News, Views and Careers for All of Higher Education
May 9, 2007
One day last year, Kristin Tichenor came across an article from a local paper about a high school student who had won all the science honors in her school and was going to enroll at Worcester Polytechnic Institute, where Tichenor is associate vice president for enrollment management.
That’s normally the kind of clipping that someone in admissions would love — great free publicity. But a quote caught Tichenor’s eye. The accepted student said “I"m really excited to be going to WPI — my guidance counselors told me I’d never get in because of my test scores.” Tichenor was curious and looked up her test scores, which in fact were “squarely” in the middle range of those accepted to the institute.
To Tichenor, it reinforced the way “people misperceive that test scores drive the admissions process” and don’t even know what test scores are considered acceptable. This fall, WPI will no longer require the SAT — joining a movement of 700-plus colleges that has been growing in recent years. That trend has been most evident among liberal arts colleges. WPI will become the first competitive science and engineering focused institution to make the leap — which is being hailed by critics of the SAT.
“The significance of the WPI announcement is that even a school with a heavy emphasis on quantitative skills — arguably among those best measured by the ACT/SAT — can do high-quality, competitive admissions without requiring test scores,” said Robert Schaeffer, public education director of the National Center for Fair & Open Testing. He called the announcement “a strong rebuttal to those who
suggest test-optional policies only can work at small, liberal arts colleges.”
Like most of the colleges that have dropped SAT requirements, WPI will still accept the scores, and Tichenor predicted that most applicants would continue to submit them. Those who wish not to will take what the institute is calling its “Flex Path” in admissions. They will be required to submit examples of academic or extracurricular work that shows their skills in organization, creativity or problem solving. Examples include written descriptions of science projects, robotics design concepts, research papers, Eagle Scout projects, entrepreneurial projects, or actual inventions.
Applications have been increasing at WPI, which this year had just under 5,700 applications for a class of about 800, admitting around 3,700. Students average class rank is the 11th percentile, and the SAT average (excluding writing) is 1290 (678 on mathematics). While WPI has been pleased with enrollment growth, it has wanted more diversity in its classes. About 25 percent of students are women, and the numbers for black and Latino students are low (49 combined in this year’s freshman class of 777).
Tichenor said that in discussions, admissions officers have been asking “who isn’t here?” and what WPI could do to attract those groups. At the same time, she said, her office was studying the students who are most successful at WPI, and finding little correlation to SAT scores. Meanwhile, some students with very high SAT scores were floundering. The conclusion the admissions team came to was that high school grades in strong math and science courses in high school were the key factor, not test scores. (The change will be in place for at least five years, while WPI will study the success rates of those who do and do not submit SAT scores.)
“Obviously we want to make sure that the students we admit are successful, but all of our internal studies have found the the SAT is not the best barometer,” Tichenor said.
She added that she hoped the policy shift would attract more female and minority applicants — as has been the case at other institutions that have dropped testing requirements.
Caren Scoropanos, a spokeswoman for the College Board, said that the group respects the right of colleges to decide whether or not to require the SAT, and that WPI’s move was “not being viewed with alarm.”
But Scoropanos said that the College Board believes that SAT scores “rounded out by grades” are the best way to predict college success. She said that grades are subjective and so the SAT allows colleges to see where students fit. With the SAT, she said, “colleges and universities are losing an important national measure.”
Want it on paper? Print this page.
Know someone who’d be interested? Forward this story.
Want to stay informed? Sign up for free daily news e-mail.
Advertisement
My daughter took the SATs because some of the schools to which she applied required them. She did not send them to those that did not require them. She said no matter what the scores were, she wouldn’t send them, because colleges needed to be encouraged not to require them.
Maybe if more students took some responsibility. . . .
Judith, It isn’t just the schools, at 4:20 pm EDT on May 9, 2007
I, in general, believe in objective measurements. I, however, disappointed by the response of Ms. Scoropanos. For one, ignoring what happened is just not right. For two, to support her statement, she should have provide her supporting material.
“The conclusion the admissions team came to was that high school grades in strong math and science courses in high school were the key factor, not test scores.” What is mean to me is that there are ways to measure the ability. And if SAT failed to measure it, they must didn’t employed the right measurement. However, this doesn’t mean it can’t be done.
The major problem of Grade is that they are standards with no standards. And I would like to see anyone that oppose the objective measurement can provide a solution to resolve the standards of no standards problem.
Duncan, at 12:15 pm EDT on May 10, 2007
An admissions office can choose not to include the data in their evaluation....but student’s self-selecting to not include the test say a lot about either:
a) their insecurity with how the test reflects on their abilities
b) a belief they can hide mediocrity
c) a mismatch between the student’s perception of their abilities and what the test reflects
None of the above are particularly well-correlated with future success.
steve, at 4:05 pm EDT on May 13, 2007
I can’t stand behind any kind of evaluation of academic aptitude when the integrity of its own standards are constantly changing to appease its sponsors. In fact, the SAT acronym has no meaning behind the three big letters that determine our college career. Yet it sits atop the collegiate gates directing us into our scholastic sanctions.
Objective testing: I can stand behind that. Although, there must be a definitive understanding of the complexities that encompass the very unique minds of today’s students. That must be injected into the constitutions of our objective academic assessment testing. The means to our academic ends are convoluted with a wide array of detriments. For example: Societal standing, educational advantage, learning disability, etc. These are the considerations, jettisoned, leaved the standardized to become arbitrary rule.
The idea behind the SAT, evaluation to determine isn’t the issue. Perhaps it’s the standardized nature of the object that is the real problem.
kristie, SAT means nothing at Yale- art, at 4:15 pm EDT on May 26, 2007
Advertisement
or search for jobs directly.
ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF REGIONAL ADMISSIONS (NY/NJ Metro Area) Chatham University, a thriving dynamic institution with three ... see job
FGCU, a member of the State University System of Florida, is a comprehensive university created to address the educational ... see job
UNIVERSITY OF LA VERNE Admission Counselor, Office of Admission #2960 The University of La Verne has an opening for an ... see job
BSC is one of the largest and most exciting centers for higher education in the commonwealth. Here in our idyllic setting, ... see job
Eastern Illinois University has a 113 year legacy as an intellectual focal point in central Illinois. Its acclaimed programs ... see job
University College Cork is seeking to recruit outstanding researchers at Professorial and Lecturer levels to strengthen ... see job
Join the Pack! A community with nearly 8,000 faculty and staff, and 30,000 students. NC State is one of the largest employers ... see job
The University of Minnesota is a premier employer and a talent magnet attracting leading faculty and staff from around the ... see job
The University of Minnesota is a premier employer and a talent magnet attracting leading faculty and staff from around the ... see job
The University of Minnesota is a premier employer and a talent magnet attracting leading faculty and staff from around the ... see job
Every time I see one of these articles I think of the president of Reed College’s op-ed in the New York Times. Willfully ignoring the unsubmitted low test scores but considering the submitted high test scores smacks of rankings prostitution.
Ed, Rutgers University, at 1:45 pm EDT on May 9, 2007