Quick Takes: Challenge to Benefits in Ky., Foreign Enrollment Rebound, Tenure Denied at Iowa State, Resignation at MIT, Tuition for the Undocumented, Syracuse Shifts Teams, Carnegie to NSSE, $100M for Illinois, Westminster Stays a College, Growth in India
Kentucky's attorney general, Greg Stumbo, on Friday issued an opinion saying that the University of Kentucky and the University of Louisville violated the state's Marriage Amendment, which restricts marriage to male-female couples, when the universities created domestic partner benefits for their employees. The problem with the benefits programs, Stumbo said, is that they establish criteria for domestic partner status, and thus violate a part of the amendment that bars the state from creating any same-sex status "substantially similar" to marriage. Stumbo told The Louisville Courier-Journal that the universities could legally offer benefits to couples of any sex who are not married if the universities just said that they would provide the benefits to anyone who lives with a university employee. University officials told the newspaper that they were still studying the opinion. The attorney general's opinion does not carry the force of law, but Stumbo indicated that he would sue the universities if they do not change their policies.
The National Science Foundation has released more evidence showing the rebound in foreign enrollments in the United States. In 2005, first-time graduate enrollments of foreign students in science and engineering was up 4 percent over 2004, the first increase since 2001. While total foreign enrollments in science and engineering were down, the first-time enrollment figure is considered crucial because most programs last several years. The NSF data are consistent with a series of surveys from the Council of Graduate Schools, which have found that the post-9/11 drops are being reversed.
Gregory Geoffrey, president of Iowa State University, announced Friday that he was denying a tenure appeal from Guillermo Gonzalez, whose supporters say that colleagues in the physics and astronomy department rejected his tenure bid because of his support for "intelligent design," a theory used to challenge the overwhelming scientific consensus about evolution. In his statement, Geoffrey said that he could not say much about any personnel decision, but he said that he based his decision on such factors as Gonzalez's publication record, his ability to attract outside grants, and the number of graduate students he has supervised. The Discovery Institute, an anti-evolution group, denounced Geoffrey's decision and blamed it on hostility to intelligent design. The Des Moines Register reported that its analysis of Gonzalez's record found that he obtained but a fraction of the average grant totals his departmental colleagues earned.
A professor who is executive director of the Center for Biomedical Innovation at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology is leaving the university to protest its decision not to reconsider a controversial tenure denial, The Boston Globe reported. Frank L. Douglas, the professor who is quitting, sent an e-mail to officials there in which he said that they broke an agreement to reconsider the tenure bid of James L. Sherley -- a pledge that MIT says it never made. Sherley, who is black, says that racial discrimination was a factor in his tenure review. Sherley went on a 12-day hunger strike in February and has indicated that he may resume the hunger strike if MIT does not reconsider his case. Faculty members involved in the case have said that race had nothing to do with their tenure decision.
The Connecticut House and Senate have now passed legislation to allow students who finish four years of high school in the state, and who lack the legal right to be in the United States, to pay in-state tuition rates at public colleges and universities in the state, The New Haven Register reported. Gov. Jodi Rell has not indicated if she will sign the bill.
Alexander C. McCormick is moving from directing the Carnegie Classifications, at the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, to become the new director of the National Survey of Student Engagement, effective in 2008. NSSE, which has become increasingly influential as colleges look for ways to document their effectiveness, was created by George Kuh at the Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research. Kuh will continue to direct the center.
The University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign will receive a $100 million bequest, with some funds being spent during the donor's lifetime, to support science and engineering programs, the Chicago Tribune reported.
Many colleges declare themselves universities once they add even a few graduate and professional programs and Westminster College, in Utah, appeared to be headed in that direction when a college-appointed panel recommended the shift. The idea had both fans and critics at the college. On Saturday, at commencement ceremonies, President Michael Bassis made a surprise announcement that the college would stay a college. "I believe that 'college' -- with all that term implies about an intensely personal, student-centered learning environment -- most adequately captures Westminster’s distinctive value and appeal," he said.
India's government has announced plans to create "central universities" in each of the 16 states that do not have at least one, The Hindu reported. There are currently 20 central universities, but several states have more than one. At the same time, the government is preparing legislation to regulate non-Indian colleges seeking to set up campuses in the country. The Times of India reported that the legislation would give foreign institutions more leeway than Indian institutions on admissions and fees, but that the plan would also include significant financial requirements, including a rule that any surpluses be invested in operations that serve Indian students.
Comments on
Quick Takes: Challenge to Benefits in Ky., Foreign Enrollment Rebound, Tenure Denied at Iowa State, Resignation at MIT, Tuition for the Undocumented, Syracuse Shifts Teams, Carnegie to NSSE, $100M for Illinois, Westminster Stays a College, Growth in India
Tenure Case at MIT
Posted
by Puzzled
on June 4, 2007 at 10:30am EDT
I'm puzzled by the protest at MIT where one professor went on hunger strike and refuses to vacate his lab after tenure denial, and a colleague has resigned his lab position. The first professor is claiming racial discrimination, but MIT tenures fewer than half of ts junior faculty. The fellow got no positive recommendations from department colleagues or his dean. He seems to want to be tenured because of his race and because of work he did prior to his current position. He insists that the provost grant him tenure unilaterally but now refuses to communicate with the provost. His website shows two first-authored publications back in 2002, and two last-authored of many authors in 2003 -- at a research institution!
Should someone with a weak record be tenured only because their social status category is "underrepresented" on a campus? Do social groups now have faculty representatives?
In State Tuition in CT
Posted
by Ellen
on June 4, 2007 at 6:30pm EDT
So...if I am NOT legally in the US but spend 4 years of school in CT I can attend UConn at in-state cost. But if I AM legally in the US and spend 4 years of school in CT I can NOT attend UConn at in-state cost.
That does not seem fair.
In-state tuition
Posted
by Eric Stoller
on June 4, 2007 at 9:45pm EDT
Ellen,
I highly doubt that a documented citizen in Connecticut who attends 4 years of high school would be denied in-state tuition.
This legislation would simply allow both undocumented and documented folks to attend CT state universities if they have attended 4 years of high school in CT.
Drama at MIT
Posted
by Cute Pug
, MIT
on June 5, 2007 at 5:35am EDT
I am a bit puzzled by the Sherley affair. If he were not publishing enough quantity-wise as well as quality-wise, they would have told him so in his mid-term review, where they essentially tell the faculty member what the chance of tenure is. I ought to know; I spent a long time at MIT and was in on several tenure hearings. Usually, they tell the junior professor that chances of tenure are 'likely' or 'possible' or 'unlikely.' Surely Sherley knew what was going on at least three years ago...
I do not understand why Sherley hasn't posted all of his publications; I just cannot believe that he hasn't published since 2003. If he has not, then he is out of touch - just as are his views about intelligent design.
Now, if Sherley was denied tenure because his religious views are regressive, then that is WRONG. They would have to go back and reconsider questionable beliefs of Jewish professors of the Zionist kind, Muslim fundamentalists of the misogynistic type, born-again X-tians who believe non-X-tians are hell-bound, etc.
That the venerable Douglas has resigned may indicate that Sherley has published a lot since 2003, since Douglas has impeccable judgement and credentials. We are lacking quite a bit of information here....
More on James Sherley
Posted
by Eaton Lattman
at Johns Hopkins University
on June 6, 2007 at 6:15pm EDT
At the sane time that James Sherley was being denied tenure at MIT he was receiving a very prestigious Pioneer Award from the NIH. The citation read in part
"Sherley’s laboratory is known for the elucidation of mechanisms responsible for the specialized renewal properties of adult stem cells and the use of this knowledge to address major research problems limiting the development of adult stem cells for biomedicine. These problems include producing large numbers of adult stem cells for research and development. Sherley will use his Pioneer Award to enable a new era of cellular medicine by developing routine methods for the production of several types of human adult stem cells with clinical potential. His honors include an award from the Pew Scholars Program in the Biomedical Sciences, selection for the Pew Science and Society Institute, and the Ellison Medical Foundation Senior Scholar Award in Aging."
There is a puzzling disconnect between the actions of these two distinguished institutions, but surely there is more on Sherley's side than some other comments indicate.
Posted
by Sheri
on June 7, 2007 at 10:40am EDT
I believe that "Cute Pug" is mixing stories. The MIT case had nothing to do with intelligent design, that was the Iowa case. Need to read your stories completely.