News, Views and Careers for All of Higher Education
April 3, 2007
Choosing a college president is always a delicate affair, and that can especially be true at public institutions where state politics and the academy intertwine. But at West Virginia University, some outspoken critics have accused the search committee of playing politics with the selection of candidates, with some alleging that one in particular has been preordained from the start.
Several presidential candidates have faced significant opposition in recent months, Jane K. Fernandes at Gallaudet University being the most prominent example. In February, a semifinalist for president at Westfield State College, in Massachusetts, left some observers wondering about his qualifications. At West Virginia, the additional accusations that political connections played a role has set the case apart from the others.
Of three final candidates for the presidency, which will be vacated when David C. Hardesty Jr. retires in September, Michael Garrison has sustained significant criticism among influential alumni and faculty. In contrast to the other two finalists, Kansas State University Provost M. Duane Nellis and Portland State University President Daniel Bernstine, Garrison is not a career academic. Instead, he was once chief of staff to former Gov. Bob Wise and until recently, chairman of the West Virginia Higher Education Policy Commission, which approves the university Board of Governors’s final choice of president. (He stepped down several weeks ago, according to the commission’s chancellor, Brian Noland.)
Critics of Garrison note that as chief of staff, he would have worked closely with the governor to appoint — pending confirmation — five of the 17 members of that governing board, including the chair, Stephen Goodwin. Goodwin also chairs the presidential search committee, and was not available for comment on Monday.
Another connection has raised eyebrows, too: Goodwin’s sister-in-law is West Virginia’s secretary of education and the arts, Kay Goodwin, who worked with Garrison under Wise. She did not comment except to say that as a member of the higher education commission, she “did not publicly support or oppose any candidate.”
The criticisms have come from various segments of the university community. Robert B. King, a director of the alumni association and a judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, wrote a letter to members of the search committee warning that West Virginians’ perceptions that the process is preordained are “disappointing” but “may be accurate,” according to a copy obtained by the Associated Press.
The chair of the statistics department, E. James Harner, sent out an e-mail to colleagues expressing disdain for the process, calling Garrison “simply not qualified,” and urged others to write letters. Harner, a prominent critic of Garrison, said he has perceived a strong “undercurrent” of opinion that the choice for president “was a done deal.”
Part of the backlash stems from a belief that a “nontraditional” president would not best serve the university’s interests. The current president, Hardesty, weathered his own share of criticism during his appointment for, among other things, insufficient academic experience. According to the American Council on Education, about 13 percent of college presidents in 2006 worked outside before their appointments.
But Harner, who strongly supports Nellis and served under him when he was West Virginia’s arts and sciences dean, believes that’s not what the university needs at this point in its development with — many contend — an eye toward the top 100. “The challenges in today’s environment are much, much more difficult,” he said. “I feel strongly that the president should be an academician.” Sherman D. Riemenschneider, a math professor, seemed to agree. “What type of experience would it take to move WVU to the next level as a national research-extensive university?” he said.
Members of the search committee are not pleased with those assessments. “It is unfair to the search committee to bring this issue up in this 11th hour,” Parviz Famouri, a computer science professor and chairman of the Faculty Senate, said in an e-mail. “I think it’s unacceptable to coerce the board of governors in their decision for or against a particular candidate and [the judge’s] letter is trying to do that.”
Kevin M. Leyden, a professor of political science and director of the university’s Institute for Public Affairs, defended the candidates. “I think all three candidates appear to be qualified to be the next president of West Virginia University,” he said. “Each has unique strengths.”
Famouri also challenged the idea that a strong academic background was a necessity for the position. “President Hardesty changed the landscape of leadership at a large public university like ours. Presidents now look outward and focus on raising money, with provost and vice presidents handling internal affairs and overseeing academic details.” The evolving job description of college president has certainly created tensions between the overwhelmingly academic careers of many candidates and the increasingly financial aspect of the job.
Still, said Nellis, the Kansas State provost and former WVU arts dean, “I feel that [academic experience is] an advantage in being a strong candidate. It’s something that I feel is an asset that I have in this process, and I would hope that others see that as well. But at the same time,” he said, Hardesty “has done an outstanding job, in my opinion, as president.”
Garrison, a West Virginia graduate and Oxford scholar, did not return calls requesting comment, and Bernstine was on campus meeting with West Virginia students and faculty in open sessions on Monday. Goodwin has reiterated that the next president will be announced on April 13.
Want it on paper? Print this page.
Know someone who’d be interested? Forward this story.
Want to stay informed? Sign up for free daily news e-mail.
Advertisement
Not only was Mr. Garrison involved in appointing several members of the Governing Board that will choose the next President of West Virginia University, but he was also a lobbyist in the state for companies owned or controlled by several members of the Board. Conflicts of interest abound. It certainly appears that a political hack is being appointed by his cronies. On the other hand, that’s the way this state works. Professor Famouri is being disingenuous at best in claiming it is “unfair..to bring this issue up at the last minute.” The names of the candidates were kept absolutely confidential until the three finalists were announced. There was no way to criticize the selections before we knew who they were. Finally, the Board of Governors is going to make their decision three days after the last candidate leaves campus, virtually guaranteeing that they will have little or no time to seriously consider faculty/staff/student input into the choice of candidates.
If Garrison is chosen, the faculty of West Virginia University can only hope there is some financial benefit to us and the institution from his political connections. He’s only 38 years old and we could be stuck with him for a very long time.
Mountaineer, West Virginia University, at 12:23 pm EDT on April 3, 2007
It is a sad state of affairs that in WV as well as in the United States at large higher education is becoming more and more biased towards a profit-like motive as its reason for existence. Universities exist to educate, inspire and enlighten. They do this by pushing the limits of knowledge and in turn sharing that knowledge. You cannot do this if you are blinded by a myopic view that political cronyism is the only way to accomplish things. Indeed, quite the opposite is true. In the pursuit of the advancement of knowledge and the creation of new ideas, progress is hampered by any bias whatsoever. When political process comes into play, no progress is possible at all. The US will see this more and more as other countries surpass it in technological prowess. This decline is almost entirely due to the introduction of politics into what should be a purely academic matter. Only by hiring the best and brightest can we hope to achieve great things.
Disaffected, at 4:41 pm EDT on April 3, 2007
Advertisement
or search for jobs directly.
The University of Minnesota is a premier employer and a talent magnet attracting leading faculty and staff from around the ... see job
Georgia Gwinnett College, the 35th member of the University System of Georgia, is a premier 21st century four-year liberal ... see job
Job Description: The Office of Academic Enrichment Services (AES) is accepting applications for a temporary ... see job
Job Summary This individual will work independently and possess demonstrated expertise in these areas. ... see job
College of Notre Dame of Maryland is currently seeking a Gift Coordinator to join our advancement services team. The Gift ... see job
The Franklin L. Burns School of Real Estate and Construction Management, established in 1938, is one of the oldest programs ... see job
The University of Minnesota is a premier employer and a talent magnet attracting leading faculty and staff from around the ... see job
College of Notre Dame of Maryland seeks an Admissions Recruiter for the School of Pharmacy. Under the general direction of ... see job
Valdosta State University where tradition and tomorrow come together. see job
BSC is one of the largest and most exciting centers for higher education in the commonwealth. Here in our idyllic setting, ... see job
politics and higher education
In a time of ever increasing scrunity of higher education by the federal (and state) governments, it can be hard to know for sure what skill set best befits the President of a college. As a WVU graduate who has worked for 34 years in higher education (mostly in Massachusetts),it is clear to me that the government funding that is a part of public higher education has clear costs. In the past twenty years we have seen the evolution of a public higher education system where government provides decreasing financial support while demanding increasing involvment in management.
So certainly, a College President’s job description has changed to include “bringing in Big Bucks” to replace what has been lost as the public funding for public higher education has been reduced.
It has always been true that ‘he who pays the piper names the tune,’ and in my years within the Massachusetts public higher education system I have seen many mid-to-high level management positions (including top jobs)filled by politicos with little to no experience in higher education.
Former Massachusetts State Senate President William Bulger comes to mind first. He moved up to the Presidency of the University of Massachusetts in 1996, then retired in 2003 with a state pension that, with recent court appeals won, provides about $196,000 a year.
Public higher education took a lot of reductions during his tenure at UMass, but it suffered less than most other Massachusetts’ public higher education institutions. Maybe his presence there made a difference.
I am not sure today that Garrison might not be the best choice for the job. What with the Spellings Commission likely to increase the power of federal and state governments over higher education, it might be very important to have someone at the helm who ‘plays ball with the big boys in Charleston and Washington.’
It seems ironic that higher education is more ‘beholding’ to government than it was when government provided a higher percentage of its support, but I think the sense that we have within higher education that we have lost a lot of control is an accurate view. Working within higher education is less satisfying than it was ten or twenty years ago.
I wish the best of luck to the students, and faculty of West Virginia University and hope that the President they get is the one they need.
Rebecca Shipman Hurst, Chair, Human Services Depatment, at 11:56 am EDT on April 3, 2007