Search News


Browse Archives

News

Impediments to U.S. Push on Languages

January 26, 2007

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

In their opening remarks Thursday during a Senate subcommittee hearing on the federal government’s efforts to develop a foreign language strategy, Sen. Daniel K. Akaka (D-Hawaii) and Sen. George Voinovich (R-Ohio) were in bipartisan agreement: The United States needs to significantly improve its citizens' foreign language skills. The problem, of course, is getting the funding and creating a national strategy to be implemented over the long term.

“What is alarming is that five years after 9/11, we are still falling behind,” said Akaka. He cited a finding by the Iraq Study Group , which reported that only 33 of the 1,000 embassy employees in Baghdad can speak Arabic. Only six, he added, are fluent.

While national defense has figured prominently in the recent interest in foreign languages, Akaka asserted that Americans lose an estimated $2 billion a year due to inadequate cultural understanding, a figure he did not explain.

Voinovich picked up on both themes, noting that after 9/11, the federal government had to put out a public call for language speakers of Farsi and Arabic because agencies did not have enough on staff. “I was outraged that when I heard that,” he said. “The need for critical languages is not an abstraction; it is important for national security and business.”

The hearing before the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Subcommittee on Oversight of Government Management, the Federal Workforce, and the District of Columbia focused on federal efforts to bolster the language skills of the government's own workers, but those efforts have implications for foreign language study generally. The two panels of experts all praised President Bush National Security Language Initiative, unveiled last January, which attempts to improve language skills by directing millions of dollars to the Department of Education, Department of Defense, and State Department. 

However, some cracks appeared. Because Congress has yet to pass a budget for the 2007 fiscal year, which began last October, Holly Kuzmich, deputy chief of staff to Education Secretary Margaret Spellings, said that the department has not been able to fund as many elementary, secondary and higher education programs as expected. The department is hoping to start dozens of these programs at universities that have strong foreign language programs, with the idea that they can be harnessed to strengthen academic standards in K-12.

Her statement caught the notice of Michael Dominguez, principal deputy under secretary of defense for personal readiness, in the Department of Defense. “The Department of Education needs to take those K-16 pipelines and expand them all across the country,” he said.

Rita Oleksak, president of the American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages, agreed that the Education Department has been constrained. “While the Department of Education has redirected some of its existing resources, it does not have the authorizing legislation it needs to implement all the education-based activities envisioned by [the president's language effort],” she said in her testimony. “Too much of [the language initiative] is reprogramming of existing resources without … additional funding needed to drive systematic change.”

The president’s No Child Left Behind program came in for criticism from multiple panelists, who said that the focus on standardized testing was impeding the ability to add languages to curriculums. “Foreign languages are being left out due to No Child Left Behind,” said Michael Petro, vice president at the Committee for Economic Development. “This trend must reverse.”

“Foreign languages are not included in required testing,” Oleksak said. “Therefore they are often not included as a core subject in the curriculum.”

Almost every panelist acknowledged that bolstering the U.S. grasp of foreign languages will require years of commitment, and most importantly, a longterm budget strategy that does not yet seem to exist.

“Language needs to be seen as meat and potatoes … not just a tasty dessert,” said Diane Birckbichler, director of the foreign language center at Ohio State University.

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Impediments to U.S. Push on Languages

  • Learning Left Behind
  • Posted by Sandra on January 26, 2007 at 9:25am EST
  • Lots of things are being left out due to the "No Child Left Behind". All the schools teach now is what is on the tests. Their study sheets are even marked with what piece of the testing the study problem correlates. That's all they care about now. It's pathetic.

  • Posted by Rosemary on January 26, 2007 at 10:00am EST
  • Look at the links to this article, and the dates when they appeared. Can We Learn the Hard Languages? is a year old, and there were no comments from readers.

    So many ordinary people in the United States are focused on English Only (without funding English classes) and looking inward, that the idea of reaching out to speakers of other languages by knowing their languages seems as impossible as ordinary people going into space.

    We can spend time on blaming or we can spend time and treasure on making a change. When's the last time a lecture or public event in a foreign language was presented at a university or college near you? Did you go?

    The cushion for people living in the USA is that most of the "foreigners" are willing to learn English and will help you out if you don't speak their language, even when they suspect (or know) the opinion of the person they're helping is less than sterling.

    However, people in the USA DEPEND on foreigners for commerce and the exchange of knowledge, and, of course, global peace. That peace is more than the absence of war,it is instead a movement away from poverty, health crises, and conditions leading to terrorism.

    Anyone who believes for any reason (lofty or crass) that knowing another language is of value has to start locally and speak up. Sure, communicate with Congress, but what actions are being taken by the local school board, and the college and university boards that affect you? That old saw, "all politics are local" continues to be true.

  • Posted by Rosemary on January 26, 2007 at 10:05am EST
  • In Charlotte, NC, it's possible for K-12 students to study IN various foreign languages, and the ripple effect in the community is positive. Yet, even when university students studying English as a Second Language are invited to come for a school visit to share their culture, the juggling of the school schedule has become a nightmare. Working such an extra (!!!) into the lock-step NCLB day is a formidable challenge.
    http://www.cms.k12.nc.us/departments/foreignlanguage/info.asp

  • FL Education Needs
  • Posted by Marge on January 30, 2007 at 4:06am EST
  • As a German teacher, I can attest to the fact that most people in this country are ignorant of the need to learn a diversity of languages. I have been teaching for over twenty years, and so often I am asked, "Why German?" as though there were no need for German speakers. People need to be aware of the usefulness of all languages! And, by the way, I would have learned Arabic and/or Mandarin had those languages been offered and emphasized when I was younger. In fact, I still have interest but probably won't have the time until I retire from teaching--and then there's the issue of funding my training! Scholarships seem to abound for those pursuing other areas of study; we could use some more support in the foreign-language sector! I'm dying to do more; just give me the time and the resources, and I'll be glad to help this nation fill its gaps!

  • languages
  • Posted by Bliman , Prof Emeritus at Univ Marne la Vallee (France) on February 2, 2007 at 8:35am EST
  • The basic problem, so far, rests on the fact that no youth are getting the meanest insight and training at any foreign language. It seems obviously more important to have them prepared at business and stock exchange( it is now known that junior high schools are preparing courses, both theoretical and practical training. Had they been doing more basic sciences, they would have been OBLIGED to get some foreign language practice just to be able to exchange and communicate(even though English or American is a must).Starting at the age of 20 or over for math or languages is often too late. And that is a pity.

  • Does foreign language training enable or disable?
  • Posted by Scrawed on February 9, 2007 at 4:30am EST
  • What are the actual outcomes for people who commit to the levels of education and training required to master one or more foreign languages?

    Very few of the enthusiasts for this latest educational "crisis" seem to be concerned with this or related questions. Yet this is central to this issue. What kinds of existences and careers do people who consider languages truly important tend to have?

    In an economy that increasingly requires flexibility and sequentially disjunct career paths, foreign language skills seem to be considered the skill sets that are least welcome and least desired - and least transferable to other skillsets and occupations. The unlucky few who major in foreign language generally find that their paths to other academic disciplines will be closed, and that the likelihood of acquiring the experience or money necessary to attend training in professional schools is fairly low. Even those who pursue such training successfully are likely to find that they are not employed in an area in which their foreign language skills are even used.
    Foreign language skills are not considered a must for most positions in this country that one would imagine would require such skills. These positions include international diplomacy, international business, international education, international politics and government, international charity and aid, and international journalism.

    It came as quite a shock to realize that all businesses wanting to particpate in a recent state Commerce Department junket were not interested in using language skills to promote the sales of local goods and services overseas. Instead they were most interested in moving their production offshore.

    There is some small demand for language skills in customer service, primary and secondary school education, sales, and shipping - all of which, except perhaps for shipping, are careers that one can fare just as well (or better) in without language skills. One does not have to learn Chinese to play Willy Loman. Tutoring or teaching private language courses (Berlitz, for example) often pays so badly and so little per occasion (try $10-15/class hour for as many as two class hours - no compensation for preparation time, you provide your own transportation, and tax withholding can approach 35% after state and FICA) in this country that they cannot be considered seriously as employment. ESL abroad tends to be far more remunerative (try $20 or more per hour, 6 hours in a single location, and you may be lucky enough to do your own tax reporting, in much of East Asia).

    There is translation - a field somewhat lacking in either quality control or meaningful evaluation, in which freelancing predominates. There are more remunerative ways in which to be self-employed, even if one is extremely active - and there are sometimes the related costs of dealing with nonpaying clients. Institutions seem to be particularly bad about dealing with small service providers. I could tell a story about providing a high-level "crisis service" - twice - and then getting stiffed for a few hundred dollars over half-a-year by a large educational institution where the president makes over $1,600 per day.

    There is a widespread and fairly erroneous perception in most sectors that language skills can simply be "picked up" or hired or had for free. People with skills in other fields are sometimes asked to acquire meaningful language skills - those with language skills are not welcome students in other "harder" disciplines. There is an illusion of ready availability of language skills. Why hire a new graduate in Japanese language when Google and Babelfish offer free translation services? After all, new hires are expensive and time-consuming, and those sites give INSTANT gratification at an unbeatable price - never mind the quality of the results.

    Furthermore, why hire a non-native speaker when it can be said that native linguistic ability is what's wanted? At least someone ought to be hired who looks the part. In America superior immigrant talent can always be found to do anything better, after all, and it sure looks good for the HR department when that talent is hired. Appearances are everything even if test results demonstrate something other than what appearances indicate.

    So why a "crisis?" One could reasonably harbor a suspicion that this is less of a "crisis" than a funding opportunity for the educational establishment, and a method of attracting public sympathy for increased skill-related immigration. This has been the pattern for promoting skill-based immigration in engineering and the sciences for over a decade. That has had the sum effect of displacing American citizens from the serious study of these disciplines in their own country, and ensuring that no American citizens in their right minds would ever consider CS and IT as careers.

    Besides, Americans who study foreign languages are just impractical and unrealistic "ethnic wanna-bes" who can't understand their own limitations or even the realities of the job market. They shouldn't be trusted with a lemonade stand, let alone an important contact or document. If they're unemployed for years after taking their degrees, that's their fault for being stupid, self-indulgent, impractical and so blatantly UN-American.

    Hard to take? I've lived it for over a decade. These are the attitudes. I therefore cannot in good conscience recommend that anyone in this country give more than lip service to learning a foreign language.