Quick Takes: Academics' Contributions Favor Dems, Arizona Tuition Increases Upheld, Accreditation Revoked at Lewis, Obstacles to Stem Cell Research, Ominous Sign for Public Higher Ed, Yale Pulls Out of BioMed Central, State R&D Policy
Employees of colleges and universities have donated $7 million to candidates for federal offices during the '08 campaign cycle -- with nearly 60 percent of the funds going to presidential candidates, and 76 percent going to Democrats, according to a new analysis of federal election records by the Center for Responsive Politics. The top two recipients of funds were Barack Obama (nearly $1.5 million) and Hillary Clinton (almost $940,000). Harvard University employees gave more than those of any other institution, the study found: $266,044, with 81 percent going to Democrats.
The Arizona Supreme Court on Thursday rejected a suit challenging large tuition increases approved in 2003 by the Arizona Board of Regents, saying that they did not violate the state's constitutional requirement that tuition be "as nearly free as possible." Despite the large size (39 percent) of that year's increase, the court found that it could not substitute its judgment for that of the regents.
Lewis College of Business has lost its accreditation, cutting off the federal aid on which most of its students rely, The Detroit News reported. Accreditation was originally revoked earlier this year, but that order was on hold, pending an appeal that has now been denied. Lewis officials told the newspaper they would try to find other funds for students, most of whom are in associate degree programs in business.
When Missouri voters last year backed a measure to assure the legality of stem cell research, scientists thought they had won a major victory. But an article in The New York Times notes that various political and financial problems have largely blocked new progress in the state on stem cell studies.
States finished fiscal 2007 with less money than they had a year ago, according to a new report from the National Conference of State Legislatures. While such figures do not necessarily mean tight budgets are ahead, public higher education is generally vulnerable whenever state funds are shrinking as such a large share of state funds (outside of higher education) are required spending. For fiscal 2008, the report projects that state revenues will grow by 2.6 percent, but state spending needs will grow by 5.4 percent.
Citing rising costs, Yale University's medical and science libraries are pulling out of BioMed Central, an open access project in which universities pay for their faculty authors' work to be published online -- and to be made freely available there. Yale said that the decision was necessary because of "unprecedented increases in electronic resources," not all of which the university could afford. BioMed Central responded by defending its overall model as being economical and supporting to mission of providing maximum access. But the publisher acknowledged that institutions where people publish more on BioMed Central would see increased charges.
The Pew Charitable Trusts and the National Governors Association have released a new report, "Investing in Innovation," that highlights state strategies for promoting research and development.
Comments on
Quick Takes: Academics' Contributions Favor Dems, Arizona Tuition Increases Upheld, Accreditation Revoked at Lewis, Obstacles to Stem Cell Research, Ominous Sign for Public Higher Ed, Yale Pulls Out of BioMed Central, State R&D Policy
Academics' Contributions Favor Dems
Posted
by Tom Ahlersmeyer
on August 10, 2007 at 8:15am EDT
This is news? What a surprise!
contributions
Posted
by DUH!
on August 10, 2007 at 8:30am EDT
24% went to republicans??? Are you people stupid? Never mind I know the answer.
I agree!
Posted
by Jim
on August 10, 2007 at 9:40am EDT
I agree with you Duh! I can't believe so many people in academe (24%) or elsewhere still support the republicans.
Contributions
Posted
by Dominick
on August 10, 2007 at 11:10am EDT
The article mentioned the percentage of people donating to Democrats -- it did not mention how many donated to Republicans. It is your assumption that 24% went to Republicans, however some of those donations could have gone to Green Party, Independents, or candidates from other political parties.
Faculty political contributions
Posted
by Silent, scared, and intimidated
on August 10, 2007 at 11:20am EDT
I read the scorn heaped on faculty members who chose to support Republicans. Other voices in other places argue that higher education is not politically biased. What do you think?
donations
Posted
by Michael
on August 10, 2007 at 1:35pm EDT
Other industries tend to favor 1 party so why should the education industry be any different. Haven't the various scandals taught us that the education industry has all the morals and ethics of any other industry? Why should we be surprised about the desire to purchase governments that would expand profits, funding, and the influence of one's business? If it works for Halliburton it works for Harvard, in the end they are both business's looking to expand.
Posted
by Ben D. Morris
on August 10, 2007 at 2:30pm EDT
I don't have a problem with the fact that the majority or professors and university professors support the Democratic Party, although I am Republican. Academics can and should vote and support their convictions. I do have a problem, hiowever, with all the lipservice to academic freedom and free exchange of ideas when in reality, GOP and/or conservative professors who reject the dubious orthodoxy of Neo--Darwinian evolution, global warming, or other trendy causes are shunned, denied promotion or tenure, or let go by institutions of higher learning for refusing to tow the party line. I know about this one first hand ... It happened to me!