News, Views and Careers for All of Higher Education
June 15, 2007
A new book from sociologists at the Graduate Center of the City University of New York argues, somewhat uncontroversially, that a college education greatly benefits disadvantaged students. Graduates across the board have a greater earning potential. Their families are upwardly mobile.
But the authors of “Passing The Torch: Does Higher Education for the Disadvantaged Pay Off Across the Generations?” say that six to eight years, the conventional timetable for measuring success in whether a student has completed college, is too short when considering “nontraditional” or low-income students whose careers or life situations might prevent them from continuous enrollment at one institution.
“Our template for evaluating students is out of date,” said Paul Attewell, one of the authors. “Three-fourths of students today aren’t traditional, so it doesn’t make sense to try to understand them through the lens of an 18-year-old living in a dorm. These aren’t failed traditional students; they are the new norm.”
Attewell and David E. Lavin, the other author and CUNY professor, followed a group of nearly 2,000 women who entered the university system in the early 1970s and checked back nearly 30 years later to see how they had fared. The authors sought an equal representation of white, black and Hispanic students. They sampled only women because the study looks at the correlation between parents’ educational levels and how they approach their children’s education — something that would be difficult to measure with a male sample given those who do not play a role in parenting, Attewell said.
The authors say the book is a response to critics of CUNY’s “open admissions” policy, adopted in the early 1970s, in which the system accepts all graduates of New York City high schools. That led to a greater proportion of disadvantaged students, and opened the door for some to conclude that the policy has been a failure “as thousands of weak students foundered on the harsh realities of academic requirements,” the book says.
Attewell said the professors’ study shows that thinking is wrong — particularly if you measure the students’ success over the long haul. “The movement says all these nontraditional students shouldn’t be in college. It’s not even in their best interest. They aren’t going to graduate,” he said. “There’s a bias in the numbers the way they are now. Poor students, women, students of color all look bad using the six-year data set. But if you look longer, it’s a trajectory that does pay off.”
Over the 30-year time frame, more than 70 percent of women in the survey had graduated from CUNY. More than half of minority women took more than six years to complete their bachelor’s degrees, and about one-fourth took more than 15 years to finish.
White students had the highest graduation rates among those surveyed. More than three in four attained an associate level or higher degree over 30 years, compared with 60 percent of both black and Hispanic respondents. Sixty-two percent of white students, 41 percent of black students and 39 percent of Hispanic students received at least a bachelor’s degree. And for master’s degrees or higher, the breakdown was 30 percent of the white women, and 16 percent of both black and Hispanic women.
In the CUNY study, the more than 70 percent of women who had finished college were earning an annual average of $7,525 more per year than they would have without a degree, the authors calculated. Even college students who enter college but don’t earn a diploma earn significantly more than students from similar backgrounds who never went beyond high school at all, according to the study.
The authors point out that the survey results are similar to findings of the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth, a government report that tracked thousands of women over a 20-year period beginning in 1979. Sixty-one percent of women surveyed in that sample had graduated over the time period.
Much has been said about the appropriate way to measure graduation rates. F. King Alexander, president of California State University at Long Beach, is working with the American Association of State Colleges and Universities to try to change federal policy and the perception that six years is the gold standard. Clifford Adelman, a long time Education Department researcher who is now a senior associate at the Institute for Higher Education Policy, has proposed changes that he says would better account for the reality that traditional and nontraditional students have different timetables. But he has also said that the current rates can be meaningful and that he is skeptical of changes that could deemphasize accountability.
The authors’ case about why it takes several decades to figure the worth of a college degree for disadvantaged students rests largely on an analysis of how the parents’ education affects the family. Attending college raises a mother’s educational expectations for her children and increases parental involvement in her child’s education, the book says.
For instance, Attewell and Lavin found that college graduates in this sample were more likely to send their children to private high schools and be involved in community organizations. They also proved to have more stable marriages than their counterparts who didn’t graduate from college. (The study draws a correlation between a stable household and a child’s performance in school.)
These trends were less pronounced for black college graduates. More black children grew up in single-parent homes with lower household incomes than the other races surveyed, and thus the mothers surveyed said it was more difficult for their children to reap the benefits of the parents’ education. Attewell said black children whose parents went to college still had an advantage over those whose parents didn’t.
Want it on paper? Print this page.
Know someone who’d be interested? Forward this story.
Want to stay informed? Sign up for free daily news e-mail.
Advertisement
It would be interesting to see how the authors of this study controlled for IQ. My suspicion is that IQ is the underlying value involved in success and not college. That’s not to say college isn’t important, it is, but its more important to people of high IQ’s. People with high IQ’s are in a better position to take advantage of the information presented in college and thus make for themselves a better life.
thomasowellfan, at 9:45 am EDT on June 15, 2007
I believe I have seen studies (I can’t find the citation right now because I am out of the office — I believe there might be some studies cited in Berliner and Biddle’s Manufactured Crisis) that show how IQ is influenced by opportunity to learn. This would make higher education MORE important for individuals with low IQ, not less.
T-bone, at 10:55 am EDT on June 15, 2007
No dads, exclude the ole man, give pops the shaft? What factors were missed by omitting “male involvement”?
The researcher have a good hypothesis in that students are more and more falling into the only category available for real assessment under current accepted structures “non-traditional”.
Don’t forget in 2007 dad is also called “moms boyfriend’, “grandpa”, “uncle Joe”, “cousin my age”, “my buddy”, “my buddies dad”, “my mentor”, “the guy from big brothers”. It would be interesting to see if the results would have significantly changed with a more representative sample population. For instance seek male involvement instead of families with dads, you know the “non-traditional crowd”
Walker, Analyst, at 11:00 am EDT on June 15, 2007
It’s a funny study and funny conclusions. They say that after 30 years the success is better than after 6 years. But, 30 years ago the education was better than 6 years ago!
Michael Pyshnov, at 12:45 pm EDT on June 16, 2007
Advertisement
or search for jobs directly.
Duties of the Assessment Coordinator for Engineering include coordinating the assessment process for the College’s ... see job
George Fox University seeks a Director of Multicultural Student Programs to work primarily with our undergraduate students. see job
The Division of Student Life and Services at Oberlin College seeks applications for the position of ... see job
Western Carolina University, a constituent institution of the University of North Carolina, announces its search for the new ... see job
Join one of the finest regional universities in the nation. James Madison University, home to 18,000 + students, welcomes you ... see job
The Division of Student Life and Services at Oberlin College seeks applications for the position of Africana Community ... see job
Bennett College is a small, private, historically Black liberal arts college for women. As a United Methodist Church-related ... see job
RECRUITMENT #632 POSITION TITLE:Associate Vice President for Research and External Support EFFECTIVE DATE: on or about July ... see job
Posting Description: The candidate will pursue her or his own research interests and will be an independent ... see job
Posting Description: The University of Colorado Denver Cancer Center has an opening for a full-time Clinical ... see job
IQ Comments?
I cannot believe that in this day and time, there would be someone talking about IQ as a factor in anything. It is a well researched topic that identifies IQ definitions as being culturally-laden. How individuals may solve problems in one culture differ from how they may be solved in another culture. Thus, the notions of IQ are fleeting.
The US preoccupation with labeling and sorting never seems to end!
Dr. “Dee”, at 8:50 am EDT on June 26, 2007