Search News


Browse Archives

News

Quick Takes: Harvard Approves Gen Ed Reforms, Intelligent Design Backer Appeals Tenure Denial, Pace President Quits, File Sharing Shut Down, Out Coach Out of Job, Canadian Dispute on Distance Ed, Budget Fight, Push for Tax Credits, The Summers Settlement

May 16, 2007

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement
  • As expected, Harvard University's Faculty of Arts and Sciences on Tuesday approved a final set of changes in the university's general education requirements. While there has been considerable tinkering and quibbling over parts of the plan, it has been widely praised -- at Harvard and elsewhere -- as a much needed shift. The changes outline certain broad subject areas as required, while giving students choice within those subject areas.
  • Guillermo Gonzalez, an assistant professor of physics and astronomy at Iowa State University, is appealing his tenure denial, and his fellow supporters of "intelligent design" are saying that he is being punished for his views, The Des Moines Register reported. Gonzalez has gained fame and some notoriety at Iowa State for supporting the theory, which is widely viewed by scholars in biology as sham science. Iowa State issued a statement outlining the tenure process and noting that Gonzalez was evaluated and rejected for tenure by his department, department chair, a college committee, a dean, and the provost. Gonzalez has the right to appeal to the president, and his appeal is pending.
  • David Caputo, who has been under fire as president of Pace University, will retire June 3, Crain's New York Business reported. Faculty and student groups have pointed to funding shortfalls at a time that top administrators have earned generous salaries.
  • Ohio University announced Tuesday that unauthorized file sharing on its network has "virtually stopped" after two weeks of monitoring for unauthorized file sharing. Notices from the Recording Industry Association of America about illegal file sharing dropped from nearly 10 to 50 per day down to almost zero, the university's chief information officer said. Ohio's original plan to block all peer-to-peer file sharing other than for students and faculty members who requested exemptions was controversial for potentially limiting valid uses of the technology. But since then, Ohio has upgraded its system to filter out illegal file sharing while leaving most legal file sharing untouched.
  • Kyle Hawkins -- a rarity in college athletics as an openly gay male coach -- has been told that his contract for leading the University of Missouri at Columbia's club lacrosse team will not be renewed, the Associated Press reported. Officials and team members said that Hawkins was not losing his job because he is gay, but because of concerns about his practice philosophy and his reputation outside the university. Before he came out, Hawkins gained a wide following on a Web site about gay athletic issues, Outsports, by writing as "Frustrated Coach" about what it was like to be a closeted coach at a university with a major athletic program.
  • A legal dispute in Canada -- in which the British Columbia Supreme Court banned Vancouver University Worldwide from granting degrees -- illustrates the difficulties governments face in regulating distance education, Maclean's reported. While the institution has its headquarters in the province, officials say that the degrees are printed, signed, and awarded elsewhere -- so the government shouldn't have regulatory authority.
  • Republicans and Democrats in the U.S. House of Representatives are sparring over a provision in the proposed Congressional budget resolution. GOP lawmakers said in a letter Tuesday that the provision would allow Democrats to use the budget reconciliation process, which is designed to raise funds to reduce the deficit, to inappropriately enact policy changes that would help the government's direct student loan program at the expense of the guaranteed loan program. College leaders are watching the outcome of this fight closely, because the provision in question -- which would allow the mandatory spending portions of the Higher Education Act to be attached to budget balancing legislation -- is very much designed to use savings from reduced subsidies and increased fees for lenders to bolster the Pell Grant and other student aid programs, as well as to cut the deficit.
  • A think tank that promotes help for low- and moderate income families is urging Congress to revamp federal higher education tax credits to make them more widely available to the needy -- ideally by making them refundable, so that even citizens who don't pay significant taxes can benefit from them. Officials of the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities discussed a new report on the subject during a conference call Tuesday in which they urged the Senate Finance Committee, which is preparing to release a set of proposals to alter the college tax breaks and other federal tax policies, to ensure that the changes benefit low- and moderate income students and families more. Some proposals under consideration by the committee would expand existing benefits for the middle class, while others would make the Hope and Lifetime Learning tax credits -- or possibly one merged tax credit -- available to recipients further down the income ladder. Class tensions have surrounded the tax credits ever since they were created in the second term of the Clinton administration, and given the limited availability of federal funds now, any plan to alter the breaks are likely to exacerbate those tensions. And the discussions are especially fraught for higher education officials because Finance Committee leaders are contemplating requiring any new funds for college tax breaks to be paid for with revenue from higher education, too -- possibly by eliminating the tax-free nature of tuition benefits for college employees, which has long been a target for some in Congress. A spokeswoman for the Finance Committee said Tuesday that it was premature to discuss the panel's plans.
  • When Lawrence H. Summers moved out of Harvard's presidential home, he wasn't short on housing options. The Boston Globe examined details of his settlement with the university -- reported on a Harvard tax form -- and found that in addition to a year's sabbatical, he received salary additions and a $1 million home loan, which requires only interest payments from 2010 to 2014 and payments on principal and interest after that.
See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Comments on Quick Takes: Harvard Approves Gen Ed Reforms, Intelligent Design Backer Appeals Tenure Denial, Pace President Quits, File Sharing Shut Down, Out Coach Out of Job, Canadian Dispute on Distance Ed, Budget Fight, Push for Tax Credits, The Summers Settlement

  • Posted by Ed Comms Professional on May 16, 2007 at 11:40am EDT
  • Re: Gonzalez: I am constantly amazed at the fact that higher education institutions are supposed to be a marketplace for competing ideas, yet when it comes to creationism vs. evolution, we all must say "Seig Heil" to the evolutionist party line . . .

  • Vancouver University Worldwide
  • Posted by Alan Contreras , Administrator at Oregon Degree Authorization on May 16, 2007 at 11:40am EDT
  • The problem isn't that Vancouver U Worldwide is authorized to issue degrees elsewhere and has a branch office in Vancouver. The problem is that the entity has no legal authority to issue degrees from ANY jurisdiction. Therefore when Mr. Rodgers says that the degrees are issued elsewhere, he needs to be asked "where? Under what authority?"

    Degree mills such as VUW often assert that a private right to issue degrees exists, with no requirement to meet standards set by an external oversight entity. That is not true anywhere in North America, and in the few situations in the world in which it is true, almost all degree providers located there are fakes.

    VUW degrees are illegal for use in Oregon and many other states because they are issued without legal authority. We are very pleased to see the British Columbia government take serious action against the many fake colleges operating there.

  • Evolution
  • Posted by Erasmus on May 16, 2007 at 12:30pm EDT
  • Um....there is a little thing called the scientific process. As soon as the ID folks can make their theories fit with established scientific methodology, maybe they will have some credibility.

    Claiming that man coexisted with dinosaurs hardly makes the grade.

  • You know?
  • Posted by Buzz on May 16, 2007 at 2:15pm EDT
  • "Um....there is a little thing called the scientific process. As soon as the ID folks can make their theories fit with established scientific methodology .."

    So -- what does Darwin have to do with astronomy? Inquiring Darwinists want to know.

    Anyone who thinks there is freedom of speech in academia for the untenured has a fool for a guide.

  • Speaking of fools...
  • Posted by Aimee on May 16, 2007 at 3:20pm EDT
  • Anyone who thinks that the Missouri club lax coach wasn't fired because of his sexual preference has their head in the sand, too.

  • Gonzalez and ID
  • Posted by Geoff on May 16, 2007 at 3:20pm EDT
  • It must be completely out of Mr. Gonzalez’s realm of possibility that he would just be denied tenure on merit. I am not familiar with his record, or with his work so cannot speak specifically about this canse, but it always seems that some Christians cry foul the loudest when they perceive their own beliefs to have been used against them, but are blissfully ignorant of how many Christian values and beliefs marginalize others every day.

    Regarding ID (creation) vs. evolution, what I have never understood is why THIS topic is a line in the sand for those that believe in a Christian-like beginning of the Earth. I never hear people challenging whether light was created on Earth the day before the Sun was created, or whether the Earth orbits the Sun. What makes creation the hot button topic?

  • Darwin and Astronomy
  • Posted by BrokenNote on May 16, 2007 at 3:45pm EDT
  • "So — what does Darwin have to do with astronomy?"

    On one level, nothing, so it's not unreasonable--in the absence of specific information to the contrary--to infer that Gonzalez's tenure denial actually didn't have anything to do with his views on "Intelligent Design," except perhaps to suspect that his work in astronomy and physics is of the the same caliber as the analysis that leads him to believe in "Intelligent Design."

    On another level, Darwin was a thoughtful and insightful observer of the bases and methodologies of scientific inquiry in general, which does apply beyond the specific discipline of biology, so, really, Darwin does have to do with astronomy!

  • Evolution v. Creationism
  • Posted by Comm Prof on May 16, 2007 at 8:00pm EDT
  • Despite Ed Comms Pro's assertion to the contrary, academia is a forum for competing ideas. The above debate, however, does not qualify for nor deserve serious attention because one is testable scientific fact and the other is ignorant superstition.

  • Gonzales at ISU
  • Posted by Arthur Frederick Ide on May 16, 2007 at 8:00pm EDT
  • Born in 1963, coauthor of two books, Gonzales is anything but a seasoned or impartial author. The book that stirred the final controversy (A Privileged Planet) was published by Regnery of Chicago--a company that went from publishing classics to hate literature. Carl Ernst, an academic scholar of Islamic studies, says that the Regnery Publishing is 'promoted and supported by right-wing organizations, who are perpetuating a type of bigotry similar to anti-Semitism and racial prejudice.' As an example, Ernst notes that Robert Spencer, whom Ernst views as an Islamophobe, publishes some of his books through Regnery.

    Few reputable scholars would even consider this press as fit for their serious studies. It has the dubious distinction of publishing such tripe as "Unfit for Command" by the "Swiftboat Captains" who have been exposed repeatedly as charlatans and fakes.

    ID has no place in astronomy, and no reputable science would accredit it as a valid scientific study--it belongs in the area of religion and mythology.

  • Proof's in the pudding
  • Posted by Buzz on May 17, 2007 at 5:25am EDT
  • " .. published by Regnery of Chicago — a company that went from publishing .."

    See? There is ideological "diversity" in academia. And the Castro Street gang did wait until Rev. Falwell's body was 45 degrees before having their outdoor celebration.

    Just another example of why public support for academia is declining -- "freedom for me, but not for thee, I know better than you." Doubtful -- ever.

  • Posted by Comm Prof on May 17, 2007 at 7:50am EDT
  • "freedom for me, but not for thee..." ? Come on, Buzz, where'd you get that? Freedom is for everybody; nobody is trying to silence people with odd beliefs. You seem to believe, though, that there is some sort of accompanying right to be taken seriously. There is not.

  • Posted by Evolution Is STILL Just A Theory on May 17, 2007 at 7:05pm EDT
  • Sorry, but as much as some would like people to believe that evolution is a fact, it is NOT. It is still a THEORY. Sorry to interject a little truth here . . .

  • You so smart, you need to be free
  • Posted by Buzz on May 17, 2007 at 8:05pm EDT
  • " .. nobody is trying to silence people .. You seem to believe, though, that there is some sort of accompanying right to be taken seriously. There is not .."

    Thanks for proving the cases of David Horowitz, ACTA, FIRE, et al. A lot of taxpayers don't take academics seriously due to their serious detachment from reality; most don't laugh in their faces.

    If public academia believes itself so above the fray -- let it leave the public payroll and start up private colleges. That is real freedom.

    BTW: I'm a Darwinist. But I'm willing to listen if there is mutual respect. Academia has gotten what it has sown.

  • "Just" a Theory
  • Posted by BrokenNote on May 18, 2007 at 9:40am EDT
  • "Sorry, but as much as some would like people to believe that evolution is a fact, it is NOT. It is still a THEORY. Sorry to interject a little truth here. . ."

    Sure, macroevolution (to be specific) is "just a theory" -- just like gravitational attraction ... general relativity ... quantum mechanics ... genetic inheritance ...

    The problem isn't that evolution is "just" a theory. Evolution *is* a theory, and one that's been rigorously tested, which is a very specific and impressive thing. As a theory, evolution has more than enough confirming evidence and explanatory power to be overwhelmingly accepted by the people who have actual professional expertise in the field, on its merits.

    "Intelligent Design," on the other hand, doesn't rise to the level of a scientific theory. It's not "just a theory," it's NOT EVEN a theory. It's not falsifiable, for one thing. And the "evidence" marshaled on its behalf is mostly along the lines of "Gee, it all seems so complicated, I can't imagine any way that could have happened except for some really smart big person thinking it up."

    Whatever "Intelligent Design" is, it's not science, and therefore doesn't belong in a science curriculum, or serve the basis for advancement in a scientific endeavor.

    Seems pretty basic, but in a Science class, one should actually teach Science!

  • Update on Gonzalez
  • Posted by Buzz on May 21, 2007 at 7:20pm EDT
  • Stories appeared today about his pub-record -- very strong. Wow.