Search News


Browse Archives

News

Competing to Catch Plagiarizers

July 10, 2007

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

As technology makes it easier for students to cheat on exams or plagiarize papers, there has been no shortage of technology meant to deter and catch students who use cell phones, iPods and Google for a little extra help.

Turnitin and SafeAssignment are the two dominant technologies for comparing students' submissions to databases of millions of student papers, articles and Web sites. But the educational software company Blackboard is today creating a new service, sort of -- releasing SafeAssign, a repackaged version of MyDropBox's SafeAssignment that will come pre-installed in future versions of the Blackboard Learning System, the leading course management software in the market.

Institutional subscriptions for Turnitin cost 87 cents per student annually, SafeAssign is free for the 2,200 institutions that have Blackboard enterprise accounts, an added service for subscribers. Turnitin offers a plug-in that allows it to be used with Blackboard.

Blackboard is billing SafeAssign as something new, explaining that it comes with the strength of Blackboard's user network and a database that will slowly expand as more student papers are checked with the service. “This is an opportunity for institutions to work together to address a problem that exists at every single school," Blackboard president and CEO Michael Chasen said. “They can connect to each other and as a community help to ensure that students aren’t plagiarizing and are citing properly."

Perhaps not surprisingly, John Barrie, president and CEO of Turnitin's parent company, iParadigms, is skeptical of Blackboard's SafeAssign technology. He calls it "the same thing as SafeAssignment but with four fewer letters," a competitor that Turnitin has "absolutely slaughtered in the market."

Using either service, graders can with the click of a mouse scan a student’s submission and get back a report on the similarity of that assignment to everything else in the database.

It’s up to the faculty member, then, to figure out whether the similarities actually constitute plagiarism or are just the unavoidable similarities that a search of millions of documents can find between, say, a student’s paper on Thomas Jefferson’s role in the Continental Congress and every other account of Jefferson in the 1770s.

It’s also up to the grader’s judgment to determine whether a student who wrote “We hold these truths to be self-evident" is passing them off as his own words or is simply including that phrase as a properly cited quotation. Graders can then comment on and evaluate assignments within the plagiarism detection applications.

The major difference, then, is the database. SafeAssign's library will include a scan of the Internet and weekly updates of the ProQuest ABI/Inform database of 2.6 million articles, as well as student and faculty submissions made Blackboard's network of users.

Barrie said Turnitin has a far larger advantage of scale: the Turnitin database includes 40 million student papers from 9,000 academic institutions in 90 countries. The database also incorporates archived copies of the Internet since 2000, meaning that even if a Web page has been taken down, Turnitin can still detect similarities.

Unlike Turnitin, which has faced complaints and lawsuits from students who say that the for-profit company’s policy of storing student papers in its database violates intellectual property law, SafeAssign asks students for permission to store their papers each time they submit one via Blackboard, which may mean that the catalog grows more slowly than Turnitin's average of 100,000 new papers each day.

Many students, Chasen said, “don’t want their hard work to be copied” and, he anticipates, will gladly allow their submissions to be included in the database. He added, “It almost becomes circular -- the more people who use it, the more we have stored in the database, becoming more accurate and more accurate as time goes on.”

SafeAssign is the underdog in the competition, with a smaller library and fewer subscribers. Daniel E. Wueste, director of the Rutland Institute for Ethics at Clemson University, said that "the size of the database is a significant challenge" for SafeAssign to "catch up with Turnitin any time soon."

But Turnitin's database is flawed, too, Wueste said. While large, it is not exhaustive of the complete contents of university libraries and essay mill collections. "It's just not true that having passed Turnitin means something's not plagiarized," he said. "No service will catch everything."

Though Barrie said Turnitin does "not consider SafeAssign to be a competitor," Wueste said it could become one for institutions driven by the bottom line. Once administrators at institutions that subscribe to both Blackboard and Turnitin realize they have "two systems that do the same job," they might choose to get rid of Turnitin, Wueste said, despite its larger database. "The main pressure point is institutions that will feel the crunch of the cost."

He added, "It's hard to know how many of those are out there and whether they'll see the redundancy."

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Competing to Catch Plagiarizers

  • Posted by Skeptic on July 10, 2007 at 8:35am EDT
  • Don't give administrators more credit than they are due.

    I paid for Turnitin out of my own pocket for years because I couldn't convince community college administrators that it was needed to catch plagarism. Dah ... It will take years before any duplication of services catches their attention.

  • Will have to change the mentality of English dept.
  • Posted by Academic Advisor on July 10, 2007 at 9:30am EDT
  • I mentioned Turnitin to our English dept head, who simply dismissed the software. According to him, the software does the students work for them, and does not teach the students about plagiarism. However, our faculty members do not teach about plagiarism either. They have the "Ha! I caught you!" mentality about the problem. Our professors have been known to spot plagiarism in rough drafts, and wait to see if the students hang themselves instead of helping the studens understand what they did wrong in their citations.

    I would love to see Turnitin or the Blackboard feature used. However, that would involve our faculty seeing themselves as teachers instead of ivory tower academics, more interested in striking down students than teaching them.

  • gotcha!
  • Posted by bradley bleck , instructor at Spokane Falls CC on July 10, 2007 at 12:45pm EDT
  • Plagiarism Detection Services (pds) are all about gotcha and very little about teaching. Frankly, I don't see how they benefit students by assuming that all must be suspected of cheating before they can submit work.

    Sound pedagogy will take care of the bulk of the problem. Requiring multiple drafts, reading and responding to those drafts, dropping age old assignments and tailoring tasks to to something specific to the course will keep the bulk of plagiarism opportunities under check.

    Problems with using a pds: lumps honest students together with the cheaters, whether they area honest or not; appropriates student copyright to their work for the profit of an outside company; opens up institution to lawsuits by aggrieved students; facilitates an "us v them" mentality rather than a learning environment; allows for lazy teaching and pedagogy because the software will catch the cheaters (you hope); and more that I'm sure others will comment upon.

    I've only been teaching comp for a year or two short of two decades, so I may not know it all, but I do know that I'm not in the higher ed game to assume that all my students are cheats, that I have to protect myself from those who do with some software. Sure, I've had students plagiarize, but because I know their work, it sticks out like a sore thumb. Of course, I'm sure some students have slid the work of others by me, but I'd rather they cheat me and themselves than I cheat everyone by assuming and treating them all as if they are cheats.

  • Posted by c on July 10, 2007 at 8:25pm EDT
  • I'm sympathetic with much of the above, though saying a detection service is about "gotcha" is really just saying that it's about detection -- not much of an argument. And while we can do more to avert it (if I see plagiarism on a draft I warn students clearly and vigorously) there's more of it going on than we may think. We catch the "sore thumb" plagiarizers *because* they're the unskillful ones, but it doesn't follow that all plagiarizers are unskillful! If we're moving to electronic submission of papers, having them go through a detection stage means greater fairness because we are more likely to pick up cases that are better hidden or that are by students we are not predisposed to suspect.

    Needless to say, plagiarism detection is not going to be very useful without a clear, legally-defensible process of adjudicating plagiarism incidents at the level of the institution (it has to go above the level of the instructor). A lot of institutions do not properly support instructors or work to ensure a uniform policy.

  • Plagiarism Is Rarely Accidental
  • Posted by TM on July 13, 2007 at 6:25am EDT
  • I fail students for plagiarizing in rough drafts regularly.

    I spend a great deal of time teaching students about plagiarism and its avoidance. Yet, every time I teach, a student "accidentally" [their claim] plagiarizes.

    If they wasted time stealing stuff from the Internet instead of learning to cite and quote and paraphrase properly, then they have violated the code of academic honesty.

    If it's a matter of not paraphrasing one item properly, or a problem of providing a proper citation, then a minor slap on the wrist is warranted, with the hope that learning will result from this experience [which it often doesn't].

    But if a student steals wholesale from several sources, cites none of them, and uses no quotation marks, then he or she has demonstrated remarkable incompetence using sources properly.

    In my view, this warrants a failing grade in the course and reporting the incident to the university.

  • Secrets and Facts
  • Posted by Joseph on July 13, 2007 at 2:55pm EDT
  • I suggest all of you read this article:

    http://www.essayfraud.org/turnitin_john_barrie.html

    Very enlightening.

  • Posted by TM on July 14, 2007 at 1:40pm EDT
  • Joseph, I read that page written by TurnItIn.com's detractors, and I find it to be full of overly dramatic scenarios.

    For example, the site relays this little gem:

    "Day 1,000: Turnitin.com's database has swelled to 100 million. Any common turn-of-phrase, or figure of speech, inevitably causes at least a marginal bump in the 'probability of plagarism.' God help the student who comes up with a sentence (honestly, on his/her own) that matches word-for-word a sentence in one of the other 100 million papers. Poof! Even though the student did not plagarize, the sentence is nearly identical to someone else's and his/her POP jumps up."

    What professor in his or her right mind would fail a student for "accidentally" re-creating a particular turn of phrase? Any grievance committee made of reasonable, sane human beings would overturn such a grade. And the offending professor should be re-trained immediately in plagiarism-detection.

    It's rather hard to re-create whole sentences and paragraphs from whole cloth that EXACTLY match a previously written work, particularly if it entails idiosyncratic language.

    I've used the software, and I found it wanting. I won't use it again, but it did help me more easily detect students who failed to learn how to cite sources and use source material properly.

    And...failure to learn course lessons constitutes a failing grade...on the assignment or the course.

  • Why do you focus on 2% instead of the other 98%?
  • Posted by Joseph on July 14, 2007 at 4:05pm EDT
  • "full of overly dramatic scenarios"

    Oh, really? I guess, as a Turnitin supporter, you'd like to bring focus to an "overly dramatic" (your biased opinion), small part of the article that you would purposely lead others to believe is the main focus of the article. Instead, why don't you focus on the hundreds of concrete facts in the article (each hyperlinked to the source of the fact) that are verified by dozens of professors and esteemed educators?

    Regardless of your opinion, Turnitin will soon be barred from stealing students' property.

  • Thank God For Turnitin.com!!!
  • Posted by Scrawed on July 19, 2007 at 2:55pm EDT
  • Thank God for Turnitin.com!

    I was able to use Turnitin.com to help confirm what I already suspected - that plagiarism in the heavily international-student-populated graduate engineering department I was in was so widespread that over 2/3 of the students in one class were guilty of substantive internet-based plagiarism. The other 1/3 did not have papers available for consideration.

    The reports Turnitin generates are perhaps not adequate evidence in themselves of plagiarism - but they certainly can serve as a starting point in identifying net-based sources used by plagiarists.

    Unfortunately the department in question was not interested in acting on these findings even when they were corroborated and plagiarism was demonstrable. My initial work was taken from me and not acknowledged, and apparently never acted on. This indicates the second "shortcoming" of Turnitin - that ultimately it is the institution that has to take action- and if the institution itself is corrupt nothing may happen.

  • Please wise up--Such sites ARE NECESSARY!
  • Posted by Professor DLM , English Professor on July 25, 2007 at 5:45am EDT
  • When I began teaching Composition, in 1994, actively seeking plagiarizers was far down on my list of priorities. My 1st year of teaching (which included a handful of plagiarism cases) caused me to reconsider this approach, & subsequent years of teaching, be they in private or public universities or community colleges, have demonstrated without a doubt that many (I dare say most) students WILL plagiarize if they think that they can do so without penalty. I spend considerable time educating my students about plagiarism, how to avoid it, & how to document. As part of that discussion, my students take a 100% anonymous survey (collected, tallied, & disposed of by classmates) regarding their attitudes toward plagiarism & history of it since they began high school. In an average class of 20-25 students, I have not seen more than 4 students, in a given section, claim that they DID NOT intentionally cheat in high school or college thus far. I've taken over classes for other, lax professors & seen as many as 13 papers plagiarized in one section (of 15 students) because the students knew the professor didn't care enough to look for instances or prosecute suspected cases. All that plagiarism detection software does is reduce the time that we would otherwise spend independently obtaining evidence of misconduct. Let's step into the real world & start making it clear to students that we don't tolerate these behaviors. Neither I nor a number of friends who completed our educations without plagiarizing find the use of such services offensive. I would argue that most people who claim to be offended are, in reality, simply scared of being caught. If they aren't frightened of the consequences, then we aren't doing our job.