emotions.
    Increase the peace!
    Alfred “X” 21

  • "Hate Crime at a Quaker Campus"
  • Posted by Jeff Woofter on January 28, 2007 at 8:50pm EST
  • I find it hard to believe that 5 or more football players armed with bricks, brass knuckles, etc., fighting against 3 other men who were unarmed, only inflicted enough harm to warrant a next day treat and release visit to a local emergency room. From the photos on the internet it looks as though one of the arrested, Michael Six, took more of a beating than the 3 palestinian lads. I would hope that the Duke lacrosse case would be a good example of why it is important for people to not rush to judgement. Obviously, from the postings on this site and others on the net, many people including Guilford faculty and students, did not learn from that case. Let the justice system run it's course. The whole truth will come out if we are patient enough to wait.

  • Guilford is not Utopia
  • Posted by Alum of Color on January 31, 2007 at 1:50pm EST
  • After hearing of this incident and reading many of the comments, I must remind you all that Guilford College is not perfect by any means. What it is, like many college campuses is a microcosm of what is happening in society overall. Racism, prejudice, sexism were alive and well while I was a student as they are alive in well in society overall today. I can recall a incident that took place involving a member or two of the football team and a student of color who was dancing with a classmate that happend to be a white female. No blows were thrown but it sure sturred up the hornets nest for a few weeks. And then there was the incident where a group of Lacrosse players beat and verbally abused two visiting students from a neighboring college in Greensboro. The school to my knowledge suspended the players who were involved. The thing to remember about this current situation and the examples that I have supplied, is that there are three sides to every story. It will be up to the investigators to uncover the truth. In summation, I am not surprised that this happend at good ol'Guilco because it is not Utopia.