Quick Takes: Richard Rorty Dies, Dartmouth May Alter Trustee Selection, False Charge at MiraCosta, Eastern Mich. Misreported Murder, Protection for Student Press, American U. in Cairo Lose Veil Case, Alberta Debates Tobacco Funds, Boycott Fallout
Dartmouth College's board announced Friday that it was studying possible changes in the way trustees are selected. Dartmouth's board is a mix of members elected by one another and those elected by alumni in elections. The last four members elected by alumni were candidates who were not nominated by the official nominating committee -- and all four were critical of the college's administration. A statement from the board said: "The alumni trustee nomination process has recently taken on the characteristics of a political campaign, becoming increasingly contentious, divisive and costly for the participants.... We believe a highly politicized process for trustee selection -- and one which may dissuade many highly qualified alumni from seeking nomination -- may not be in the best interests of Dartmouth or its students."
The president of the board of MiraCosta College, in California, has apologized for accusing faculty and staff leaders of vandalizing his home, The San Diego Union-Tribune reported. In an apology sent to all employees, Charles Adams, the board chair, said he didn't believe that recent vandalism was really committed by faculty or staff leaders and said that "I sincerely regret" having made the accusation. The board and employees have been involved in a series of disputes and Adams went on to say that "I do believe that the climate created by the Academic Senate leadership has contributed to and cultivated a campus climate that nurtures malicious gossip and unfounded allegations and attacks."
Eastern Michigan University on Friday released a report that found that the institution violated federal crime reporting laws and misled students and faculty members when officials suggested that there was no foul play in a student death last year -- a student death now considered a rape and murder, The Detroit News reported.
The Illinois House and Senate have passed legislation, now under review by the governor, to protect student journalists at public colleges from administrative censorship, the Chicago Tribune reported. The legislation -- similar to a measure enacted in California -- is designed to reverse the impact of a 2005 federal appeals court ruling involving the paper at Governors State University, in Illinois.
Egypt's top court has apparently ruled that American University in Cairo cannot bar from campus women wearing face veils, the Associated Press reported. However, the court said that woman wearing face veils may be required to uncover their faces, to female guards, when entering the campus. University officials said that their lawyers were studying the decision, which may not be the final one in the case. On the issue generally, the statement said that "the policy prohibiting face veiling was established by the university because all members of the AUC community have a basic right to know with whom they are dealing, whether in class, the library, labs or anywhere else on campus. It is not a religious issue. In fact, AUC does not have a policy restricting the hijab (hair covering)."
Leaders of the University of Alberta School of Public Health are pushing for a ban on research financed by the tobacco industry, CanWest News Service reported. Faculty members raised the issue out of concern over a professor's $1.5 million project on chewing tobacco, in which the grant funds come companies that sell such tobacco. The lead researcher said that the ban some of his colleagues want -- and that would require approval by the university's board -- would violate his academic freedom. A similar debate has been taking place at the University of California.
The vote by Britain's main faculty union to support a boycott of Israeli professors and universities continues to have reverberations for governments and academics. Britain's higher education minister is headed to Israel to condemn the boycott and to pledge his government's willingness to use educational links to promote peace in the region, the BBC reported. On the legal front, Anthony Julius -- a British lawyer best known for representing Princess Diana in her divorce from Prince Charles -- is teaming up with Harvard University's Alan Dershowitz on representing any Israeli academics who face difficulties because of the boycott and who wish to sue, The Guardian reported. Hillel, the worldwide group of Jewish students, last week issued a statement condemning the boycott.
Comments on
Quick Takes: Richard Rorty Dies, Dartmouth May Alter Trustee Selection, False Charge at MiraCosta, Eastern Mich. Misreported Murder, Protection for Student Press, American U. in Cairo Lose Veil Case, Alberta Debates Tobacco Funds, Boycott Fallout
Changes
Posted
by Disappointed Dartmouth Alum
on June 11, 2007 at 6:35am EDT
Can't win an election? Try to change the constitution. Constitutional change defeated by a majority of voting alums? Change the bylaws.
Solid Controls the Issue
Posted
by William Sumner Scott, J. D.
on June 11, 2007 at 7:45am EDT
The source of the money is never the problem; most money donated expects a certain outcome. The researcher must have controls in place to eliminate skew.
William Sumner Scott, J.D.
wss@jefound.org
Time for a Coup
Posted
by thomasowellfan
on June 11, 2007 at 8:10am EDT
The situation at Dartmouth reminds me of Latin American politics. In Latin America there is always some justification for a military coup. Like Latin America, Dartmouth seems to be afraid of progress. Thus the rules have to be changed.
Dartmouth
Posted
by Jack Olson
on June 11, 2007 at 8:35am EDT
How can the Dartmouth board object to the election of trustees by alumni educated at Dartmouth? If the board claims the alumni make poor choices, what are they saying about the quality of the education their college offers?
Time for a Ban of British Academic members of union?
Posted
by Manny
on June 11, 2007 at 10:40am EDT
Should the boycott be adopted, I think the time will have come for American Universities to consider a ban on all these sanctimonious academics of the British University and College Union. Why? On what basis? Not because they are British - unlike their boycott against Israeli academics - but quite simply that their boycott is tantamount to discrimination based on national origin, plain and simple, a tenet that no American university can (or should) tolerate.
dartmouth selection of trustees
Posted
by cami green
on June 12, 2007 at 6:05pm EDT
I hold a special interest in (and knowledge of) Parliamentary Law and Procedure...wishing every college would teach it .., but I don't understand what "nominated by alumni vote" means. Am I to understand that the alumni have their own nominating committee? If so, is there a second nominating committee that nominates the rest of the candidates? From a parliamentary standpoint this is quite interesting. Usually, Bylaws call for one committee to which different interest groups would submit their candidates for screening and consideration, etc. The final slate is then submitted to the Board for a vote, but there must never be an understanding that a slate should be rubber-stamped, lest all the power of a board be given to one (usually non-democratically selected) committee. Maybe someone can enlighten me as these are some of the issues that interest me: there is so much misunderstanding "out there" about organizational rules ("Const" and "Bylaws") and this frequently leads to totally unnecessary conflict and tension. We really need to educate our future leaders on the basics of organizational rules.