Search News


Browse Archives

News

Some Plan Boycott of Summers Talk at Tufts

February 27, 2007

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

Some professors at Tufts University are calling for a boycott and protest of a lecture there next month by Lawrence H. Summers, who left the presidency of Harvard University last year following a long debate over his comments about women and science.

“Having Larry Summers here is like a slap in the face,” said Gary Goldstein, a professor in the physics and astronomy department.  “I see him being invited here as a lack of awareness about how that affects our campus environment.”

Lawrence S. Bacow, the Tufts president, invited Summers to give the Richard E. Snyder Lecture, which was endowed to enhance the intellectual climate on campus outside of the classroom. Past speakers in the series have included Salman Rushdie, Tim Berners-Lee and Shelby Steele. Summers plans to talk about “Rethinking Undergraduate Education.”

Summers is away on business, according to his secretary, and did not respond to an e-mail message seeking his comment about the criticism from some at Tufts.

“The issues that have made him a national news item have to do with his attitudes toward women and the African American society,” said Goldstein. “The attitudes toward race and diversity can be a troublesome one.” (While Summers hit his greatest controversy with comments about women and science, for which he apologized, he also clashed with some members of the university's black studies program and was seen as critical of multiculturalism.)

John McDonald, a music professor, recently wrote a letter to the editor of The Tufts Daily encouraging professors to boycott the lecture -- and minimize its impact -- by reserving tickets but not attending.

That prompted Matthew Knowles, a computer science major, to write a reply in which he called that proposal “juvenile.”

“The idea of buying tickets and then not attending is not only foolish but it also excludes those who may wish to see the event,” wrote Knowles. “To deny anybody the opportunity to attend is unfair and unjust.”

That prompted McDonald to modify his proposal and to instead urge students and professors to congregate elsewhere during the lecture.

James Glaser, dean of undergraduate education at Tufts, runs the lecture series and said of Summers: "His topic of conversation is not related to the things he is controversial for. I think people will want to have a chance of seeing him in action.”

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Some Plan Boycott of Summers Talk at Tufts

  • Planned Boycott of Lawrence Summers
  • Posted by Sol Gittleman , Professor at Tufts University on February 27, 2007 at 8:20am EST
  • These faculty members certainly do not speak for me, and the idea of keeping speakers off campus embarrasses me as a member of this community. Summers will speak and then take questions. Is the potential audience so pitiful that they can't muster an intelligent intellectual confrontation, if they want one? Do we shelter our community from uncomfortable ideas? Good grief...

  • Posted by Isaiah Hunahun on February 27, 2007 at 10:05am EST
  • Without our socially constructed academic victimhood, our lives would be as shaky as ... as a fiddler on the roof!

  • Larry Summers
  • Posted by Peter Wolfe , Professor of Mathematics at University of Maryland on February 27, 2007 at 11:25am EST
  • Larry Summers has commited the mortal sin of being politically incorrect. For this he must be punished.

  • The demise of academic debate
  • Posted by KED , College President on February 27, 2007 at 11:25am EST
  • Prof. Gittleman has got this exactly right. I fear the concept of civil academic debate has gone the way of the phonograph record (on its way to extinction yet still regarded as the highest quality recording).

    Academic debate as part of the college experience, and whatever may bring it about, is the most enduring academic aspect of my undergraduate years spent at both a community college and an elite Boston area university. That many institutional cultures of (supposed) higher learning cannot handle disagreement without being disagreeable is the single greatest threat to the soul of higher education today.

  • Adolph would have been proud
  • Posted by B.D. on February 27, 2007 at 12:10pm EST
  • When a Clinton-era deputy secretary, whose wife and mother came from academia, cannot get a respectful hearing in an alleged "bastion of freedom" -- it is no wonder that public support for higher education is falling significantly.

    Words like hypocrisy, narcissism, and onanistic cognitive development go to top of mind. Uncle Joe, Mao, Ho, and Adolph would have concurred with this kind of "freedom."

  • Summers Boycott
  • Posted by Paul Manner , MD FRCSC at University of Washington on February 27, 2007 at 2:31pm EST
  • This is insane. As a Tufts alumnus, I'm embarrassed. As an academic, I can't understand why a bunch of Know-Nothings feel it appropriate to deny access for students who would benefit from hearing Dr. Summers.

  • Past is Past - Price Paid
  • Posted by Quizzical on February 27, 2007 at 3:01pm EST
  • Obviously those critical of Dr. Summers have no regard for his apology or that was in his past and he paid the price, the loss of the best academic job in the country.

  • Posted by Marvin McConoughey on February 28, 2007 at 5:31pm EST
  • I am surprised at the erratic and inconstant quality of academic tolerance for dissent. One suspects that the extreme left is as rigid and dogmatic as the extreme right.

    Whatever the ultimate reality of female-male differences, I doubt that they are yet fully delineated. Until they are, there should be room for scholarly discussion on what the differences are and in what way and to what degree.