News, Views and Careers for All of Higher Education
Feb. 26, 2007
A speaker who was shouted down one year ago returned to the University of Arizona Friday at the former president’s request to do what he couldn’t do last year – speak.
Mauricio Farah, an ombudsman for Mexico’s National Human Rights Commission (La Comisión Nacional de los Derechos Humanos) spoke on the campus without any major incidents Friday. Farah came to Tucson to give a talk on “Mexico-U.S. Migration: Let’s Talk About Solutions,” and answer audience questions. A similar speech by Farah was shouted down before it could begin last year by about 10 to 15 anti-illegal immigration attendees, unaffiliated with the university, who demanded that the Spanish-language speech be translated or delivered in English, said Francisco Marmolejo, executive director of the Consortium for North American Higher Education Collaboration, a network of universities in Canada, Mexico and the United States that is based at the University of Arizona. The organization sponsored last February’s event and was one of 16 entities, including multiple university departments, colleges and offices, organizing last week’s speech.
Friday’s second attempt came as a result of a presidential invitation that leaders at another university facing a failed speech attempt recently declined to extend. After protestors stifled another speech on immigration issues at Columbia University this October, observers urged President Lee C. Bollinger — whose response was derided by many as inadequate — to invite Jim Gilchrist, founder of the anti-illegal immigration group, the Minuteman Project, to come back to campus and give his talk another try. While Columbia administrators have affirmed their commitment to accommodate Gilchrist’s return to campus if he is invited by a student group (the College Republicans invited him last time), a university spokesman, Robert Hornsby, said Friday that such an invitation must come from students, not the Columbia administration: “It’s not our invitation to make.”
Peter Likins, the now retired president of University of Arizona, had taken just the opposite tack eight months earlier, having sent a written apology and invitation asking Farah to return.
“It is OK to criticize the university for not providing a translation. But to shout down the speaker was unacceptable, rude and also illegal,” Likins told The Arizona Daily Star last March for a story reporting on his response. Likins did not respond to an e-mail request for comment Friday.
A University of Arizona spokesman, Johnny Cruz, said Friday morning that simultaneous translation services would be provided for the lecture, and the event would be open to the public and held in a hall with a capacity to hold 130 people. Seating was to be first-come, first-serve, with a limited numbers of chairs reserved for sponsoring organizations.
Cruz said it is typically up to event organizers to decide whether translation services should be made available for events conducted in foreign languages.
Marmolejo said the problem was that last year’s speech, which attracted 40 people, was previewed in a local newspaper without a reference to the fact that it would be in Spanish. Some attendees immediately began shouting, “‘We are in America and in America we have to speak English,’” Marmolejo said. “The situation became completely out of control. They didn’t want to stop shouting and of course it was just impossible for the speaker to deliver his speech. He was unable to say anything, because as soon as he began to speak, they began shouting.”
Friday’s speech was billed as focusing on immigration “from the perspective of the human rights component of the individuals who are migrating,” said Marmolejo, who pointed out that while Mexico’s National Human Rights Commission receives federal funding, it is independent from the Mexican government and in fact offers recommendations to government entities on human rights issues. An Arizona Daily Star account of the speech — in which Farah characterized immigration as a phenomenon, rather than a problem, that contributes to the U.S. economy — can be read here.
“We realize it’s controversial, but something that should be very clear to everybody is that universities are a space for ideas, and for dialogue,” Marmolejo said.
Columbia leaders can take heart, however: No attempt to remedy a botched speech attempt will make everyone happy. Laine Lawless, the director of an anti-illegal immigration group, Border Guardians, whose members shouted a desire for translation services at last year’s event, said via e-mail Friday afternoon that she disagrees with Likins’ decision to apologize to Farah and invite him to return: “He owed Americans an apology for not providing a translation. To hold a public event only in Spanish at a university that the taxpayers have paid for is the height of Open Borders Lobby hubris.”
But when asked whether the group had any plans of protesting Friday, she responded, “As long as they are providing a translation, that satisfies us.”
Want it on paper? Print this page.
Know someone who’d be interested? Forward this story.
Want to stay informed? Sign up for free daily news e-mail.
Advertisement
It is interesting that on the one hand U of A administrators felt in necessary to approach the pro (illegal?) immigration speaker to allow his speech, while at Columbia, the administration felt no remorse for the activities of its students in shouting down Gilchrist, an American citizen. Please note that the group represented by Farah is the same group that was working together with “..Tucson’s Humane Borders to publish and distribute to migrants in Mexico thousands of maps showing highways, rescue beacons and water tanks in the Arizona desert.”
http://www.azstarnet.com/metro/118376
The purpose of the maps was to aid illegals in their treck across the border into the US, which is a violation of the law.It would be interesting to know what exactly took place in Farah’s speech, as that is not mentioned here.
Craig C, political pundit at http://blogresponder.blogspot.com, at 9:11 am EST on February 26, 2007
Ever since 2004, when the Republican Congress and Bush 43 passed the “Free Speech Zone Law” free speech can be restricted to certain areas. The penalities for violating this law are more severe than the older “disturbing the peace” laws.
Daniel Pedroso, at 11:32 am EST on February 26, 2007
Mr. Pedroso, 1) Please provide this statute; and 2) please tell me how it applies to Hampton University on a daily basis. I think you misunderstand the law, but since you brought it up, you need to provide specifics.
Larry, at 1:00 pm EST on February 26, 2007
Click the links. The statute is on one of them.
Craig C, political pundit at http://blogresponder.blogspot.com, at 7:36 pm EST on February 26, 2007
But I agree, the argument that the shouters were “disrupting the educational process” is specious. This was not a class, or seminar that required attendance with the expectation of a grade provided at the end.It would be pretty extreme to apply such a law to this instance.
Craig C, political pundit at http://blogresponder.blogspot.com, at 7:46 pm EST on February 26, 2007
Shouting down free speech IS NOT FREE SPEECH!
Isaiah Hunahun, at 9:40 pm EST on February 26, 2007
Craig, I clicked the links. No statute. Did you make this up?
Larry, at 7:51 am EST on February 27, 2007
Advertisement
or search for jobs directly.
The selected individual will teach 12 credit hours per semester consisting of undergraduate mathematics major and service ... see job
TEXAS WOMAN’S UNIVERSITY College of Professional Education Department of Teacher Education Assistant Professor or Associate ... see job
DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES Applicants should be prepared to teach all levels of French language and French/Francophone ... see job
The University of Minnesota is a premier employer and a talent magnet attracting leading faculty and staff from around the ... see job
Azusa Pacific University seeks applications for Department of Exercise and Sport Science. see job
POLICY/History/Geography/ Political Science: Responsibilities of the position include offering introductory and advanced ... see job
The University of Minnesota is a premier employer and a talent magnet attracting leading faculty and staff from around the ... see job
General Purpose
Reporting to the Director for Information Technology, and with considerable latitude for ... see job
Small in size. Big in resources. Wake Forest, located in Winston-Salem, NC, provides the intimacy and personal attention ... see job
Drake University is a diverse learning community of more than 5,600 students, distinguished by collaborative learning among ... see job
“But to shout down the speaker was unacceptable, rude and also illegal,” —- ILLEGAL??? Isn’t shouting someone down protected by the oh-so-precious- ‘Freedom of Speech’??? Or is it only valid when protecting the rights of the speaker?? Why isn’t protesting protected by ‘Freedom of Speech/Expression’ — seems like everything else is: strip clubs, student newspapers that run articles about rape being beneficial, etc...
E.J., at 9:10 am EST on February 26, 2007