Search News


Browse Archives

News

Stage Fright

April 23, 2007

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

It was six hours before opening night. Sarah Holdren, director of a Yale University student production, had just entered the theater for a routine pre-performance errand when the man who runs the hall gave her an update: In the wake of the Virginia Tech shootings, a Yale administrator decided that she didn't want any weapons used or portrayed during theatrical productions.

Holdren was perplexed. Her show, Red Noses, is set in the Middle Ages and includes metal swords and daggers. But they are stage props. And there were no guns.

"I understand the university's need to react to Virginia Tech and display sensitivity, but dealing with it this way is ineffective," she said in an interview Friday.

Holdren said her main concern wasn't the limitation on her production but the limitation on artistic expression. She explained her objections in a Thursday meeting with Betty Trachtenberg, dean of student affairs at Yale.

According to Holdren, Trachtenberg, who did not respond to multiple messages for comment, was unmoved. The dean told Holdren that she needed to look out for a whole campus of potentially vulnerable undergraduates -- a response that Holdren said "made it sound as if I was trying to traumatize people."

Trachtenberg agreed to allow weapons that were obviously fake to appear on stage. Red Noses opened with wooden swords and some peeved cast members. Holdren wanted her commentary to be public record. So before the first production and with the full cast's blessing, the director stepped on stage and delivered this message to the audience:

"We cannot cure the violence of this world by limiting the artistic creations that seek to address it. Red Noses is a play about hope, joy and fellowship in the face of death and injustice.

It is a clear note out of a dark world, and I hope with all my heart that it may do something, no matter how small, to pierce the darkness of our world at the present moment. Taking a sword away from an actor does nothing save limit his ability to tell the story of a play as fully and clearly as possible. Calling for an end to violence on stage does not solve the world's suffering; it merely sweeps it under the rug, turning theater--in the words of this very play -- into 'creamy bon-bons' instead of 'solid fare' for a thinking, feeling audience. Here at Yale, sensitivity and political correctness have become censorship in this time of vital need for serious artistic expression.

Our swords tonight may be wooden, but our show aims to be much more than child's play. We hope our story lifts you and lightens you, for it is founded upon 'the mirth of children and sages, the mirth born of compassion and joy.' And such mirth will not be stifled, no matter the shadows of this or any other time."

Holdren said some in the audience applauded.

The weapons curtailment also has affected other productions on campus. Leah Franqui, student director of Accidental Death of an Anarchist, received an e-mail from Trachtenberg saying: "Given the events of a few days ago in Virginia I question, at this time, the use of even a prop hand gun in this (or other productions). I suggest that you find another way."

Franqui said her show will proceed without a gun this weekend when it opens.

"It's only used once in the show, but still I think the decision is ridiculous," Franqui said. "This is an inappropriate way to show support [for Virginia Tech]. It's an empty gesture and censorship of the arts."

Added Holdren: “This decision is permanent until further note -- who knows if it’s going to change in the next month. It's an odd thing hanging over our heads.”

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Stage Fright

  • Posted by Anton Pearce on August 24, 2007 at 4:25am EDT
  • Thanks for the article! I've had problems with stage fright myself so it's good to read other perspectives on this.
    I still get nervous any time I have to perform in front of others, but I find the best things to do are to be totally prepared, accept that a mistake doesn't mean the whole thing is a disaster and get your breathing under control.
    For anyone interested, another website that has articles and help for stage fright is www.stagefrighthelp.com

  • Violence on Campus
  • Posted by Sociologist With A Cape on October 23, 2007 at 7:00am EDT
  • Yale is foolishly and destructively making a meaningless gesture for ending violence while censoring artistic freedom. The university's reaction is simply ridiculous. I expect a more meaningful response from higher education to what is - all agree - a serious issue. Yale's position minimizes the real problem and belittles those who would genuinely like to address violence on campus in effective ways. From a social science perspective, I have to ask - does Yale have its hands on some data that links weapons in theater to violence on campus or are logical evidence-based decisions a thing of the past? What's next, banning fake Twinkies in theater to curb obesity?

  • Stage Weapons?
  • Posted by Craig C , political pundit at http://blogresponder.blogspot.com on April 23, 2007 at 6:55am EDT
  • Obviously, Trachtenberg isn't up on current events. Mr Cho wasn't a drama student, and did not obtain his weapon from the drama department.

  • Empty Repertoire
  • Posted by Jane Robbins, PhD on April 23, 2007 at 7:30am EDT
  • I believe this applies to all 37 of Shakespeare's plays, and would render more than half of them farcical at best.

  • Zero Tolerance Strikes Again
  • Posted by Keith Johnson on April 23, 2007 at 9:15am EDT
  • This story is quite similar to an incident that took place on the campus of the local high school here (ETHS--Evanston Township High School). Needless to say, the school has a "no guns on campus" policy.

    The high school theater department was putting on a play in which a police officer appeared, and the student in full police uniform was stopped because his uniform included a holster with a toy pistol when he left the theater to go to the washroom. Aside from suspending the offender, the administration demanded that the play be changed to eliminate the "gun" and eventually it was.

    What happens on high school campuses eventually works its way onto the college and university level, it would appear.

  • Posted by Bob on April 23, 2007 at 9:20am EDT
  • I think the phrase "hoisted by her own petard" is perfect in this situation.

  • Dumb Dean
  • Posted by ACLU on April 23, 2007 at 9:20am EDT
  • Censorship pure & simple. Where's the faculty outcry?

    Does the Dean know Yale has a fencing team?

  • whose bright idea was this?
  • Posted by Larry on April 23, 2007 at 9:25am EDT
  • “Used or portrayed.” Considering that just about all drama (including the equivalent of old chick flicks like “Romeo and Juliet”) involves some weapons, this is beyond silly. Perhaps a more sensible policy would be to limit the use of life ammunition in theatrical productions.

  • Where to draw the line?
  • Posted by Katherine Burke , Weapons in art at Purdue University on April 23, 2007 at 9:55am EDT
  • The decision to remove prop weapons from the stage is an insensitive, knee-jerk choice that assumes that Yale audience members cannot make sophisticated artistic observations. Perhaps the administration should put a parental block on all television shows that contain simulated murders as well.

    Will all artistic representations of weapons be banned? Perhaps the images will all receive labels: "This is not a gun."

  • Extreme Censorship Lunacy
  • Posted by John Lobenstein , Mr. at Common Sense School of Learning on April 23, 2007 at 10:40am EDT
  • The intellectual capacity and perversions demonstrated by Betty Trachtenberg in her position as an administrator speaks volumes about the non-educational environment that has been, or is being, created at our institutions of higher(?)learning.

    I want to believe that by the time our young people have progressed to the competency level required to enroll at Yale, in this case, that they are quite capable of separating real life situations from the imagery displayed during a stage production.

    What percentage of the audience were actually 'poor' little innocent overly impressionable undergraduates? What was the average age of the audience? What have their life experiences include? Is Betty Thrachtenberg qualified as a physiologist therefore able to make these determinations?

    Ms Betty Thrachtenberg; while you have your head buried in the sand hiding from reality do not open your eyes, it can be painful.

  • "Et tu Eli"
  • Posted by Frizbane Manley on April 23, 2007 at 12:35pm EDT
  • He was stabbed on the steps of the Forum

    Even though there wasn’t a quorum;

    But to stage it at Yale

    Will land you in jail.

    "Et tu Eli!" ... you’ll bore-em.

  • Trachtenberg Should Resign
  • Posted by JHC at Yale on April 23, 2007 at 12:41pm EDT
  • Trachtenberg is playing the fool. This total disregard of academic freedom damages Yale. This reactionary policy weakens our institution's good name and her absurd notion that state props propagate real-world violence makes a mockery of those of us who study the causes of violence.

    Trachtenberg's policy mirrors the stupidity of those who would arm all students and faculty as a solution to the crazed acts of an insane student.

  • Posted by JBM on April 23, 2007 at 1:00pm EDT
  • "Holdren said her main concern wasn’t the limitation on her production but the limitation on artistic expression."

    Not to mention the limitation on freaking common sense.

  • If Leah Franqui Complies With The "Request" She Weakens Us All
  • Posted by Pat on April 23, 2007 at 1:25pm EDT
  • Trachtenberg hasn’t demanded that director Franqui remove the handgun from her production of Accidental Death of an Anarchist, instead she only “suggests” that she find another prop.

    If Leah Franqui censors herself and complies with this suggestion, she will demonstrate to the world just how little Yale cares about academic freedom.

    Oppressors like Trachtenberg are only empowered by those who comply with their suggestions. If Yale taught it’s students about academic freedom, they’d know to not comply—instead Yale is famous for not giving tenure to scholars like David Graeber and others who are punished for using their academic freedom.

  • rational gun control
  • Posted by Prof on April 23, 2007 at 1:25pm EDT
  • Actions like Trachtenberg's feed the far right's image of the left and make it more difficult to advocate for rational gun control measures.

  • Trachtenberg infantilizes the Arts
  • Posted by Drew VanDyche , Assistant to the Provost at JFK University on April 23, 2007 at 3:20pm EDT
  • I attended a performance of "West Side Story" at the College of Marin (Kentfield, CA) back in the 90's where one of the prop weapons, a blank-filled gun, which was aimed at Tony, the male lead, did not go off as planned. Instead, one of the quick-thinking drummers did a rim-shot…about 3 seconds too late; an admirable attempt, but one that also sent ripples of mirth throughout the audience. This was unfortunate as the whole drama - all of the fear, tension, love, beauty and power to be found in this tragedy, climaxes with that one shot and during this particular performance, that power was lost. Through the Arts, we have the opportunity to provide students with a safe place for emotional catharsis, to give them a darkened sanctuary where emotions can be felt and processed without fear of reprisal. The theatre has the potential to bring the individual into the moment of a shared experience, experiences that are often out of the realm of a person's daily life. Unless a drama is specifically written, designed and crafted to utilize a symbolic imagery of inauthentic weaponry and wooden swords, such a mandate as Trachtenberg has given serves to infantilize the art form and the audience, robbing them of the possibility for catharsis. For it is when we are NOT given a refuge and an environment where our emotions can be felt without judgment and a haven where full emotional expression with protective boundaries is present - this is when we have wounded souls prone to implosion, and angry souls full of explosion set at large with emotional violence. The world of the theatre and the world of psychology and spirituality (not religion) are the few places where the whole human being is acceptable. By her misguided censorship, Dean Trachtenberg dis-empowers her student body and renders another arena of our world impotent to address the realities of humanity.

  • Play Weapons
  • Posted by Les on April 23, 2007 at 3:35pm EDT
  • When I was a student in the 60's, we would not have hesitated to stage the play as planned. If there had been repercussions, we would have organized a sit-in, a teach-in, or other similar action. Such nonsense should not be tolerated. Bring back free speech!

  • Stage Fright
  • Posted by arch on April 23, 2007 at 4:45pm EDT
  • Typical academic gun-phobic reaction. Where I live, it is fairly easy to get a hand gun permit. Fill out a form, pay $20, and you're good to go.

    I intend to carry my own weapon on campus, regardless of the rules. If a student had shot Cho after he had killed 5 people, do you think Va Tech would have punished him?

    Student have 2nd amendment rights, too. This week, they may not want to bet their lives on campus cops.

  • Posted by Todd Ristau , Director, MFA Playwriting Program at Hollins University on April 23, 2007 at 4:45pm EDT
  • This does three bad things simultaneously.

    It trivializes the rational debate on gun control.

    It demonizes the arts as irresponsible promoters of violence rather than celebrating the arts as a vehicle for commenting on the violence in our society which already exists.

    It gives fuel for conservatives to attack the percieved lunacy of the liberal academics in this country.

    But maybe some of the loudest of the conservative pundits will now come out stridently for more prop guns on campus, as they have for lifting the weapons ban on college campuses and encouraging students and faculty to arm themselves.

    The world, unfortunately, is becoming more like a Dario Fo play every day...and I guess that is what they mean by the death of irony.

  • to last comment
  • Posted by DBeth on April 23, 2007 at 5:10pm EDT
  • Don't worry, we've planned an "art-in" for later in the week. (This will include petition signing/doodling, juggling and flamenco guitar.)

  • Typical of Yale's Climate of Fear
  • Posted by O'Brien on April 23, 2007 at 9:25pm EDT
  • Yale really is the armpit of American academic freedom. How dare these frightened faculty and students so quickly cave to such outrageous limitations of academic freedom. Why are they such cowards? Do they realize that their decision to go along with this censorship endangers us all, or don't they care? Yale has come to represent exactly what it means to “play it safe” in American academia.

    ‘Veritas’ my ass, how about ‘Cowardice?’

  • Yale is for cowards
  • Posted by Wilhelm Scream on April 24, 2007 at 5:15am EDT
  • What's the matter with these faculty? Doesn't anyone have TENURE at Yale? Don't they have any standards of Academic Freedom? I'm at a third tier university and no administrator could get away with telling me to do this--and I wouldn't even if they did. Why does Yale have such academic freedom whimps? Why did Sarah Holdren decide to whine to her audience instead of standing up for what is right?

    What a let down.

  • Spaghetti
  • Posted by Shiangtai Tuan on April 24, 2007 at 5:20am EDT
  • The drama dept should thank the thoughtful and politically correct Dean to help cut down the budget. From now on, Hamlet, and for that matter, Romeo, only need to hold one spaghetti in each hand for dueling.

  • Posted by Lisa , student at Yale on April 24, 2007 at 5:20am EDT
  • Hey, don't be so harsh on the theater students so soon. When something like this is sprung on you without warning, it's hard to know what to do; will rebellion mean risking losing performance space (already at a premium)? If the administration dares to take such a bold, foolish action, what might it try against dissenters?

    The administration took several days after the shootings to announce this policy and it makes sense that it should take a few days for the student response to crystalize out. There is a definite sense of outrage, not only among theater students but among all those concerned with art or free speech; the groups are forming, the letters are being written, and the acts of protest are being organized.

    So do not judge too harshly when a producer decides that less harm is done by voicing her objections but playing along than by making a fuss that could prevent her message being seen at all.

  • Play guns
  • Posted by Les on April 24, 2007 at 8:30am EDT
  • My apologies to Yale students. The students involved did respond in a mature, thoughtful way. And I am glad to learn that they are not letting the matter drop. The idea of an art-in with other actions sounds right!

  • WHY I'M POMO NO MO
  • Posted by Lev on April 24, 2007 at 10:10am EDT
  • I'm a former Yale grad student who left in disgust two years ago. Everywhere I looked I saw an faculty and students who so embraced a form of postmodernsim that left them unable to take meaningful political action. They talked a good lefty critique, but when it was time for action they all had salons to attend.

    This latest episode and the awful response of students and faculty shows exactly how out of touch with reality these clowns are.

    They are getting what they deserve. I am sure they will write endless essays deconstructing what they have allowed happen to them, but they don't have the skills or mindset to do anything about it.

    Typical for Yale...

  • Stage Fright at Yale
  • Posted by Hazel on April 24, 2007 at 1:35pm EDT
  • Yale University gave us George W. Bush. This is the man who was awarded a Yale diploma and famously said, decades later as US President: "The trouble with the French is they don't have the word 'entrepreneur' in their language."

    THIS from a Yale Graduate!! So why should anyone be surprised that there may be an endemic problem in one of America's great bastions of higher education?

    Could George W. Bush pass the vocabulary test on today's SAT? Could the president of the university pass the comprehension test?

    The verdict is out.

  • Time for a Reality Check
  • Posted by Henry Bowman on April 24, 2007 at 2:40pm EDT
  • I checked the calendar -- it wasn't April 1. I checked the URL -- it wasn't The Onion. I checked the dateline -- it wasn't Bizarro World (or even Massachusetts).

    Unbelievable.

    Yes, you bet this sort of thing undercuts the "movement for rational gun control" because that's an oxymoron to begin with -- all weapons control not based on individual due process is based on an irrational phobia. When you ask one of the "movement" leaders to name a ban that they feel goes beyond rational, they will refuse to answer.

    When banning guns actually RAISED the violent crime level in England and Australia (the violent crime rate in England is now FIVE TIMES that of the US!), they added knives, swords, box cutters, toy weapons, and even glass mugs and bottles in pubs to the ban. None of it worked, of course, but when "rational" control inevitably fails its proponents are forced to travel farther and farther down the road of irrational control.

    We thank the Yale staffers responsible for giving us a preview of where this lunacy ultimately leads. Consider it a valuable learning experience.

  • In all fairness
  • Posted by Morgan on April 24, 2007 at 8:30pm EDT
  • To be fair to these directors, if they were students, they do not have tenure and are not protected from the whims of the Deans on their campuses. To speak out to the audience before the production was a risky move if the administration is so controlling, and this may have been the only recourse for the studet directors.

  • Posted by mark on May 13, 2007 at 8:25pm EDT
  • As always, administration seeks to 'right' wrongs it knows it cannot possible exercise control over in the real world by finding examples within its control. Again, as always, the administration act with fear and panic whilst the student show themselves to be the calm, clear minded, intelligent, thoughtful people the administration wants them to be.