Search News


Browse Archives

News

Understanding Gaps Among Asian Groups

July 27, 2007

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

Many discussions about affirmative action or demographics in higher education start with the assumption that Asian American students are outperforming everyone else and don't need any help. That view is frustrating to many Asian Americans and some educators who say that -- even if true on average -- it results in too little attention being paid to members of some groups that are not doing well at all educationally.

The U.S. Government Accountability Office released a report Thursday that backs up those concerns. The report notes that by most measures Asian Americans have a higher educational attainment than other groups, with almost half of Asian Americans aged 25 or older having a four-year college degree, a percentage far greater than those for white adults (almost one third) or black or Latino adults (less than one fifth). But this overall success, the GAO found, "masks" the realities of many Asian subgroups in educational preparation and attainment.

For example, the report found that half of Southeast Asian high school students are not enrolled in college preparatory programs, more than half of Southeast Asian and Native American and Pacific Islander students are in the lower socioeconomic quartiles, and many Asian groups set aside less money for their children's college education than do members of other racial and ethnic groups.

Educational Attainment and Average Income of Asian-American Groups, 2005

Group % of Adults With at Least 4-Year Degree Average Income
Asian Indian 68% $66,000
Korean 54% $52,000
Pakistani, Bangladeshi, Sri Lankan 54% $48,000
Chinese 53% $56,000
Filipino 48% $46,000
Japanese 44% $59,000
Indonesian, Malaysian, Thai 44% $40,000
Vietnamese 25% $41,000
Native Hawaiian, Pacific Islander 17% $38,000
Cambodian, Laotian, Hmong 13% $32,000

The GAO also found significant differences in terms of how much money families from different Asian groups were saving for a child's future college education.

Amount Set Aside for Higher Education by Asian-American Families, by Group

Group None Up to $10,000 $10,001-$20,000 >$20,000
Southeast Asian 12% 73% 4% 8%
Filipino 3% 51% 10% 32%
South Asian 6% 34% 17% 22%
Korean 3% 40% 17% 42%
Chinese 9% 31% 22% 37%
Japanese 6% 41% 23% 27%
See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Understanding Gaps Among Asian Groups

  • Culture matter, Race/Genetic doesn't
  • Posted by Duncan on July 27, 2007 at 3:05pm EDT
  • In general, Chinese, Japanese and Korean share similar culture than others. They also more or less share Buddhist that is originated from India.

    Southeast Asian share some culture from China and India.

    Beside this, geographic factors also set in.

    My take of this is: There are factors that influence people's behavior and made them different but the race is not the deciding factor. People can learn to behave different. These don't have to be inherited. But parents definitely have big influence on their child.

  • Asian and the diversity within
  • Posted by Ay Saechao on July 27, 2007 at 4:20pm EDT
  • The stereotype that all asian are the same (look alike and are alike) permeate not just in mainstream society, but in our educaitonal institutions. When programs out there that mean to provide the underrepresented and underserved with services, it's important that they go beyond the artificial race lines. What is real are those numbers you see there and the lack of attention and services to masses of students in Southeast Asian and Pacific Islander groups.

  • Diversity
  • Posted by Lee on July 28, 2007 at 4:10pm EDT
  • The same diversity of outcomes is evident in all racial & ethnic groups. Irish vs. German immigrant whites, Sephardic & Ashkenazi Jews, Cuban & Mexican immigrants, southern vs northern Chinese, etc., etc. True in the US, Argentina, Nigeria, Indonesia.... The public discourse (and law)ignore this inconvenient diversity.

  • Posted by vannoch on August 1, 2007 at 12:25pm EDT
  • The comments made me sick. Cambodian, Loatian and Hmong people are also still recovering from Genocides, and the majority of those in America are refugees, not immigrants. The difference being about choice. I don't think it's fair to make assumptions and generalizations linking this to culture when you're talking about displaced groups of people who have had their entire economy and social structure torn apart. Moreover, These groups have only recently arrived in vast numbers to this country. If you survey any other group of people within their first 20 to 40 years, I'm sure their percentile ranking will not be much different.

    Like other minority groups that generally score low academically or tend to fall in lower income brackets, I believe that access and opportunities are the cause and affect of these statistics.

  • History Repeats Itself
  • Posted by Scrawed on August 5, 2007 at 5:40pm EDT
  • James Michener, prior to writing his city telephone-directory-sized novels, wrote short novels and essays. In his "Return to Paradise" (1950) he wrote an essay on Fiji's history, political and racial issues that is still relevant to understanding the differences between Pacific Islander populations and expatriate Indian nationals.
    Frankly, a lot of what he said about the Fiji expatriate Indians 57 years ago is applicable to Indian nationals generally today.

  • Treatment of Asians by U.S. military authority
  • Posted by E. A. Cooper on February 16, 2008 at 10:40am EST
  • For an interesting review of Asian and American relationships during the early 1960s, I recommend that you review the novel, "B.C. Street." You will find it listed by that title on amazon.com or by visiting the web site: www.okinawa-bcstreet.com.

  • Posted by Chelse , RACE AND CULTURE BOTH MATTERS on September 21, 2008 at 7:50pm EDT
  • In the majority of studies of Asian Americans in higher education does not recognize the within it the diaspora of Southeast Asians. The Asian American experience to America has historically been documented since the 1800s, like the 1882 Chinese Exclusion Act. But withing this board term of Asian, includes East Asia(India, Pakistant, etc), Southeast Asia (Cambodia, Vietnam, Loas, etc), East Asia (China, Japan, etc), etc. Each ethnic group that entered the US each has a different story. The Chinese, Japanese, and Korean community in the US are much more established than the Southeast Asian community Hmong, Cambodian, Vietnamese, Thai, etc. They are the recent refugee/immigrant groups that have entered the US and their data/tracking are not well established to be generalized in the Asian American category. Their journey from refugee camps and settling in the urban poverty have just started to provide understanding of the first generation of Southeast Asian Americans.