News, Views and Careers for All of Higher Education
March 12, 2007
Like many large public universities, Arizona State University has an engineering college on its main campus, in Tempe, which offers a wide array of engineering programs, up to the Ph.D., with a strong emphasis on research.
In 2005, Arizona State renamed one of its other campuses as its polytechnic university, embracing a name with historic roots in engineering education, but not widely used today. Engineering and other programs at the polytechnic are seen as more hands-on and less research oriented, and enrollment has taken off. On Friday, the University of Wisconsin Board of Regents designated that university system’s Stout campus as a polytechnic university. And a few other institutions with the name are experiencing notable surges in enrollment and attention.
To be sure, “polytechnic” is part of the names of some of the oldest technology universities in the United States — such as the Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute — that have an array of graduate and research programs. And engineering universities have always had a strong practical orientation. But those embracing the new polytechnic tag see themselves as distinct from graduate-oriented institutions and also from traditional undergraduate, liberal arts and sciences programs.
Lisa Rossbacher, president of Southern Polytechnic State University, in Georgia, and formerly an administrator at California State Polytechnic University at Pomona, has spent a lot of time thinking about what the name means these days. “It’s about applying technology,” she said. Comparing her institution to the Georgia Institute of Technology, she said: “Georgia Tech is much more focused on theory and the research of discovery — discovering new technologies. We’re about taking that knowledge. A graduate from Georgia Tech is quite likely to get an advanced degree and do research there or later. Our graduates are more likely to get a job after graduation.”
If liberal arts colleges are about “knowledge for the sake of knowledge,” said Rossbacher, “we’re at the other end of the spectrum.”
Enrollment at Southern Polytechnic is up 10 percent this year, to 4,200, mostly undergraduate with only master’s programs at the graduate level. At Arizona State’s polytechnic, enrollment this year is 7,000 — roughly twice that of three years ago, and is projected to hit 12,000 by 2012.
Not only do the polytechnics appear to be attracting students, but more diverse students — not easy for many engineering oriented institutions. Southern Polytechnic leads the nation in producing black bachelor’s graduates in engineering technology, and is fifth for women.
Nancy Hensel, executive officer for the Council on Undergraduate Research, said that she is seeing increased interest in the hands-on approach to teaching, and that this may be particularly helpful with retention in the sciences. “There’s clearly a pipeline issue, and all the evidence suggests that when students really dig in to what they are doing, they are more likely to stay in the sciences.”
Al McHenry, vice president and executive vice provost at Arizona State, sees a very specific mission for polytechnics. “It’s about educating the masses to run a high-tech society,” he said. McHenry said that he thinks of an airline pilot as typical of the kinds of graduates he might produce — someone with both a specific knowledge base about technology and the skills to fly. “We want to turn out a graduate who is immediately functional in the work environment.”
Forrest Schultz, a chemistry professor at president of the Faculty Senate at Wisconsin-Stout, said that in his discipline, courses have become more applied as the university has moved toward the polytechnic model. In the second semester of freshman chemistry, he is teaching about the chemistry of substances (ceramics and glass) and having the students make glass to better understand it. “This is not theoretical but a focus on manufacturing,” he said.
Schultz said that professors are on board with the university’s proposed new designation. Rather than being seen as not the equal of the engineering program at the flagship campus at Madison, Schultz said he likes to think of the new emphasis “attracting students who are looking for something different, for a certain kind of environment.”
Differentiation is a key selling point for administrators who are attracted to this idea. Michael Crow, president of Arizona State, likes to talk about how the traditional branch campus model produces a “lite” version of what’s offered at a main campus, but the polytechnic programs are as rigorous, but with different goals.
Charles W. Sorensen, the chancellor at Stout, also sees differentiation as key. “I believe fundamentally that higher education is so competitive right now with the private schools and the for-profit schools that we need to differentiate. This is our brand,” he said. About half of the Stout student body is in science or technology programs, and Sorensen said that for those in other programs, the practical emphasis and significant use of technology also reflected the polytechnic idea.
The Stout proposal has been backed by faculty, student, and local groups. Still, Sorensen and others realize that they have their work cut out for them. A marketing analysis prepared for the university found that most prospective students and their families didn’t have much sense at all of what polytechnic might mean, although when Stout’s approach was described using other words, it got good reviews.
Some historians of engineering education are slightly dubious about the new use of polytechnic and note that the relative attraction of the term seems to change over time. John H. Lienhard, M.D. Anderson Professor Emeritus of Mechanical Engineering and History at the University of Houston, has written extensively about the history of the polytechnic idea, going back to Napoleon, who provided crucial early support for the École Polytechnique. Lienhard considers that the early engineering schools in the United States and the land grant concept were applications of the French model. “It was democratized here,” he said.
To Lienhard, the polytechnic concept is much more research-grounded than the current concept being pushed in Arizona, Wisconsin and elsewhere. “MIT is as strong as it is because it has a foot in both camps,” he said, just like the École Polytechnique, with a major research agenda and a practical agenda. “Some of this may be muddying the waters and assigning a more fancy name” to other missions, he said.
Of course a name embraced today may not be forever. Britain’s polytechnic colleges pushed in the 1990s to drop the name and become universities.
Some institutions that dropped the name still identify as polytechnics. The Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology was founded with the “poly” name, but changed along the way. Gerald S. Jakubowski, the president, came from Arizona State’s polytechnic campus and said of Rose-Hulman, “for all purposes we remain a polytechnic.” Jakubowski sees the definition as being a place where “graduates move directly into technical and professional careers.” He sees the popularity of the programs based in part on employer support. When engineering programs are theory-driven, he said, companies need to train their new workers extensively, but that doesn’t tend to be the case with polytechnic grads.
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University is the official name of Virginia’s land grant university, which has practical roots as do most land grant institutions, but has pushed hard into the national research scene in more recent decades. And it now generally calls itself Virginia Tech, dropping the poly. Mark Owczarski, a spokesman, said that while there is less of a job-training focus now than earlier in the university’s history, there is a more straightforward reason for just going by Virginia Tech. “People get and understand Virginia Tech,” he said. “Our full name is a mouthful.”
Want it on paper? Print this page.
Know someone who’d be interested? Forward this story.
Want to stay informed? Sign up for free daily news e-mail.
Advertisement
While “theory and research for discovery” are certainly areas of tremendous strength at Georgia Tech, this article fails to recognize Georgia Tech as a leader in applied “practical” research.
Georgia Tech is home to the Georgia Tech Research Institute (GTRI), an applied research institute conducting more than $100 million worth of “real world research” for a wide variety of government and industry partners. GTRI’s sole business is taking basic research, advancing it and applying it. Our nearly 600 scientists and engineers spend each day finding innovative ways to solve some of the world’s toughest problems.
Unlike the separation at many other universities, is GTRI is an integral part of Georgia Tech. This allows our full-time researchers to collaborate freely with colleagues in Georgia Tech’s schools and colleges, developing potent multidisciplinary teams better able to satisfy the ever-changing needs of our diverse research sponsors.
Here are just a few examples of practical applications of GTRI research:
1. The computer language serving as the backbone of the national Amber Alert system was developed at GTRI. It allows information to quickly be disseminated to emergency management services, law enforcement, public works offices, transportation agencies, and broadcasters when a child is abducted anywhere in the nation.
2. GTRI’s Human Factors Branch has helped hundreds of manufacturers refine and redesign their products so that they are easier for consumers and the disabled to use. Some of the products include coffee cans, golf equipment, gardening tools, copy machines and pill bottles.
3. GTRI developed a compact wireless captioning system that will help the hearing impaired take part in and enjoy public sporting events, theater shows, movies, and religious services to which they currently do not have access through captions.
4. GTRI’s Falconview multimedia mapping system has been a key component of the military’s portable flight planning software for nearly 14 years and is currently in use in a majority of U.S. Military aircraft. It displays elevation maps, charts, satellite-produced data, and geographically referenced overlays which helps pilots plan missions.
For more information on the Georgia Tech Research Institute please visit us online at www.gtri.gatech.edu
For more than 20 examples of GTRI applied research that is having a direct impact on the world today — check out our 2006 annual report online at http://www.gtri.gatech.edu/news/ar2006/index.html
Kirk Englehardt, Director of Communication at Georgia Tech Research Institute, at 9:25 am EDT on March 12, 2007
Over ten years ago then president of Arizona State University, Dr. Lattie Coor created a vision of one university in many places in part due to the rapid growth of the Phoenix Metropolitan area and the fact that the ASU Tempe campus was land locked. The formation of the ASU East campus (Polytechnic) was to accomplish some of the same geographical dispersion goals as was the existing ASU West campus in West Phoenix. These were not seen as second tier satellite campuses, rather one University geographically dispersed to meet the needs of a growing metropolitan area.
When President Michael Crow came to Arizona State University he had a plan in place to form ASU (a rapidly growing metropolitan University) into a ‘New American University.’ Michael Crow’s vision includes one University in many places that is responsible for the economic, social, and cultural vitality of the region. Further, ASU will provide education at the highest level that is accessible to a broad population. The future greatness of ASU will be based on an institution that is inclusive not exclusive. The necessary expansion of Arizona State University was planned to include differentiated campuses so that when a student was admitted to ASU they would attend the campus that their academic program resided on.
The ASU Polytechnic campus emphasizes professional and technological programs that engage students through project-oriented, problem-based, and service learning. The goal is to prepare students that can add value to employers’ day one upon graduation. The contextual learning environments as well as the validation of curriculum by business and industry make the Polytechnic campus a unique learning environment. Faculty at the ASU Polytechnic campus must have industry and professional experience. The teaching, as well as the scholarship and service of the faculty at the Polytechnic campus will have a different focus. The funded research on a Polytechnic campus will in many cases provide real-time practical solutions. One program in my department is the Environmental Technology Management program and this past year it generated $1,181,216 in funded projects to include some of the following projects.
Homeland Security Grant for Technology Development—Emergency Operations Center Simulator for the Arizona Division of Emergency Management.
Incident Command, NIMS, and NRP training for the Maricopa County Dept of Health Services.
Arizona Department of Transportation — Bioremediation of PCS
This ETM program has offered an on-line Master of Science degree that attracts students from Los Alamos Laboratory, Sandia Laboratory, NASA, APS, SRP, CAP, Tennessee Valley Authority, Banner Health, engineering firms, and many from the US military. My Environmental Technology faculty lecture all of the world, and more recently have used distant learning technology to deliver live joint classes with faculty in Europe.
The concept of a Polytechnic institution will continue to evolve beyond its historical roots. I applaud the decision by the University of Wisconsin to define the Stout campus as a Polytechnic institution as it will provide a mission for the academic programs and faculties.
Thomas Schildgen Department Chair/ProfessorArizona State University
Thomas Schildgen, Chair Department of Technology Management at Arizona State University, at 12:46 pm EDT on March 12, 2007
Cal Poly SLO is so popular in California that for some majors it is harder to get into than Cal Berkeley. It has always had the “job after graduation” goal and its graduates were and are highly valued by employers. At least one school at Cal Poly used to list their year’s graduates by the beginnning salaries they brought down. We, in the humanities, made the mistake of countering this obscenity by pointing out that after 10 years or so these polytech stars would be working for liberal arts majors. I taught there for 20 years, was a dean rather briefly, and have a son there now. At one time the engineering school was under accreditation pressure for its lack of liberal arts electives. “Cogs” in the industrial machine comes to mind. But every virtue has two vices, too much and too little. My advice to the new poly’s is: introduce every techie to the history, ethics and political history of their “applied” discipline and don’t whitewash the danger of technology outside the framework of caring for the whole human. And then require at least one humanities course, art, music, literature or philosophy, which they take for the pure joy of it. No parsing of Shakespeare, just soaking up its delight.
Stanislaus Dundon, Pro9fessor Emeritus at Cal Poly and Sac State, at 8:30 pm EDT on March 12, 2007
I cannot let the comments by scrawed pass without correction. Contrary to those comments, most of the degrees being created at the ASU Polytechnic campus have the normal BA, BS, MA, MS designations. Whenever possible, they are seeking accreditation through the same accreditation boards as are used for similar programs nationally.
Furthermore, the general studies requirements for all bachelors degrees on all campuses of ASU are identical. A course approved for such purposes on one campus is accepted for such purposes on all other campuses.
The minimum admission standards for programs on one ASU campus also are identical to those of any other campus. Students at any campus have a single, ASU wide academic record and are free to transfer into any programs of any ASU campus for which they are academically suited. Their financial aid normally follows them from program to program and they are free to live in student housing on any campus of their choice. Some year, I hope to have it once again be an important point that students on any campus can get student football tickets.
One last point of course whould be made and that is that ASU is not the largest publicly funded higher educational system in Phoenix. That distinction belongs to the Maricopa Community College District (MCCD). State law mandates that credits be easily transferred between MCCD and ASU and we do it so well that many students simultaneously enroll at both ASU and MCCD.
Would more educational competition be useful in Phoenix? Of course it would and there are on-going efforts at establishing at least one new, private liberal arts college in the Phoenix metro area. In the meantime a good faith effort by the ASU to grow to accomodate demand is not by and of itself an anti-competitive move. The mission differentiation of the various campuses is in fact an effort to avoid some of the bad side-effects of a large, monolithic university.
In the national context of engineering the polytechnic concept is particuarly important precisely because nationally we have a rather monolithic system in which pretty much everybody offers the same degrees and teaches them the same way. Whenever anybody suggests changes, they are always told that they are watering things down and creating an “engineering lite” degree. Personally, I would prefer to think that we are just cutting out the trans-fat.
Robert Grondin, Assoc. Prof. Engineering at ASU Polytechnic, at 8:25 pm EDT on March 13, 2007
Advertisement
or search for jobs directly.
Located just north of Houston, Texas, our five campuses serve 1,400 square miles. Our student enrollment is nearly 50,000 in ... see job
To provide skilled assistance in creating, modifying, and editing publications including technical manuals, procedures, ... see job
The University of Minnesota is a premier employer and a talent magnet attracting leading faculty and staff from around the ... see job
Northeastern University, founded in 1898 and located in Boston, is a private research university that is a leader in ... see job
Cradled in the foothills of the Appalachian Mountains in northeast Alabama, truly Jacksonville State University is a place ... see job
Keuka College seeks instructor(s) to teach multiple sections of a course in health and wellness for Fall 2008 and Spring 2009 ... see job
Serve as Department Chair, which includes supervision and mentoring of faculty and staff; representing and advocating for the ... see job
Job Description: This is a full-time, tenure track faculty position in the Dental Hygiene Program beginning ... see job
SOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY. Personal. Professional. Practical. see job
The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill seeks an organized, knowledgeable and enthusiastic Legacy Finding Aids ... see job
Anti-Competitive Education Lite or Real Commitment?
There’s nothing wrong with the “Polytechnic” designation in itself. In many cases it has been used to describe what have been some fine institutions.
Unfortunately this is being used in Arizona State’s case to disguise the status of a satellite campus. The construction of satellite campuses has been undertaken by ASU several times over the last 25 years to stifle competition in local higher education.
Although the facilities can be much nicer, and less crowded (a consideration when a main campus may serve as many as 60,000 students), typically the programs instituted are “lite” versions of main campus programs. This is often reflected in the degree nomenclature. Many of the degrees are not given traditional designations (e.g. B.A., B.S., M.A., M.S., etc.) and may not be recognizable to most potential employers or other institutions.
In some instances less “desired” or more politically “problematic” programs are farmed out to these satellite campuses, sometimes regardless of actual quality. Most of the programs deemed more critical are retained by the main campus. Programs which have some overlap and potential for competition with these are relegated to the periphery (both in terms of the geography as well as discourse) and lumbered with degree labels that ensure that graduates from the “peripheral” school will not compete with main campus graduates either in further education or in the job markets. Arizona educational institutions have historically had a very difficult time sharing resources and accreditation with each other and ASU is no exception, even when the satellite institutions are actually part of ASU.
It’s past time that the Phoenix metro area had a more institutionally diverse educational environment, one that is not overrun by the questionable economics of mass market education either in the public sector (ASU) or the for-profit sector (University of Phoenix). It probably will never happen. This is a city that for decades has aspired to a brighter economic future than its planning decisions will ever allow.
Scrawed, at 6:56 am EDT on March 12, 2007