Quick Takes: House Panel Adopts AmeriCorps Bill, Transformative vs. Incremental Research, Another Report Blasts Teacher Ed, 'Differential Tuition' Comes to Florida, Boost for English Universities, Friday Classes and Thursday Drinking
The U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Education and Labor overwhelmingly approved legislation Wednesday that would extend the federal government's AmeriCorps and other national service programs for five years. The measure aims to increase the number of AmeriCorps volunteers each year to 100,000 from the current 25,000 and to increase the annual college stipend for those who engage in community service to $5,225 from $4,725 by 2012. David Elsner, chief executive officer of the Corporation for National Service, which oversees AmeriCorps, applauded the House panel for its bipartisan support for the legislation.
A new National Science Foundation report reviews the importance of "transformative" research, as opposed to the incremental research that is the norm in science. The report suggests that the NSF consider how it can be sure it is supporting high-risk studies that have the potential to yield major breakthroughs, especially when many scientists doubt the NSF's interest in the area, and feel that the grant application process does not favor such studies. At the same time, the report noted that many examples of transformative research don't start off that way, but may be receiving support for what appears like it will be simply the next step forward, but then turns out to be a major leap.
The National Council on Teacher Quality on Wednesday released a report criticizing most states for their teacher education policies. Among the criticisms: too few "alternate routes" to teaching for liberal arts graduates and others and insufficient monitoring of the academic skills of those entering and graduating from teacher education programs. Most of the criticisms are similar to those made in previous reports -- and are of the sort that teacher ed groups say are outdated. The new report provides state by state analysis in addition to national summary data.
Florida Gov. Charlie Crist, a Republican, reversed himself Wednesday and said he was willing to sign legislation allowing three public universities -- Florida State University, the University of Florida and the University of South Florida -- to have "differential tuition," The St. Petersburg Times reported. The three universities have been pushing for that right, saying that uniform state rates hold back research institutions, which have broader missions and face more national competition than do other universities.
The British government announced Wednesday that it would match up to 200 million British pounds (nearly $400 million) for donations English universities bring in between August 2008 and September 2011, The Guardian reported. The plan is part of a government effort to bolster private fund raising at the universities, which in recent years have tried to adopt American-style development efforts, but which are far behind their counterparts in the United States in these areas.
In recent years, one strategy discussed to combat excessive drinking by students on Thursday nights has been to increase the number of classes that meet on Fridays, particularly in the morning. New research from psychology professors at the University of Missouri at Columbia backs the strategy. The researchers tracked the drinking habits of 3,341undergraduates and found that students who don't take classes Friday consume twice as much alcohol on Thursday as those with early Friday classes.
Comments on
Quick Takes: House Panel Adopts AmeriCorps Bill, Transformative vs. Incremental Research, Another Report Blasts Teacher Ed, 'Differential Tuition' Comes to Florida, Boost for English Universities, Friday Classes and Thursday Drinking
or do away with Friday classes?
Posted
by Henry
on June 28, 2007 at 9:15am EDT
When I was a student, there were Saturday morning classes (M-W-F, and Tu-Th-Sa were the normal schedules for classes.)
These became rare later, and then essentially extinct. Last time I looked, my university still had Saturday am as a potential class time but only one course a year scheduled for that time.
Friday afternoon seems to be on the same trend, with fewer and fewer classes - to avoid competing with student weekend activities.
Perhaps this trend should be honored, and in a bold stroke (the NSF would call this "transformative") we should do away with all Friday classes!
In addition to further eliminating interference with student weekend activities (and therefore giving our recruiters another great feature to advertise) it would also restore parity to class schedules - and there would be no difference in how M-W and Tu-Th classes were handled!
The efficiency of a shorter week
Posted
by Mark Stewart
on June 28, 2007 at 10:00am EDT
Many campuses are searching for ways of becoming more sustainable, whether it be for environmental reasons, economic reasons, or both. Some campuses have done away with Friday classes to reduce costs of heating and cooling buildings, close dining facilities, staff fewer people on those days, and cut out a commuting day for many students, faculty, and staff. With all the money saved, perhaps colleges and universities could sink more money into alcohol awareness programs or alternative Thursday night activities?
Posted
by GradStudent
on June 28, 2007 at 10:25am EDT
Let's remember the not-so-silent faculty who also enjoy having no class on Friday; institutions are responding to student AND faculty desires to have longer weekends. Establishing classes on Friday will get some push-back from faculty as well.
Efficiency and shorter weeks
Posted
by Observer
on June 28, 2007 at 11:35am EDT
Savings gained through the reduced costs of electricity and temperature control in a shorter week are more than offset by increased capital and other costs due to the perpetual 'shortage' of classroom space at most colleges. Nothing could be more inefficient than building shiny new structures to accommodate a Monday-to-Thursday schedule while underutilizing existing buildings for three out of seven days a week.
Please Stop
Posted
by rbd
on June 28, 2007 at 11:40am EDT
Let's not look to the benefits/drawbacks of having classes on Friday solely to appease the neo-prohibitionists. There are good reasons to NOT have classes on Fridays. Many major associations have conferences on fridays, and courses that meet that day are often cancelled quietly without students really caring.
I am so happy I moved to the UK where alcohol is seen as a normal part of university life. We spend so much less time and money thinking about this nonsense.
I don't know how firmly Henry's tongue is in his cheek...
Posted
by Dr Chuck Pearson
on June 28, 2007 at 11:55am EDT
...but there are several public institutions (particularly in Alabama and Georgia, which is my general neck-of-the-woods) that are doing exactly that.
When I left my previous institution, it was in the process of establishing a schedule where M-W and T-Th classes were the norm, and Fridays could be set aside for three- or four-hour special classes. While I can't vouch for the present implementation there, what it looked like as I was leaving was that all the classes were gravitating towards M-W and T-Th, and Friday was being treated as the first day of the weekend.
And this might make some faculty happy, but I still can't imagine how you teach an intense science or mathematical subject with only two meetings a week. (I went to school on a quarter system, and most of my lecture classes were four meetings a week; even three meetings per week seems low-maintenance to me, and I know there are high-maintenance students out there, because I was one.)
Never mind the fact that such a schedule, as Henry suggests, essentially encourages laziness.
So...yes, I don't like how I see this story ending.
WOO - HOO!!
Posted
by Comm Prof
on June 28, 2007 at 4:20pm EDT
Henry and Dr. Chuck are right. Eliminating Friday classes will just make Wednesday night Party Night, enabling them to show up hung over (if at all) on Thursday instead of Friday.