Search News


Browse Archives

News

Sociologists and ACLU Blast Visa Denial

August 13, 2007

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

One of South Africa's top social scientists was unable to give a scheduled talk Saturday at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, in New York, because U.S. officials refused to act on his visa application. By refusing to act (as opposed to rejecting the application), authorities made it difficult to determine exactly why Adam Habib could not get to the United States. In October, while holding a visa, he was turned back at John F. Kennedy International Airport when he arrived for a series of scholarly meetings in the United States.

Habib has previously entered and left the United States for education and scholarly purposes without event -- he earned his Ph.D. at the Graduate Center of the City University of New York. Leaders of the sociology group, along with the American Civil Liberties Union, denounced the government for making it impossible for Habib to travel to the United States. They believe Habib is being kept out not because he poses any danger, but because he is a Muslim who has been vocal critic in South Africa of the U.S. war in Iraq and of other U.S. government policies.

Habib is an expert on civil society and democracy. He is executive director of South Africa's Human Science Research Council's Program on Democracy and Governance and a professor in the School of Development Studies at the University of Kwazulu-Natal. He has written several scholarly books, served as the editor of several journals, and supervised numerous dissertations at South African universities.

U.S. officials, as has been the case with other visa disputes involving scholars, have refused to say why Habib is being kept out. When he was detained and turned back in October, Habib said that he was asked for hours about his views on terrorism. One of the questions Habib reported being asked was whether he had ever been interrogated before and he replied that he had -- when South African security forces during the apartheid era asked him about his speeches against racial discrimination.

In a statement issued through the ACLU, Habib said "I am deeply disappointed that a country like America has treated me in this way when I have done nothing wrong. If the U.S. continues to act in an undemocratic way, refusing to allow in outsiders who disagree with administration policy, it will continue to alienate large portions of the world."

The sociology association issued a statement as well: "The ASA expresses its deepest disappointment and profound concern about the Department of State's de facto denial of a visa, which has barred Professor Adam Habib from participating in the association's annual meeting. Such actions undermine the willingness of numerous scientists and academics from many nations to visit the United States and collaborate with their American colleagues. The ASA believes this limitation on scholarly exchange erodes our nation's reputation as a defender of the free and open search for knowledge."

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Sociologists and ACLU Blast Visa Denial

  • Tip of the Iceberg
  • Posted by William Sumner Scott, J.D. on August 13, 2007 at 9:25am EDT
  • It will be academics who lead the way to a non-violent peace. That is done by a free exchange of ideas. To deny a Muslim scholar the opportunity to speak and field questions also denies him the opportunity to learn from those in attendance. Everyone suffers.

    Our government is led by criminals. Watch 9/11 Revisited on youtube.

    If we wish to remain free, we must collectively exercise our freedoms, including the right of assembly.

    To fail to speak out will eventually lead to forced silence. Examples: Sophia Scholl and Valerie Plame.

    William Sumner Scott, J.D.
    Judicial Equality Foundation, Inc.

    wss@jefound.org

  • denied visas
  • Posted by jimsecor on August 13, 2007 at 9:25am EDT
  • OK. It's horrid. But you know it's going to happen, so why do you keep on making it happen? What happened to resourcefulness? There are other ways of getting these people "there" that can't be blocked (Internet, phone...). Also, just take the conference out of the country, a kind of thumbing your nose action. It would also open up your thinking, etc., to others you'd probably never reach. Some extra-US university or organization might just LOVE to have your conference.

  • Just like the cold war
  • Posted by Jon T on August 13, 2007 at 10:00am EDT
  • About a month ago the print version of Counterpunch had a great article that looked at Andre Gunder Frank's FBI file to show how the US State department and the FBI monitored him and took actions to keep him out of the US after he developed Dependency Theory and wrote works critical of US economic policy. It was shocking to see how far the FBI went to keep American scholars from having contact with him--the FBI seems to be up to its old tricks again.

    Some forms of oppression just don't change.

  • The Rest Of The Story
  • Posted by Craig C , political pundit at http://blogresponder.blogspot.com on August 13, 2007 at 10:05am EDT
  • It would be interesting to know exactly what this individual has said about US policy, and who he is affiliated with.

    There may be a lot more info that we do not know that justifies the actions of the US government.

  • ASA meeting
  • Posted by gbrenes , MS at University of Wisconsin-Madison on August 13, 2007 at 11:15am EDT
  • It's non-sense to say that ASA should be moved abroad. There is already the International Sociological Association with a meeting every 2 or 4 years.

    Besides, a lot of American students travel to the ASA meeting, and moving it abroad would make difficult for them to attend the meeting, especially since the Government has shrunk funding that was used by Universities to subsidize student attendance to this kind of meetings.

  • Posted by VerySkeptical on August 13, 2007 at 12:10pm EDT
  • >>> It would be interesting to know exactly what this individual has said about US policy, and who he is affiliated with.

    Agreed, 100%.

    >>> There may be a lot more info that we do not know that justifies the actions of the US government.

    Theoretically, perphaps. But probably not.

  • Speech Never a Problem
  • Posted by quizzical on August 13, 2007 at 12:10pm EDT
  • Craig C wants to know more - that's good. He believes it is possible for the government position that a public speaker is dangerous has merit - that's dangerous.

    Another comment suggests we leave the country.

    This is 2007 not 1920 under the Comstock Law.

    Sticks and stones may break my bones but names will never hurt me.

  • Voice vs silence
  • Posted by Michael on August 13, 2007 at 4:45pm EDT
  • For reasons that seem the antithesis of a Democracy, the United States (of late, particularly) seems resistant to, indeed, afraid of, any VOICE that is not in tune with official policy. As such, the silencing of VOICE has become de rigueur for this present administration and its fawning supplicants.

    Although there may be some reasonable expectation to call for more information about the details of what Adam Habib said about the United states, it seems vastly more important for the American Sociological Association –and well as all Americans- to know the laws, rules, and expectations regarding what is now considered free speech … and that should be articulated first –and without spin- from the government of this country.

    Anything less undermines the efficacy of democracy.

  • Posted by Daniel on August 13, 2007 at 7:50pm EDT
  • Hadib backs boycotts of Israeli academics, so I wouldn't bend over backwards looking to defend his academic freedom - he's not defending anyone else's.