Search News


Browse Archives

News

Calling Would-Be Science Teachers

June 12, 2007

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

A group of academic and business leaders added their collective voice Monday to the many recent calls for a significant upturn in the number of science and math teachers the United States needs to inject into elementary and secondary classrooms by 2015.

The report by the Business-Higher Education Forum (BHEF) is distinguished from the many other recent reports on the subject, the forum's leaders said, by the group's emphasis as much on increasing the number of undergraduate majors in scientific fields as on getting more scientifically adept people into teacher preparation programs. One of its major initiatives is to double the number of college graduates earning degrees in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) by 2015.

The report, “An American Imperative: Transforming the Recruitment, Retention and Renewal of Our Nation’s Mathematics and Science Workforce,” proposes an emphasis on recruitment, retention and teacher preparation to improve math and science education and research.

It includes plans for the creation of a national consortium to step up teacher recruitment efforts, improve the prestige and pay of teachers with expertise in STEM fields, and create programs to effectively train and develop teachers’ skills. The forum, a group made up largely of university presidents and Fortune 500 CEOs, estimates that American elementary and secondary schools will need 280,000 new science and math teachers between now and 2015 to keep up with teacher retirement and attrition, as well as growth in the population of school-aged children.

Those findings echo the findings of several reports in recent years. But the forum's report is unique in suggesting that improved science and math programs for students in primary and secondary schools should depend on the collaboration of colleges and universities with businesses and government to improve the size and quality of the national corps of science and math teachers.

As part of the forum's initiative to double the number of college graduates with degrees in STEM fields, the report calls for higher education to collaborate with school districts, state governments, the federal government and businesses to recruit, retain and provide professional development to science and math teachers.

Unlike other studies proposing solutions to the growing need for science and math teachers, including the College Board's 2006 report, "Teachers and the Uncertain American Future," and the Department of Education's "Before It's Too Late" from 2000, the forum's report stresses the important role that colleges and universities, as well as businesses and foundations, play in improving the quality and quantity of teachers in public schools.

Rather than proposing programs that focus on student testing or enrichment, Brian K. Fitzgerald, the forum's executive director, said at a Washington panel discussion on the report that “very little progress” is possible in science and math education without solving "the teacher problem.”

The national consortium will allow for higher education and businesses to lobby at the state and national levels for strong teacher preparation programs that are coordinated with college and university programs in scientific and mathematics fields.

Science and math departments are typically unsuccessful in collaborating with their own universities' teacher preparation programs, said Mary Ann Rankin, dean of the College of Natural Sciences at the University of Texas at Austin.

Recognizing these problems, Austin created the UTeach program to identify strong undergraduates majoring in STEM subject areas and makes it easier for them to be trained and licensed as teachers in those disciplines. Since its founding in 1997, the program has graduated more than 350 students, 90 percent of whom currently teach or are planning to teach. It is also the model for the National Math and Science Initiative, a $125 million program sponsored by ExxonMobil that will promise up to $2.4 million each to 10 colleges and universities that replicate the program.

In addition to funding programs like the National Math and Science Initiative, the business forum hopes that companies will work to advertise for and recruit public school teachers and encourage their employees to consider leaving their companies for teaching jobs. In 2005, IBM began a program to provide financial support to employees who leave the company for jobs teaching math and science.

The ultimate goal of the proposals is for “every student to have a confident, inspirational and effective teacher in the classroom,” Warren J. Baker, president of California Polytechnic State University at San Luis Obispo, said at the discussion. Baker, co-chair of the forum's Securing America’s Leadership in STEM project, with Raytheon CEO William H. Swanson, was instrumental in writing the report.

Though Baker acknowledged that improving science and math education was important for the economic interests of U.S. companies, he emphasized the importance of STEM education to solving problems like climate change, which he said could be the current generation’s Sputnik in terms of inspiring students to consider careers in science and math.

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Calling Would-Be Science Teachers

  • ... And By The Way, Guess Who Is Going to Pay?
  • Posted by Scrawed on June 26, 2007 at 6:15pm EDT
  • Something else to consider about IBM's "generous" offer -

    Who do you think is going to pay for the retirements of these thousands of mid-career transfer science and math teachers?

    Somehow, I doubt very much that IBM will.

  • Teaching is very different from Industry
  • Posted by NEB on July 12, 2007 at 4:15am EDT
  • I am a scientist who mid career chose to teach high school chemistry in a public school in Florida. It was an eye opener!
    I went throough "back door certification" with out a science ed. degree. I thought I would be snapped up by a school because of all the research I did and experience, but they prefer those with pedagogy backgrounds.
    I was hired mid semester at an over crowded high school and worked in a portable with no running water, no block scheduling, and I was told by the Administration to skip labs because the students were so far behind when their previous teacher quit.
    The typical mid career scientist today paid attention in school and read many books growing up. Many children today have lower attention spans and multi task, but don't turn out products with any depth (they cite Wikipedia and don't read lab experiment directions). Also students and their parents have no undertanding of what it takes to do well in science so they bitch and moan to the Administration about how their grades are suffering so it must be the teacher is making it too hard and my student MUST get that scholarship for college (and drop college classes when they find out what a rude shock it is when they really have to study). Finally, everyone dreams of teaching AP or IB students science classes - they are well behaved and motivated students, but those classes are left for teachers who have 20 years seniority. They paid their dues and had to put up with disruptive students, so the Administration heaps all the lower functioning courses on the new teachers. My advice is to stay in Industry, but if you like children (and I still do), become a mentor with your professional society like ASSM or ACS.

  • Everything has a Price
  • Posted by Ms. Nomer , Asst. Dir. of Corp and Foundation Relations at Williams College on June 12, 2007 at 11:25am EDT
  • The bottom line in this whole equation is TEACHER PAY. If you want strong, self-assured, young, energetic STEM graduates to turn to teaching, then society has to hold that up to an entry level position in a bioengineering firm with stock options and say "This is important! This is a better use of your talent and knowledge to teach and steer these youngsters for the next five years than to come in here and slog through 80 hour weeks until the IPO hits and we're all set!" The "industry" needs to come along; make it a condition of employment in the corporate world that you show a teaching credential from Springfield Public Schools for 5 years prior to going into the industry. STEM teaching as an adjunct to TEACH AMERICA. Federal and State government are going to have to make it attractive with college loan forgiveness or large annual stipends attached to each year of service. The best time to get these great teachers is right out of school. Even if they teach for two years and go out to private industry, at least they have had an exposure to teaching and the rewards and frustrations that go along with that. I would bet a tidy sum that within five to ten years of experience in the corporate world, you would get a percentage that would rather return to teaching.

  • Why professionals don't switch mid-career to teaching
  • Posted by Staffer on June 12, 2007 at 12:25pm EDT
  • I am a staff member in the life sciences at a university in Pennsylvania. The institution does have a one-year program for professional people with at least a bachelor of science degree to receive education and training to become a teacher. However, the program requires at least one semester of full-time study (more if your undergraduate credits are inadequate) and then one semester of student teaching. This means a full year without pay. There are stipends for the student teaching but the ranges I read were $3000-$5000 total. Additionally, new teachers, regardless of their work history, start at the bottom of the pay scale in their district of hire. Finally, it's my understanding that teachers are usually punished financially if they leave their school district to work elsewhere. Given these hard financial truths, who would want to shift mid-career and become a teacher?

  • NYS Science & Math Teacher Incentives
  • Posted by Richard Martin at Syracuse University on June 12, 2007 at 5:15pm EDT
  • The State of New York is in the first (I think) year of an incentive program for college students, to interest them in a career in teaching science and math. The program grants annual scholarships to students enrolled in qualified teacher prep programs -- the scholarship amount is equal to the annual tuition at a SUNY school (about $3700/yr.). Students can get scholarships for up to five years (including 1 year of grad school), but must agree to teach in a needy public HS for five years upon graduation. (Most urban or rural NYS high schools are considered needy, as are some suburban schools.) If the teaching commitment is not fulfilled, the scholarship turns into a loan. Combine this with potential Federal loan foregiveness, and it can turn into about $35K towards a qualifying bachelors -- more if you go on and get an MAT.

  • Teaching road blocks
  • Posted by William Motley on June 13, 2007 at 10:20am EDT
  • I have a bachelor's degree in Civil Engineering from Carnegie Mellon. I have had a desire to turn to teaching for the last 4 years. However, there is so much red tape involved. I want to teach secondary mathematics. But no matter where I decide to go to pursue a MAT (Master of Arts in Teaching) degree, there are like 5 prerequisite upper level math classes I have to take, as well as an upper level English Literature class. So before I can even get enrolled in an MAT program, there is more than a semester's worth of prerequisites I have to knock out of the way. And that has to come out of my own pocket unless there are some grants out there I don't know about. The sad part is that I already have an engineering degree in hand, and I am already very capable of handling any high school math material. There are many people out there like me who have a desire to teach, but are frustrated with the red tape involved.

  • mid career change
  • Posted by Paul Nevins on June 14, 2007 at 9:30am EDT
  • I switched to teaching from inudstry after a few years because I wanted what I was doing to be important. Teaching has that, but, with 20+ years experience and a couple on M.A. degrees in an above average pay district you earn about the same as a kid fresh out of college with my undergraduate degree. (B.S. chemistry)

    Most people are not going to go back to school for a couple years to take a job for half the pay or less.

  • Sounds good... until context is included
  • Posted by Scrawed on June 18, 2007 at 6:20pm EDT
  • This all sounds very good, up until one hits this parargraph:

    "...the business forum hopes that companies will work to advertise for and recruit public school teachers and encourage their employees to consider leaving their companies for teaching jobs. In 2005, IBM began a program to provide financial support to employees who leave the company for jobs teaching math and science."

    The context that is NOT disclosed in the article is this: as part of its new initiative "Project LEAN," IBM has been laying off US employees (see, for example "Lean and Mean: 150,000 U.S. layoffs for IBM?" - May 4, 2007 article appearing on www.pbs.org , and related articles from early May in the Poughkeepsie Journal and Burlington Free Press)- at the same time that it has opened its 4th facility in Chennai.

    This opportunity to provide teachers is therefore just a way to make such layoffs a little more palatable to the people caught in them and to the American public.