Search News


Browse Archives

News

Riled Up Over Changed Grades

April 5, 2007

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

Among the breaches of academic conduct that rile up professors the most, unauthorized grade changing approaches the top of the list. At Kean University, in New Jersey, evidence that it happened last semester has members of at least one department up in arms -- with the university agreeing that mistakes were made.

What happened isn't really under dispute. Three students majoring in industrial design were enrolled in a technology course taught by Mohammad Behi, from another department in the College of Natural, Applied and Health Sciences. Members of the design department advised the students that they could withdraw from the course, after the deadline, and enroll in a "special topics class" created especially for them (and free of extra tuition charge) by Timothy Riegle, who declined to comment.

Normally, students withdrawing late would have to get approval from the appropriate dean -- the one from the college offering the course they're dropping. In this case, the students' dean -- from the School of Visual and Performing Arts -- approved the action and, according to people close to the case, offered the alternative course as a solution. And deans in these situations are supposed to consult with the necessary faculty members, to avoid scenarios where students facing a rigorous grader just shop around for an easy A. Such consultation didn't take place.

Because the withdrawal didn't follow normal procedures, last semester ended with the students still enrolled in Behi's class and F's on their transcripts. By the end of January, those grades had been changed to W's -- for "withdrawal" -- without Behi's approval. The replacement course had also suddenly appeared, with each student receiving the same grade of B+.

Those academics involved "should be a model for their students, but they’re just cheating themselves," Behi said.

Not only has the incident demoralized Behi and the chair of his department; it has brought new life to charges that Kean has fostered a climate of hostility and intimidation during Dawood Farahi's controversial presidency.

"Our university is [trying] to look good on the surface," said the technology chair, Kamal Shahrabi. "We have nice green grass … but the quality of the education is going down."

It was reportedly the students who first approached the arts dean, Carole Shaffer-Koros, about difficulties they were having with Behi's's class. Shaffer-Koros wrote a memo on Jan. 19 asking the registrar to retroactively withdraw one of the students from Behi's class, which she was "incorrectly advised" to enroll in. Shahrabi said that there is "no paper trail" for the other two students.

Behi has since filed a grievance with the faculty union seeking to have the original grades restored. In a letter to Behi, the university's provost and vice president for academic affairs, Vinton Thompson, admitted that the charges of improper grade changes -- without consulting Behi, Shahrabi or the sciences dean, Xiaobo Yu -- were true. But, he added, "I have concluded that it is in the best interest of the students to let the withdrawal grades stand. The students were following instructions given to them by their faculty advisor. I cannot allow them to be adversely affected by the actions of a faculty member and a dean."

Daniel Higgins, a Kean spokesman, emphasized the procedural lapses that led to the change of grades. "The situation was not handled the way that the situation should be handled," he said. Thompson's letter alluded to "measures to insure that there will not be another incident of this kind," and Higgins added that "the deans have been advised and reminded of what the policy is ... and reminded not to do this in the future." He did not specify whether any disciplinary actions would be taken.

Thompson, who did not respond to requests for comment, asked Behi in the letter to drop his grievance with the Kean Federation of Teachers, the campus AFT affiliate. "They want to sweep this under the carpet," Shahrabi said. (The deans from both colleges involved also declined to comment because of the ongoing grievance proceedings.)

María del Carmen Rodríguez, president of the faculty union, called the episode unusual and unethical. "The students are getting a very powerful message that you are rewarded for not being responsible," she said.

Meanwhile, Kean isn't the only university to have a grading scandal on its hands. Palomar College in Southern California is launching an investigation into whether an administrator altered students' grades without the professor's consent.

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Riled Up Over Changed Grades

  • procedure
  • Posted by Joseph Duemer , Professor at Clarkson University on April 5, 2007 at 8:00am EDT
  • "The situation was not handled the way it should have beeen . . ." Hmmm, where have I heard that recently? Oh yeah, the firing of eight US attorneys who were deemed insufficiently loyal to George W. Bush. And it's true, the situation was handled badly; but handling the situation was not the issue, nor is it in this case. The issue is "the situation" itself. The students should nor have been allowed a late withdrawal, but even if they had, a gut course should not have been created for them. Those are simply wrong actions that have nothing to do with how "the situation" was handled.

  • Posted by Jon Todd , Registrar on April 5, 2007 at 9:06am EDT
  • What were they thinking? Nice message to send to students and faculty, not to mention the next accreditation team visit. The school, by allowing this, is begging for a close examination of financial aid SAP.

  • Posted by Jane on April 5, 2007 at 9:16am EDT
  • I'm wondering just how common this tactic is. I taught for one semester in a school where I was told in advance what grade to give a student on a paper. When I left, the dean of the school changed all my grades (lowered them half a grade). I have routinely advised students to avoid this school.

    When I was a TF at a major university, after consultation with the professor, I failed a student who never showed up to section (I assumed he'd dropped the course) and submitted one of the two required papers after the end of the course. I later found out that the professor spent the summer fighting with the university, which wanted the grade changed. To his eternal credit, the professor did not cave in.

  • Posted by Alan on April 5, 2007 at 10:25am EDT
  • As a student at Kean University, I find that the grade change situation is not acceptable. It lowers the value of my degree and sends the message to other students that they are able avoid Inter-Disciplinary courses that are mandatory for their major and still graduate.

  • Much ado about nothing
  • Posted by Bob at State U. on April 5, 2007 at 12:10pm EDT
  • So students are allowed to withdraw from a class after the drop deadline. It happens all the time, and there are all kinds of reasons/excuses that can officially be used in doing that. Here, because of a procedural glitch and a professor upset at those students getting out of receiving their duly deserved F's, a pseudo-scandal erupts. But it's not the same as improving a grade that the student earned through a semester's worth of work, thus giving them credit for a level that they did not achieve. If they're allowed to withdraw they get no credit for the course. The professor involved, and everyone else, should use their outrage on more important things (of which there are plenty). For instance: The business about the "independent study course" and the substance of it, is, for me, the more questionable aspect.

  • A few more interesting tidbits
  • Posted by A at Kean University on April 5, 2007 at 12:45pm EDT
  • Having been close to the situation, there are a handful of other bits of information that add a bit to a full understanding of this incident.

    There were four ID students in the class. One of them worked and got an A. The remaining four did no work. As I was present for the lab practicals for that class, I got to see this happening.

    Dr. Riegle claims that he believed that the class in question was a Computer Animation/Rapid Prototyping class not required for ID. The class was, in fact, Materials and Processes, a required course for ID students and vital for any professional designer.

    Dr. Riegle was informed before and during the incident of his mistake as to which class it was, but continued anyway.

    The excuse of the students being 'incorrectly advised' to take the course is rediculous because it is a required course (freshman level) which they had put off to their senior year.

    Prior to this incident, I had been told by the Provost that there is "bad blood" between Industrial Design and Technology.

  • B+?
  • Posted by prof on April 5, 2007 at 4:55pm EDT
  • If I were the instructor I let the
    W's stand as long as the bogous B+'s
    are expunged. The students should
    retake the required class before they
    can graduate.

  • Posted by Deb on April 5, 2007 at 8:50pm EDT
  • Students who miss the deadline to officially withdraw should receive a failing grade and a "W". The reason they don't withdraw is to keep a full time schedule on the books for financial aid taking money away from students who actually want to attend class.

  • Posted by Sam on April 6, 2007 at 5:10am EDT
  • I entirely believed what I read in this article because I've been witnessing how the Chairman of the Graphic Design Dept and his faculty were trying to grab the students from Technology and add them to their students.
    It seemed to me that the decision makers at Kean university sacrificed the Dept of Technology for making the university more commercial than educational. It did hurt when I saw that the beneficial Department of Technology at Kean was going to be destroyed with all of its machinery and laboratories. I did and still do feel sorry for all the hard work that was done by individuals who established the Dept of Technology at Kean, and for all the money that was collected from the students and tax payers to provide the advanced machinery and laboratories that is now going to be trashed.

  • ETHICS & DEADLINES
  • Posted by Antonia Khanian on April 6, 2007 at 10:46am EDT
  • Deadlines are not randomly chosen dates. With regard to university classes, a reasonable amount of time is determined so that a student will have a long enough period in which to decide, based upon a number of factors, whether a class is appropriate for them. To remain enrolled in a class beyond that point and then withdraw after learning of a failing grade in order to maintain a higher average is highly unethical. To be advised and assisted in this by the faculty degrades not only the reputation of the university, but, specifically, the work of the students who remained in that class. Perhaps the arts dean, C. Shafer-Koros, believed one student had been incorrectly advised to enroll in M. Behi's class (although he was not consulted on this issue). And we are not informed here how far beyond the deadline January 19th is. But even if a withdrawal was the correct course of action in that single instance, how does that explain multiple students having a "special topics clas" created for them - a special class where in just two weeks they could achieve a B+ grade AND not have to pay a tuition fee for it? I would be interested in an explanation by V. Thompson, university provost and vice president for academic affairs, as to how he rationalized his conclusion to let the withdrawal grades stand "...in the best interest of the students..." These students are mature enough to discern right from wrong - having a faculty member suggest the wrong path does not alleviate the students of personal responsiblility. Switching out a bad hand in a poker game by adding a secreted ace is cheating, no matter who thought it was a good idea. I applaud M. Behi for his decision to file a grievance seeking the original grades be restored. Rather than this being a punishment for students attempting to evade deserved grades, I see a teacher simply struggling to preserve the value of those students who worked hard for the grades they received.

    And, as an aside, let me appeal to T. Riegle: I was unable to complete college due to unfortunate family circumstances. Could you be kind enough to create a few "special" classes for me? I would certainly appreciate being able to add the remaining credits necessary to achieve my degree in less than a month - and for free!

  • Students followed advice
  • Posted by John S on April 9, 2007 at 10:51am EDT
  • The provost and vice president for academic affairs, Vinton Thompson absolutely made the right decision with respect to the grades. The students did not do anything that conflicted with the advice they were getting from the staff/faculty of their department.

    We do not know, from what was written here, what the students would have done had the advisors in the Design department told them that they could not withdraw after the deadline. Under that scenario, perhaps they would have just remained in the course, done the work, and received whatever was the appropriate grade. The students were told that they could withdraw and that they could enroll late and without charge into the special topics class. I agree that that opportunity sounds suspicion on the part of the staff. But again, the students did not do anything wrong.

    Another topic not addressed in the article and the responses, is the considerable variation by institution in terms of deadlines for withdrawals. Some are early, some are late. Students who attend institutions with late withdrawal deadlines certainly have an advantage and greater opportunity to drop a course for which they are heading for a mediocre grade.

  • Endemic Situation
  • Posted by I am from Kean on April 11, 2007 at 11:51am EDT
  • I am familiar with this situation. The Design department has a reputation of being easy graders. So, when some students got a normal fair grader so close to their graduation date they complained to the faculty in the Design Dept. Since the Design Dept is so used to getting away with absolutely every unethical action that they have done that they probably figured that they could get away with this as well. Now someone has put their foot down and the Design Dept. doesn't have a leg to stand on to support themselves.

    Each time that they cross the line in doing something they are allowed to do it. After they are given permission then it is pronounced that they should follow the university's procedures next time. If the university's procedures are that flexible then why have them? Or are they only flexible for the Design Dept?

    Hopefully this will cause the Design Dept. to make serious modifications in how they conduct themselves. Maybe now they will realize that they can't get away with everything that they want to do. But, I am not so sure. The administration now feels that the Design Dept. are the victims in this case now that it has become public.

    Hopefully students will get back to earning their grades instead of finding ways to skirt the system to improve their grade. This is not the type of ethical behavior that should be demonstrated in a university. This is how the corporate world's ethics get polluted. People learn not just from their coursework, but by how people act. If this didn't go challenged then the students would think that this is normal behavior that they can get away with in the corporate world.

  • New leadership
  • Posted by Kean Faculty , Prof at Kean on April 13, 2007 at 5:30am EDT
  • It is time to have a new Leader in our university. They have failed and the failing grade can not be changed. For sure in many universites they will send the Dean,chair, faculty, and any other person involved home for good but at KEAN they will be promotted since they have the support of Dr. Farahi.

  • Incomptence and Mediocrity Rewarded
  • Posted by Long time Kean faculty member on April 14, 2007 at 3:31pm EDT
  • I can attest to the veracity of many Kean faculty members'comments. The incompetence and mediocrity rewarded at Kean is akin to any authoritarian regime. The incompetent and mediocre are those most vulnerable and therefore most easily controlled and willing to do anything to garner the protection of those in power.

    After 3 years of the Farahi regime those competent and truly committed to the good of our university who initially supported Farahi have now left his administration. Those left as Farahi's brain trust are the frightened and insecure.

    It's a sad and frightening old story. Unless the bulk of the hardworking and decent faculty at Kean are willing to stand up together against the assault on the university, expect more policies designed to reward the weak and incompetent toadies of the administration and to marginalize and punish the decent.

    As a group, academics tend to want to be left alone to do their work and under the circumstances at Kean. Sadly, such ostrich-like behavior only plays into the hands of those who care only about power. Student achievment, academic quality, and the the free exchange of the best ideas are damned.

  • Posted by Kean Student on April 16, 2007 at 10:10am EDT
  • Firs this, now the professor who was hired as tenure and wasn't finished with her 90% plagiarized doctorate. What’s next? I feel that the value of my degree is jeopardized and I am annoyed by the lack of school funding for learning while they make the grass greener. Hopefully this communistic place will get organized.

  • Tech Majors in Kean
  • Posted by Concerned Student on April 19, 2007 at 1:01pm EDT
  • This is just one more symptom of the university’s goal of getting rid of the technology department. Any technology student in Kean knows that the majors offered under technology get no funding, no equipment, no new enrollments, and now… no respect for their faculty. The technology classrooms are used as storage for the rest of the school, the students’ and faculty’s morale is in the pits in that building, the whole thing is just falling apart.

  • Posted by Monika on May 22, 2007 at 1:25pm EDT
  • If I failed a class and wasnt able to get thsese advantages, I would bring it up. Now that they have let 3 students go with that, they should do it for everyone. They cant discriminate, but they shouldnt have let them slide in the first place.

  • Posted by Kean Student on May 22, 2007 at 1:25pm EDT
  • This is a slap in the face to the select students that worked hard all semester. Long papers, tough exams and extreme studying were all done to recieve grades "earned". It's a shame that students were given grades not earned.

  • Posted by Kean University Student on May 22, 2007 at 1:25pm EDT
  • The students were allowed to withdraw in the fist few weeks. So why did they wait until the end of the course to withdraw. In this case the faculty should make it the right for all students to do this same thing. You can’t have double standards for students. Every student should have the right o do this now.

  • Grade Change is Not Fair
  • Posted by Kean Student at kean on May 29, 2007 at 5:40am EDT
  • The whole issue with the grade change really isnt fair, because there are many students who cant even graduate with their class because they have to take classes over, and now you students like this that get their way and get their grade changed with no problems at all. Im just disgusted with the education that kean university has to offer, it really does seem like landscaping tends to be more important.

  • Posted by M L on May 29, 2007 at 11:55am EDT
  • It's sad that they get to get B+s for not showing up to class and getting strings pulled for them, but that's college politics. I don't think that Kean is going to change its methods. Nobody wants to hear the truth at the administration.

  • Posted by Eric Brown , Student on June 22, 2007 at 8:45pm EDT
  • I found it very interesting that the students were able to get their grade changed, especially from a dean from a different college that the class is under. This sends out a message to ALL Kean students that if ever they feel they need to drop a class past the deadline they can do so because its that easy. I find it not fair because I can remember I knew I was failing a class a couple days after the withdraw day but was adviced to stick in the class because of missing the deadline. I think the dean didn't take into consideration ANYTHING regarding this situation. Also for the Provost to say that it's not the students fault, they were only doing what they were advised is way off because the dean didnt pick the students out, the students went to the dean.