Search News


Browse Archives

News

Education Dept.'s New College Chief

May 23, 2007

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

The White House and the Education Department announced late Tuesday that President Bush has nominated Diane Auer Jones, a seasoned Washington policy expert with significant campus experience, to be assistant secretary for postsecondary education, the department's primary higher education job.

Jones, nominated to fill a job that has been vacant since Sally Stroup left for the House of Representatives Education and Labor Committee in March 2006, has had a remarkably diverse array of jobs within multiple sectors of higher education and in the research and postsecondary policy world. She actually began work (unannounced) at the department last week as principal deputy assistant secretary in the Office of Postsecondary Education, and before that had been deputy to the associate director for science at the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy since early 2006.

Before taking her post in the science office, Jones spent three years as a lobbyist for Princeton University. That job was preceded by a stint as acting staff director for the research subcommittee of the House Science Committee, and by service as a program officer in the National Science Foundation's undergraduate education division.

A molecular biologist with a bachelor's degree from Salisbury University and a master's from the University of Maryland-Baltimore County (where she also completed doctoral coursework), Jones spent nearly most of the 1990s as a laboratory manager and professor at the Community College of Baltimore County, where she established the Biotechnology Institute and started several companies.

Terry W. Hartle, senior vice president for government and public affairs at the American Council on Education, characterized the nomination of Jones -- which requires Senate confirmation -- as a "terrific appointment." He described Jones as having a "very different background from anybody else who's ever had that sort of position," background that will "obviously give her a great deal of insight into academic issues."

"It's very important for the assistant secretary to be somebody who knows how government works," Hartle said. At the same time, he added, the "people who have not done very well" in the department's top postsecondary job are those who "didn't have much background in higher ed. Obviously Diane has that."

The big question, Hartle said, is how much influence Jones can have in the relatively short time she is likely to have in the job from the time she gets confirmed (after a background check, etc.) and until the Bush administration's time is up in less than 18 months.

"Taking over in the waning days of an administration" is a challenge, he said.

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Education Dept.'s New College Chief

  • Riiiggghhhttt...
  • Posted by Keegan on August 7, 2007 at 4:20am EDT
  • Look, if you can't finish the Ph.D., you lose credibility with almost all academics -- good or bad, that's the way it goes folks. Before I finished my dissertation, I taught at a high school and a CC, and frankly, while CC's are enormously important and valuable for higher ed, they are nothing like four-year universities and colleges. I can see into the internal movitvations Ms. Jones (or anyone), but she fits the pattern of officious know-nothings who are not intellectuals but glory and money-seeking paper shufflers. I don't know of a single, high (or even mid-level) college or university that would higher her to teach molecular biology -- the competition for those positions is too stiff and goes to those with proven records.

  • A Resourceful, Unique Pro
  • Posted by Rob Bannister , educator on August 19, 2007 at 5:45am EDT
  • Diane Auer Jones will make her mark in the short period of time she will serve as Asst. Secretary for Post-Secondary.

    Those who scoff at her qualification, lack of PhD or elite academic credentials on her transcript, without taking into account the totality of her experience only some of which is published in various biographical sketches are in for a real surprise.

    Ms. Jones is a brilliant, hard-working, quick-learning professional who not only has tremendous knowledge of higher education and areas in which it needs reform, she is a multifaceted talent whose unique background and experience gives her special qualifications to provide leadership on higher education issues that she would never have gained had she followed the conventional "up the ladder" academic progression.

    While her academic and public policy background is substantial; additionally, she enjoyed some unique experiences which help her understand higher education's benefits and short-comings as seen by business and industry as well as the greater public and private sectors. Further, Ms. Jones has gained her broad Washington experience while fulfilling her role as a working mom deeply involved in her children’s education home-schooling them part of the way.

    To suggest Ms. Jones "fits the pattern of officious know-nothings who are not intellectuals but glory and money-seeking paper shufflers" shows the point-of-view of a person who has no knowledge of Diane Auer Jones’s unique talents, what motivates her, or why she is such a brilliant choice in the twilight of the Bush Administration. These are simply generic criticisms that must be promptly dismissed as having absolutely no merit. The logical fallacy of the suggestion is obvious.

    As someone who has had the pleasure of working with Ms. Jones in the past, I will warn her critics, she is no stranger to low expectations and exceeding them to the highest degree. Stand back while she proves you wrong. You'll not find a more conscientious, fair-minded, thorough, imaginative professional willing to make the sacrifices required of public service. Her motivation has nothing to do with status or finance. Her new position is another step on a remarkable journey for a truly unique person who had dedicated her life to the benefits of learning and discovery.

  • Posted by Dr Elaine R Parent on May 23, 2007 at 2:40pm EDT
  • Here's hoping that she is confirmed. Being what appears to be an ABD (all but the Dissertation) surely sensitizes her as the filing grade that graduate institutions should receive in meeting respectable accountabily standards to the nation. This does not include as well the 50% (over all disciplines) who start but do NOT complete the doctorate. The fate of women, especially in the sciences, is even more precarious. Perhaps she can institute the needed reform in graduate education!

  • Jones appointment
  • Posted by Fred Flener , Retired at University Professionals of Illinois on May 23, 2007 at 3:35pm EDT
  • I have no idea whether Jones would be effective in her role as chief guru for higher ed, but I chuckle at the suggestion that she obviously has higher education experience -- as a cc professor? It merely highlights the dimwitted nonsense the Bush adm. seems to pump into their agenda. I wish Jones well, and I am the last person who would argue that a Ph.D is necessary to take on the task, but don't try to pump up her academic credentials. Until she spends time at U of Maryland, or Johns Hopkins and produces an academic paper or two don't claim she has significant higher ed experience.

  • Nice
  • Posted by Buzz on May 23, 2007 at 5:00pm EDT
  • " .. but I chuckle at the suggestion that she obviously has higher education experience — as a cc professor?

    What a lovely, back-handed comment. Anyone who knows anything about Mr. Bush and higher ed knows that he's big on the "cc." But that takes effort to read and think. Pity.

    " .. It merely highlights the dimwitted nonsense the Bush adm. seems to pump into their agenda."

    See above.

    Yes, Bush, like Kennedy-Kerry-Hilliary, is a hack. Thanks for stating the obvious -- Michael Moore should be calling you, soon.

    " .. Until she spends time at U of Maryland, or Johns Hopkins and produces an academic paper or two (sic) don’t claim she has significant higher ed experience."

    Why .. of course. U-Md is just like Ann Arbor and Berkeley, and Hopkins is the Harvard of the Mid-Atlantic. And the builders of higher ed all had PhDs prior to their rise to power.

    This reminds me of what Dave Chappelle (whose parents are academics) told Wayne Brady's workers:

    "Run! Get out! While you still have a chance!"

  • Good Choice Near the End
  • Posted by G. Casper , Grants writer on May 24, 2007 at 7:40am EDT
  • Congratulations To President Bush for making a good choice in Diane Jones. It is refreshing to see that the White House can occasionally make a wise decision in its remaining reign.

    I am please to see that she has a strong science background. A good role model for future women in science/education/politics.

    Yes, she has a background in the cc area of education. Let's not be too arrogant you university folks. That is one of the major negatives in Education in the U.S., today. The inability of K-16 educators and administrators to get along with each other. The condescending attitudes are so petty and are really an indication of insecurity on the part of the arrogant ones.

    Maybe Ms. Jones can achieve something positive in the next 18 months to give the Bush administration a feather in its cap! It could use one.

  • Reply to other comments
  • Posted by Fred Flener , Retired on May 24, 2007 at 12:35pm EDT
  • I never criticized Jones for her cc experience. I have no problem with having someone like her taking on the higher ed agenda. What ticked me off was the white house trying to impress others with there claim of significant academic experience. Why not simply argue that she was successful in business and has a lot of management experience, etc., but no--they had to give her a resume that is misleading and in a sense diminishes her real qualifications.

  • Of course
  • Posted by Buzz on May 28, 2007 at 9:25am EDT
  • " .. What ticked me off was the white house trying to impress others with there claim of significant academic experience .."

    Of course. Working with the executive managements of Princeton University, National Science Foundation, and American Association of Universities has nothing to do with higher ed.

    Those Bush people are so stupid -- Joy Behar is right.