Quick Takes: Antioch Profs May Sue, Budget Boost in Louisiana, Mugabe Can Keep Degree, NCAA 'Clarifies' Rule on Bloggers, Wharton Dean, No More Latin on Ottawa Diplomas, Probation for Colorado, Copyright Option, Senior Slumps, Japan's Search for Students
Professors at Antioch College are considering a lawsuit against the board of Antioch University over its decision to shut down the college. A statement issued on behalf of the faculty, by Dimi Reber, an emerita professor who noted that she can speak freely without fear for her job, blasts the university's board. While board leaders have said that they tried to save the college, and couldn't continue it with enrollment of around 300, the faculty statement says that the board forced changes that prompted an enrollment decline. "The board risked the college's well-being with the imposition of an ill-considered plan, failed to provide promised support, and then closed the college," according to the faculty. The statement goes on to note that the university would gain the college's endowment and land if the college is destroyed. "Can the board and university administration which conducted their review of the college's recent situation in secrecy, in violation of our governance policies, without consulting faculty and staff who stand to lose their livelihoods and professions, be trusted with the college's current assets, its legacy and its future?" the statement asks.
Louisiana's Legislature approved a 2007-8 state budget late Wednesday that will provide the biggest increase in funds for the state's public colleges and universities in decades. The budget, which Gov. Kathleen Blanco had drafted and plans to sign, will provide $200 million in new funds for higher education, as well as additional money for deferred maintenance on buildings. The higher education budget will ensure that Louisiana's colleges are financed at the level of peer institutions in the South for the first time in more than 25 years.
Students at the University of Massachusetts at Amherst have been pushing the institution to revoke an honorary degree awarded in 1986 to Robert Mugabe, the president of Zimbabwe whose autocratic rule has been criticized by human rights groups worldwide. But on Thursday, the UMass board decided that Mugabe could keep the degree, although the board did adopt a resolution criticizing him. The resolution said that the board "decries the association with the University of Massachusetts of a person of such early promise and commitment whose descent to the depths of a brutal and bloody regime have brought worldwide scorn and unremitting rebuke.” A spokesman said that the discussion of Mugabe's degree was in private so it was unclear why board members decided to criticize Mugabe, but not take away the honorary degree.
The National Collegiate Athletic Association has issued what it is calling a clarification of its policy on blogging by reporters during championship games. Under the clarified policy, blogging about scores is permitted, and only "live play-by-play information" is banned (except of course by the press entities that have paid for broadcast rights). The NCAA has infuriated many bloggers and several news organizations in recent weeks by revoking press credentials for reporters blogging during games. In doing so, the NCAA said that blogging during games could cover "atmosphere, crowd and other details during a game but may not mention anything about game action." The clarification said that "incorrect information" has been issued in response to the bloggers. It is unclear if the clarification will resolve the matter as some blogging organization are asserting First Amendment rights.
The University of Pennsylvania announced the selection of Thomas S. Robertson as dean of the Wharton School -- a position that will give him unusual prominence in the world of business education. Robertson, 64, is the former dean of Emory University's Goizueta Business School and director of Emory's Institute for Developing Nations. He was on Wharton's marketing faculty from 1971 to 1994. Penn's president, Amy Gutmann said Robertson "brings great leadership experience and great knowledge to the school," as well as an interest in international outreach, experience building interdisciplinary programs and "a belief in business schools as a force for good in the world. Robertson said that though he has certain ideas he'd like to put in place as dean -- including programs on developing nations and increased collaboration with Penn's 11 other schools, initiatives in which Gutmann also voiced interest, "ultimately, your job as dean is hiring and keeping faculty and attracting the best students possible." Robertson replaces Patrick Harker, who after seven years as Wharton dean is to become president of the University of Delaware on July 1.
The University of Ottawa had ended a tradition of allowing students to request that their diplomas be in Latin (over the more popular options of English or French), The Ottawa Citizen reported. Relatively few students would picking Latin and the university was having difficulty coming up with Latin equivalents for some words, such as “software” and “genomics.”
The NCAA Division I Committee on Infractions has placed the University of Colorado at Boulder on two years probation for failing to monitor a meal program for athletes. More than 130 athletes in six sports received what amounted to $61,700 in benefits by being allowed over the course of six academic years to eat meals set aside for training athletes even though their practice schedules didn’t prohibit them from eating in the residence halls or their meal plans hadn’t been correctly purchased. Both the NCAA and Colorado found that the violations were inadvertent. The university will also pay a $100,000 fine, which will go to a charitable cause involved in efforts to alleviate hunger or homelessness, and lose one football scholarship per year until 2010.
The Copyright Clearance Center, which has handled permissions requests for colleges' coursepacks and other educational materials, has introduced a new flat fee option for institutions, as opposed to what has been the norm of paying per item.
The University of California's highly competitive campuses are increasingly revoking admissions offers to high school seniors whose academic performance fell dramatically after they submitted their college applications, The Los Angeles Times reported.
As Japan's population ages, universities have been forced to start paying more attention to anything that will give them a recruiting edge for students -- either of traditional age or retirees who want to take courses, The New York Times reported.
Comments on
Quick Takes: Antioch Profs May Sue, Budget Boost in Louisiana, Mugabe Can Keep Degree, NCAA 'Clarifies' Rule on Bloggers, Wharton Dean, No More Latin on Ottawa Diplomas, Probation for Colorado, Copyright Option, Senior Slumps, Japan's Search for Students
Suit against Antioch College?
Posted
by Jack Olson
on June 22, 2007 at 10:45am EDT
Suppose the faculty at Antioch carry out their threat of "legal action" against the college administration. Upon what ground would they have a case? Even if their claim of ineptitude on the part of the administration is true and provable, is it the duty of a court to remedy that?
A judge or a court might claim that it is their duty, since judges and courts can think of few things which they consider none of their business. But, wouldn't a lawsuit by a group of faculty against a college administration convert an academic issue into a legal one and put the courts in the business of running the colleges?
Amo Amas Amant
Posted
by J Madison Davis
, Profesor
at University of Oklahoma
on June 22, 2007 at 10:45am EDT
Don't they know in Ottawa that the Vatican creates a dictionary of all the new words, so that they can communicate in the official Latin?
Carpe dictionarium!
It is a legal matter now and not an academic one.
Posted
by Anonymous Professor
on June 22, 2007 at 1:25pm EDT
Being fired from a college (Antioch or elsewhere) without just cause against the dictates of one's legally binding contract and against the rules of the college is in fact a legal matter and not just an academic matter.
I hope the professors sue and gain at least a settlement that will give them money to live off of while they search for new employment. It is a catastrophe to be fired so suddenly and deceptively and to be left bereft.
In fact, in consideration of the way the board and administration handled the crisis, suing is the professors' only option for redress.
Anyone who thinks differently does not know the legal gravity of the situation--a gravity that comes down to contractual obligations and legally honoring the by-laws of the college.
Antioch contracts
Posted
by Rick
on June 22, 2007 at 2:20pm EDT
Antioch's faculty are claiming that the decision to shut the college was made by a process not in conformance with the institution's established policies. There's plenty of Higher Ed-related case law to back up a claim that these policies are an enforceable part of each faculty member's employment contract, in addition to the wording of each contract document itself. If what the faculty are claiming can be demonstrated, they may have a very strong case.
Posted
by JBM
on June 22, 2007 at 4:30pm EDT
"If what the faculty are claiming can be demonstrated, they may have a very strong case."
Even if the claim stands up in court, good luck recovering on it.
What Antioch profs want
Posted
by Jack Olson
on June 23, 2007 at 9:15am EDT
All I have to judge the Antioch faculty's complaints as ground for lawsuit is Dimi Reber's remarks, linked in the IHE article. If we may take her remarks as representative, their complaint is not specifically breach of an employment contract. It's mismanagement by the Board: "In brief, the Board risked the College's well-being with the imposition of an ill-considered (Renewal) Plan, failed to provide promised support, and closed the College."
If they're asking for a wad of cash in damages, she didn't mention it. Instead, "The faculty will be exploring legal action to stop the College's closing and preserve tenure and the college's assets."
But, how do you keep a college open after the student body has, as Reber noted, "plunged from 650 to 300 in two years"? To paraphrase Sam Goldwyn, if people don't want to go to a college nobody can stop 'em.
THE FALL OF ANTIOCH
Posted
by Russell Eisenman, Ph.D.
, Associate Professor of Psychology
at University of Texas-Pan American
on June 23, 2007 at 4:35pm EDT
THE FALL OF ANTIOCH: SAD OR GLAD?
by Russell Eisenman Univesity of Texas-Pan American
Some think Antioch College deserved to die. It became too liberal, they say, in a dogmatic, authoritarian way (unintentional rhyme, although I do write poetry from time to time, is that a crime?) For instance, an Op-Ed piece in the New York Times by Michael Goldfarb, who was a student there years ago, says that after the Antioch college strike in 1973, things went really bad, enrollment declined, and
"Since it is always easier to impose a conformist ethos on a small group than a large one, as the student body dwindled, free expression and freedom of thought were crushed under the weight of ultraliberal orthodoxy. By the 1990s the breadth of challenging ideas a student might encounter at Antioch had narrowed, and the college became a place not for education, but for indoctrination." (Goldfarb, 2007, p. 2). Sounds pretty awful to me.
The most extreme and stupid thing the college did was their sexual harassment policy in which every step of the way in sex between two people had to have explicit verbal consent. I do research on human sexuality and have had some personal experiences, as well. Much of sex is nonverbal, so imposing a verbal policy is dumb. I once thought of writing to Antioch when they had this policy and telling them how foolish it was, but decided it would probably be a waste of time, especially when I read how proud they were of it, and how they boasted that other schools, including Harvard, had asked for a copy.
I did not know this, but they once had a death row inmate from Pennsylvania, a convicted cop killer, as their graduation speaker. I have followed this case and while it is not a slam dunk that he is guilty, the evidence points that way. But, some liberals, including movie stars, have made him a cause celebre. Mammua Ahmoo Jubal or something like that. You will probably know who I mean. Sorry I cannot recall his name exactly. In his court trial instead of explaining what happened, which could have been a helpful defense, he mostly stated and shouted radical slogans.
I have also read that Antioch declined because of poor upkeep of the facilities. If things look ugly and in disrepair, how many prospective students will want to go there?
So, did Antioch just put itself out of the market with liberal and authoritarian nonsense or should we feel bad about its death (although they hope to resume in 4 years)? I once heard of a female student who went there and was assigned a male roommate. I see this as possibly something good, an experimental approach that most places would be afraid to undertake. Perhaps they did other experimental things that most have not heard about, and we should feel bad about its decline/death. I wonder. They certainly made mistakes: poor facility upkeep, stupid sex policy, and poor choice of graduation speaker. If Goldfarb (2007) is correct, they also became a place of intolerance and indoctrination. I do not know enough to know if I feel bad about the death of the school, although what I know makes me think that perhaps they deserved to pass from the scene.