Search News


Browse Archives

News

Conflicts Over Textbook Choice

February 19, 2007

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

Alfonso Pino, assistant professor of anatomy and physiology at Miami Dade College, sat on a three-person committee that makes textbook selection decisions for his department.

Two years ago, while serving in that role, Pino accepted an expenses-paid trip to San Francisco from a publisher whose book was under consideration by the committee. The publisher, Addison-Wesley/Benjamin Cummings, invited Pino to take part in a focus group on textbook development, according to information provided to the Florida Commission on Ethics, which investigated the arrangement.

As the Miami Herald revealed on Friday, within months, the textbook committee selected the publisher’s book. A complaint filed by an employee of a rival company alleges that Pino violated state statutes by accepting the trip with the understanding that the publisher hoped to influence his -- and the committee’s -- decision. Pino, who did not respond to messages, denied the allegations when interviewed by an investigator from the ethics commission’s office.

The commission cleared Pino on one ethical charge but found that by accepting “a thing of value,” he should have known that the publisher sought to influence a vote or other action in his capacity as a committee member. But the commission recommended that no further action be taken.

The ruling comes amid a steady drumbeat of complaints from students and the State Public Interest Research Groups that the cost of textbooks is rising too fast, and that professors are choosing material without keeping price in mind.

A senior lecturer at the University of California at Davis has come under fire for asking students to tear out worksheet pages from a textbook, which she authored.

“She has every right to use her book, but this is $76 for what is basically a summary of the lecture material, so we should be able to sell it back,” said Arlen Abraham, a Davis senior who has raised an issue with the policy.

The professor, Liz Applegate, who did not return calls for comment, told The California Aggie, Davis' student newspaper, that she instructs students to tear sheets out of the book for an assignment to prevent cheating.

The university's Academic Senate committee on student-faculty relationships last year determined that special accommodations were made for students who "cannot either afford or do not want to buy the textbook."

In the Miami Dade case, the college says it does not plan to investigate or take action against Pino.

Records provided to the ethics commission show that the cross-country trip cost under $700. The publisher also offered Pino a $250 honorarium but never paid him, according to the investigation.

Juan Mendieta, a spokesman at Miami Dade, said the college has no conflict-of-interest policy regarding textbook selection. He said the issue of how books are selected is already up for review this year by a college-wide executive committee, and that the review might yield a specific policy.

“We take these issues very seriously – whether perceived or real – and want to make sure we are doing things as air tight as possible,” Mendieta said. “It’s certainly something that can be reviewed.”

The textbook in question was already being used by the department, according to Mendieta.   

David Hakensen, a spokesman with Addison-Wesley/Benjamin Cummings, said that the company does not plan to change it practice of inviting scholars to its meetings.

“It’s a common practice – and it’s pretty clear that [Pino] went to his department chair and asked for permission,” Hakensen said. “It’s vital for us to hear feedback from professors to learn from them how our products can be better.”

In interviews with the ethics committee, a saleswoman from the publisher's office said that the company seeks out academics who are the most respected in their fields.

Bruce Hildebrand, executive director for higher education at the Association of American Publishers, agreed that the arrangement is common.

“A professor could ask for hundreds of dollars an hour for their time and will be paid much less to spend days reviewing a textbook," he said. "It’s part of the peer-review process that ensures that the publisher has the best minds looking at their work.

“It’s ironic that a faculty member working aggressively to make sure he is up to date on the material is being challenged for going the extra mile," Hildebrand added.

He said that in cases of faculty textbook selection, it's more than just the sell-back price that matters -- overall cost and the educational value should also be taken into account.

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Conflicts Over Textbook Choice

  • Is It Payola?
  • Posted by Craig C , political pundit at http://blogresponder.blogspot.com on February 19, 2007 at 8:06am EST
  • In similar stories here at Higher Ed, other cases of potential conflict of interest involving textbooks have been discussed. It is interesting that this situation isn't getting any better. There seems to be no clear cut rules involving this potential for conflict of interest. In the long run it is the students who suffer.

  • Textbook scam; open-source rules!
  • Posted by B.D. on February 19, 2007 at 9:01am EST
  • How ENRON of those faculty to "conveniently" be so superior in their writing and pedagogy that requires new textbooks on a regular basis.

    Hey -- who cares? Government is lending the students the money -- what's the big deal? Oh -- the average college graduate owing $20,000 upon graduation, for starters.

    Colleges should require professors who use their own textbooks to disclose how much the professor was paid. Let everyone know, what is going on. After all -- isn't college about "truth?"

    And support the open-source textbook (OST) movement. Like this --

    http://www.media.rice.edu/media/NewsBot.asp?MODE=VIEW&ID=8672&SnID=2

    http://www.google.com/search?as_q=+college+textbook&hl=en&num=100&btnG=Google+Search&as_epq=open+source+&as_oq=&as_eq=&lr=&as_ft=i&as_filetype=&as_qdr=all&as_nlo=&as_nhi=&as_occt=any&as_dt=i&as_sitesearch=.edu&as_rights=&safe=off

    It is OST, with MIT's Open Courseware

    http://ocw.mit.edu

    that will change the world. Not faculty with secretive, insider book deals.

  • Posted by Guy on February 19, 2007 at 9:26am EST
  • In my experience every professor using their own book in a course they personally teach has donated the royalties on those sales back to the department or school. I know many textbook authors so this is not a limited sample.

  • oh, please
  • Posted by Christopher on February 19, 2007 at 12:05pm EST
  • I can cite many examples of senior academics forcing adjuncts and lower level faculty to use their textbooks for no other reason than to generate royalties.
    Let's be honest, folks. It's an embarrassing situation.

  • professors are not the problem, they are a part of the solution
  • Posted by Dave Rosenfeld , Program Director at The Student PIRGs on February 19, 2007 at 12:20pm EST
  • To be clear about our position - professors are not the cause of high textbooks prices. However, professors can be a part of the solution. The root cause of high textbook prices stems from a simple market dynamic - faculty order books, but don't pay for them. Publishers, keenly aware of the market power this dynamic affords them, engage in practices that they would never get away with in a truly free market where they had to directly contend with the person who buys their product. However, students, faculty and administrators can work together to re-inject price into the sales conversation, and in doing so, guarentee both affordable and quality textbooks for students.

  • Posted by College teacher on February 19, 2007 at 4:30pm EST
  • There *are* legitimate reasons for publishers to offer payments for real work. But junkets like what’s described above, or the $300 to "review" (fill in a 1-page form) a book that has already been published, look an awful lot like payola. There’s usually no explicit quid pro quo, but anyone can figure out that if you take the money and adopt the book there'll be more of these offers in the future. Requiring people to list publicly payments received may, however intrusive, be a necessary first step.

    Open-source is great. For a lot of basic stuff a good website is better than an expensively-produced book.

  • Text-book royalties
  • Posted by Stanislaus Dundon , Professor Emeritus at CSU Sacramento on February 19, 2007 at 5:15pm EST
  • One campus I was on also had the requirment that faculty could not accept the royalties on their own texts and should assign them to some one of a list of appropriate beneficiaries. A problem I had was that locally reproduced text (e.g. a copy-shop working with camera-ready material)was not considered "serious" material by the students. One ethical principle which is hard for some to keep in mind is that those in public positions must not simply avoid evil, but also the strong appearance of evil.

  • Posted by Dr Chuck Pearson on February 19, 2007 at 8:25pm EST
  • I've actually had the opposite experience of Prof. Dundon, who wrote that "locally reproduced text (e.g. a copy-shop working with camera-ready material) was not considered 'serious' material by the students." In those instances where I've used my own material, I've actually had more success getting my students to "buy in" to the material because they know I constructed it and I'm going to be able to communicate that material best (and, cynically, it probably has more to do with the exams than the $100 major publisher textbook that Professor X had them buy). I worry about how well having both the lecture material and the text material in my own voice works, but purely from the perspective of "pleasing the customer", locally-produced open source has been a positive in my experience.

    The overall point remains the same - unless there is an absolutely compelling presentation of the material by the major publisher text, open-source wins the day ten times out of ten. (I say this as a major fan of Ben Crowell's Light and Matter series, especially the waves, electricity and magnetism, and optics texts, which I've used for my General Physics II courses for three years now - and I've used the other books in that series off and on.) It's cost-effective for the student, it eliminates copyright concerns in reproduction, and all of the ethical issues cited above disappear...

  • Bookstores - Resale a Problem, Too
  • Posted by TBD on February 19, 2007 at 11:10pm EST
  • Some of the churning of increasingly expensive, unnecessary new editions is due to buyback and resale. If publishers and editors received a royalty on resales and rentals, like songwriters do when a song is played on the air, it might help this situation by starting to deemphasize frequent new editions, which are produced so as not to lose book revenues.

  • what's really going on
  • Posted by HH on February 20, 2007 at 9:27am EST
  • I work for a publisher and have been part of every aspect of what this story describes. I can tell you that there are two ways in which a publisher pays faculty to review material: editorial or marketing. I can't say specifically because there aren't enough details, but this story sounds like a marketing review. It's also common for some publishers to have focus groups or marketing events. These events aren't sinister--the profs actually talk about books and their course for a day and a half! Publishers learn a ton from the event...and hope to secure business from it. There is no quid pro quo though. Plenty of faculty have gone on the trip and dropped the book when they got home.

    Publishers view paying money to review after publication a way to get faculty to pay closer attention to a book. In truly competitive situations (like MDCC's A&P course) you need to offer this to even compete. The publisher who does NOT have the business always drives the offer too. I feel bad that this one prof at MDCC has become a poster boy for common behavior.

    As for the discussion of profs using their own books to make money...get real! They use their own book because they wrote it for their course. That's common sense people. And most reputable schools will ask them to donate the royalties from their on campus sales back to the school. There is nothing wrong with this practice.

  • Posted by Dan Close on February 21, 2007 at 12:20pm EST
  • The trip sounds like a boondoggle. I have in the past accepted as little as $25 (but never more than $100) to review and correct textbook chapters prior to publication. When I say review and correct, my average "commentary" is usually about 20-25 pages single-spaced for four to seven chapters plus a TOC. Am I vastly underpaid for such editorial work? Certainly. Do I enjoy seeing by many suggestions incorporated into new or revised texts? You betcha.

  • A little
  • Posted by invisible adjunct on February 21, 2007 at 7:41pm EST
  • This is an interesting case, here are some quick notes after reading the report.

    Statement:
    David Hakensen, a spokesman with Addison-Wesley/Benjamin Cummings, said that the company does not plan to change it practice of inviting scholars to its meetings.

    “It’s a common practice – and it’s pretty clear that [Pino] went to his department chair and asked for permission,” Hakensen said. “It’s vital for us to hear feedback from professors to learn from them how our products can be better.”

    Fact: It is not pretty clear that Professor Pino asked and received permission from his department chair. Professor Pino only stated that he asked for and received permission from his department chair. According to the investigative report, Drs. Berkey and Salinas advised that they could not recall having discussed the matter with Respondent and neither could recall having advised him that he was permitted to accept the trip from the publisher.(page 6 of the report.)

    http://www.miami.com/multimedia/miami/news/documents/pino1.pdf

    Comment: Many people don't feel these trips have any impact on the objectivity towards reviewing educational material. However, if one looks at data from the pharmaceutical field, one will see that trips do influence prescribing habits.

    http://www.scu.edu/ethics/publications/submitted/morreim/prescribing.html

    If this professor recused themselves from the decision making committee, then the decision would have been perhaps acceptable. In this case, you have a professor who takes a trip from a vendor shortly before he was to make a decision. Would it be OK if judges accepted trips from attorneys trying an active case before them.

    If you allow trips you create a marketing arms race....what's next, three day cruises to "review" textbooks.

    I would be curious to find out who gets invited to these trips. I would imagine the adjunct with thirty years teaching experience and does not vote on textbook committees does not often get invited. In my opinion, most invitees are probably decision makers at large schools.

  • Resale A Problem,Too
  • Posted by Wendall Hubbard , Bookstore Manager at L. A. Southwest College on February 23, 2007 at 2:21pm EST
  • Publishers have not been intrested enough in the "Used Book" problem to take any steps to try and solve it. In my opinion publishers created the "Used Book" problem by not accepting returns on slightly damaged books and not trying to create a market for used or slightly damaged books.

    When the wholesaler saw the market and moved on it the publishers strated crying foul. If publishers would accept slightly damaged books and sold them to their customers at a reduced price with no returns, I'm sure they would not have a problem except for availability of more books at the reduced price.

    My take on the matter is that publishers created a problem and their only answer to it is to publish new editions that are not really new and bundles. When are they going to start to really address their problem and stop making it the problem of our students who purchase their books,