Search News


Browse Archives

News

Antioch to Close Main College

June 13, 2007

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

Antioch University announced Tuesday that it would suspend operations of its main undergraduate college -- which has played a historic role in American higher education -- at the end of the next academic year. All of the approximately 40 faculty members teaching at the college will lose their jobs. Antioch's other campuses, which focus on graduate programs and nontraditional students, will continue.

Antioch's official announcement said that the college could reopen as soon as 2012, in some new form. But in an interview Tuesday evening, the university's chancellor used "if" to describe a prospective reopening. And several people at the college said that they were not sure how the financial problems could be solved and the campus rebuilt in a few years.

Low enrollment and a small endowment were blamed for the decision. For the coming fall semester, 125 new students had been expected, which would have brought total enrollment to just over 300.

Antioch was founded in 1852, with Horace Mann serving as its first president. The college played a role in the abolitionist movement and was an early institution to admit students who were women or black. In the 20th century, Antioch was among the pioneers in "co-op education" in which students alternated positions of work all over the country with their education at the Yellow Springs, Ohio, campus. Antioch was particularly notable in that the education was focused on the liberal arts, and the college was known for turning out graduates who went on to play major roles in intellectual life and social activism, people like Clifford Geertz and Stephen Jay Gould and Coretta Scott King.

More recently, however, Antioch's history has been more troubled and sometimes controversial. The campus -- designed for 2,700 students -- has seen fewer and fewer students. The college's long association of liberal politics attracted more students in the '60s than the '90s, when a policy requiring explicit verbal consent before any sexual act made the college a favorite target of pundits seeking to mock political correctness.

While the university has created campuses from California to New England -- boosting total Antioch enrollment to around 5,000 -- that development has worried many supporters of the undergraduate liberal arts college. These supporters felt that the attention of the board shifted too far away from the undergraduate institution that once was Antioch.

Tullisse Murdock, chancellor of the university, said Tuesday that the board was very sad about its decision, but felt it had no viable option to offer a high quality education. "Liberal arts institutions are tuition dependent and endowment dependent," she said, and Antioch lacks not only enough students, but enough money (the endowment is about $30 million). The campus, she said, "has a tremendous amount of deferred maintenance" that also needs to be fixed.

Murdock said that the board was committed to trying to reopen and to doing so in Yellow Springs, but she acknowledged that "you can't guarantee anything."

The university's board declared financial exigency, clearing the way for the faculty members to lose their jobs. Students will be educated this year and will be helped to finish up at other Antioch campuses or to transfer. Murdock acknowledged that for the 125 new students, they will be receiving this news just weeks after they put down deposits and in some cases turned down other colleges. But Murdock said that the board was "watching enrollment numbers carefully," hoping to find another way to deal with the problems.

A team of scholars -- some from Antioch and some from outside -- will work to develop a new plan for the college and a new curriculum that might attract more students if the college reopens, she said.

Eli Nettles, assistant professor of mathematics and associate dean of of the faculty, was among the 15 or so faculty members who were on campus Tuesday (during a between term period) and who were told in person that the college was being shut down and that they would lose their jobs. "I don't think anybody thought this could happen," she said. "There were tears. There were people shocked. A lot of our faculty were students here. They came back after they got their Ph.D.'s -- this is the only place they wanted to be," she said.

Even as she faces unemployment, Nettles said that she does not blame the current leadership of the college or university. "We didn't use our money well 30 or 40 years ago," she said, and so the college never saw its endowment or fund raising base grow as it needed, leaving the current leaders without any good options. "You cannot be a small liberal arts school that is this tuition-driven," she said. "Every time we lost a student, we felt it. If we'd had more money to work with, it would have been easier to deal with."

Other faculty members are more critical.

David LaPalombara, a professor of art, said that there was no doubt that the decision "could have been avoided," and that there are "a lot of responsible persons who could have done something." While he said he did not want to name names, he said that the Board of Trustees had responsibility.

He said it was difficult to envision how the money would now flow in. "It's hard to imagine supporters of Antioch ever wanting to give money now to whatever the future of Antioch is."

"I think this is a tragedy. This is a school with 150 years of illustrious history that is apparently over," he said.

LaPalombara recently accepted a job at Ohio University, but he said he had no idea that the college would be shut down and that he is as stunned as everyone else.

The idea that deferred maintenance and physical plant were being discussed as key problems bothered LaPalombara. "We've always been a little rough around the edges," he said.

Chad Johnston graduated in 2001 and is among the alumni who have been worrying about the college closing and monitoring the situation through a group called Save Antioch. He too said that university officials shouldn't be focused on buildings.

"Look at photos from the '40s and '50s. The facilities were always needing work," he said. "But there was a simple eloquent beauty in that at this school, you learned what it meant to run an institution and to survive."

During his time at the college, Johnston said, he saw the student role in governance diminished, and more authority shifted from the college to the university -- changes he said paved the way for Tuesday's news. "It's been a downward spiral of college autonomy," as the university focused more on its far flung campuses, which he acknowledged brought in money. He said it angered him to see the university focus on these regional campuses for financial reasons, while still using the Horace Mann legacy, prominently using a Mann quote -- "be ashamed to die until you have won some victory for humanity" -- on those campuses' Web sites, while letting Mann's legacy in Yellow Springs disappear.

All afternoon, he said, he has been e-mailing and on the phone with Antioch alumni all over the world who are devastated and angered by the news.

Antioch is about social justice, he said, not making money, so the college should have stayed the institution's top priority. "Of course it's a struggle" for the college to manage financially, he said. "But it's always a struggle to be a liberal arts college and to do some radical things for education."

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Antioch to Close Main College

  • Posted by jim jaffe on June 25, 2007 at 3:05pm EDT
  • All the comments are financial mismanagement and lack of transparency are true, but are tangential to the big issues here -- Whatever it is that Antioch's selling (and its become increasingly unclear to me over the years) is something a declining number of college students are buying. without some vision, competent management and a financial infusion won't solve the problem.

  • Good Riddance!
  • Posted by walt235 on June 26, 2007 at 10:40pm EDT
  • I grew up in the area and am glad to see this lefty bastion of weirdo-ness go! Maybe they can make into something far more useful than Antioch ever was--like a parking lot!

  • Posted by GG on June 28, 2007 at 6:35pm EDT
  • I had the misfortune of attending Antioch College in the last years of operation and I will say this with the utmost confidence: Antioch should close.
    It has become an awful place and everyone, deep down inside, knows that. There were BRILLIANT students there but they were the minority. There are great profs there too, but the institution let them down by accepting disruptive and sub standard students and giving them staggering power and influence.
    I will always remember my graduation in 2003 as one of the greatest disappointments of my adult life. Our guest speaker was Amy Goodman from Democracy Now but they also allowed students to speak. Inarticulate and belligerent student speakers cursed one another and argued from the podium. It was humiliating and I will never forget it and I will never forgive Antioch for allowing such behavior.
    Good bye forever.

  • not impressed by campus visit
  • Posted by Elizabeth on July 9, 2007 at 12:45pm EDT
  • My son and I visited Antioch this last April after reading the wonderful write up in Loren Pope's book, "Colleges that Change Lives". We also managed to visit Reed College in Portland, OR as well. Sadly Antioch did not fare well in comparison. In a one day campus visit you managed to turn my son off even with your fantastic co-op program. Your housing is in bad shape, your campus landscaping depressing. If you can't be located in an exciting city, you better have a killer campus. It is too bad for the current students that the adults let you down.

  • 2cents worth of thinking for art
  • Posted by Mr. Artsy Fartsy on July 14, 2007 at 9:05am EDT
  • Ajx above has a very important comment that should not get unnoticed. Yes Antioch has all this great legacy about creating people full of fervor for social justice, but this was not WHY it was founded, nor was it WHY Arthur Morgan did his revisions to the College. The connection between Acdemia and real-world practise were the thing. "Social Justice" as a pursuit became the thing as the times demanded it. Antioch, as an open institution that is/was very responsive to what is going on in the outside world, happened to be a very conducive institution to respond to these demands. But to claim it as a be all, end all of the College is, for me short-sighted.
    I, for one (almost literally it feels like), come at the College from the perspective of an artist (albeit a minor one that wil die obscure...hey, just like Mozart!). While I was there in the 70's, under the aegis of two well-known avant-guard filmmakers, the film department was the place to be. But of course because of that "avant-garde" thing, no one except those of us who majored in film and a few other wise art majors really knew it. The resulting graduates have gone on to create amazing work.
    Many other Antiochians, particularly of the time, might view such accomplisments as besides the point, or worse, debilitatingly bourgeois. (A fellow student had his work thrown back in his face once with the comment "This is nothing but bourgeois trash!" Ah, those were the days.) The art department was always scrambling for recognition from the institution at large, let alone money from the Administration at large. We always felt like, at best, the bastard children of Antioch, and at worst, a sort of sheltered workshop for the weird and crazy. From my own observations, and anecdotal evidence, this has only since gotten worse. The once thriving, vibrant film department became co-opted into the Communications Department with the result (that I observed at one showing of 2006 graduate's films) being navel-focused political tracts with a rather insane obsession with Gender. I recently talked with a very talented recent art major graduate who had to fight her own faculty in order to use oil-based paints. The reason? They are toxic and not good for the environment. (Ultimately she was allowed to paint in the sculpture buidling which had better ventilation and a specialized wash area for toxic chemicals.)

    But look if you will, at a thriving school like Evergreen (a comparison fair to make since Antioch mimiced its interdisciplinary curriculum). They have not only a very creative array of interdisciplinary curicula, but an art department that on first glance makes one wonder if they were really more an Art School than a Liberal Art School. Why is that College, as an institution, not as embarassed as Antioch has been, to have a developed Art Department? And is it going to far to ask if this has any bearing on Evergreen's success?
    If I might throw in a gross generalization, Art is what keeps our minds free. It is beyond ideology, or if you want, pre-ideology. Despite how it is used by the powerful for their own ends, it is a priori not political and no one is going to make me believe otherwise. But it is these very attributes that make it so vital. Thoreau said wilderness is the preservation of the world. With apologies to ecologists and environmentalists, I submit that Art is society's (and therefore the College's) wilderness. And I submit that in any ressurected Antioch College it be placed front and center. Ok, I'll accept "off-center". This is not to say that the things Antioch as an institution is most proud of should be lost in the general picture. But it is to say that the politicization of nearly everything is not what Antioch is or should be about.

  • Not Education, Indoctrination!
  • Posted by jimbo on July 20, 2007 at 6:10pm EDT
  • Antioch is part of the stupiding (not dumbing) down of education! It may have once been a great college, but it has long since lost that. Instead, what it became was simply an indoctrination center for the weird and immature know-it-all's.

    Americans increasingly cannot seem to answer simple questions or give opinons adequately on many sugjects because they are blissfully uneducated. They have not acquired a broad knowledge of language, literature, philosophy, and history. Antioch led the way with this stupiding down.

    Increasingly, for the last couple decades they have pushed a “Studies” curriculum. Fill in the blanks: Women’s Studies, Gay Studies, Environmental Studies, Peace Studies, Chicano Studies, Film Studies, and so on. These courses aim to indoctrinate students about perceived pathologies in contemporary American culture—specifically, race, class, gender, and environmental oppression.

    Such courses are by design deductive. The student is expected to arrive at the instructor’s own preconceived conclusions. The courses are also captives of the present—hostages of the contemporary media and popular culture from which they draw their information and earn their relevance.

    This was pretty much what Antioch descended into. If you didn't parrot the "Antioch party line," you were treated badly. It became a bunch of big mouthed lefty lemmings who patted themselves on the back because they all said basically, "hurray for our side!" No real dialogue, no vision, just the same stupidity since the 1960's repeated.

    I went there briefly, could not stomach it and finished up at a small liberal arts college I really enjoyed going to. The College of Mount St. Joseph in Cincinnati. I got a much better education than I would have at Antioch!

    They may survive by becoming a "Great Books College." But I rather doubt it. I won't miss this bastion of lefty propagana, and frankly, maybe it should die the death it earned!

  • Why am I not surprised?
  • Posted by Jugador on September 1, 2007 at 8:10pm EDT
  • What a shock. A college that espouses socialism folds because of a lack of funds. Did Antioch seriously expect its alumni to support it? Chic left poets, feminists, environmentalists, and performance artists? Just how much money do people with gender studies degrees make? Antioch is, and always was, a pseudo-intellectual joke. Maybe Hugo Chavez can bail them out.

  • Posted by Tom Copley on September 21, 2008 at 1:30pm EDT
  • I taught at Antioch YSO from 1979-84. In my tenure there it became evident that the spirit of the institution was slowly being squeezed in a variety of ways to the point of slow strangulation. The issues were never merely financial or market-based. Whether the decline was self-imposed or else through the intervention of an unseen hand, I do not know. I will only say that the victims of abuse usually are blamed by their abuser(s). When I read about such things as Abu Ghraib and the steady advance of creeping fascism in this country, I don't find it a stretch at all to believe that such a beacon of left-leaning free thought and iconoclasm as Antioch could be under more than an attack of mere spiritual warfare. It looks like most of those who claim to love the place are willing to give up with little more than a whimper, but there is only one real way to reverse such a negative situation as this, and that is to take heart and fight back!

  • Sad
  • Posted by RWH on June 13, 2007 at 7:45am EDT
  • Very sad ...

  • Resurrections
  • Posted by R.J. O'Hara at The Collegiate Way on June 13, 2007 at 8:15am EDT
  • This is a great shame, for historical reasons if no other. But here is a proposal: after a period of financial retrenchment, let's see Antioch reopen as a Great Books college. (I'll develop the science curriculum for them. ;-) That would be radical reform in the true sense of the word, and would be a fine foundation for another hundred and fifty years.

  • Only the Beginning
  • Posted by William Sumner Scott, J.D. on June 13, 2007 at 8:40am EDT
  • The effect of name universities offer of internet and distant campuses has begun to bite the marginal and underfunded. War and research and public funded cannot be beat.

    William Sumner Scott, J.D.

    wss@jefound.org

  • Posted by Adios on June 13, 2007 at 8:55am EDT
  • Antioch College was once voted the most "antimale" college. Let's hope their fate is a wake-up call for other institutions of higher learning.

  • The problem has always been the university campuses
  • Posted by Jo Procter '60 on June 13, 2007 at 9:05am EDT
  • Antioch College was a great institution until it began building a mediocre university system (eating up all the endowment), which then took over and diminished the undergraduate campus. The college's model that included diversity, experiental education, shared governance with students, and liberal arts education informed by personal responsibility for one's speech and actions is still the best educational model around, and rarely found. Shame on Antioch University, which ihas never lived up to the original standards and qualities of the Yellow Springs college.

  • end of an era
  • Posted by JHR , Dean on June 13, 2007 at 9:05am EDT
  • Antioch's closing signifies the end of an era. RW, you develop the science curriculum and I will do the same for sociology...

  • Posted by Ed Ahlsen-Girard on June 13, 2007 at 9:05am EDT
  • The effect of commencement speakers who are convicted murderers was felt, too.

  • so sad
  • Posted by Theron on June 13, 2007 at 9:15am EDT
  • Although not quite a shock, this announcement is sad and disheartening beyond belief. A sad commentary on the commodification of education and a sad commentary on how little Antioch's mission is currently appreciated.

  • dancing on the edge
  • Posted by Bert on June 13, 2007 at 9:30am EDT
  • Antioch did not appear to have unity of purpose or unity of leadership. The absence of these items sometimes led to use of limited funds in ways that did not contribute to the benefit of the college and left the college dancing on the edge of financial disaster. While a very sad event, it was not entirely unpredictable to anyone who read and understood their financial statements in recent years.

    The patient is not dead; it does require hospitalization and surgery if Antioch College is to survive.

  • A tragic end
  • Posted by Max Headroom on June 13, 2007 at 9:35am EDT
  • I wonder what role distance education played in this? The story doesn't address online education and distance ed, but that sure seems to me how Antioch has really extended itself over the years and now it is in a state where the periphery no longer needs the center so they are cutting it off. If so, then I can think of a dozen more schools that seem to be heading in this unsustainable online direction--where main campuses with tenure faculty are increasingly becoming extensions of online and distant programs

    Can someone at Antioch provide more information on what the President and Board have been doing for the last decade?

  • Sad
  • Posted by Rebecca on June 13, 2007 at 10:45am EDT
  • I love Antioch. I grew up near Yellow Springs and the college was such a beacon of enlightenment. I later taught there as an adjunct, and it was a great experience working with those students. But the poor management and the financial problems were evident even to a relative outsider in the late 90's. The end of an era, indeed.

  • Posted by HK on June 13, 2007 at 11:15am EDT
  • Lots of concern for the faculty; what about the dozens of other employees without PhD's in a community that must offer pretty limited employment options beyond the campus?

  • Posted by Yrs., E. A. on June 13, 2007 at 11:20am EDT
  • Perhaps our present bottom-line driven era--with its ultra-conservatism, theocratic ambition, and preference for cheap, self-righteous slander rather than meaningful discourse--cannot abide the existence of the truly liberal academic atmosphere that Antioch provided. Reference to pop polls labeling Antioch "antimale" (Adios) and finger-pointing at the audacity of allowing free speech to a "convicted murderer" (Ed Ahlsen-Girard) are just two examples of this current climate. Antioch became an anachronism in this era of college-as-job-training. Unfortunately I don't expect the proposed reopening of the school to occur in 2012; however, as long as there are those who can envision its reinvention (e. g., the "great books" idea)perhaps there is hope that liberal education will not die.

  • Antioch College
  • Posted by Steve Conlon on June 13, 2007 at 11:50am EDT
  • Over the years my wife and I have provided co-op work experiences for maybe ten Antioch students. My brother and sister-in-law are Antioch grads. We have watched sadly as Antioch has self destructed. I have walked the campus and appreciated the beauty that someone created years ago. What happened? Maybe , they lost sight of what they had. Maybe they felt that time was better spent discussing social issues than fixing the roof. Maybe since they opposed corporate mentalities, they thought that they were above having to market a product. Maybe they thought that they could charge high tuition rates and offer adjunct professors for ever.
    Without a vision, the people are lost. In Antioch's case, no leadership and no devotion to infrastructure and marketing were fatal.

  • Good Riddance
  • Posted by Josh , Hilarious on June 13, 2007 at 1:05pm EDT
  • Who needs another left-wing asylum anyway? Maybe when they re-open O.J. Simpson can deliver the commencement address.

  • Wow
  • Posted by Walker , Student on June 13, 2007 at 1:50pm EDT
  • "One by one all of our old friends are gone"!

  • Anti - male?
  • Posted by PM on June 13, 2007 at 2:35pm EDT
  • It is always intriguing when (men?) dredge up the anti-male ranking that was delivered by that venerable fountain of knowledge - Men's Health. That's laughable. Because Antioch had the audacity to require students to get permission for sexual contact? Get a grip. It was common sense that has been codified in sexual assault laws across the country. I hope Antioch can be resurrected, but it sounds like it will take a miracle. Did their demise occur because of their consent rule? That is a rather far fetched claim that is just absurd.

  • Posted by Rob Moore at Lipman Hearne on June 13, 2007 at 2:35pm EDT
  • A number of commentators seem to believe that Antioch's liberal stance is what starved it of students, while Steve Conlon's comments include the mention that Antioch did not seem to feel the need to market itself effectively. I believe the latter is far more the cause of Antioch's unfortunate decline, as a number of progressive or "nontraditional" institutions (Oberlin, New School, University of California Santa Cruz, New College of Florida), liberal arts colleges, and co-op based programs have thrived while Antioch has slowly circled the drain. I suspect -- without direct evidence or experience -- that Antioch fell prey in part to "true believers" syndrome, in which adherents feel that students, donations, support, and the like will all naturally gravitate towards the institution because its mission is so clear and estimable. This is simply not the case. Any institution, except those with an "unassailable" brand, needs to understand how it meets the needs of the students who will benefit most by the programs that it offers, to identify those individuals and reach out to them with effective and well-positioned marketing materials, and engage them in a dialogue about their interests and their future that results in their applying and matriculating. It's not rocket science, but it does require attention, rigor, and persistence. To me, the fact that Antioch has been running at 10-15% of capacity for a number of years should have sent up a whole signal corps of red flags, and the closing should have come as no surprise. It is unfortunate that an institution as storied and historically important as Antioch would become the poster child for a whole new category: institutions that refused to understand and address the market, to their peril.

  • Antioch College
  • Posted by Sam '72 , Dean on June 13, 2007 at 3:00pm EDT
  • This is indeed a sad day for higher education in the US. I remember participating in a sit-in in the president's office to protest the initiation of the far-flung campuses of Antioch in the early 70s. I believe the focus shifted away from the hard work of keeping Antioch College vital to instead what can bring in resources across a university network. Yet the emphasis on living Horace Mann's words was always in my heart based on my Antioch education. I've spent my life tying to make a difference in our world. Antioch allowed me to see our world through lenses not colored by any particular agenda, but instead as possibilities. Nothing was impossible -- except now the survival of this powerful little institution. A great loss and a great shame...

  • Sadly not surprised
  • Posted by Not surprised on June 13, 2007 at 3:15pm EDT
  • Yes, it's sad, but it's not surprising. Just a bunch of leftover hippies who could never admit that the 60s were over.

  • This Didn’t Come As a Surprise To Too Many
  • Posted by Frizbane Manley on June 13, 2007 at 4:55pm EDT
  • About twenty years ago a close friend – my paddleball partner at the time – interviewed for the position of Director of Development at Antioch College. When he returned to Ann Arbor he told me that spending the day on the deteriorating Antioch campus was so depressing he couldn’t imagine going to work there every day. He said, “If they manage to stay open through the end of this century, I’ll be surprised.”

    Sadly, he didn’t miss it by much.

  • too much building
  • Posted by Dan Bag of Donuts '90 on June 13, 2007 at 4:55pm EDT
  • When I attended 87-90 the talks was how in the early/mid 80"s the college was close to being bankrupt. Low enrollment and the outflow of resources (financial as well as spiritual) to the univesity system were often cited as reeasons. With increased enrollment and annual tuition hikes seemed to signal a corner was being turned. Then all this money went into renovations and new buildings (corry hall renovation please) Antioch was about the relationship and interaction among the students, faculty, administration and staff. All the focus on the physical structure in the late 80's early 90's really was like giving a face lift to a guy recovering from a heart attack. It may look good and get the guy some action, but in the long run the problem is still there waiting to kill you.
    Sad day indeed. It was a place where a lot of brilliant people were able to find themselves.

  • Sad sad day
  • Posted by ach95 on June 13, 2007 at 5:00pm EDT
  • How awful! I grew up in Yellow Springs, and Antioch is truly the life blood of the community. Not only will the college suffer, but the village will as well, losing businesses and residents. This is truly a sad moment, and Antioch a thing to be mourned.

  • Posted by Yrs., E. A. on June 13, 2007 at 6:00pm EDT
  • Thank you, "Josh" and "Not Surprised" for adding evidence to support my earlier comment.

  • Posted by e.a. is partly on June 13, 2007 at 6:20pm EDT
  • E.A. is right: Antioch needs to actually be a liberal arts school with something to offer, like a "great-books" course, the foundations of any liberal arts degree. You can't give out ideology like candy and expect that people can live without the healthy classics.

  • Posted by cas on June 13, 2007 at 7:20pm EDT
  • Great to see that stereotyping is alive and well. How many of you are familiar with Antioch's curriculum, student body, or faculty to comment on it? How do you know they are a bunch of hippies left over from the 60s? And what part of that is a problem...the idealism? I teach at Antioch, and our students are by far the most passionate and intellectually engaged I have ever had the privilege of teaching. Almost all are dedicated to social justice.

    Antioch ultimately failed because it never cultivated much of an endowment, so was highly tuition-driven. This left little to invest in an infrastructure. Also, the emphasis on the University campuses (which are not residential and have most courses taught by adjuncts) to the detriment of the college was constant. If it does re-open in 2012 which I doubt, (and even if it does, it will never be the Antioch that people loved, or hated), it will be without tenured and tenure-track faculty, since none of the other branches of Antioch university have this. Perhaps this was a way to get rid of us.

  • Then there is the incoming class...
  • Posted by Mike Sexton on June 13, 2007 at 7:55pm EDT
  • I, too, feel sad at the demise of a unique institution of higher education. At the same time, I feel sadder for the recent HS grad who called our admissions office yesterday after finding out that her school of choice announced the closing before she even began her first year.

    The young woman told us of her decision to attend Antioch back in April and was calling now to see if she could change her mind. She, and many like her, will find that there is no longer space at the other colleges that admitted them.

    The timing of this decision is inexcusable. How much more did the Board know now than they did right after May 1? The extra year they are trying to eek out will be at the expense of the incoming class.

  • Posted by cas on June 13, 2007 at 9:00pm EDT
  • The board of trustees made the decision at their annual meeeting this past weekend. I certainly did not see this coming. We all feel horrible that those students who were admitted now have to scramble to find other schools and have lost scholarship money. We hired tenure-track faculty who will now only have one year.

    When the board forced a curricular change on the faculty 3 years ago--obstensibly to save the school, even though our problems have never been curricular--we were told that they expected a temporary decline in enrollment and would give us 5 years to get it back up. Two years into the curriculum change--which we worked our butts off to do--we are told they will shut down the college. We doubled the size of the first year class last year from the previous year. We were allowed to hire tenure-track faculty for the first time in three years. Many of us were feeling confident for the first time in many years. Then they voted to close the school.

  • Posted by Mary , From a sad student at Antioch College on June 14, 2007 at 5:05am EDT
  • I am an incoming second year at Antioch College. I went through a lot to be there. To many, I do not seem like the typical "Antioch type" which goes to show how little some know of the college. I would have to say that my peers and teachers were more passionate and caring than anywhere I have every been. I felt at home, and I am horrified that in a blink of an eye my home is lost. Everyone was very excepting of everyone else. There were no clique's, very little racism or classism. It was different and wonderful. As far as the SOPP (sexual prevention policy), that is NOT why they are shutting down, and from a first hand experience, it made people feel comfortable, and kept them safe. I just wanted everyone to hear from a student, but these words are not just from me, they are from everyone; every friend of mine crying on the phone, every teacher wondering where to go, everyone who has lost something very special.

  • Very Sad
  • Posted by David Berry '79 on June 14, 2007 at 5:10am EDT
  • Like all undergraduates, I had a love-hate relationship with the college while I was there -- loved that my college was like no other and hated it for the same reason. There really is the need for an Antioch in the world, and I hope that Antioch itself will eventually come back to fill that need.

  • Languishing completed
  • Posted by AJX , Ph.D on June 14, 2007 at 5:10am EDT
  • I attended Antioch in the mid-80's, at one of the many nadirs in enrollment. There were 223 of us on campus. I had come from a much larger university in the Midwest, and it was a rude awakening to see a college living dangerously, so close to the edge. Still the spirit and life and vibrancy there were magnitudes greater than my previous school with its vast resources and money and prominence hungry students. Antioch had a profound and permanent affect on me, and I am as shocked and horrified as any.
    I think the key thing that it taught me was taking responsibility for ones self and ones society. You don't learn that in liberal arts educations that are focused on self indulgence and following the curriculum. (The self indulgence is outside of class). The idea of creating your curriculum and owning your own path in life have never been better inculcated.

    I have visited the town and the campus from time to time over the years, and have spent quite a bit of time there in the last year. I never saw any students. I felt like a ghost walking through the buildings, seeing traipsings of activity but no people. It seemed more desolate than at any time in the past, and the campus much more forlorn than usual. The Record was more bitter in its criticism of the school than ever. All warning signs that no one ever heeded because no one ever thought it would come to this.

    Did the administration ever warn the world? "Help now or we WILL fold!!!" Ever take emergency steps to stop the decline? It was acted out as if it was sudden death, but this was thought through for some time. A passive aggressive secret, dropped as a bomb.

    Antioch is a beautiful thing, and I sometimes feel that good things do come to an end. Some of the unfair criticisms about the 60's etc. maybe have a shred of truth to them. There is a lot of denial going on, a lot of hubris about what the place has to offer.

    Here's my analysis of the failure:
    #1. The University - broke the health of the school. Endowment spent in the 70's, all campuses distractions for the mgmt, focus on the universities was a crutch for the mgmt.

    Also #1. Many students leave frustrated by the administration. The attrition rate is not entirely to do with the condition of the campus. Eking away community government's role in the campus is a big one. Tearing down favorite buildings is a big one. All sorts of little annoyances that are unnecessary and tit-for-tat. There has been a very tenuous connection between the administration and the student body all along, but the dialog and the connection are important to keep people feeling they have a say in their community - and that is huge with the kind of students that Antioch has.
    Another aspect - students leave frustrated even if they graduate, and they don't contribute. Most of my friends thrived at the place but left so pissed off they never gave a cent, no matter how much they made.

    Becoming one dimensional. I did not come to Antioch because of activism. It was great and healthy to have that, but the school can not live by a particular mind-set.
    Art, literature, sociology, science, healthy debate, what about all of that? Does anyone bemoan the loss of the other attributes the school should have had to truly provide a liberal education? There were stunning things that happened at Antioch that were about expression and brilliance without a political or social framework.

    Also #1. Staying part of the past but not part of the future. Antioch hides behind its reputation quit a lot. I am tired of hearing about famous this and that. I think the school needed to show its current capabilities, and its plan to provide an education that is relevant to the future. I don't know why they have to wait 4 years to do that. It loses the opportunity to market itself on the quality of its students, who are probably its greatest assets, and the reason I came there. They will all be gone.

  • Posted by Jack , Former Ohioan on June 14, 2007 at 5:10am EDT
  • Above someone says: "Perhaps our present bottom-line driven era-—with its ultra-conservatism, theocratic ambition, and preference for cheap, self-righteous slander rather than meaningful discourse-—cannot abide the existence of the truly liberal academic atmosphere that Antioch provided."

    Or perhaps, just maybe, people got tired of condescension from Antiochians like you and voted with their feet. Talk about "self-righteous"! Physician, heal thyself; educator, look for lessons within.

  • It's a poor decision
  • Posted by recent grad '07 on June 14, 2007 at 5:10am EDT
  • I think the board has made a very poor decision.

    I just graduated. As a student at Antioch I have spent tons of time and energy learning about it and working to understand it and its history. There is a lot of history going into this, as people above have mentioned. The strikes in the early 70s, the always-small endowment, etc.

    However, there has also been very poor management by the Board of Trustees. This is partly a structural problem--that their attention was divided among 5 campuses. In the proposed reopening of 2012 the Board has said there will be a "satellite board" for each branch of Antioch, including one just for Yellow Springs. This is a good idea, and it should have been implemented years ago.

    The Board has been out of touch with what Antioch needs and how to go about making Antioch more successful. There has been a huge need for leadership to solve the problems Antioch's had, to rebuild trust and respect among all parts of the institution, and to chart a course for the future. The board has not provided this.

    The college community has the commitment, the intelligence, the energy, the connections, the ideas, etc. that it needs to turn itself around and become more successful. And many people have worked very hard to make things better, with some good success. The admissions office, the development office, the Coretta Scott King Center, Student Affairs, and other departments have been making changes in the past year that have been very positive.

    It seems like the board hasn’t really tried. They haven’t come to campus and really had a conversation with the people on campus. They haven’t given the changes that’ve been made a chance to succeed. They imposed a Renewal Plan on the college 3 years ago, and everyone at the college has worked really hard to make the changes they called for. There was an expected drop in admissions when the new curriculum was implemented, because it was a new curriculum. The board had promised to support the college through that drop, until admissions had recovered. The new curriculum has only been in effect 2 years, and it has been going pretty well, with definite potential to be really great with a few more years of refining. And they’re pulling the plug.

    They aren’t the ones who will be bearing the cost of this decision. They aren’t the ones who know the college best. And they aren’t the ones who really tried to pull things together and do what needed to be done.

    If there had been clear communication and an honest effort and it had failed, it would be different. There hasn’t been clear communication, and I don’t think there has been an honest effort by the board of trustees.

    What I think we’ve needed is a visioning process, a process for sitting down and gathering ideas, and really considering the obstacles we face, and picking a goal for where we want to go, and making a plan, a strategy for how to get there. This kind of thing takes participation and time and good, skilled facilitation. There hasn’t yet been the kind of coming together that I think Antioch needs to survive. It’s not going to be the board (I don’t think) who makes this kind of thing happen. The board has proven its ineffectiveness. It’s going to take leadership from outside the formal administration. And, I don’t think the board is useless, it just can’t be trusted to take care of things.

    And another thing—I haven’t had enough communication with board of trustees members. I’m sure there’s stuff I’m not understanding or misperceiving. This is how I’m seeing things right now.

    Antioch is so complicated. Maybe this post will have illuminated some of it for those who aren’t part of Antioch.

  • Bad News
  • Posted by labahr on June 14, 2007 at 5:10am EDT
  • I am a 1983 graduate of Antioch College--the last class to receive a B.F.A. from a dying fine arts program--even then one of the best in its league. I attended the college from 1979-1983 and lived in Yellow Springs until 1992. It is strange, because in the spring of 1979, after I applied and was accepted; the hometown newspaper in Kent, OH reported that Antioch was not able to pay its faculty and may be closing its doors. It was the big joke at our commencement that Antioch actually made it to 1983 for our class to graduate. One of the speakers read letters from the archives in 1850's about the financial struggles and that they may be forced to close the doors. Financial woes are in the DNA of Antioch's institutional structure.

    I have always seen Antioch as a Phoenix that rises from its own destructive tendencies. However, there has always been a collective memory that keeps the place afloat, along with a freshness from all the comings and goings of the students and the stability of a faculty/staff who understood the place and held it together for each generation. I wonder is this base eroding? The historic/global and technical challenges loom larger than they did 20+ years ago when I attended. No baby boom generation to keep up enrollment. We are losing a sense of place--a scripted and generic world is replacing what is most unique in us as a country. Antioch has always been a champion of the terminally unique, for better and for worse, but it always managed to survive.

    I do not see any great visionary leaders on the horizon. Although the current president (Laury?) looks good on paper, I wonder if he really gets the place.

    Antioch College is about this wonderful merging of ideal and place. There is an experimentation and a certain political banter, but there have always been wonderful teachers and characters that stay with you forever. And there has alway been the beautiful village of Yellow Springs, which has an air of the transcendental in its marrow. It is a tangible presence, perhaps connected to the presence of the natural world. There is no Antioch without the Village of Yellow Springs and visa versa--I would hate to see them go their separate ways, if that were even possible.

    Antioch has always been about character and place, not institutional conformity or curriculum or even academic rigor. It has been about exploring character and being challenged by characters to open oneself to character in oneself--for better and worse--and to the character of a place. It's historical figures have taken on a certain, challenging, "epic" character. I have found it to be true that finding my own character, I can learn anything and reinvent myself over and over. This is the best that an American Liberal Arts training can offer. It is why all of us who have set foot on that campus do not forget it, even if we leave it, it stays with us.

    However, to hear people talk about the same problems that we did in 1980's--"the problem is University" or the problem is "never recuperating from the extremism of the 1970's"--I do not buy. This sounds like "deja vu, all over again"! We just keep spinning our wheels with the same old rhetoric. It seems there has not been the right combination of leaders to reinvent the place for the next generation. It is stagnating.

    Several years ago I brought my husband "home" to Yellow Springs to meet the "family" which had to do with all my old haunts. My red flags were raised when I found most of the old, art building closed--which was my mainstay and refuge as a student. My red flag, if you gut the art, you have gutted the imaginary depth of the place. All the slides I filed for the slide library, gone. No fourth floor paint studio--all the exchanges. Only the ceramic studio seemed to be operational. This broke my heart and it is the first time I wondered if Antioch would make it.

    At the moment the news does not bode well. Bad news today. 28 years later, it appears the news has finally come, that the doors are closing. Sad for all of us whose characters have been formed in the crucible of Antioch College. It is our loss. We know it to be a loss for American culture, as well. It is hard for me to imagine an American educational landscape without the place of Antioch. I hope the board realizes that to cave into these forces is a huge failure on its part.

  • Antioch College Closing
  • Posted by Andy Winnick on June 14, 2007 at 5:10am EDT
  • I was on the faculty at Antioch from 1972 to 1984 -- and there was always a fiscal crises and it was always due to the same three issues -- incompetent fiscal management, inadequate fund raising, and the absurd expansion of the College to a so-called University with at one time more than 40 satllite. In order to cover the loses from these satillites, the administration took out loans, illegally putting the endowment up as collateral. When Antioch defaulted on the loans, the entire endowment was seized by the banks. THAT is why there is no endowment. The lack of successful fund raising was due to the disillusionment of the alumni of the home campus due to the energy and money put into the satellites. The college actually went bankrupt in the mid 1970's and failed to pay salaries from April to October one year. The continuing problems stem directly from a continuation of the same pattern of inadequate attention to the needs of the home campus, its students, faculty, programs and facilities. The current closing is tragically sad, but not at all surprising.

  • Resurrection
  • Posted by Tom Bingenheimer on June 14, 2007 at 9:20am EDT
  • So what IS the plan for the resurrection of Antioch College? Who's heading it up? What do we need? Does the Board have a plan, or is it a smoke-and-mirrors to close down Yellow Springs?

  • blame a clueless board
  • Posted by S.J. on June 14, 2007 at 1:25pm EDT
  • I taught at Antioch for 5 years and it was clear to me that the board had not idea what it was doing. The administration came up with wild plans for expanding to branch campuses without any concrete numbers on generated revenue. When faculty spoke up and questioned these plans, the board treated us like wild animals and the more alarms we sounded, the less they listened.

    Antoich died when the board did not listen to the faculty's voice, and the board leveraged Antioch's good name against risky distance education ventures.

  • Campus for the 21st Century?
  • Posted by Rick Martin on June 14, 2007 at 1:25pm EDT
  • I'm guessing that, if Antioch College does reopen in 2012 (or any other time), it will not use its campus in the manner that we're accustomed to. Some short residencies, perhaps, but Antioch's traditional emphasis on mixing real-world experiences with "book learning" may be about to take a quantum leap. I certainly hope so, otherwise this pile of lemons is just a pile of lemons.

  • Rising University-of-Phoenix-like from Its Ashes?
  • Posted by GlennHelen on June 14, 2007 at 7:00pm EDT
  • These post-mortems are important not only as grief management but also as clues to what to expect in 2012. Jim Dixon destroyed Antioch College in order to create what he believed was something greater: justice. In particular, distributive justice. Antioch College, circa 1967, was an elite residential liberal-arts college with a bad conscience. Despite its egalitarian professions it was, as a NYT headine circa 1974 had it: "A Symbol of Quality." Dixon believed it was possible to deliver Antioch quality in quantity. The faculty disagreed, and Dixon--with the Trustees' connivance--destroyed faculty governance. The tipping point was when Dixon fired Howard Greenlee as Dean of Faculty. Dixon brilliantly foresaw the day when strong administrators could cut faculty down to size. It is not a coincidence that Antioch University relies on adjuncts. Dixon was also brilliant in foreseeing the viability of a delocalized web of nonresidential "campuses," no one node of which need be permanent or central. As he said in to the NYT in 1974: "There could be a national Antioch without any of the individual pieces that now exist," referring specifically to "the social asset known as Antioch College." That was consistent with the campus zeitgeist: Antioch the elite liberal arts college must see itself as a social asset to be distributed to the less privileged and (therefore) more deserving. If an Antioch College reopens in 2012 it will be not so much a phoenix-like, as a University-of-Phoenix-like, rebirth. We glum alums who pine for a return to the heyday when Antioch ranked with Oberlin, Carleton, Reed, and Swarthmore had better grasp this: a majority of Antiochians don't want that. And we may be certain that a majority of the University trustees would not attempt that even if it were feasible.

  • Post Mortem on Antioch College
  • Posted by Sister Sara at (ret: U of MN) on June 15, 2007 at 4:35am EDT
  • I agree with GlenHelen in most respects, but in particular for providing those of us deeply connected with Antioch a means for putting forward critical analysis of what went wrong.

    As an Antiochian, class of 1962 -- sometimes called "the Golden Years" and then as someone who kept multiple connections to the college, and then served as an elected director, 1988-1994 on the Alumni Board, I have had the possibility to observe and fully or variously participate in the College for over 50 years. I grew up in Dayton, I spent summers in the 1950's sitting on front campus watching rehersals for Shakespeare Under the Stars productions, It was the only college to which I applied in 1957 when Antioch only accepted one out of ten applicants. And I had to get ACLU help to force my High School to release my transcript to Antioch to complete the Application -- the "guidence counselor" said no, cause they didn't wear shoes out there!!! Moreover, I have an ancestor who, back in the 1850's was involved in founding Antioch. Yes, I am the only member of my family to earn an Antioch degree, but the connections run deep.

    Sadly and without much doubt but many regrets, I agree with the Board of Trustees decision to suspend operations. This kind of surgery was needed thirty years ago. Decisions made in the early 1960's, and built on over the years were profoundly destructive, and at some point a line has to be drawn under destructive dynamics. GlenHelen notes Dixon's destruction of Faculty control over the Academic Enterprise -- but it actually happened my Senior year (1961-62) when Dixon pushed a Rockefeller Foundation Grant on the school (which included many goodies) that involved substitution of a Rockefeller generated First Year Program for the normal initiation to the Academic Enterprise, essentially taking out of the hands of Faculty the power to oversee pre-degree curriculum. Because the teaching Faculity did not own it, and had no real input into its creation, it set up the power conflict between Administrators who frequently acted as agents for Foundations, and the Faculty. This was plastered over for many years, but it is the core of the Discipline oriented faculty/Administration conflict that never was resolved.

    There is a huge unpublished manuscript by Joan Yalman and Everett Wilson (Social Psychologist and Sociologist) dealing in detail with each element of this decline, that needs to be both published and peer reviewed by anyone trying to characterize the cause of Antioch's demise. (Ev Wilson was my advisor). But as I found when I was serving on the Alumni Board in the late 80's and early 90's -- it was generally understood that anyone who really read it carefully was a traitor. Critical analysis was never all that popular.

    In contrast, but likewise, my generational Antiochian cohort, Peter Irons, (we selected him for the Horace Mann Award when I was on the Board) has also done much of the preliminary research on the matter of J. Edgar Hoover targeting Antioch for destruction in the 1970's, basic testimony and documents on this in the files and report of the Church Committee. Antioch was in Hoover's sights for many reasons going back to the 1930's -- and in the 1970's he flipped the switch. The Strike in the early 70's, the subsequent loss of student population, and then the months without pay for the faculty and many administrators, were a product of this, even though the cause of living wages for service personnel was clearly a legitimate issue. Peter Irons needs to finish the research and publish, because this hidden matter is part and parcel of the problem. (Peter got the Mann award for his research on Japaneese Internment during WWII, that led to Congressional Compensation and a formal apology).

    There is a huge story of poor management of both resources and tradition involved here, and it begs telling, if only for the sake of understanding why institutions fail.

    Can Antioch College come back? I think so, but only if a serious post-mortem is done and discussed -- leading to a total re-design of the undergraduate college program, and the proper resourcing of any such plan. The College was bankrupt in 1920 when the Dayton Industrialists hired Arthur Morgan to either bury it or fix it, and he invented the co-op program that for at least four decades enabled students to work their way through a highly demanding Liberal Arts program. Today the cost of Antioch is more than the Average Family Income, as is the case with most private colleges, and many students leave with a hundred thousand dollar debt to be paid off as they form families, have kids, buy a house, etc. etc. This is just not sustainable, particularly if the economics do not encourage investment in tenure, in scholarship and academic development. I focus on this because I have known Antioch since the last days of the WWII GI Bill student population, the Korean vets who followed on, and were still there when I entered, and what I saw in the 1990's. No, the freedom to trash is not why older alumni such as myself tried to help and donated.

    Unmentioned in much of the obits is the fact that some of us tried to do something perhaps ten years ago. We established a trust and raised funds eventually equal to more than a million dollars all from alumni that would go to Antioch College if it established an independent Board of Trustees for the College, and ownership of College assets. The money was in the bank, and the Trustees refused to meet and discuss. The fund was liquidated and donated to charity other than Antioch. Sadly trying is not something that necessarily counts.

  • Ashes
  • Posted by labahr on June 15, 2007 at 4:35am EDT
  • So GlennHelen are you saying that the majority of Antiochians no longer want an Antioch College? Are you saying that Dixon's 1974 "vision" has succeeded? If the people can't come to Antioch then take Antioch to the people. It never seemed to really work, there were just a bunch of crazy schemes and much disenchantment. This is hard for me to swallow having delved into the archives of the place. Has social engineering ever succeeded for very long? (I am probably way over my head asking this question!)

    What has emerged are a loose knit bunch of minimal learning institutions, with very little substance, but apparently more and more administration and the name Antioch. (Like the apostles going forth to spread the "Good News"--Guess we haven't escaped the Christian roots either. Mary (Peabody) Mann in her letters describing Horace Mann often used the analogy of Christ.)

    I did my first co-op in Seattle in 1980. Antioch--Seattle, was just around the corner from the center where I worked. One of it's students was doing a practicum at the same employer. Antioch--Seattle, did not hold a candle to the teaching that was still taking place at the Yellow Springs Campus in 1980. No comparison. Seattle's curriculum was lame, and the students I encountered were even lamer. Nothing, remotely close to what Antioch College was offering my nineteen year old body, mind, and soul.

    At that time there was talk that the college could "secede" from the University corporate structure. Legally, it was so complex, without precedent, that it seemed an impossibility. So over time a compromise was made between Antioch College and Antioch University. Many of the satellite, "Antioch's" closed. Including the DC Law School, another sad occasion. The idea being that some of the "Antiochs" needed to be sacrificed for the center to hold. It is unbelievable that the center would not include the campus! Is this the final trump?

    When I look at the internet images on the University web site, it is difficult to believe it is the same place. Even the architectural facade, is that on the Kettering Building? or Fels Institute. Say it isn't so! I think our history is being stolen, and made into a public relations campaign while the place is becoming a ghost of a campus. They are making Coretta Scott King the poster girl for an institution they have destroyed. They are resurrecting corporatized "Antioch" education in its place.

    Of course Arthur Morgan took a dwindling institution, and reinvented it into a different place than it had been when Horace Mann first arrived. He stretched the academics and melded it with a deep pragmatism. However, it was the campus, the place, that provided the continuity. It is difficult to believe that this is a relic! I see young people as being very tribal, longing for a place, that a physical campus provides.

    Are you saying there is no need for a campus or infrastructure, or tenured faculty for this generation of Antiochians? Too much baggage. All that is needed is a bunch of administrators with resumes and photo ops. Those digital 8x10's (no longer glossy) do not substitute for vision or intelligence or leadership! All you need are a few characters to put in an appearance at the board meetings, looks good on the resume. Some commuter students. What a ruse! There are no clothes!

    This is hard to accept.
    Maybe a different Phoenix can rise than Glenn Helen's statement I hope it is not just a heap of ashes. I still don't believe the place will actually go under. Although, I would probably come to the grave and plant flowers, even if I do not make the wake.
    The shock needs to be absorbed.

  • Posted by Joe on June 15, 2007 at 8:25am EDT
  • The Integrated Postsecondary Education Data Set, a national database for colleges and universities, etc., list this total undergraduate enrollment for the past few years. It looks as though something dramatic happened in recent years to put the college over the edge. Additional and more recent data not available.

    1994 687
    1995 637
    1996 632
    1997 611
    1998 595
    1999 NA
    2000 639
    2001 682
    2002 669
    2003 585
    2004 496

  • What's wrong with the university ...
  • Posted by jp on June 15, 2007 at 10:55am EDT
  • Dixon's idea was a great idea in the 70s FOR a place like Harvard or Princeton with deep pockets. But Antioch didn't have deep pockets. Still I'd like to know how much of the Antioch endowment was spent then to build the university system. The college may have had problems in adjusting to changing times as it was a first-rate college, IF it hadn't been run by a third-rate or worse university system. The trustees have argued for a number of years that the college needed the university because the university was making money. If truth be told, it could be that had the university repaid in today's dollars all that Antioch College spent on starting the university, the college would not have been killed.

  • From a former Trustee
  • Posted by Laura Markham '80 , Dr on June 15, 2007 at 11:35am EDT
  • As a former member of the Antioch University Board of Trustees, I need to state for the record that much of the education at the other Antioch campuses is impressive and in keeping with the legacy of Horace Mann. But Andy Winnick has perfectly stated the origin of Antioch College’s problems, which stem from its expansion to a University.

    Although the other campuses have been financially subsidizing the college’s deficit for some years now, this would not have been necessary if they had not drained the College’s resources at the time of their birth. The fiscal mismanagement at that time and continuing to the recent past, and the fact that Antioch College has been frequently mismanaged by a Board that represents not the College but the University are responsible for the College’s demise.

    Antioch College does have other, very real problems (Why are so many graduating students so angry at the College? Would you describe the campus climate as tolerant and embracing of real discourse?) but in my view these are symptoms of the larger problem of poverty, created by the flawed structure. And despite these problems, during Antioch’s three decades of decline, there have been many heroes teaching and working at the College, and many graduates who’ve gone out into the world inspired to win victories for humanity.

    How does the University structure create Antioch College’s poverty? First, the financial foundation never recovered from the College's resources being plundered to start the rest of the University. Second, it has dramatically discouraged alumni giving. Since the birth of the University, giving by Antioch alumni has dwindled to one of the lowest rates of alumni giving in the country. Third, Board members are simply overwhelmed and distracted by the weight of so many campuses. I was on the Board’s finance committee, and I saw what I can only call a lack of responsible oversight by some trustees. Fourth, the ULC –- the leadership of the campuses – runs the school day to day, and has only one College leader who is simply outvoted. Fifth, University administrators hired by the Board have too often been incompetent and/or openly hostile to the College, which has been seen as the problem child.

    This positioning of the College as the problem child, I believe, is what eventually killed it. There are some good, hard-working people on the Board, but the power imbalance that has favored the University for decades now has left Antioch College floundering. It is hardly news that the lack of investment –- and let’s not just talk infrastructure, Antioch’s mostly terrific faculty are among the lowest paid in the country -– led to the declining enrollment and attrition problems. And yet the College was continuously criticized by the Board for not becoming more self-supporting, something small liberal arts colleges just can't do.

    Finally, I believe the multiple campus structure kept the full University Board from feeling responsible for its failure to raise money to implement the Renewal Plan. It was always someone else’s problem. I know this fundraising was not an easy feat. But a responsible Board would have recognized that extraordinary measures were necessary two years ago, when the fundraising stalled. The Board made a commitment to raise the necessary investment, and, quite simply, the Board broke that commitment.

    Does Antioch College have a chance of reopening in service to its historical mission? A slim one, but only if alumni ask the hard questions. I would start with this one: Can Antioch College take all its property, including the small endowment that legally belongs only to the College and the physical plant that legally belongs to the University, and find itself a new Board of Trustees – not subsidiary to the current Board -- with real power?

    If the current Board is left in charge of the college, it will never reopen as the Antioch that inspired so many. The assets will be -- dare I say it? -- plundered for use by the rest of the University.
    Antioch College has risen from the ashes before. Are there enough fearless and committed champions to help it do so again? Now that would be a victory for humanity.

  • cuiousities
  • Posted by anonymous on June 15, 2007 at 11:45am EDT
  • It is curious to me that Antioch claims to have an endowment of $30million--have they stated what they will use that money for once the main campus is closed down? Are readers assuming that money will go to fix the buildings?

    Toni Murdock was brought elevated from Seattle campus president to chancellor for a reason. My intuition tells me that they knew last year when the Trustees made her chancellor that they were going to do this.
    A warning: any straight, white male faculty member needs to lawyer up right now!

  • College Independence
  • Posted by GlennHelen on June 15, 2007 at 12:30pm EDT
  • I agree with Sara and Laura. Antioch College will never revive under the governance of Antioch University. A few years back Katy Jako organized what was called the Antioch Independence Fund, which raised money for the College that would be either a) give to the College once the trustees allowed it to govern itself, or b) would be given to various secondary charities designated by the donors. The Trustees refused to talk with Katy, and so over $1m went to the secondary donees. Between now and 2012 there is plenty of time to organize something along these lines, to offer deep-pocketed "white knights" and "angels" an alternative to the present--discredited--management of the College.

  • Antioch
  • Posted by Mark on June 15, 2007 at 1:05pm EDT
  • Maybe Cedarville University, which is bursting at the seams, will buy the place and turn it into a educational showcase. Nothing would make the pointy headed socialists more angry!

  • Antiochian roots
  • Posted by GlennHelen on June 15, 2007 at 5:25pm EDT
  • Cedarville's taking over the campus? Antioch would then have come at least full circle. The following is how Horace Mann began his Inauguaral Address at the Dedication of Antioch College, in 1854, after accepting “three costly-bound Bibles” from ladies’ church groups:

    "Reverend Sir: Did time and the occasion permit, I might give myself free scope to enumerate and enlarge upon the grand characteristics and prerogatives of this volume of the Sacred Scriptures; I might speak of the venerableness of its antiquity; of the sublimity of its eloquence; of the splendor of its poetry, whose words shine out as though precious stones had been scattered over the page; of its touching pathos; of its precepts and examples of wisdom and truth; and its inspirations of devotion and love; but in this pressure and urgency of the hour [sic], it seems more fitting that I should, so far as I am able, accumulate all excellences in one phrase, concentrate all eulogiums into a single expression; ay, sweep the horizon of time, and of eternity too, gathering their glories into one refulgent blaze, and say that it is a book which contains the truths that are able to make men wise unto salvation. This book...." [it continues].

  • Antioch's Endowment
  • Posted by GlennHelen on June 15, 2007 at 11:05pm EDT
  • The idea of a church takeover of Antioch's endowment may no be so far-fetched. According to Robert L. Straker's "A Brief Sketch of Antioch College:1853-1921":

    "In June 1865, Edward Everett Hale for the Unitarians reported to the trustees that the denominational test for trustees having been removed, the Unitarians in two months had raised $100,000, a permanent endowment for the exclusive use of Antioch. He then presented it to the college on condition that it would revert to the American Unitarian Association should the sectarian test for trustees ever be restored or if the fund should ever be perverted from the use of Antioch College. The trustees accepted the endowment on these terms."

    If what has happened since 1978 has not "perverted funds from the use of Antioch College," I'm not sure what would. Can you, Unitarians?

  • full circle it would be
  • Posted by labahr on June 15, 2007 at 11:05pm EDT
  • The irony is not lost on to any historian of the place, if Antioch became Cedarville Colleges next satellite campus. It could start its own corparate branching following in Dixon's footsteps. At least they would still be in Green County!

    Horace Mann was a "visionary" Easterner come to the western edge to found a college close to the curative waters of the Yellow Springs. He struggled with the various religious streams of that place and time, from the start. The place killed him before it had barely begun. The biographies of some of those early graduates are even sadder.

    Antioch College, however, did survive. A seed was planted, a campus laid.

    So where are the Unitarians when you need them, now? Is there no Unitarian foundation in 2007 that could boost a campus endowment? I keep hearing that Unitarian fellowships are thriving across the country.

    How does the college get its leverage back?

    I don't know if the issue is salvation or sweeping the horizon of time and eternity...however I will repeat:

    PLACE MATTERS.
    CHARACTER MATTERS.

    The brick and mortar of Main Building is not just a 19th century fuselage, is it? Does it matter, is it relevent? We certainly use it as an icon. What are we going to do tear down the structure and auction it off brick by brick? Preserve it as a historic monument? Hire an architect to put up a new facade?

    What happens to the campus? Expand, Antioch, McGregor? Parcel it out like a dead bride's dowry to all her competitive and jeaulous sisters? Who gets the spoils of Antioch College? Rent it out to Cedarville College? Turn it into a retirement village for all the tenured faculty and former staff when they have no retirement and no savings from so many years of being the sacrificial lambs. Maybe the students need to be included for all the debt incurred, and dreams delayed for shouldering Antioch. Do they get a condo in North Hall or West? Hmm Hmm.....
    What do you do with a campus in the 21st century?

  • Posted by RA '91 on June 16, 2007 at 8:20pm EDT
  • I attended Antioch in the mid-late 80s. We were the first large class in many years. At the time, there was hope that we would be the first of many large first year classes. The campus was in rough shape. Many of us were strangely attracted to that. There were improvements on that end, and students were excited to see some positive change. I left with a great education and a wealth of experiences, thinking there was a positive future ahead for Antioch.
    I returned to Yellow Springs with other alumni more than 15 years after having earned my degree. As I got further away from my undergraduate years, I gave less and less thought to Antioch. When I visited the campus, what I saw broke my heart. Realizing that I was looking at it as an older person, it was still very sad. There were few students to be seen. When I saw the conditions of the student union, I was sickened and embarrassed. I wondered if I could ever advise my own children, or anyone else's to attend Antioch. Although many of us have always said that Antioch is self selective and not for everyone, I think at this point perhaps the number of those that would choose to attend despite the conditions may have become too small. I can't see how Antioch could possibly compete with other small colleges in its current state, regardless of how exceptional the education is. I am very sorry for all of those that will be directly hurt by the closing.

  • Morphing Antioch (True Roots)
  • Posted by Richard H. Moore , DOE Professor at National Defense University/ICAF on June 16, 2007 at 8:25pm EDT
  • The ironies abound in the current state of Antioch, but so do the opportunities. Antioch has roots in many areas of social action that it should now draw upon. As a graduate from 1972, having spent time in both Yellow Springs, where I also graduated from high school, and the Baltimore-Washington Campus, where I was one of the founders of the Homestead-Montebello Center, there is much potential I still see. The Homestead-Montebello Center, which incorporated separately and thus was able to break away from Antioch when it was going through so much turmoil, has now been an independent college for more than a quarter-century as Sojourner-Douglass College in Baltimore.

    What the Yellow Springs campus needs to do is form and execute a new strategy that incorporates its engineering and radical roots to focus on sustainability - a move it should have made long ago. Moreover, it needs to combine modalities of campus, coop, and communications options through the internet. Long ago, Jim Dixon saw the writing on the wall with threats to the survival of small liberal arts colleges. That's why he launched the Antioch Network, which few understood at the time. Ninety-five percent of similar colleges went out of business between 1950 and 1970. Antioch was one of the survivors. But, it got diverted through an inability to focus effectively, and had a series of rather inept leaders who went down paths inconsistent with both the legacy and future of Antioch.

    An example is the extent to which it departed from its engineering roots, when it could have developed that precisely as a way of marrying its social action to real-world realities in sustainable development. That need remains and only grows more urgent. A further issue is that most students today are not traditional students moving directly from high school, but older adult students working in careers or with family responsibilities. Only 20 percent are the traditional type of student, so that is not a good market segment on which to stake survival or success. But, the proposition that Antioch has no mission left nor ability to mobilize around that mission is absurd on its face. What it lacks is effective strategy, vision, and leadership to lead its evolving mission at this time - and not for the first time in its history.

    It was precisely in such a situation that Arthur Morgan entered upon the scene and dramatically resurrected a faltering Antioch in the 1920's. He had no college degree himself, yet organized a college that set the standard for its time, then went on to be the first head of the TVA, and began social experiments around the world that continue to this day. Such a vision and enterprise is still both possible and necessary.

    Those with deep insight into what is happening today realize that many seemingly robust and great institutions will themselves be soon eclipsed by a failure to adapt to the demands of sustainability in a world as turbulent as ever and challenged as always to bring the full capacity of human ingenuity to bear in meeting the challenge laid down by Antioch's first president, Horace Mann, when he said "Be ashamed to die until you have won some victory for humanity." I would add the words of Antoine de Saint-Exupéry: “As for the future, your task is not to foresee it, but to enable it.”

  • Another Ramble
  • Posted by labahr on June 17, 2007 at 6:25am EDT
  • It matters to have a place/structure/campus from which you focus your ideals, where students practice what it is they want to come to embody. A place with a rich historical soil; is a very precious place. Walking through the same spaces as one’s predecessors, investing oneself in a place, participating in governance and ecology of a community, creating culture, repeating the tasks of living, exploring a larger world/universe, building something tangible; these things have real impact. A place from which you leave and return.

    Since the founding of Cooperative Education, most Antiochians know that feeling of leaving for 3 or 6 months and the returning. The return was as important as the leaving. Sure many students travel these days and do student internships—but I would argue it is not of the same calibre that Antioch Coops provided. Not just leaving once or twice, but leaving and returning multiple times. By the end of my second year I had worked in a community mental health center in Seattle, given tours to 4th graders in a Savannah,GA Art Museum, and worked interning at Schlesinger Library of Radcliffe College in Cambridge, MA. It wasn’t just the work, it was living in all those places, meeting people connected with those institutions…so much. Others went to India, Europe, New York, Atlanta, to Central and South America, all over creation.

    Returning to the campus was a touchstone, it was the best of both worlds. It was an amazing education. There needed to be more integration/structure between the coop time and the on-campus classroom/study time but the experiences were rich, the education real.

    What is sad to me is that the technological changes in the last twenty years could help integrate the study and coop components of Antioch College. This could help support the community and the student out on coop. It could revitalize the campus experience, rather than leaving the traditional liberal arts college in the dust. It could fulfill the vision of distributive justice…“taking Antioch to the people”, without diminishing the college or the campus. Localize and globalize all at the same time. Yet the college has stagnated without an endowment & independence from the University, to invest more fully in technology.

    I don’t believe the glory days—are past for Antioch College in Yellow Springs. It still has relevance, it still can be vital. Money can be found, if there is clear vision and collective will. Aren’t it’s alumni and the whole cast of characters still present as its legacy and its advocates? The past has not been successfully absorbed into the next vision, that does not mean the college has no role to play.

    Walking into a classroom where a teacher is prepared to exchange and share the spark of intelligence that is their call and character, is irreplaceable. Dare I conjure their names?--so many great teachers--that are the lineage of Antioch College. How could that ever be an obsolete commodity?

    There is always a focus on the stereotypes and the extremes of Antioch. The abolitionist, the suffragette in her bloomers, the pinkie communists, the barefoot/toking hippies and beatniks, the graffiti, the drugs, all the counter culture stuff and political correct stuff that cycles through…the punks, the queers, and cross-dressers, the avant-garde jazz man jamming the night away, the marginalized in many stripes and colors. Wasn’t something else happening at that extreme, in the edginess? Something that mattered? Is it just the bohemian sheik of spoiled rich kids, not quite grown? Is it just a refuge for weary transcendentalists wanting to create an ideal community, find a piece of salvation? Is it “camp Antioch”, “bootcamp for the Revolution”? Is it just a repository for the fringe? Is it just a place of self righteous intolerant moralizing, bickering and sniping? Are the students unruly, juvenile delinquents who need to grow up and get with the program or be dismissed as elitists?

    Each generation has its extreme Antioch tales to tell, but isn’t there something else, more than a thrill ride of destruction/depravity/debauchery or manifest destiny--happening on the edge—where those Eastern Liberals and Radicals came to experiment? Where staid mid-westerners came for refuge or to gawk at the spectacle? Where the non-sectarians, the women, and the “other” were given room to stand up and be counted, to imagine even extremely? Where satellites can be launched? Where the artist found meaning and work? Where an attempt to create a more egalitarian and creative milieu is the ideal?

    There is nothing wrong with that edge, in fact there is great strength of character that resides there too. What is wrong with experimenting? Is this not the promise of democracy, of an education? Of America?

    Great buildings were built. Companies formed that are living legacies and have given much back to Yellow Springs. Great experiments of science, theatre, dance. Galleries full of images, ideas, and hard work. Theories of management, education, and social studies. There are so many stories to be remembered and told not just for one generation of Antiochians but for all of us. There is a link between the generations.

    Antioch College was a life altering experience because of the place, because of the vision/model and because we kept packing our bags and showing up to leave again. This cast of friends and characters you returned to, this return to Yellow Springs & Glen Helen, was deeply felt. There is a depth to it that has to do with place and character. For any young person to enter such a milieu was transformative, even if frustrating or crazy making at times; the character of the place allowed this to be contained. The edge gave definition. The Antioch College I know, even as it floundered, did give us that container. There is a power at the edge of things, even when it gets a little crazy.

    If the destructive has overtaken the creative, if poverty has replaced the richness; then maybe a decompression period is needed. I can't imagine it is any worse than what was reported leading up to the Strike or even in 1980 when enrollment, funds, and faculty morale were deplete. What is surprisning is not that it is closing, what is surprising is how it has survived and sometimes thrived for decades after all of these catastrophes. There must be something fit in there to have survived.

  • COME TO THE REUNION!
  • Posted by jknaggs on June 17, 2007 at 12:35pm EDT
  • If this upsets you and you want your voice heard, please come to the Antioch Alumni Reunion next week!!
    June 21-24, 2007!!! Now is time to mobilize and unify as many alums as possible!

    Your letters about your Antioch experiences are wonderful to read--don't let your words fall on deaf ears! Mail them to the board of trustees!!

    All emails at antioch-college(dot)edu

    Thomas A. Faecke
    Vice Chancellor and Chief Financial Officer
    email: tfaecke (at) ...

    Laurien Alexandre,Ph.D.
    Vice Chancellor for University Academic Affairs
    Director, Ph.D. Program in Leadership and Change
    email: lalexandre(at)...

    Art Zucker - Board Chair azucker@...
    Dan Fallon - Vice Chair df@...
    Bruce Bedford - Treas. bedfob@...
    Sherwood Guernsey - Sec. guernsey@... and
    sherwood@...
    Barbara Winslow bwpurplewins@...
    Jeffrey Kasch jckasch@...
    Hal Joseph halmary80@...
    Paula Treichler ptreich@...
    Reuben Harris rharris@...
    Amy Chappell aschappell@...
    Larry Stone stone@...
    Everett Freeman everette.freeman@...
    John Feinberg john@...
    Diane Brou Fraser dbfraser@...
    Thomas McNicol tam845@...
    David Crippens dcrippens@...
    Michael Alexander malexander@...
    Niels Lister nielslyster@...
    Jack Merselis msweetwood@...

  • About the Morgan Model
  • Posted by Sara on June 18, 2007 at 5:30am EDT
  • I am glad Richard Moore posted some detail on the Arthur Morgan model-process at Antioch. Yes indeed, the fair school was in as ratty shape in 1920 as it is today, and Morgan was hired by Dayton Area Industrailists to either bury the place or revive it. The Rike Family (Dept. Store, the Pattersons, (National Cash Register) and Charles Kettering (Self Starters, Battery & Delco Division of GM) Backed Morgan as he fired all the trustees, all but one of the faculty, required existing students to apply for re-admission, and then hired "teachers" in or out of discipline. A former Austrian Monk taught European History, the Personal rep of Gandhi (1928 till Independence) in the US, (A Brahamin German-Scottish trained engineer) taught Sociology/Anthropology, The art Department centered around an Italian Anti-facist lost wax sculptor, a New York advertising writer taught American Lit, and eventually American History. Morgan was a genius in using the co-op for speciality training, and the classroom for the guru and analysis. While Morgan left in 34 for TVA, he lived in YSO into the late 1960's thus his impact went well beyond his presidency.

    If Antioch reorganizes and reopens, it will need another somewhat authoritarian leader in the 21st century sense of Morgan. You can't re-organize anything based on a committee of 17,000, the rough number of living Alumni, all of whom believe they could manage the college. Somehow the idea that the teaching faculty owns the curriculum needs to take root -- for many reasons ownership was gradually given up over the years beginning in the 60's. How one finances a small liberal arts college in the 21st century needs real attention, particularly if you intend racial and economic class diversity. Right now Antioch needs an independent Forensic Audit if anyone is ever to find what went wrong. If anyone looking for a PHD topic in that field (Business - Academic Economics) needs a really interesting subject -- look no further.

  • Antioch Independence Fund
  • Posted by GlennHelen on June 19, 2007 at 4:25am EDT
  • Those who may not have known about the Antioch Independence Fund, what it tried to accomplish, and how it wound up can find a synopsis here, in the Yellow Springs News:

    http://www.ysnews.com/stories/2003/june/062603_antioch.html

  • Posted by Tony on June 20, 2007 at 12:25pm EDT
  • I attended Antioch from 1979 to 1982. Although I transferred out after two years -- at the time I lacked the focus to settle on what I wanted to do with my life -- I have very rich memories of unique people and thought-provoking instructors.

    The experience has undoubtedly had innumerable influences on me, but I think my need to remain constantly engaged in politics and world events can be largely credited to Antioch.

    And the co-op jobs -- the Library of Congress -- teaching outdoor ed. to kids in Cape Cod--no school could match Antioch's vision for a "holistic" education.

    I'm of course saddened by Antioch's apparent demise. As other posters have already mentioned, the place has been on shaky ground for decades. Even when I was there the enrollment seemed quite small.

    I'm not familiar with the political or financial intricacies of this decision. I suppose it's too late now but I do wonder if more couldn't have been done to expand the student base and to create some POSITIVE publicity on a national basis.

    Whether I was debating the ins and outs of history in Fred Hoxie's Foreign Policy class or meditating in the soft needles of a sun-dappled pine forest, Antioch is an integral part of my own personal history.

    Aside from the personal -- the socially- conscious graduates Antioch has produced have made an indelible mark in the soul of our nation. It will be a sad farewell.

  • Antioch
  • Posted by Kel Feind on June 20, 2007 at 8:40pm EDT
  • It was nice to read Andy Winnick's post on Antioch. I was at the school from 75 to 79 and took a few classes with him before he moved on. (Hi Andy!). I have tried to contribute money yearly and this next year, am sending my wife to Antioch McGregor for a masters in "conflict resolution". After Antioch I went to Medical School. Meeting my new classmates, I was left with the strong impression that I could never had suceeded at a "normal" college. I survived medical school (barely) and am now in the middle of my carreer. It was impossible to account for the contribution Antioch gave me until last year when I became unemployed as the result of political dispute at the hospital I was working at. Many times, I thought of ending it but I managed to get over the hump, and regain my professional footing by using the skills I learned by taking all those co-op jobs, so many years ago. I don't think I could have done it without drawing on those experiences.

    It's sad to see so many people harken back to the 70s, the 60's and even back to Horace Mann! One thing that life has taught me is that in order to survive, you must change. Antioch, sadly, was an anachronism, unable or unwilling to change. Sure it would have been nice to have a larger endowment, or smarter administrators. But what would have been even better would have been to have a greater understanding of what high school students wanted and then gave it to them (and their parents)And somehow, like the hermit obsessing over his navel, Antioch failed to do that and so now it comes to this.

    Open again in 2012? Maybe in name but what would it take to make it happen? Does the country need another marginal small liberal-arts college? For Heavan's sakes, what is liberal arts anyway? The 60s were a time of great promise and for most people, it was pretty easy to coast along in life (not all, I know!) It made sense to spend 4 years studying liberal arts, there was always later. Now it is tougher to be a young person. My two sons see this and are driven in ways I never was. They know that they face greater obstacles than their parents and they are working hard now to suceed later. In 1975, I didn't know anyone like that. Or maybe, they were just the ones who went to Harvard that I met 4 years later in Medical school.

    So Antioch has joined the passenger pigeon. Unable to change to meet it's new challenges, it has finally died. This is the story of evolution and life itself. Maybe Stephen Jay Gould (Class of 1969, now deceased) is somewhere smiling

  • Antioch Closing: Alumni Response
  • Posted by Phaye Poliakoff-Chen on June 21, 2007 at 10:55pm EDT
  • This is a copy of letter that a group of us sent to the Chair of the Antioch University Board of Trustees, Arthur Zucker, and the
    Chancellor of Antioch University, Tullisse "Toni" Murdock. It provides an analysis/summary, as well as positive plans for the future.
    June 22, 2007

    Dear Mr. Zucker and Ms. Murdock,

    As graduates of Antioch College in the late 1970s and early 1980s, we can identify with the tragic uncertainty now facing the campus community after the Board of Trustees suddenly announced it is closing the College in Yellow Springs.

    We, too, were told that the College would likely be closing at some time during our tenure there because enrollments had dropped and the endowment was too small. As it turned out, that didn’t happen. But the internal debate over the relationship between the main College campus and Antioch’s satellite campuses (it was never a true university no matter what the college PR department said) was high on the agenda in those years.
    Many of us remember refusing to shake hands with then College President, William Birenbaum at graduation ceremonies in 1980 as a public protest. It wasn’t merely that we disliked his ideas about education, his arrogance in dealing with students, faculty and staff, or his misguided attempts to funnel resources away from Yellow Springs. An even greater transgression was his total disdain for a cornerstone principle of Antioch College: community governance.

    We are outraged and saddened to see that the current Board of Trustees has exhibited a similar lack of regard in the way it has sprung news of the College’s closing on the campus body politic. It has compounded the wrongdoing by not outlining a clear role for that community in key decision making about what kind of institution will supposedly reopen its doors in Yellow Springs in four years.

    As this year’s alumni reunion goes forward, we want to deliver a clear message to you and the current College administration: We will not support any future educational institution bearing Antioch’s name that fails to return control and academic focus to the main College in Yellow Springs.

    The Board of Trustees needs to be comprised of members who support that mission and who have demonstrated their commitment by contributing to the College campaign. The assets of the College need to be returned to the College—including Antioch University McGregor, which should be merged with the College and come under the control of the College President.

    College leaders should launch a democratic process of renewal on campus that will result in a plan for a future educational institution in Yellow Springs that respects the best traditions of Antioch. The current Board of Trustees has betrayed those traditions, both in the way it announced the College closing and in actions it has taken—or failed to take—that have brought us to this pass.

    Specifically, the current Board of Trustees reneged on a commitment to raise the needed funds to implement the Renewal Commission Plan that it imposed on the College. In fact, most individual trustees did not even contribute to the campaign. When the fundraising campaign foundered, trustees failed to address the obvious implications for the College. In addition, the board only recently discovered problems with University bookkeeping that disguised previous losses. The University Board of Trustees has failed miserably in its legal and ethical responsibilities and has lost all moral right to the Antioch name and mission. The time has come to return control of Antioch College and its assets to the College community, including its alumni.

    We stand ready to pledge money and fundraising energy to a reopening of Antioch. But we will not support any plan created without the involvement and leadership of members of the College community. Nor will we back a future institution that fails to uphold the school’s long established standards of shared decision-making, innovation and the notion that even the privileged realm of higher education can be a proving ground for social justice.

    Sincerely,

    Barbara Solow, Class of 1980, Highland Park, NJ
    Christopher Adams, '87, Landsdowne, PA
    Jeanne Badman, '80, St. Paul, MN
    E. Ann Baldwin, 80
    Douglas Brodoff, ’77, Paris, France
    Marianne Connolly, ‘80, Amherst, MA
    Peter Crosman, ’77, Flintridge, CA
    Laura Drey, ’80, Durham, NC
    David Feinstein, ’79, San Francisco, CA
    Rob Kenter, ’81, Toronto, ON Canada
    Laura Markham, ‘80, New York, NY
    Barbara McCann, ‘83, Washington, DC
    Lizzie Olesker, ’79, Brooklyn, NY
    Glenn Paris, ’80, San Diego, CA
    Lydia Dean Pilcher, ’80, New York, NY
    Phaye Poliakoff-Chen, ‘80, Baltimore, MD
    Scott Pollock, ’80, Evanston, IL
    David Pratt, ’80, Brooklyn, NY
    Sandina Robbins, ‘80, Oakland, CA

  • Posted by AM on June 22, 2007 at 6:15pm EDT
  • This is quite a tragedy, I was greatly anticipating attending Antioch next year. I felt like I finally found the right school, I suppose my college search continues.

  • Posted by Glennhelen on June 22, 2007 at 11:15pm EDT
  • Would the "new governance plan"--referred to at today's meeting with alumni--free Antioch College from its dysfunctional entanglement with the "University"?
    The answer is No.
    What was proposed is yet another layer of bureaucracy: a satellite board of trustees, chosen on the basis of willingness and ability to pay to get on and, once on, expected to concentrate on finding more donors (as President Lawry made very clear).
    Power and property will remain with "the only legal entity," the University, ruled by the Chancellor and the existing BoT, who will oversee the College "from an altitude of 30,000 feet" (Chancellor Murdock's words).
    And if the new urban village can't sustain the obsolete liberal-arts college, at least it can be sold!
    Cui bono?