News, Views and Careers for All of Higher Education
Aug. 21, 2007
Want it on paper? Print this page.
Know someone who’d be interested? Forward this story.
Want to stay informed? Sign up for free daily news e-mail.
Advertisement
Let’s just remember that all of PR’s so-called “rankings” are bologna, pure, plain, and simple. They are based on student responses to a survey of questions that no responsible researcher would ever devise, much less use for some legitimate purpose. Equally bad — the sampling involved is simply whoever (which students) happen to visit the website where the survey resides, and take the time to complete all (usually only some) of the “survey.” This is the electronic version of mall-intercept surveying, a technique that very little reliable research is based on. A student attending college X can easily give ratings for *another* college, any other college, whether they’ve ever even been on campus there or not. The list of perfectly appalling research methodologies, and ludicrous ranking categories, goes on and on. It is truly unfortunate that this kind of “research” can be foisted off on an unsuspecting college-bound public of prospective students and families seemingly as if there were some validity to it. Shame on the PR for annually and cynically selling its brand of snake oil. And shame on us for not relentlessly attempting to bring this deceitful organization to account, at least to use high quality surveying, sampling, and analytic techniques.
David D-VA, Institutional Research, at 11:50 am EDT on August 21, 2007
” .. Security on Campus has asked the U.S. Education Department to determine whether Virginia Tech took too long (two hours) to notify students of the first shootings ..”
Of course not. Something like this would be very difficult to prepare for radio stations:
“Those heading to VT this morning: VT police reports a building problem on the XX side of campus. You are asked to plan accordingly. Please stay tuned and call police only for emergencies.”
Buzz, at 12:50 pm EDT on August 21, 2007
In response to “A’s” comment: If an individual wants to give their money to an athletic department, so be it. It is “their” money. However, they should not be able to take an 80% tax write off on this “donation to education.” When academic programs are being cut, hirings and salaries frozen, and class sizes increasing (all things that could be alleviated with more money), it is reasonable to believe many faculty members may be “stirred up” about this.
Oregon is one the few athletic programs that can rely on a Sugar Daddy such as Phil Knight to support the bulk of the program (Boone Pickens at Oklahoma State and John Arrillaga at Stanford are two others to name a few). What “stirs up” more faculty is the majority of athletic programs that are not self-supporting that take money from the university’s general fund and/or increased student fees to cover budget deficits — money that could be used to support academic programs.
George, UNT, at 12:50 pm EDT on August 21, 2007
Lighten up a bit. Did you attend a school that was ranked most likely to educate dodgeball targets?
SB, at 12:50 pm EDT on August 21, 2007
“In 1996, Knight donated $25 million to The Oregon Campaign, the UO’s $200 million capital campaign which exceeded its goal and stands at $217 million raised. Knight’s gift dedicated $15 million to the creation of endowed chairs across campus and challenged the campus to find a matching donor for each chair. The remaining $10 million is helping to finance construction of a new law school building to be named the William W. Knight Law Center after Phil Knight’s father, a 1932 UO law school graduate.”
Source: University of Oregon
Knight has also given ca. $25M to upgrade and enlarge the UO library.
Sports is sports and business is business. And billionaires usually get to sit anywhere they want to.
Old Duck, Professor, at 4:40 pm EDT on August 21, 2007
Now that those institutions have money for sports, savvy Development folk can say to the next big donor, “Sorry, sports is covered. Let’s work to find another worthy area for your legacy.”
mdiehl, at 4:55 pm EDT on August 21, 2007
You can say that Princeton’s rankings are crap, but when you visit these schools you’ll see that there’s a lot of truth behind them. For instance, kids don’t stay sober on the weekends at WVU. It’s just not possible.
Amarie, at 5:15 am EDT on August 22, 2007
Advertisement
or search for jobs directly.
Gustavus Adolphus College invites nominations and applications for a tenure-track position of Assistant or Associate ... see job
Fairmont State University and Pierpont Community & Technical College, with a 120-acre main campus in Fairmont, WV, is part of ... see job
BSC is one of the largest and most exciting centers for higher education in the commonwealth. Here in our idyllic setting, ... see job
Joliet Junior College is located in the Chicagoland area. JJC offers over 100 degree and certificate programs in the arts and ... see job
A leader in academe, the University of South Carolina holds the Carnegie Foundation’s highest research designation and is ... see job
The University of Minnesota is a premier employer and a talent magnet attracting leading faculty and staff from around the ... see job
The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill seeks a motivated, innovative, collaborative, service-oriented, and ... see job
HACC, a leader in education in Central PA, is a comprehensive, multi-campus community college, providing quality instruction ... see job
Job Summary The individual will be responsible for high-throughput processing of plant leaf and wood tissues ... see job
The University of Minnesota is a premier employer and a talent magnet attracting leading faculty and staff from around the ... see job
I think the clause “a trend to stir up faculty members” is a blatant attempt to stir up faculty members itself. If someone wants to give to the sports facilties, so be it; it is there money. I don’t think most faculty members would give this a second thought. Quit trying to create antagonism that doesn’t necessarily exist. Journalism (while it never really is) is supposed to at least attempt to be balanced and not incite others through little clauses like that.
A, at 11:10 am EDT on August 21, 2007