Quick Takes: Purdue Renews Investigation, NCAA Punishes Temple, Yale Press Sued, Tufts Magazine Sanctioned, Medical Schools Get Poor Grades, New Reason for Newspaper Theft, Community Colleges and Teacher Ed, Gender Gap Narrows for UK Faculty
Purdue University announced Thursday that -- in part because of a request from a Congressional leader -- the institution was continuing its investigation into concerns about the research on "bubble fusion" conducted by Rusi P. Taleyarkhan, one of its professors. The findings have been questioned by others, but an earlier Purdue probe found no misconduct. Thursday's announcement stated that the university actually started an investigation into new allegations shortly after a faculty panel in February concluded that there was no evidence of misconduct. Based on conversations with Rep. Brad Miller, chair of the House Committee on Science and Technology's investigations subcommittee, Purdue will now take additional steps, such as adding one or more outside scientists to the review.
The National Collegiate Athletic Association on Thursday announced that Temple University would be on probation for two years and would have to vacate certain tennis game scores because of a series of violations by the former coach. During the 2004-5 academic year, according to the NCAA, the former coach permitted an ineligible student to practice and play, and during the spring 2005 season, the former coach directed an athlete to compete under the name of another athlete. Ann Weaver Hart, president of Temple, issued a statement agreeing with the NCAA's action and noting that the university had fired the coach and instituted other reforms when it became aware of the situation.
Yale University Press is being sued for libel in connection with the publication of Hamas: Politics, Charity, and Terrorism in the Service of Jihad, according to The New Haven Independent. KinderUSA says that it is a legitimate charity and was unfairly discussed in the book. The group's suit charges, among other things, that the Yale press did not do any fact-checking for the book -- a charge denied by Yale officials.
A judicial panel at Tufts University has found that The Primary Source, a conservative magazine at the university, harassed black students with the publication of a parody Christmas carol titled "O Come all Ye Black Folk," the Associated Press reported. An editor must now sign off on all published work, and the student government was urged to consider the magazine's conduct in allocating future funds. The parody led to protests -- and an apology -- in December, but some supporters of the magazine have also said that the incident raises issues of free expression.
Very few medical schools have adopted policies to adequately limit the influence of pharmaceutical companies in encouraging the use of certain drugs or treatments, according to a new report from the American Medical Student Association.
You've heard of the theft of student newspapers by those offended over various kinds of news coverage, but here's a new one: Nearly 1,000 copies of the newspaper at Framingham State College, in Massachusetts, were stolen, apparently because of a photograph showing female students in tank tops cheering at a lacrosse game. The MetroWest Daily News reported that some of the students were apparently upset because they believed the photo made them look fat.
The Education Commission of the States has released a new report on issues related to teacher education at community colleges. Because teacher education programs are four years, the report calls for better coordination between the programs at community colleges, four-year institutions, and the schools hiring teachers.
Male faculty members at British universities earned an average of 14.1 percent more than female faculty members in comparable positions in 2005-6, a decrease of 0.3 percentage points in a year, according to research covered in The Guardian. Generally, the gaps were smaller at younger universities than at the older, more research-oriented universities. At only one institution -- the University of Arts -- did female pay on average exceed male pay for comparable positions.
Comments on
Quick Takes: Purdue Renews Investigation, NCAA Punishes Temple, Yale Press Sued, Tufts Magazine Sanctioned, Medical Schools Get Poor Grades, New Reason for Newspaper Theft, Community Colleges and Teacher Ed, Gender Gap Narrows for UK Faculty
Publishers Duty?
Posted
by William Sumner Scott, J.D.
on May 11, 2007 at 7:55am EDT
The Yale Press case will ferret out the First Amendment.
Every academic should become informed and express an opinion.
Hopefully, to conclude that the thoughts expressed are those of the author only.
William Sumner Scott, J.D.
Judicial Equality Foundation, Inc.
wss@jefound.org
Book on Hamas
Posted
by Mathew
on May 11, 2007 at 9:25am EDT
The outcome of this case will be of interest to anyone who believes in applying accepted scientific standards for scholarly publications. Facts are the ultimate judge of truth in a scholarly publication, not opinion or politics. Propaganda works are best left to other outlets, not academic presses. Far too long have elite academic institutions used their academic presses for propaganda purposes. They need to be challenged.
Posted
by S.D.
on May 11, 2007 at 9:45am EDT
Three cheers for Tufts Judicial committee!! Too bad Central Connecticut State University didn't have the guts to do the right thing with their newspaper - that published the article about how ugly women should just lie there and enjoy a rape.
Posted
by Weibing
on May 11, 2007 at 11:20am EDT
This is a great list of stories. Judicial censorship at Yale, Administrative censorship at Tufts and reader censorship at Framington. Elite publishing houses are certainly having their propaganda stifled.
So courageous
Posted
by Unapoletically Tedious
, Math teacher
on May 11, 2007 at 11:20am EDT
"Three cheers for Tufts Judicial committee!! Too bad Central Connecticut State University didn’t have the guts to do the right thing with their newspaper — that published the article about how ugly women should just lie there and enjoy a rape."
How brave you must be to champion censorship at a higher ed. talk forum. Tell me, what punishment should be handed out to people in the general public who express the wrong opinions? What government agency should be deployed to stomp out thought crime? The Ministry of Truth maybe...
It’s all censorship – and it hurts those it purports to help
Posted
by Larry
on May 11, 2007 at 2:25pm EDT
SB, If a newspaper wants to say that people should “enjoy” a crime, then your remedy is to publish an editorial saying that they shouldn’t enjoy it. For example, some people say that you should enjoy smoking pot. (Usually possession, not "smoking" is a crime.) Other people say that you shouldn’t. These arguments are rather silly, and strangely enough because you think that they should be suppressed (because, it seems, upon gazing upon them, people might irrevocably change their mind), you have given them legitimacy. Nice going!
I don’t see how any newspaper can “harass” someone. And so what if it is racist? If people disagree with the underlying message they can publish something that rebuts it.
Look folks, I would much rather be around people that make racist jokes and make their prejudices known then people that cover them up with the language of bureaucracy or HR-babble. If these students want to make a permanent record of their racism, I say: go ahead. By censoring them, you are allowing them to remake themselves into “fair-minded” individuals and they can subtlety exercise their discretion on racist grounds without any way of knowing their motivations.
Bubble Fusion Controversy - More Beneath the Surface
Posted
by Steven B. Krivit
on May 11, 2007 at 2:25pm EDT
The devil is in the details -- there is much more to this story than reported here.
As someone who has spent the last six years investigating controversial science, I have a good sense of the difficulties of new, poorly-understood science.
The challenge of replication in unchartered scientific territory is not to be taken lightly and readily dismissed as "evidence" of non-science. Many people in the field of science, when pushed, will admit that one can never prove a negative, no matter how may attempts fail.
I am also keenly aware of the multitude of human issues in high-profile science; among these, intellectual property, intellectual primacy, competition for funding and grants.
The bold, outspoken criticisms of respected scientists in the popular media do not always make it easy for the lay reader to distinguish between science fact and science politics.
The important question to ask here, is, why all the fuss, and why a Congressional inquiry about who is listed on a science paper?