Search News


Browse Archives

News

Inspired by Aquinas

August 16, 2007

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

Like many academics, Christopher Wolfe has lots of ideas about what the ideal university should be. Unlike all but a handful, though, he’s decided to take action in a big way, by creating a new institution.

After close to 30 years at Marquette University, Wolfe, a political science professor known for his course on constitutional law that weeds out the formerly pre-law undergraduates from the future lawyers, will leave his tenured job to prepare full-time for the fall 2011 launch of a not-yet-named university in a location to be determined. It's a dream he’s had since the 1980s.

Though Wolfe doesn’t yet know precisely what programs the institution will offer, how many students it will accommodate or where funding will come from, he does have a strong sense of the university’s core purpose: giving students “a unified, integrated conception of reality” based on the scholarship of St. Thomas Aquinas, the 13th century Roman Catholic thinker, and even further back to Classical thinkers like Aristotle.

“Contemporary higher education is increasingly specialized and disintegrated,” he said. “We want to go back to the kind of education where students develop a coherent understanding of deeply integrated areas of study.”

There are other institutions with a similar ethos, and the United States alone features half a dozen colleges and universities named after Aquinas, with differing levels of reliance on his philosophy. Thomas Aquinas College, in Santa Paula, Calif., offers an interdisciplinary curriculum with no majors, minors, electives or specializations. The college emphasizes "great books" and eschews lectures for tutorials, seminars and labs.

The university will offer both undergraduate and graduate degrees, starting in philosophy but expanding into the natural sciences and other fields according to “student interest and needs,” he said, and on the specific demands of the region where the institution makes its home. South Carolina and St. Louis, Mo. are possibilities being considered right now and Wolfe anticipates a decision on location by the end of this year.

Wolfe is co-director of the Ralph McInerny Center for Thomistic Studies, named in honor of a professor of philosophy at the University of Notre Dame. The center’s co-director, Fulvio Di Blasi, is a former visiting professor at Notre Dame who teaches at ARCES University College in Palermo, Italy.

The two men established the center in 2004 “to have something concrete before launching a university,” said Joshua P. Hochschild, the center’s assistant director and an assistant professor of philosophy at Mount St. Mary’s University in Emmitsburg, Md. “The center was created partly to start a … core around which a vision of a university can be created.” Its advisory board includes Robert P. George, a politics professor at Princeton University, and Mary Ann Glendon, a professor at Harvard Law School.

Because of this network, unlike many start-up institutions of higher education, Wolfe anticipates that the university will be able to emphasize scholarship from its onset, initially hiring four or five distinguished scholars and then “building up the faculty around them.”

The university aims to unite academics and student life. “There’s a radical divorce in many places between studies and life -- in many places it’s party or other things not connected to academics,” he said, but that will not be the case at the university, where faculty and graduate students will lead tutorials in residence halls.

Though the university will depend heavily on Aquinas’s writings and “out of the Catholic tradition,” Wolfe said it will not be a place just for Catholics. “It’s going to be a school for everyone, though obviously not everyone will be interested.”

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Inspired by Aquinas

  • Godspeed, Professor
  • Posted by B.D. on August 16, 2007 at 9:40am EDT
  • Institutions focused on facts, traditions, standards, and disciplined outcomes. There must be a God.

  • Hmm
  • Posted by sarah munson at U Tulsa on August 16, 2007 at 11:05am EDT
  • Will they be as modern as Peter Abelard and Micheal Montaigne. MMmmm. I want to attend!

  • Worthwhile but....
  • Posted by S.J. Sullivan on August 16, 2007 at 12:35pm EDT
  • Aquinas's thought is certainly worthy of close examination--especially if it is not whitewashed to eliminate his homophobia and sexism, or his support for slavery and executing heretics....How many Thomists are willing to discuss such matters?! Precious few, I fear.

  • Post-industrial education
  • Posted by R.J. O'Hara on August 16, 2007 at 1:40pm EDT
  • This new institution will presumably start small, and I hope if it does eventually grow it will do so by multiplying small colleges within itself. Small colleges are the way of the future, whether they are fully independent or internal to a larger university:

    http://insidehighered.com/views/2006/11/28/ohara

    They are the way of the future because small colleges can support an intensity of life and a density of learning that is unequalled.

    There are many internal college-foundings taking place in universities around the world. Quite a few are noted on the Collegiate Way's news blog:

    http://collegiateway.org/news

  • Posted by Thomist skeptic on August 16, 2007 at 5:10pm EDT
  • Since it's no longer the 13th century, I'm not entirely sure how well a Scholastic educational program will hold up in a time of specialization. Indeed there is room for integrating the various fields of study, but perhaps we should look for a compromise between these schools of thought rather than a throwback to a time that's too far gone.

  • what's the alternative
  • Posted by Second Thoughts Wisest on August 16, 2007 at 9:25pm EDT
  • One might imagine someone reading the superficial comments posted above and thinking that intelligence really ought to have a more profound expression.

    Let's see, the depth and nuance of an Aquinas, or the smug cavils of today's professoriate .... Is a choice for the spirit of the 13th c. so difficult to understand?

  • Dear Lord Yes
  • Posted by Ken on August 17, 2007 at 5:00am EDT
  • "Let’s see, the depth and nuance of an Aquinas, or the smug cavils of today’s professoriate .... Is a choice for the spirit of the 13th c. so difficult to understand?" Dear God yes it is hard to understand! Aquinas was nice as far as apologists go, but as he lived in a century that was literally medevial-a time where a hypocritical church and thuggish princes enforced a deadening dogma through superstition, intimidation, fanaticism and force-his philosophy never reached the disinterested objectivity that is found in more modern thinkers. He quite literally could not go there, as he enjoyed not having his books (or self) burned for heresy. He's a quite terrible model for an institute of higher learning that values free and open discussion and fearless search for the truth untrammeled by enforced dogma.

  • Fantastic!
  • Posted by Karen on August 17, 2007 at 6:20pm EDT
  • Kudos! This is a fantastic and enormous undertaking; and much needed... Regarding the relevancy of a 13th century philosopher and theologian (and saint), it is not about what year he lived, but about what he says that counts. Are his principles anchored in unchanging, objective truth? Or, are they anchored in transient, political or cultural opinions of the day? The value of what an author — any author — teaches comes not as much from when he lived, as from what he says and what his principles are. And, are his principles unchanging first principles, or transient? The discussion builds from there.

  • Posted by Ken on August 18, 2007 at 8:35am EDT
  • Karen
    I can't think of writers who were MORE bound to the cultural and political opinions of the day than religious writers in that time period, since you could get burnt at the stake for differing with the powers that be back then! Every time period has its prejudices and preconceptions, but at least in modern times your actual safety is not threatened by following your intellectual trail...Aquinas did not live in a time in which the same could be said. Who knows how much of the admittedly clever apologies he wrote for the church were from honest intellectual inquiry or from outright fear of being charged with heresy?

  • Better find new advisors
  • Posted by Boko P. Fittleworth , Dr. at Ave Maria School of Law on August 23, 2007 at 1:50pm EDT
  • Seriously, after the Ave Maria School Of Law "failed experiment" fiasco, wouldn't you think Robert George would have the decency not to lend his name to Catholic start-ups for a few years?

  • Posted by RM on September 4, 2007 at 10:20am EDT
  • Ken, unfortunately, you could not be more wrong or biased in favour of modernity yourself (funny how that happens, isn't it?).
    Firstly, if Thomas had been so blindly wedded to his own time, he would no longer be relevant, but in fact, he is. His ideas are still studied and used by philosophers and theologians.
    Furthermore, Thomas actually ran a great risk in studying Aristotle, since, for a time, doing so ran the risk of ex-communication.
    Thomas, a conformist? Hardly. He was much more intellectually honest and probing that *anyone* you'll find in the left-wing Academy today.

  • Posted by JohnH , St Thomas took his opponents seriously on September 4, 2007 at 1:00pm EDT
  • For those of you who have never read St. Thomas Aquinas, he is very well known to this day for honestly struggling with the questions of the day. For every issue, he writes arguments for the other side, and then says why he rejects them. These are not straw-man arguments like you see today, but in some cases are much better arguments than his opponents of the day were writing.

    Simply not going down the path of straw-man arguments, but taking your opponent seriously, and trying to engage logically, is huge compared to today.

    Also, many theologians of his day wanted some of his writing condemned, not something you'd hear about if he just wrote what he was supposed to.

  • inspired by Aquinas
  • Posted by Chris Ryland on September 11, 2007 at 11:30am EDT
  • There is already such an institution as Wolfe describes at Thomas Aquinas College (TAC) in OJai, California, where we have sent two of our children. Anyone interested in Wolfe's vision should also investigate TAC.

  • Skeptical
  • Posted by Larry on November 7, 2008 at 5:55pm EST
  • This will be a school established to praise a man who saved the world and left his mark for mankind. I'm not talking about Jesus, I'm talking about Dr. Chrissy. This school will be focused on brain washing students to be narrow minded thinkers like Dr. Chrissy. He is frustrated that he has no credibility at MU and wants to create his own world where he is king.