Search News


Browse Archives

News

Banned in Akron

February 5, 2007

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

The poetry and other writing of Jimmy Santiago Baca have won him appearances at Harvard and Stanford Universities (among others), top literary fellowships, the Pushcart Prize, and numerous other honors. He is known as well for his work with the disadvantaged and with prison inmates, leading scores of writing programs in prisons and in poor communities. Last week, he was the keynote speaker at a College Board meeting.

This year, however, there's one place he won't be able to go: the University of Akron. A faculty panel picking a book for next fall's freshmen to all read had winnowed its list down to two, and one of the books, apparently the favorite, was Baca's autobiographical A Place to Stand: The Making of a Poet. The book tells the story of how Baca was illiterate until he started educating himself in jail, where he had been sent after a drug conviction and a childhood of poverty and abuse. In jail, he turned to writing, and when he got out of jail, he earned a college degree and turned his life around.

But despite his life story and literary acclaim, university administrators banned his book from consideration because they didn't want him to visit the campus (as the authors of books selected are invited to do). The problem is that Akron has had some controversy involving felons, and officials thought a Baca visit might revive that controversy.

In recent months, Akron has been embarrassed by a series of revelations about felons -- some in their 40s -- living in dorms and sharing rooms with freshmen in their teens. As the Akron Beacon-Journal reported, one freshman was instructed to call his roommate by his jail nickname and another felon was alleged to have committed more crimes while enrolled. None of the felons living in Akron dorms are known to have published volumes of poetry.

Karla Mugler, associate provost at Akron, was presented with the finalists for the freshmen to read and she sent an e-mail message to the committee ruling out Baca. "Due to the publicity which the university received this fall regarding individuals with criminal records residing in UA residence halls, I would not support the recommendation to bring Jimmy Santiago Baca to campus in fall 2007,'' she wrote. She added that she had conferred with other administrators on the issue, and they had agreed that it would be "prudent to delay our invitation to Mr. Baca."

Mugler did add that Baca could be scheduled at some point in the future.

Claude Clayton Smith, a professor of English at Ohio Northern University who organized a visit there by Baca in 2002, said Akron students were losing out on a great experience. Baca's lecture was popular and he also led an in-depth workshop for creative writing students, preparing individual comments on their work in advance of his visit. Smith said he has been teaching A Place to Stand ever since.

Asked if Mugler's decision amounted the censorship, an Akron spokesman said it did not because the committee hadn't yet made a selection and Mugler was just commenting on one book among multiple finalists. "We had several books that were under consideration. His book was never chosen. We did not say we would never invite him to campus or never use his book," the spokesman said.

Baca disagrees, calling the action by officials there "censorship and duplicity."

In an e-mail interview, he said: "It's very sad the students at Akron, Ohio, are dumbed down in such a way, especially by educators....  That dark-age mentality has led us blindly over the cliffs, one following the other into more and more violence, racism, and plain stupidity. Students deserve respect for their intelligence: Treat them like adults, with integrity, eyeing them as leaders of tomorrow, not timid little minions, slaves to ignorance. It's a dangerous time to nurture ignorance when we need, now more than ever, understanding and open-mindedness."

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Banned in Akron

  • Posted by j ranelli on February 5, 2007 at 8:15am EST
  • Associate Provist Mugler has it backwards, it is preciely becasue of Akron's recent history with felons that the institution needs Baca. As the academy, (once the seat of free inquiry), continues it's decline, (toward commodification), at the hands of misguidend educationists and their misbegotten policies the the voice of one Charles Dillon "Casey" Stengal rises above those of all the other great philsophers. In his despair at the incompetence of the nascent New York Mets, he, their manager, lamented "Can't anyone here play this game".

  • Posted by Melocoton on February 5, 2007 at 9:41am EST
  • Well, this is what university administrators are for: ignorance and weak-willed spinelessness.

  • A forest? All I see is trees.....
  • Posted by Christopher W. Milton on February 5, 2007 at 10:20am EST
  • Ok, first of all, felons aren't allowed to live on campus? I thought timed served was time served. But beyond that, wouldn't Baca's story served as an inspiration to those felons attend UA?

  • Posted by kgotthardt on February 5, 2007 at 11:30am EST
  • So if your roommate asks you to call him by his jail name and talks about his life in prison, it seems to me you would have the choice to request a roommate change if it really bothered you. But from this article, it doesn't sound like that happened. Furthermore, there are more dangerous roommates out there than felons, especially those felons who are trying to recover their lives and lost time. It does seem that having Baca visit would be more of a positive than a negative, doesn't it? What better way to show that being in jail doesn't mean you have to STAY in jail? I'm not sure I would categorize the University's choice as censorship, but I sure would call it a seriously poor choice and a missed opportunity.

  • Huh?
  • Posted by Kevin Guidry on February 5, 2007 at 11:30am EST
  • I fail to see how "we didn't select his book" means that he or his work is "banned in Akron." Did I miss something?

  • Posted by what? on February 5, 2007 at 11:41am EST
  • I suppose reading works by MLK (among scores of others)is now out of the question too?

  • This is a non issue
  • Posted by Paul on February 5, 2007 at 11:52am EST
  • I'm sure the Univeristy of Akron administrators have a book in mind that is just as eductational to give to the incoming freshmen next year. It seems like everyone is jumping to conclusions too fast regarding this isssue.

  • Felon's Book
  • Posted by Roger on February 5, 2007 at 12:30pm EST
  • The pathetic, naively reasoned {as well as poorly spelled) defenses of Baca's work is an embarrasing reflection on higher ed today. 40 year olds felons rooming with teens and the onus is on the teen to ask for a reassignment??? Not listening to another felon spout street drivel is an "eduational opportunity" forfeited??? Not recommending a book is banning it ??? God help the generation being "educated" in colleges today.

  • Maybe a good decision after all
  • Posted by Brian on February 5, 2007 at 1:25pm EST
  • Most of the way through the article I was thinking "another story about silly administrators." Then I got to the quote from Baca himself.....

    “It’s very sad the students at Akron, Ohio, are dumbed down in such a way, especially by educators."

    I guess Baca believes that not reading *his* book results in "dumbing down" the students. In his view there couldn't possibly be another book in the universe that is as good as his. It appears that Baca is either an arrogant jerk or delusional.

  • Books by Felons
  • Posted by Mathew on February 5, 2007 at 3:05pm EST
  • The New Testament contains the story and teachings of a convicted felon; So do Plato's dialogues. M.K. Gandhi and Nelson Mandela were convicted felons too. I wonder if Akron's student body would be allowed to read works by these convicted felons.

    Good publicity for Baca. Now, my students would be eager to read his work, without being asked. Thanks, Akron's administrators!

  • Akron Obligation to Comment
  • Posted by William Sumner Scott, J.D. on February 5, 2007 at 5:20pm EST
  • What forced Akron U to comment on why one of the books on the list was not selected? Is that a requirement for all other books?

    Some facts necessary to a complete discussion of the issues are missing. One question, was this administrator set up for criticsm? Who defends the administrators?

    William Sumner Scott, J.D.

    wss@jefound.org