News, Views and Careers for All of Higher Education
April 9, 2007
For four decades, the University of California at Los Angeles has administered the Cooperative Institutional Research Program Freshmen Survey, recording the values, attitudes and backgrounds of the high school graduates who will become the next batch of American college students. Their self-reported answers form the backbone of a large trove of data that has served to illuminate trends in higher education.
Today, UCLA’s Higher Education Research Institute is releasing a broad overview of trends gleaned from the survey. The report, “The American Freshman: Forty-Year Trends 1966–2006,” highlights some striking changes in the makeup of college freshman classes, many of which confirm widely reported trends — but not without a few surprising findings.
Amid reports documenting the widening gap between the lowest and highest earners in America, as well as concern among educators that selective institutions are mainly the domain of the financially advantaged, it might not come as a surprise that today’s freshmen are the most well-off since at least 35 years ago — with median incomes 60 percent above the national average, as compared to 46 percent above average in 1971. The report also highlighted a difference between public and private incoming freshmen: the income of families sending students to public institutions is rising faster than that for students at private colleges.
Income Gap Between National Average and Median Parental Income of Freshmen (2006 Dollars)
|
Type of Institution |
1971 |
2005 |
|
Public |
$17,800 |
$25,600 |
|
Private |
$27,300 |
$35,700 |
Meanwhile, two developments in students’ attitudes toward life provide either contradictory or nuanced responses — depending on one’s point of view — about financial goals and altruism. Being well-off is students’ number-two priority (73.4 percent) — second only to raising a family — but helping others comes in third, the highest it’s been as a priority in 20 years.
The percentage of freshmen last year who predicted they’d participate in community service also increased significantly, while being a community leader was rated more important than ever (about a third considered it “very important” or “essential"). The report also noted the increased engagement in community service at the high school level, although it wasn’t clear how much of that was due to college admissions pressures and graduation requirements. Instead of concluding that today’s students are becoming more materialstic, John H. Pryor, director of the CIRP survey, interpreted these trends as showing that students are “very interested in raising families and helping others, both of which are accomplished with greater ease if one is well-off financially.”
These trends have been ongoing within a rapidly changing demographic environment. In 1971, 90.9 percent of first-time, full-time freshmen were white, while today the percentage is down to 76.5. Since then, all minority groups have made attendance gains, although at different rates and some, like African Americans, already reached their numerical peak and, due to various factors, have slowly decreased their share of the freshman population.
|
Racial/Ethnic Group |
1971 |
1980 |
1990 |
2000 |
2006 |
|
White |
90.9 |
84.1 |
80.7 |
76.1 |
76.5 |
|
African American |
7.5 |
12.5 |
12.1 |
10.4 |
10.5 |
|
American Indian |
0.9 |
0.8 |
1.3 |
1.9 |
2.2 |
|
Asian/Asian American |
0.6 |
1.4 |
3.8 |
7.1 |
8.6 |
|
Latino/a |
0.6 |
1.4 |
2.2 |
6.7 |
7.3 |
|
Other race |
1.0 |
1.7 |
1.8 |
3.6 |
3.6 |
|
Multiracial |
1.3 |
1.2 |
1.7 |
4.8 |
7.2 |
The report also highlighted several other trends:
Want it on paper? Print this page.
Know someone who’d be interested? Forward this story.
Want to stay informed? Sign up for free daily news e-mail.
Advertisement
The article says that there is a significant “Income Gap” between the “national average” and the “median parental income of freshmen.” But the article doesn’t say whether the “national average,” against which the frosh parents are being compared, is an average of those in a comparable age bracket. If the “national average” is of a couple in their mid-thirties, and the parents of frosh average, say, in their mid-forties, then wouldn’t that be relevant to the comparison?
CTMathewes, at 7:05 am EDT on April 9, 2007
It comes as no surprise to me that their is a large body of conservative students on college campuses who believe that speech should be censored. Nor is it a surprise that, as a percentage of all students, conservatives are twice as likely to support censorship as self-avowed liberals. Having taught for years at a university in the South, I was accustomed to conservative students who expressed amazement that liberal views could be expressed vocally and in print without government intervention. This is alarming, and certainly goes against the values of traditional conservatism, which opposed government intervention and regulation of the private actions of citizens.
Scott, Ast. Professor at Carroll College, at 7:45 am EDT on April 9, 2007
The article notes that women still are underrepresented in science and engineering, but it does not mention the fact that women outnumber men in all other areas. In fact, women are suceeding in college at a substantially higher rate overall.
Stan Vittetoe, Senior VP at St Petersburg College, at 7:50 am EDT on April 9, 2007
Andy,Thanks for a helpful summary of this stalwart report. It provides a handy format for updating our faculty. My hope is that this report finds its place among strategic planning teams, but alongside other reports that collectively provide a fuller context, such as the HERI, NSSE, SSI, and various surveys noted in Randy Swing’s materials (Policy Center for the First College Year, Brevard, NC). Nonetheless, this report is cross-indexed with many others and your handy review will indeed find its way into many of them. Thanks.
Jerry Pattengale, AVP for Scholarship and Grants at Indiana Wesleyan University, at 9:00 am EDT on April 9, 2007
This article states:
“The report also highlighted a difference between public and private incoming freshmen: the income of families sending students to public institutions is rising faster than that for students at private colleges.”
But the table in the article shows that the increase in the income gap for publics over the past 40 years in 2006 dollars rose at 44 percent while the income gap for privates rose at 31 percent. The income gap for public institutions is, in fact, catching up to the income gap for private institutions. The 40 year problem, of course, is that either one rose at all.
C. Anthony Broh, Director of Research Policy at Consortium on Financing Higher Education, at 10:06 am EDT on April 9, 2007
While women may outnumber men in their entrance to and graduation from higher education, they are stiil not being retained in the workforce nor are they being promoted to top positions in most fields. The 7 year limit for tenure track faculty tends to coincide with most women’s last years at full/easier fertility so this needs to be changed as women should not be penalized for their biological predisposition to have children.
Indigo, at 2:25 pm EDT on April 9, 2007
Interesting material. Their presentation from ACPA/NASPA ‘07 is online:http://www.gseis.ucla.edu/heri/PP...R_NASPA-ACPA_04-07.ppt#256,1,Looking at the Past, Shaping the Future: Getting to Know Our Students for the Past 40 Years
shannon, coordinator of res life, at 2:45 pm EDT on April 9, 2007
“Students’ self-confidence in academic ability continues to soar, with 68.6 percent considering themselves “above average” or in the top 10 percent of their peer group.”
Garrison Keillor would be proud.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lake_Wobegon_effect
Chris, at 3:45 pm EDT on April 9, 2007
In your article “40 Years of Change” published nationally today it was stated that “a difference between public and private incoming freshmen: the income of families sending students to public institutions is rising faster than that for students at private colleges” (between 1971 & 2005). In percentages this is correct and may be used against publics. However, in reality this is far from correct because the private income difference has grown by $8,400 while the public incomes have grown by $7,800 during the same period. Additionally, this means that the difference between the two (private versus public) has increased from $9,500 to $10,100.
King Alexander, at 9:55 pm EDT on April 9, 2007
Stan, shhhh. . . don’t emphasize that point so much.
Anon, at 8:35 pm EDT on April 22, 2007
Advertisement
or search for jobs directly.
Job Description: Teach Astronomy classes
Duties of Position:
see job
In the historic, coastal city of Charleston, the Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC) offers a wide range of ... see job
The Department of Music in the Faculty of Arts at the University of Alberta invites applications for a tenure track position ... see job
The University of Minnesota is a premier employer and a talent magnet attracting leading faculty and staff from around the ... see job
Posting Description: The Movement Disorders Program in the Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery has an ... see job
Salem State College is an equal opportunity / affirmative action employer. Persons of color, women and persons with ... see job
East Carolina University, a constituent institution of the University of North Carolina, is a doctoral institution with an ... see job
Located just north of Houston, Texas, our five campuses serve 1,400 square miles. Our student enrollment is nearly 50,000 in ... see job
Located just minutes from the nation’s capital on a hillside in residential Arlington, Virginia, Marymount University seeks a ... see job
DEAN – PHYSICAL EDUCATION Job #FCM997 STARTING DATE January 2, 2009 BASIC FUNCTION Under the direction of the Chief ... see job
It is interesting that the survey states that conservative students are considerable more likely to back an institution’s right to control its invitations to speakers. This is interesting primarily because it is the conservative speakers who most often get disinvited by the institution or heckled to the point of exclusion while at the unversity by liberal students —according to the majority of newspaper accounts that I have seen.
Larry, at 1:55 pm EDT on August 11, 2007