Search News


Browse Archives

News

Surge in Distance Ed at Community Colleges

April 16, 2007

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

Community college enrollment growth is increasingly coming from online students, leading many institutions to create extensive online student service operations. Many of those institutions are also considering a shift in their course management systems -- just as Blackboard's purchase of WebCT would seem to have solidified its dominant position in that market.

Those are some of the key findings from a new study on e-learning in community colleges, released Sunday at the annual meeting of the American Association of Community Colleges. The study was conducted by the Instructional Technology Council, a group of nearly 500 colleges -- almost all of them two-year institutions -- with a strong interest in online education. The council has been doing similar surveys of its members for several years, but shifted gears this year to conduct its survey from the full membership of AACC, hoping to get a more accurate picture of distance education at community colleges.

In the survey -- completed by 320 institutions, a representative sample of community colleges nationally -- the council found that online enrollments had increased by 15 percent on average over the last year, during a period when community colleges' total enrollment was up by 2 percent.

In addition, 70 percent of responding institutions reported that there was more student demand for distance learning than they could meet.

"I think this shows that this is the area where a lot of the future growth and vitality of community colleges will be found," said Fred Lokken, a member of the board of the council who presented the data at the AACC meeting, in Tampa.

Lokken, associate dean for e-learning at Truckee Meadows Community College, said that his institution's experience was consistent with the national report. Of the roughly 6,000 FTE students enrolled at the Reno institution, 24 percent are enrolled in online programs. Their numbers have increased 26 percent in the last year, compared to a 4 percent overall increase.

Over 95 percent of the online students are from Nevada, the vast majority of them from the same part of the state Truckee Meadows serves with in-person classes. "We are tapping the regular student," Lokken said. In fact, he said he "would love to do away with the phrase 'distance education' " because so few community college online students are really at a great distance.

Other findings in the survey reflect the continued growth of online education at community colleges and the sense that it is becoming normal, not exceptional. Sixty-four percent of those responding (the survey was completed by those who run distance education) report to either a vice president for academic affairs or a dean of students. Lokken said that previous surveys had found smaller percentages reporting to academic officials, as opposed to IT administrators.

The shift to an academic reporting line makes sense, he said, "because the issue for growing programs is working with faculty and deans."

A few years back, those organizing distance programs at community colleges would complain that faculty skepticism was a big obstacle, but Lokken said that the survey found that is no longer the case. Relatively few distance education directors identified that as a problem (they were far more likely to identify as problems the need for more training for support staff, budget issues, and the need for student services for distance students).

"I think there has been real buy-in," Lokken said.

In selected areas, the survey did find that either faculty skepticism or pedagogical challenges were limiting the growth of distance education. These included: lab-based science, speech, fine arts, nursing, mathematics, industrial technology, foreign languages and computer hardware.

All the growth in enrollments has prompted many colleges to create significant online student services infrastructures, the study found.

In many categories of student services, all or nearly all colleges identified themselves as either having those services now or as planned for the next one-two years.

Status of Services for Online Students at Community Colleges

Service Currently Offer Plan to Offer in Next 1-2 Years
Campus testing center for distance students 69% 30%
Distance ed specific faculty training 92% 8%
Online admissions 77% 14%
Online counseling / advising 43% 35%
Online library services 96% 1%
Online plagiarism evaluation 48% 52%
Online registration 87% 13%
Online student orientation for distance classes 66% 33%
Online textbook sales 66% 33%
Online tutoring assistance 42% 57%

Another issue examined by the survey was the relative market share -- and potential for change -- in the course management software industry. The survey, conducted last fall after Blackboard's absorption of WebCT had cleared Justice Department approval, found to no surprise that the combined entity dominates the market. Of those in the survey, 43 percent were Blackboard customers and 41 percent identified themselves as WebCT customers, for an overwhelming market share for the combined company.

Moodle, Angel, Desire2Learn, Etudes, and Sakai were well behind. But in a sign that may provide hope for some of those competitors, 31 percent of respondents indicated that they were considering a switch in platforms in the next few years.

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Surge in Distance Ed at Community Colleges

  • distance learning
  • Posted by Dr. Michael Ginsberg , Associate Professor at Jefferson Community and Technical College on April 16, 2007 at 8:35am EDT
  • I'm not surprised to learn that distance education is growing in numbers.
    I'd like to see a serious study of the quality of distance education. Convenience and profit are not the only measures for judging educational programs; the "market" and "the marketplace of ideas" are not synonyms.

  • Distance Ed
  • Posted by Dr. Victoria McLure , Professor of English at South Plains College on April 16, 2007 at 9:30am EDT
  • After teaching online courses for several years, one of the serious problems I have run into is the quality of the students. Many think this is a way to avoid the rigors of the classroom, little realizing that their reading and writing skills must be above par if they are going to succeed. I think one of the measures of a quality distance ed program is how well the students are screened before they are allowed to enroll. Do they have the technology skills? Do they have the reading and writing skills? If all a college wants is money for enrollment, then they will set students up for failure because they will allow students who are not prepared for the class to enroll, just to get the money and the high numbers. If we are going to have quality programs, we need to look both at course content and at how students are recruited for the courses.

  • Posted by Joe Clark on April 16, 2007 at 9:45am EDT
  • If you're looking for comparison studies, a good place to start is with the "no significant difference phenomenon" (e.g. http://nosignificantdifference.wcet.info/faq.asp).

    On the other hand, for evidence that prejudice against online learning continues, see http://www.pilotmedia.com/adams/xPDF/dl_grad.pdf.

    This is not to suggest that schools aren't pursuing online learning as a cost-saving method. But the medium is not the problem. It's the overall push towards the factory model -- whether that's 500-seat lectures or online page-turners, neither allowing for interaction, reflection, practice, feedback....

  • Quality Distance Education
  • Posted by Megan Kean, MPA , Program Coordinator at Park University on April 16, 2007 at 10:10am EDT
  • Dr. Ginsberg noted in his comment, "I’d like to see a serious study of the quality of distance education. Convenience and profit are not the only measures for judging educational programs".

    I can tell you first-hand, both as an online student and as an administrator for an online Masters Degree program - the quality of online programs can be as high as, if not higher than, face-to-face learning. For example, students are forced to participate in discussions, and cannot just sit in the back of the classroom and zone out. Many courses are much more rigorous than many of the face-to-face classes I have taken in the past.

    Our Master of Healthcare Leadership program, for example, offers high-quality distance education to students who yearn for a true education - not just a degree. We don't pass students through, we don't accept plagiarism or academic dishonesty, and our classes are very rigorous. Some people do not expect this level of commitment from an online program, but we are here to change that conception.

  • Posted by Rob R on April 16, 2007 at 10:20am EDT
  • While this 'survey summation' article did not speak to quality, neither did it ascribe a profit motive to the increase in online. So, I wonder why the first two commentors believe that this phenomenon is driven by institutional avarice? The survey did indicate that most institutions felt they could not meet student demand for online.

    As to the quality question, I wonder why it is still being asked. To my knowledge, more scrutiny and assessment is performed in online programs than in face-to-face programs. Why is face-to-face instruction held to be the benchmark for quality?

  • Disagree.. Online is second best
  • Posted by Matthew on April 16, 2007 at 10:50am EDT
  • I have been both a student online and in a traditional classroom - in multiple universities. In my experience, online education is merely a second-best alternative especially when you consider the accelerated pace that is the norm for many online programs. In these situations, classes last only 6 weeks or less, there are no final exams (in many cases), and the interaction between students is gratuitous and not subject to the rigor that would be expected in an academic setting.
    Online looks great on the surface but when you dig a little deeper, the smell can get overwhelmingly sour. It surprises me that online education is accepted so quickly without the level of scrutiny that would be required of any other academic model.

  • Asynchronous Eduaction vs Synchronous Education
  • Posted by Greg Harris on April 16, 2007 at 11:06am EDT
  • As a graduate of two Online Schools I have to agree with Dr.McLure. People don’t release the dedication needed for Online Education; for me I had for many years been a fan of any alternative based education, from adult based high school continuing education to self studying based programs for professional licenses and factor in tenacity for any degree and I always kept trying. Along comes the internet and it was a perfect fit for me personally; however when others who saw my tenacity and hunger for a sharper mind they said… “Oh that’s what I need to do” and once there the complaints come flying…its too much work, why do I have to read those e- books or I need to talk to someone etc… Clearly some are mis –guided about what it means to get an education; furthermore I found many a younger person trying to beat the system even though most of these issues will be found in brick & mortar based education such plagiarism or intellectual property theft or out right cheating.

    I think the future of all education is going to be online and the above issues will become a thing of the past. I rec’d mines in technology and constantly watch the growth with regards to graphical interface ability, steaming capability and much coming from a technological standpoint. One aspect of computer based learning that is being researched and in my opinion will rock the whole educational world is called ‘Non-linear learning’. Non-linear learning is a concept that the younger game players will be exposed too and anybody who surfs daily. Moreover asynchronous communications which is at the root of online education is not so asynchronous anymore because of this newer technology. I hate to say this but we are living in a new frontier and the things of old will become older and older and those with the desire to learn ... actually learning; Online Eduaction will not just be for the gifted intellects but for all.

  • Online Ed takes a committment
  • Posted by Janie Sullivan , Faculty Development Specialist at Central Arizona College on April 16, 2007 at 3:46pm EDT
  • I teach online classes, I have taken online classes, I develop curriculum for online classes, and I facilitate faculty training for online faculty. While it is true that there are online programs that may be 'second best' as one person commented, if the institution, the faculty, and the student all understand the committment it takes to create and implement a successful online program, the end result will be a program that meets or exceeds the rigor of a brick and mortar school. Students in online programs have the luxury of taking classes from wherever and whenever they like, but the convenience of online learning should be the only thing that is easy about it. I have more interaction with my online students than I ever did in a f2f classroom and my students report that they have learned more in their online programs than they ever did in more traditional settings. I applaud the move to more online learning opportunities being offered by community colleges.

  • Quality Planning
  • Posted by Sheri Schmeckpeper , Director of Distance Learning at Central Arizona College on April 16, 2007 at 3:51pm EDT
  • This is a very informative article!

    Regarding quality, quality learning is not dictated by the delivery method. Quality, regardless of modality, is achieved through unified planning & implementation. The faculty needs to learn how to teach, students need to be adequately prepared, staff need to know how to set student expectations correctly, and the facilities/technology must be as invisible as possible.

    Institutions know how to support traditional education because it's within the "comfort zone." Online communication is different; it requires breaking molds. Like turning a massive ship, it takes a great deal of time and energy, but the outcomes of change can be highly rewarding and supportive of the learning community's needs.

    The educational industry has reached a point where many best practices have been proven, but it isn't at the point where institutions have evaluated, let alone embracee those practices. In most cases there are two primary barriers to quality in online learning: either the institution hasn't holistically learned best practices, or traditional decision-making is impeding the application of those practices.

  • Posted by Roy on April 16, 2007 at 4:01pm EDT
  • In reply to Matthew-

    I have also taken online classes. And I teach them in a community college as well. My experience does not mirror yours. I have not seen or participated in "accelerated" classes and don't see that as the "norm." There certainly are some but there are also as many, if not more, seated classes that are taught in accelerated mode.

    The final exams in the classes I teach are the same as those I use in seated classes. The students are required to actively participate in discussions of the subject matter. Nothing gratuitous here. It would appear that your experiences were less than satisfactory but I'm concerned that you brand all online education as smelling "overwhelmingly sour" because of your experiences.

  • Surge in Distance Ed at CCs
  • Posted by Mary Harris , Instructor of Physics at Glendale Community College, AZ on April 16, 2007 at 5:46pm EDT
  • Are there any studies that compare final grade distributions, retention rates and number of repeat students for traditional classes compared with online classes? Same student population, same curriculum, same course length, same testing modalities. My anecdotal evidence is that online students take the same class multiple times (and pay multiple times) before passing and that online average grades are less. If the point of online classes is to make money then this is exactly what we want, right?

  • Posted by Amy , Student at American Public University System on April 16, 2007 at 6:46pm EDT
  • I received my bachelor's degree the old-fashioned way, before anyone even heard of the internet (makes me sound really old and I haven't even hit 40 yet!). I am making a career change and am pursuing a master's degree in history at American Public University, which is 100% online. It is a regionally accredited university that employs faculty from around the country. Their primary pool of students comes from the military, but I happen to be one of the few students that is not in the military. I suspect that this is a fantastic option for military personnel who want to get a degree, but obviously cannot just drive to a classroom.

    In my opinion, the faculty make or break the education that I receive. Fortunately, most of my professors have been highly involved and do a fantastic job of teaching at an advanced level. However, I can definitely see the difference is one of my current courses. Professor R. has not been heard from one time on the discussion board and offers little feedback on our papers. I could have saved my $$$ for this class and just read the text, had the class not been required in order to graduate.

    Is this a problem exclusive to on-line learning? Of course not. I have had a few in-person courses with profs and instructors who have "checked out". However, it is more problematic in an on-line course because it is easy to feel isolated.

    With that being said, the academic standards for me are rigorous. There are required readings, essays, researcg papers, discussion board postings, and exams required of me just as if I were in a "traditional" classroom. I will have to complete a thesis and I do have an internship (yes, supervised from another state). While we will never replace the bricks and mortar, online learning IS here to stay. I would suggest that those who resist reconsider their positions because online learning is definitely not automatically "second best" just because it is online. The online degree needs to be evaluated within the context of the institution, just as we do with traditional degrees.