Search News


Browse Archives

News

Much More Money for Veterans?

May 14, 2007

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

Given the growing gap between G.I. Bill benefits and rising college tuitions, and the growing sentiment that the troops need to come home sooner rather than later, it’s not surprising that Congress is considering action to welcome veterans back with better educational benefits.

"When we are talking about truly honoring service and truly taking care of the people who have served in an affirmative way, I can't think of a better thing to do than to allow them to reach the level of their talent with the type of educational assistance that will allow them to go to any school that they can get into,” Sen. Jim Webb, a Virginia Democrat, said during a Senate Committee on Veteran Affairs hearing last week. “We're not seeing that today."

Under the Post-9/11 Veterans Educational Assistance Act of 2007, sponsored by Webb and described by the senator as “a mirror of the World War II G.I. Bill,” members of the military who have spent at least two years on active duty -- including those who have served in the Reserve and National Guard -- would be eligible for varying levels of educational benefits for up to 36 months based on time served (under the proposed act, at least some of a veteran's active duty service would have to have fallen after September 11, 2001, to be eligible for the enhanced benefits).

The bill would enable eligible veterans to receive payments covering tuition -- up to the cost of in-state tuition at the most expensive public college in a veteran's home state -- room and board, fees, educational costs and a $1,000 monthly stipend. Currently, under the Montgomery GI Bill – described by Webb at last week’s hearing as “a peacetime G.I. bill" – the monthly cap on educational benefits for active duty personnel completing an enlistment of three years or more is $1,075, with the benefits maxing out at $38,700 after 36 months, or four academic years.

Kimberly Hunter, a spokeswoman for Webb, said via e-mail that she is hopeful the committee will mark up the proposed measure within the next month. The bill has already received endorsements from a number of veterans' organizations for restoring G.I. benefits to something akin to their post-World War II form.

Yet the legislation has already run up against resistance from the Department of Veterans Affairs. In testimony last week, Daniel L. Cooper, under secretary for benefits, criticized the bill for its complexity and its cost. Although Hunter said the senator’s office is currently getting the legislation priced by the Congressional Budget Office and expects to have a cost estimate within the next month, the veterans affairs department already has its own estimate, and it is not insignificant: The department estimates a $5.4 billion cost during the 2008 fiscal year and a $32.2 billion expenditure for 2008 through 2012. In his written testimony, Cooper also suggested that the bill, if passed, “may lead to lower reenlistments.”

While Congress debates whether or not to spend the big bucks on educational benefits, many individual campuses have stepped up in recent months to enhance the benefits they deliver to veterans on their own. Among the most recent efforts, Western Michigan University’s Board of Trustees approved the new Returning Veterans Tuition Assistance Program at its April 27 meeting. The program will offer a free first semester for veterans so they can get started on their educations as they wait for their veteran affairs' benefits to take effect. After their free first semester, eligible veterans at Western Michigan can now expect to pay in-state tuition rates, regardless of their state of residence.

“It just struck me that a lot of these soldiers coming home" are facing problems getting their paperwork processed that could sidetrack their educations, said Dan Pero, chair of Western Michigan's Board of Trustees. Pero wondered, he said, "what can we do at Western for those coming home to make their transition better and also to provide a shot in the arm for our own enrollment?”

"This is a win-win situation," Pero said. “This will give a returning soldier an opportunity to enroll while they’re sorting through this nightmare of paperwork.”

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Much More Money for Veterans?

  • Education $$ for Vets
  • Posted by Sgt April Loza on October 1, 2007 at 4:35pm EDT
  • I entered the National Guard right after 911 and after going through basic I was deployed to Iraq for 18 months ... now after serving for 6 years I recently received a letter stating that I will no longer receive any more money for my education. I took classes online while stationed in Iraq and have been enrolled every semester since along with working fulltime...I am on the deans list with a high GPA and I will not be able to continue without the financial support I was receiving because I did not re-enlist. I only have 2 semesters till I could have graduated. :-(

  • GI Bill
  • Posted by Josh April , Student at University North Carolina Wilmington on July 23, 2008 at 9:15pm EDT
  • It is great to see the government increasing the GI Bill and all but it is not going to help me or others in my situation at all. Like most other veterans who served during and much after 9/11, we are either close to being finished with school or are done already. I know I wont see any back pay for my bills I have aquired over the years and it really disapoints me. Not to sound selfish or anything but if their going to make somthing like this happen make sure we all get the benefits next time. Thanks.

  • school
  • Posted by A Thomas , LPN on January 12, 2010 at 6:00pm EST
  • I was in the Army from 95-01 and got out just before 9/11 but was inactive guard. Can I still use the post 9/11 benefits? Wanting to go back and get my RN and have the GI bill but that helps only so much!

  • Why?
  • Posted by L.L. on May 14, 2007 at 7:35am EDT
  • Higher education costs have been rising faster than general inflation for years. While complaints about educational quality and outcomes have been rising.

    And the Democrats want to give HE more money? With no clauses for standards, outcomes, and fiscal restraint?

    Why not just take money directly from the U.S. Treasury and set it on fire? Wouldn't that be easier?

  • Veterans education benefits
  • Posted by feudi pandola on May 14, 2007 at 10:35am EDT
  • I hope this legislation passes. Our veterans have suffered and endured far more than is fair over the past few years. They deserve kudos for the job they've done and if the public can help them with their education, then we should do so.

  • only in the US....
  • Posted by ML on May 14, 2007 at 11:20am EDT
  • Only in this country would the reason for not giving veterans benefits be because they might not re-enlist. Pathetic.

  • Amazing!!
  • Posted by Patrick on May 14, 2007 at 12:40pm EDT
  • Its about time we step up and help our veterans with a real GI Bill, next thing would be in state tuition for our servicemembers where ever they chose to reside. Can you imagine, Illegal immigrants receive in state tuition in many states, but servicemembers who dont have residency must pay out of state!!! crazy!!!

  • Nutmeg State has a great veteran's program
  • Posted by stm60 at UConn on May 14, 2007 at 2:30pm EDT
  • I am proud to say that blue state Connecticut betters most states in that combat era veterans do not pay any tuition within the state system. For virtually any degree.

    And I have never heard a single taxpayer complain.

  • question on CT
  • Posted by Larry on May 14, 2007 at 4:45pm EDT
  • STM, Does that go for the law school, too?

  • Posted by stm60 at UConn on May 14, 2007 at 5:40pm EDT
  • Larry,

    Yes it does. That's how I got my JD in fact. As I age gracefully in fact, I can go back and take "enrichment classes" at local CCs.

    One does not have to serve in combat or a combat zone. Just serve during a certain time period.

    "Educational Benefit/Tuition Waivers

    State law provides that tuition fees at state educational institutions be waived for certain veterans and certain dependents.

    Approved institutions for this benefit are:

    State Regional Community/Technical Colleges

    State Universities

    In order to be eligible for a tuition waiver, one must:

    Be a veteran who served 90 days of active duty during a period of war as defined in; and

    Have been accepted to an approved institution; and

    Be a Connecticut resident at the time of acceptance to the institution.

    A veteran’s dependents can also qualify for tuition waiver if the veteran is declared missing in action while serving in the armed forces after January 1, 1960."

  • Posted by abram on May 15, 2007 at 4:45am EDT
  • As a veteran over the course of '00-'04 it is comforting to know that others understand the widening gap bewtween a benefit that is a converation starter in terms of serving and its actual value.

    Although I would MOST LIKELY have served regardless it is quite frustrating to realise that my benefits had depreciated in value approximately 15% over the 4 years I served.

  • Posted by tim on May 16, 2007 at 8:00pm EDT
  • As a veretan, I used the GI Bill in the early 80's when it almost covered the cost of my tuition at a public university, but then again, I guess I shoudn't have expected more as I wasn't a member of the "greatest generation". They got theirs, so they didn't need to enhance the GI Bill when they were firmly in control. In any event, the time to enhance the GI Bill is long past due!

    Unfortunately, neither of my two Senators, Cantwell and Murray, has yet signed on as a cosponsor of Senator Webb's legislation despite their professed "support" for the troops.