Search News


Browse Archives

News

'Customer Management,' From Classroom to Boardroom

July 9, 2007

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

The competition to provide colleges and universities with institutionwide software to manage relationships with all of its constituents is heating up, and one player in the field is bringing in a big name in the higher education software industry to help it launch its new product and expand its reach.

Todd Gibby, a former senior executive at Blackboard, is moving to Intelliworks to become its new CEO as the company readies the next version of its customer relationship package aimed at the higher ed market.

The development comes at a time when many colleges and universities have grasped the need to stay in touch with potential students, alumni, parents and others to keep donations flowing and interest high. It's called "customer relationship management" in industry parlance, but behind the jargon is a set of capabilities that is crucial to the continuing health of a college or university.

The ability to control vast e-mail and phone lists and to zero in on potential customers fitting a particular profile isn't limited to higher education, of course, but that slice of the customer relationship industry is growing as more institutions realize that success is linked to an effective grasp of the "constituent life cycle," another buzz word that in higher ed circles would encompass one's entire experience with a college, from the application process to considering a major donation to the alma mater decades later.

"More than half of [higher education] institutions have CRM in place somewhere in the institution, but a very small number of that … have an institution-wide CRM," said Craig Stanford, vice president at Talisma Higher Education. So while plenty of colleges and universities might use software to reach out to people for specific uses in particular departments -- such as development or recruitment -- relatively few have a fully integrated system throughout the entire institution. That's where Talisma, Intelliworks and others see a potential for growth.

The higher ed customer relationship sector already has its share of competitors, including Talisma and the information technology software giant Oracle (which did not respond to multiple phone calls and e-mails for comment). But Intelliworks is seeking to win over a good share of the market with a next-generation product and some new blood.

"I hope it's a big deal in terms of what it means for clients," Gibby said of his decision to move from Blackboard to Intelliworks.

At first glance, the choice of Gibby might not be intuitive: Blackboard, a leader in "classroom management" software, which allows professors and students to interact online, assign and submit homework and post announcements, hasn't stepped into the customer management arena. Gibby, who was the executive vice president of operations, oversaw day-to-day activity at the company and managed product lines.

"I think it's more complementary than it is duplicative," Gibby said of his adopted field.

But one thing Gibby would have is experience managing large higher ed-focused projects and expanding market share -- not to mention a client list the company hopes is ready to be tapped, to "leverage the existing relationships that I have with all manner of prospective partners throughout the world," he said.

Gibby has also been a member of the Intelliworks board of directors and said he will be focused on increasing the scale of its business.

"Todd is going to do the same magic that he did at Blackboard," said Dev Ganesan, Intelliworks' outgoing president and CEO who will now become its chairman. Ganesan said its officials were looking toward expanding to a "$100 million business and beyond."

The next version of the company's customer relationship package, dubbed Orion, is set for a July 20 release. What Gibby and Ganesan have touted as its advantages are a quick set-up time and ease of use. Intelliworks is relatively unique in the CRM world for having a main focus on higher education -- a desire to be what Ganesan called "vertically focused."

Orion, unlike other similar solutions, is entirely Web-based and is being offered as a "SaaS" package -- "software as a service." The idea, which has rapidly caught on in the business support realm, is that rather than purchasing software to accomplish a specific task, companies can more easily "rent" the capabilities by hiring an outside firm that hosts the software off-site and can offer continuous support.

At least one competitor offers a product with similar goals and features. Talisma, which offers highly customizable CRM solutions that could be seen as requiring more lead-up time than would normally be considered "user friendly" for colleges seeking a relatively easy solution, has also recently introduced a "Basics" version of its software.

And like Intelliworks, the company is touting the hosted, SaaS design of the product as well as its ease of use.

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on 'Customer Management,' From Classroom to Boardroom

  • Down with WebCT
  • Posted by LogicGuru on July 9, 2007 at 11:05am EDT
  • I don't know if this package for managing customer relationships with alumni and such is worthwhile, but I can say that at the academic end the commercial products that have been pushed on us, e.g. WebCT are lousy. They include bells and whistles that sound cool and trendy--like student/faculty chat rooms--that we'll never use and modules for managing tasks that tasks that are inferior to cheaper, freestanding products that we do use. E.g. the "grade books" are relatively inflexible and inferior to even the most basic spreadsheets. Setting up a course using them is more time and labor intensive than it would otherwise be and the burden falls on faculty.

    My real objection though is that they password protect all course materials so that only current students can access them. Potential students interested in signing up for a course can't take a peek to see what it's like and other faculty, at our own universities and elsewhere, don't have access to course materials. I strongly object to limiting access to information in this way. It defeats the virtue of the internet in making everyone's stuff accessible to everyone and so promoting better research and teaching.

  • Their days are numbered
  • Posted by web user on July 9, 2007 at 12:05pm EDT
  • These companies will be out of business within five years as all these functions become available online with free software.

  • applications available via open source
  • Posted by bradley bleck , instructor at Spokane Falls CC on July 9, 2007 at 1:35pm EDT
  • One course management system already available that does a much better job than either WebCT or Blackboard is Drupal, found at http://www.drupal.org. There are other open source options such ad Moodle. I've been using drupal for several years. I don't use the gradebook application as of yet because I don't want students obsessing about grades. Besides, in my classes, most of the time they just have to add up their essay grades and divide by the number of essays. If they can't do that, they can damn well learn to average, even if it's an English class.

    The reason for not using open source is there are no salespeople calling on campuses to pitch their wares and they require more support. It's faculty who have to pitch the software, and IT departments are resistant to faculty--read non-IT expert-- views, at least in my experience. But if the money spent on licensing was shifted to support services, that could pretty well be mitigated--not the resistance to faculty views, but the need to fund support.

  • Computer technology sessions at the APA
  • Posted by H. E. Baber on July 9, 2007 at 6:15pm EDT
  • If I may put in a free plug: there will be a couple of panel discussions at the next APA Eastern on these issues. One will be on computer technology in support for research and other professional tasks, including a discussion of cheaper and better alternatives to commercial products. On the other, one of the participants will be discussing access to information, including the password protection issue that limits access to teaching materials and other stuff that should be readily available.

    IMHO it's up to us, as academics, within our departments and professional societies, to become informed, share information, and actively push our institutions to get us the stuff we need instead of buying into commercial packages.

  • Posted by Piss Poor Prof on July 9, 2007 at 6:15pm EDT
  • Good article. I appreciate the "behind the scenes" aspect of it.

    CRM software has been exploding in customer facing businesses since the millennium, and they will not go open source anytime soon. Why, because the back-end set-up (while relatively easy by IT standards) is well beyond the capability of most college/university presidents and boards. In short, it is too geeky, and therefore unknown. Things unknown are not funded.

    What is really scary about this story is the database that will result, which could easily include real-time access (by no telling who: adjuncts, work-study students, etc.) to all manner of data about future, present or past students.

    The real story is not if CRM's enter academia, but when they do how will the information be handled? I know that my alums use work-study students to call for cash...what will they one day see?